Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Administración de suplementos de folato en pacientes con anemia de células falciformes

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011130.pub3Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 16 marzo 2018see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Fibrosis quística y enfermedades genéticas

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2018 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Ruchita Dixit

    Correspondencia a: Department of Community Medicine, Melaka-Manipal Medical College (Manipal Academy of Higher Education), Melaka, Malaysia

    [email protected]

  • Sowmya Nettem

    Department of Periodontics, Faculty Of Dentistry, Melaka-Manipal Medical College, Melaka, Malaysia

  • Simerjit S Madan

    Department of Orthopaedics, UNIVERSITI TUNKU ABDUL RAHMAN, KAJANG, Malaysia

  • Htoo Htoo Kyaw Soe

    Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Melaka-Manipal Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Melaka, Malaysia

  • Adinegara BL Abas

    Department of Community Medicine, Melaka-Manipal Medical College (Manipal Academy of Higher Education), Melaka, Malaysia

  • Leah D Vance

    School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA

  • Patrick J Stover

    Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, USA

Contributions of authors

  • Conceiving the review: Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis & Genetic Disorders Review Group.

  • Literature search for background: RD, SN, SSM, PS, LV.

  • Writing the background, objectives and inclusion criteria sections: HH, RD, PS, LV.

  • Writing data collection and analysis sections: RD, AL A, SN, LV, PS.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No sources of support supplied

External sources

  • The National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), UK

    United Kingdom Cochrane Centre

  • WHO/Cochrane/ Cornell University Summer Institute for Systematic Reviews in Nutrition for Global Policy Making, USA

    The review was partially developed during the World Health Organization (WHO)/Cochrane/ Cornell University Summer Institute for Systematic Reviews in Nutrition for Global Policy Making hosted by the Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA, 27 July to 7 August, 2015. WHO partially supported this programme through Cornell University Conferences Services.

Declarations of interest

Ruchita Dixit: none known.
Sowmya Nettem: none known.
Simerjit S Madan: none known.
Htoo Htoo Kyaw Soe: none known
Adinegara BL Abas: none known
Leah Vance: has undertaken a research year that allowed for her participation in this review was supported by Grant 2014086 from the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation. She has no other conflicts to disclose.
Patrick Stover: none known.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank: Tracey Remmington, Managing Editor, Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis & Genetic Disorders Review Group for managing the editorial process for the protocol and reviews; Natalie Hall, Information Specialist of the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis & Genetic Disorders Review Group, for comments on the search strategy; and the editors of the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis & Genetic Disorders Review Group for their comments on the protocol and full reviews. We are very grateful to Professor Datuk Dr Abdul Razzak Chief Executive of Melaka‐Manipal Medical College, Malaysia and Professor Dr Jaspal Singh, Dean, Faculty of Medicine, Melaka‐Manipal Medical College, Malaysia for their support, constructive comments and encouragement in writing the protocol and review.

The review was partially developed during the World Health Organization (WHO)/Cochrane/ Cornell University Summer Institute for Systematic Reviews in Nutrition for Global Policy Making hosted by the Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA, 27 July ‐ 7 August, 2015. WHO partially supported this programme through Cornell University Conferences Services.

This project was supported by the National Institute for Health Research, via Cochrane Infrastructure funding to the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group. The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Systematic Reviews Programme, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health.

We would also like to thank the referees for their peer review comments on the protocol and review.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2018 Mar 16

Folate supplementation in people with sickle cell disease

Review

Ruchita Dixit, Sowmya Nettem, Simerjit S Madan, Htoo Htoo Kyaw Soe, Adinegara BL Abas, Leah D Vance, Patrick J Stover

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011130.pub3

2016 Feb 16

Folate supplementation in people with sickle cell disease

Review

Ruchita Dixit, Sowmya Nettem, Simerjit S Madan, Htoo Htoo Kyaw Soe, Adinegara BL Abas, Leah D Vance, Patrick J Stover

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011130.pub2

2014 May 25

Folate supplementation in patients with sickle cell disease

Protocol

Ruchita Dixit, Sowmya Nettem, Simerjit S Madan, Htoo Htoo Kyaw Soe, Adinegara BL Abas

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011130

Keywords

MeSH

Medical Subject Headings Check Words

Child, Preschool; Humans; Infant;

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Study flow diagram

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Comparison 1: Folic acid supplementation versus placebo, Outcome 1: Acute splenic sequestration

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1: Folic acid supplementation versus placebo, Outcome 1: Acute splenic sequestration

Comparison 1: Folic acid supplementation versus placebo, Outcome 2: Painful episodes

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1: Folic acid supplementation versus placebo, Outcome 2: Painful episodes

Comparison 1: Folic acid supplementation versus placebo, Outcome 3: Minor Infections

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1: Folic acid supplementation versus placebo, Outcome 3: Minor Infections

Comparison 1: Folic acid supplementation versus placebo, Outcome 4: Major Infection

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1: Folic acid supplementation versus placebo, Outcome 4: Major Infection

Comparison 1: Folic acid supplementation versus placebo, Outcome 5: Dactylitis

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1: Folic acid supplementation versus placebo, Outcome 5: Dactylitis

Summary of findings 1. Summary of findings

Folic acid compared with calcium lactate for sickle cell (SS) disease

Patient or population: 117 children with homozygous sickle cell (SS) disease

Settings: hospital

Intervention: folic acid 5 mg

Comparison: calcium lactate (placebo)

Outcomes1

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of Participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

calcium lactate (placebo)

folic acid 5 mg

Folate concentration

Serum folate levels, measured between 6 and 12 months after entry to the study

1. values in excess of 18 pg/L occurring in 6/39 (15%) children in the placebo group.

2. levels below 5 pg/L occurring in 15/39 (39%)

1. values in excess of 18 pg/L occurring in 33/41 (81 %) in
the folic acid group.

2. levels below 5 pg/L None in the folic acid group.

NA

80/115 (70%)

(1 study)

⊕⊕⊝⊝

low2

There were marked differences between trial groups in the distribution of serum folate levels.

Haemoglobin concentration

Haematological analyses were performed in the 100/115 (87%) children in whom baseline (within 2 months of entry to study) and 1 year (between 10 and 14 months after entry)

See comment

See comment

NA

100/115 (87%)

(1 study)

⊕⊕⊝⊝

low2

There were no significant differences in total haemoglobin (Hb) either at baseline or after 1 year.

Adverse events ‐ acute splenic sequestration

Clinical events experienced by children during the 1 year period commencing at entry to the trial

8/56

Total episodes

15

9/59

Total episodes

12

RR 1.07

(95% CI 0.44 to 2.57)

115

(1 study)

⊕⊕⊝⊝

low2

There were no significant differences in these measures of growth between the folic acid and placebo groups.

Adverse events ‐ painful episodes

Clinical events experienced by children during the 1 year period commencing at entry to the trial

18/56

Total episodes

27

22/59

Total episodes

39

RR

1.16

(95% CI 0.70 to 1.92)

115

(1 study)

⊕⊕⊝⊝

low2

There were no significant differences in painful episodes
between the folic acid and placebo groups.

Adverse events ‐ minor Infections

Clinical events experienced by children during the 1 year period commencing at entry to the trial

48 out of 56 children

Total episodes/child: 2.3

50 out of 59 children

Total episodes/child: 2.7

RR 0.99

(95% CI 0.85 to 1.15)

115

(1 study)

⊕⊕⊝⊝

low2

There were no differences in minor infections
between the folic acid and placebo groups.

Adverse events ‐ major infections

Clinical events experienced by children during the 1 year period commencing at entry to the trial

15 out of 56 children

Total episodes/child: 19

14 out of 59 children

Total episodes/child: 18

RR 0.89

(95% CI 0.47 to 1.66)

115

(1 study)

⊕⊕⊝⊝

low2

There were no differences in major infections
between the folic acid and placebo group.

Adverse events ‐ dactylitis

Clinical events experienced by children during the 1 year period commencing at entry to the trial

17 out of 56 children

Total episodes: 32

12 out of 59 children

Total episodes:15

RR 0.67 (95% CI 0.37 to 1.27)

115

(1 study)

⊕⊕⊝⊝

low2

There were no differences in dactylitis events
between the folic acid and placebo group.

*The basis for the assumed risk is the risk in the control group. The corresponding risk (and its 95% CI) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; RR: risk ratio.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: we are very uncertain about the estimate.

1. Pre‐specified adverse events of 'Increased incidence of priapism' and 'The risk of masking cobalamin deficiency with consequent neuropsychiatric manifestations (nanogram per litre (ng/L))' were not assessed in the included trial (Rabb 1983). In the included trial, there was no difference between the folic acid and placebo groups for growth, determined by height‐for‐age and weight‐for‐age as well as height and growth velocity.

2. Reason for downgrading evidence to low ‐ very serious risk of bias (two domains of high risk of bias).

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 1. Summary of findings
Comparison 1. Folic acid supplementation versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1.1 Acute splenic sequestration Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

1.2 Painful episodes Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

1.3 Minor Infections Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

1.4 Major Infection Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

1.5 Dactylitis Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Folic acid supplementation versus placebo