Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Codeine versus placebo for chronic cough in children

Esta versión no es la más reciente

ver la versión actual 13 julio 2016

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011914Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 12 octubre 2015see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Protocol
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:

  1. Grupo Cochrane de Vías respiratorias

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2015 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Samantha J Gardiner

    Correspondencia a: Queensland Children's Medical Research Institute, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

  • Anne B Chang

    Queensland Children's Medical Research Institute, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia

    Child Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia

  • Helen L Petsky

    Queensland Children's Medical Research Institute, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia

Contributions of authors

SG predominantly described the background and was responsible for formatting. HP predominantly described the data analysis strategy and both HP and SG contributed to the body of methodology. AC provided guidance with protocol development and edited the review. All authors approved the final draft before submission.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No sources of support supplied

External sources

  • National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), Australia.

    AC is supported by a NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship (grant 1058213) and HP is supported through a NHMRC Centre for Research Excellence in Indigenous Lung Health (grant 1040830) post doc fellowship

  • Lung Foundation of Australia/Australian Satellite of the Cochrane Airways Group Scholarship to SG, Australia.

    Scholarship funds facilitate author attendance at a Cochrane review workshop and will contribute towards conference attendance where the review findings will be presented upon completion.

Declarations of interest

AC is the recipient of a grant from GlaxoSmithKline to study microbia in bronchoalvoelar lavage (BAL), a topic unrelated to this review. AC has been the recipient of multiple Australian Government grants (National Health and Medical Research Council Australia (NHMRC)). AC is an author of articles referenced within the background of this protocol.

HP has been the recipient of a NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence (CRE) Post Doctoral Fellowship (ID.104083) and is an employee of the Queensland University of Technology.

SG is an employee of the Queensland University of Technology.

Acknowledgements

We thank the Lung Foundation of Australia and the Australian Satellite of the Cochrane Airways Group for the provision of a scholarship supporting the development of this review. We further acknowledge the Cochrane Airways Group for allowing us to conduct this systematic review. We also acknowledge the assistance of Trials search Coordinator Liz Stovold in the formulation of the search strategy for this review and thank her for her ongoing support.

Chris Cates was the Editor for this review and commented critically on the review.

The background and methods section of this protocol is based on a standard template used by the Cochrane Airways Group.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2016 Jul 13

Codeine versus placebo for chronic cough in children

Review

Samantha J Gardiner, Anne B Chang, Julie M Marchant, Helen L Petsky

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011914.pub2

2015 Oct 12

Codeine versus placebo for chronic cough in children

Protocol

Samantha J Gardiner, Anne B Chang, Helen L Petsky

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011914

Keywords

MeSH

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) Keywords

Medical Subject Headings Check Words

Child; Humans;

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.