Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Continuation versus discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy for bleeding and ischaemic events in adults undergoing non‐cardiac surgery

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012584Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 08 marzo 2017see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Protocol
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Anestesia

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Sharon R Lewis

    Correspondencia a: Patient Safety Research Department, Royal Lancaster Infirmary, Lancaster, UK

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

  • Phil Alderson

    National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Manchester, UK

  • Andrew F Smith

    Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Lancaster Infirmary, Lancaster, UK

Contributions of authors

Sharon R Lewis (SL), Phil Alderson (PA), Andrew F Smith (AS)

Co‐ordinating the review: SL.

Undertaking manual searches: SL, AS.

Screening search results: SL, AS.

Organizing retrieval of papers: SL.

Screening retrieved papers against inclusion criteria: SL, AS.

Appraising the quality of papers: SL, AS.

Abstracting data from papers: SL, AS.

Writing to authors of papers for additional information: SL.

Providing additional data about papers: SL, AS.

Obtaining and screening data on unpublished studies: SL, AS.

Managing data for the review: SL.

Entering data into Review Manager (RevMan 5.3): SL.

Analysing RevMan statistical data: SL, PA, AS.

Performing other statistical analysis not using RevMan: PA, AS.

Interpreting data: SL, PA, AS.

Making statistical inferences: SL, PA, AS.

Writing the review: SL.

Securing funding for the review: AS.

Serving as guarantor for the review (one review author): AS.

Reading and checking the review before submission: SL.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No sources of support supplied

External sources

  • NIHR Cochrane Collaboration Programme Grant, UK.

    ’Back to normal’: speed and quality of recovery after surgery, major injury and critical care. Project ref. 13/89/16

Declarations of interest

Sharon Lewis: none known.

Andrew Smith: none known.

Phil Alderson: none known.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Arash Afshari (content editor), Jing Xie (statistical editor),Michael Desborough, Domenico Prisco (peer reviewers) for their help and editorial advice during the preparation of this protocol for the systematic review.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2018 Jul 18

Continuation versus discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy for bleeding and ischaemic events in adults undergoing non‐cardiac surgery

Review

Sharon R Lewis, Michael W Pritchard, Oliver J Schofield‐Robinson, Phil Alderson, Andrew F Smith

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012584.pub2

2017 Mar 08

Continuation versus discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy for bleeding and ischaemic events in adults undergoing non‐cardiac surgery

Protocol

Sharon R Lewis, Phil Alderson, Andrew F Smith

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012584

Keywords

MeSH

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.