Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Análogos de insulina de acción rápida subcutáneos para la cetoacidosis diabética

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011281.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 21 enero 2016see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Trastornos metabólicos y endocrinos

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2016 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Carlos A Andrade‐Castellanos

    Correspondencia a: Department of Emergency Medicine, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara "Dr. Juan I. Menchaca", Guadalajara, Mexico

    [email protected]

  • Luis Enrique Colunga‐Lozano

    Department of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara "Fray Antonio Alcalde", Guadalajara, Mexico

  • Netzahualpilli Delgado‐Figueroa

    Department of Pediatrics, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Dr. Juan I. Menchaca, Guadalajara, Mexico

  • Daniel A Gonzalez‐Padilla

    Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain

Contributions of authors

Carlos A Andrade‐Castellanos (CAC): protocol drafting, acquiring trial reports, trial selection, data extraction, data analysis, data interpretation.

Luis E Colunga‐Lozano (LCL): acquiring trial reports, trial selection, data extraction, data analysis, data interpretation, review drafting, and future review updates.

Netzahualpilli Delgado‐Figueroa (NDF): protocol drafting, acquiring trial reports, data analysis, data interpretation, review drafting, and future review updates.

Daniel A Gonzalez‐Padilla (DGP): acquiring trial reports, data analysis, review drafting, and future review updates.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Department of Emergency Medicine, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara "Dr. Juan I. Menchaca", Mexico.

    Moral support

External sources

  • No sources of support supplied

Declarations of interest

CAC: none known.

LCL: none known.

NDF: none known.

DGP: none known.

Acknowledgements

We thank Karla Bergerhoff and Maria‐Inti Metzendorf, Trials Search Co‐ordinators of the Cochrane Metabolic and Endocrine Disorders Group, for developing the electronic search strategies.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2016 Jan 21

Subcutaneous rapid‐acting insulin analogues for diabetic ketoacidosis

Review

Carlos A Andrade‐Castellanos, Luis Enrique Colunga‐Lozano, Netzahualpilli Delgado‐Figueroa, Daniel A Gonzalez‐Padilla

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011281.pub2

2014 Sep 01

Subcutaneous rapid‐acting insulin analogues for diabetic ketoacidosis

Protocol

Carlos A Andrade‐Castellanos, Luis E Colunga‐Lozano, Netzahualpilli Delgado‐Figueroa, Daniel A Gonzalez‐Padilla

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011281

Notes

We have based parts of the background, the methods section, appendices, additional tables and figures 1 to 3 of this review on a standard template established by the CMED Group.

Keywords

MeSH

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Study flow diagram.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included trials (blank cells indicate that the particular outcome was not measured in some trials).
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included trials (blank cells indicate that the particular outcome was not measured in some trials).

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included trial (blank cells indicate that the trial did not measure that particular outcome).
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included trial (blank cells indicate that the trial did not measure that particular outcome).

Comparison 1 Insulin lispro versus regular insulin, Outcome 1 Time to resolution of diabetic ketoacidosis.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Insulin lispro versus regular insulin, Outcome 1 Time to resolution of diabetic ketoacidosis.

Comparison 1 Insulin lispro versus regular insulin, Outcome 2 All‐cause mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Insulin lispro versus regular insulin, Outcome 2 All‐cause mortality.

Comparison 1 Insulin lispro versus regular insulin, Outcome 3 Hypoglycaemic episodes.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Insulin lispro versus regular insulin, Outcome 3 Hypoglycaemic episodes.

Comparison 1 Insulin lispro versus regular insulin, Outcome 4 Length of hospital stay.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Insulin lispro versus regular insulin, Outcome 4 Length of hospital stay.

Comparison 2 Insulin aspart versus regular insulin, Outcome 1 Time to resolution of diabetic ketoacidosis.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Insulin aspart versus regular insulin, Outcome 1 Time to resolution of diabetic ketoacidosis.

Comparison 2 Insulin aspart versus regular insulin, Outcome 2 All‐cause mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Insulin aspart versus regular insulin, Outcome 2 All‐cause mortality.

Comparison 2 Insulin aspart versus regular insulin, Outcome 3 Hypoglycaemic episodes.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Insulin aspart versus regular insulin, Outcome 3 Hypoglycaemic episodes.

Comparison 2 Insulin aspart versus regular insulin, Outcome 4 Length of hospital stay.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 Insulin aspart versus regular insulin, Outcome 4 Length of hospital stay.

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Subcutaneous insulin lispro versus intravenous regular insulin for diabetic ketoacidosis

Subcutaneous insulin lispro versus intravenous regular insulin for diabetic ketoacidosis

Patient: participants with diabetic ketoacidosis
Settings: emergency department and critical care unit
Intervention: subcutaneous insulin lispro versus intravenous regular insulin

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Intravenous regular insulin

Subcutaneous insulin lispro

All‐cause mortality (N)

Mean hospital stay: 2‐7 days

See comment

See comment

Not estimable

156 (4)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderatea

No deaths reported

Hypoglycaemic episodes (N)

Mean hospital stay: 2‐7 days

118 per 1000

70 per 1000
(27 to 180)

RR 0.59
(0.23 to 1.52)

156 (4)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
lowb

Comparable risk ratios for adults (4 trials) and children (1 trial)

Morbidity (N)

Mean hospital stay: 2‐7 days

See comment

See comment

Not estimable

96 (2)

See comment

No cases of cerebral oedema, venous thrombosis, adult respiratory distress syndrome, hyperchloraemic acidosis

Adverse events other than hypoglycaemic episodes

See comment

See comment

Not estimable

See comment

See comment

Not investigated

Time to resolution of diabetic ketoacidosis (h)

Mean hospital stay: 2‐4 days

The mean time to resolution of diabetic ketoacidosis across the intravenous regular insulin groups was 11 h

The mean time to resolution of diabetic ketoacidosis in the subcutaneous insulin lispro groups was 0.2 h higher (1.7 h lower to 2.1 h higher)

90 (2)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very lowc

Metabolic acidosis and ketosis took longer to resolve in the subcutaneous insulin lispro group in 1 trial (60 children); no exact data published

Patient satisfaction

See comment

See comment

Not estimable

See comment

See comment

Not investigated

Socioeconomic effects: length of hospital stay (days)

Mean hospital stay: 4‐7 days

The mean length of hospital stay in the intravenous regular insulin groups ranged between 4 and 6.6 days

The mean length of hospital stay in the subcutaneous insulin lispro groups was 0.4 days shorter (1 day shorter to 0.2 days longer)

90 (2)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
lowd

US setting: treatment of diabetic ketoacidosis in a non–intensive care setting (step‐down unit or general medicine ward) was associated with a 39% lower hospitalisation charge than was treatment with intravenous regular insulin in the intensive care unit (USD 8801 (SD USD 5549) vs USD 14,429 (SD USD 5243); the average hospitalisation charges per day were USD 3981 (SD USD 1067) for participants treated in an intensive care unit compared with USD 2682 (SD USD 636) for those treated in a non–intensive care setting

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; h: hours; RR: risk ratio

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

*Assumed risk was derived from the event rates in the comparator groups.
aDowngraded by one level because of imprecision (see Appendix 12).
bDowngraded by two levels because of risk of performance bias and serious imprecision (see Appendix 12).
cDowngraded by three levels because of risk of performance bias, serious risk of inconsistency, and serious risk of imprecision (see Appendix 12).
dDowngraded by two levels because of serious risk of imprecision (see Appendix 12).

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Subcutaneous insulin lispro versus intravenous regular insulin for diabetic ketoacidosis
Summary of findings 2. Subcutaneous insulin aspart versus intravenous regular insulin for diabetic ketoacidosis

Subcutaneous insulin aspart versus intravenous regular insulin for diabetic ketoacidosis

Patient: participants with diabetic ketoacidosis
Settings: general medicine ward and intensive care unit
Intervention: subcutaneous insulin aspart versus intravenous regular insulin

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Intravenous regular insulin

Subcutaneous insulin aspart

All‐cause mortality (N)

Mean hospital stay: 3‐5 days

See comment

See comment

Not estimable

45 (1)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
lowa

No deaths reported

Hypoglycaemic episodes (N)

Mean hospital stay: 3‐5 days

67 per 1000

67 per 1000
(5 to 970)

RR 1.00
(0.07 to 14.55)

30 (1)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
lowb

Morbidity

See comment

See comment

Not estimable

See comment

See comment

Not investigated

Adverse events other than hypoglycaemic episodes

See comment

See comment

Not estimable

See comment

See comment

Not investigated

Time to resolution of diabetic ketoacidosis (h)

Mean hospital stay: 3‐5 days

The mean time to resolution of diabetic ketoacidosis across the intravenous regular insulin groups was 11 h

The mean time to resolution of diabetic ketoacidosis in the subcutaneous insulin aspart group was 1 h lower (3.2 h lower to 1.2 h higher)

30 (1)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very lowc

Patient satisfaction

See comment

See comment

Not estimable

See comment

See comment

Not investigated

Socioeconomic effects: length of hospital stay (days)

Mean hospital stay: 3‐5 days

The mean length of hospital stay in the intravenous regular insulin group was 4.5 days

The mean length of hospital stay in the subcutaneous insulin aspart group was 1.1 days shorter (3.3 days shorter to 1.1 days longer)

30 (1)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
lowd

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; h: hours; RR: risk ratio

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

*Assumed risk was derived from the event rates in the comparator groups
aDowngraded by two levels because of serious imprecision (see Appendix 12)
bDowngraded by two levels because of risk of performance bias and imprecision (see Appendix 12)
cDowngraded by three levels because of risk of performance bias and serious risk of imprecision (see Appendix 12)
dDowngraded by two levels because of serious risk of imprecision (see Appendix 12)

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 2. Subcutaneous insulin aspart versus intravenous regular insulin for diabetic ketoacidosis
Table 1. Overview of study populations

Intervention(s) and comparator(s)

Sample sizea

Screened/eligible
[N]

Randomised
[N]

Analysed
[N]

Finishing trial
[N]

Randomised finishing trial
[%]

Follow‐up timeb

Umpierrez 2004a

I: s.c. insulin lispro

Arbitrary estimation of a difference between groups of ≥ 5 hours to determine ketoacidosis as being clinically important; a sample size of 20 participants was needed in each group to provide a power of 0.93, given an alpha level of 0.05, a SD of 4, and a 1:1 inclusion ratio

20

20

20

100

Mean hospital stay: 4 days

C: i.v. regular insulin

20

20

20

100

total:

40

40

40

100

Umpierrez 2004b

I1: s.c. insulin aspart, every hour

Arbitrary estimation of a difference between groups of ≥ 4 hours to determine ketoacidosis as being clinically significant. A sample size of 15 participants was needed in each group to provide a power of 0.81, given an alpha error of 0.05 and a SD of 3

15

15

15

100

Mean hospital stay: 3.4 days

I2: s.c. insulin aspart, every 2 h

15

15

15

100

Mean hospital stay: 3.9 days

C: i.v. regular insulin

15

15

15

100

Mean hospital stay: 4.5 days

total:

45

45

45

100

Della Manna 2005

I: s.c. insulin lispro

25

25

25

100

Mean hospital stay: 2‐3 days

C: i.v. regular insulin

21

21

21

100

total:

46

46

46

100

Ersöz 2006

I: s.c. insulin lispro

10

10

10

100

C: i.v. regular insulin

10

10

10

100

total:

20

20

20

100

Karoli 2011

I: s.c. insulin lispro

25

25

25

100

Mean hospital stay: 6 days

C: i.v. regular insulin

25

25

25

100

Mean hospital stay: 6.6 days

total:

50

50

50

100

Grand total

All interventions

110

110

All comparators

91

91

All interventions and comparators

201

201

aAccording to power calculation in study publication or report
bDuration of intervention and/or follow‐up under randomised conditions until end of study

‐ denotes not reported

C: comparator; I: intervention; i.v.: intravenous; s.c.: subcutaneous; SD: standard deviation

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Overview of study populations
Comparison 1. Insulin lispro versus regular insulin

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Time to resolution of diabetic ketoacidosis Show forest plot

2

90

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.13 [‐0.64, 0.90]

2 All‐cause mortality Show forest plot

4

156

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Hypoglycaemic episodes Show forest plot

4

156

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.59 [0.23, 1.52]

3.1 Adults

3

110

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.67 [0.11, 3.94]

3.2 Children

1

46

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.56 [0.18, 1.72]

4 Length of hospital stay Show forest plot

2

90

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.38 [‐0.97, 0.22]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Insulin lispro versus regular insulin
Comparison 2. Insulin aspart versus regular insulin

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Time to resolution of diabetic ketoacidosis Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2 All‐cause mortality Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3 Hypoglycaemic episodes Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

4 Length of hospital stay Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Insulin aspart versus regular insulin