Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Cirugía reconstructiva para el tratamiento de las úlceras por presión

Esta versión no es la más reciente

ver la versión actual 13 octubre 2022

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012032.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 06 diciembre 2016see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:

  1. Grupo Cochrane de Heridas

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2016 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Jason KF Wong

    Correspondencia a: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital South Manchester, Manchester, UK

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

  • Kavit Amin

    Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital South Manchester, Manchester, UK

  • Jo C Dumville

    Division of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

Contributions of authors

Jason Wong: conceived the review question; developed and co‐ordinated the review; completed the first draft of the review; approved the final draft of the review; and is the guarantor of the review.

Kavit Amin: conceived the review question; developed the review; completed the first draft of the review; and approved the final draft of the review.

Jo Dumville: conceived the review question; secured funding; developed and co‐ordinated the review; completed the first draft of the review; and approved the final draft of the review.

Contribution of the editorial base

Nicky Cullum (Co‐ordinating Editor): edited the protocol and the review; advised on methodology, interpretation and content; approved the final protocol and review prior to submission.

Gill Rizzello/Sally Bell‐Syer (Managing Editors): co‐ordinated the editorial process; advised on content; edited the protocol and the review.

Reetu Child (Information Specialist): designed the search strategy and edited the search methods section.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Division of Nursing Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, UK.

    Jo Dumville

External sources

  • National Institute for Health Research, UK.

    This project was supported by the National Institute for Health Research, via Cochrane Infrastructure and Cochrane Programme Grant funding (NIHR Cochrane Programme Grant 13/89/08‐ High Priority Cochrane Reviews in Wound Prevention and Treatment) to Cochrane Wounds. The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Systematic Reviews Programme, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health, UK

Declarations of interest

Jason Wong: none known.

Kavit Amin: none known.

Jo Dumville: is funded as part of the NIHR Cochrane Programme Grant Project: 13/89/08 ‐ High Priority Cochrane Reviews in Wound Prevention and Treatment.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the following peer reviewers for their time and comments: Kurinchi Gurusamy, Bryan Chung and Roy Buffery. The authors would also like to acknowledge the contribution of the copy editors, Jenny Bellorini (protocol) and Denise Mitchell (review).

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2022 Oct 13

Reconstructive surgery for treating pressure ulcers

Review

Gill Norman, Jason KF Wong, Kavit Amin, Jo C Dumville, Susy Pramod

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012032.pub3

2016 Dec 06

Reconstructive surgery for treating pressure ulcers

Review

Jason KF Wong, Kavit Amin, Jo C Dumville

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012032.pub2

2016 Jan 07

Reconstructive surgery for treating pressure ulcers

Protocol

Jason KF Wong, Kavit Amin, Jo C Dumville

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012032

Keywords

MeSH

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) Keywords

Medical Subject Headings Check Words

Adult; Aged; Humans; Middle Aged; Young Adult;

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Study flow diagram
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva