Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Study flow diagram

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Comparison 1: Folic acid supplementation versus placebo, Outcome 1: Acute splenic sequestration

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1: Folic acid supplementation versus placebo, Outcome 1: Acute splenic sequestration

Comparison 1: Folic acid supplementation versus placebo, Outcome 2: Painful episodes

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1: Folic acid supplementation versus placebo, Outcome 2: Painful episodes

Comparison 1: Folic acid supplementation versus placebo, Outcome 3: Minor Infections

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1: Folic acid supplementation versus placebo, Outcome 3: Minor Infections

Comparison 1: Folic acid supplementation versus placebo, Outcome 4: Major Infection

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1: Folic acid supplementation versus placebo, Outcome 4: Major Infection

Comparison 1: Folic acid supplementation versus placebo, Outcome 5: Dactylitis

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1: Folic acid supplementation versus placebo, Outcome 5: Dactylitis

Summary of findings 1. Summary of findings

Folic acid compared with calcium lactate for sickle cell (SS) disease

Patient or population: 117 children with homozygous sickle cell (SS) disease

Settings: hospital

Intervention: folic acid 5 mg

Comparison: calcium lactate (placebo)

Outcomes1

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of Participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

calcium lactate (placebo)

folic acid 5 mg

Folate concentration

Serum folate levels, measured between 6 and 12 months after entry to the study

1. values in excess of 18 pg/L occurring in 6/39 (15%) children in the placebo group.

2. levels below 5 pg/L occurring in 15/39 (39%)

1. values in excess of 18 pg/L occurring in 33/41 (81 %) in
the folic acid group.

2. levels below 5 pg/L None in the folic acid group.

NA

80/115 (70%)

(1 study)

⊕⊕⊝⊝

low2

There were marked differences between trial groups in the distribution of serum folate levels.

Haemoglobin concentration

Haematological analyses were performed in the 100/115 (87%) children in whom baseline (within 2 months of entry to study) and 1 year (between 10 and 14 months after entry)

See comment

See comment

NA

100/115 (87%)

(1 study)

⊕⊕⊝⊝

low2

There were no significant differences in total haemoglobin (Hb) either at baseline or after 1 year.

Adverse events ‐ acute splenic sequestration

Clinical events experienced by children during the 1 year period commencing at entry to the trial

8/56

Total episodes

15

9/59

Total episodes

12

RR 1.07

(95% CI 0.44 to 2.57)

115

(1 study)

⊕⊕⊝⊝

low2

There were no significant differences in these measures of growth between the folic acid and placebo groups.

Adverse events ‐ painful episodes

Clinical events experienced by children during the 1 year period commencing at entry to the trial

18/56

Total episodes

27

22/59

Total episodes

39

RR

1.16

(95% CI 0.70 to 1.92)

115

(1 study)

⊕⊕⊝⊝

low2

There were no significant differences in painful episodes
between the folic acid and placebo groups.

Adverse events ‐ minor Infections

Clinical events experienced by children during the 1 year period commencing at entry to the trial

48 out of 56 children

Total episodes/child: 2.3

50 out of 59 children

Total episodes/child: 2.7

RR 0.99

(95% CI 0.85 to 1.15)

115

(1 study)

⊕⊕⊝⊝

low2

There were no differences in minor infections
between the folic acid and placebo groups.

Adverse events ‐ major infections

Clinical events experienced by children during the 1 year period commencing at entry to the trial

15 out of 56 children

Total episodes/child: 19

14 out of 59 children

Total episodes/child: 18

RR 0.89

(95% CI 0.47 to 1.66)

115

(1 study)

⊕⊕⊝⊝

low2

There were no differences in major infections
between the folic acid and placebo group.

Adverse events ‐ dactylitis

Clinical events experienced by children during the 1 year period commencing at entry to the trial

17 out of 56 children

Total episodes: 32

12 out of 59 children

Total episodes:15

RR 0.67 (95% CI 0.37 to 1.27)

115

(1 study)

⊕⊕⊝⊝

low2

There were no differences in dactylitis events
between the folic acid and placebo group.

*The basis for the assumed risk is the risk in the control group. The corresponding risk (and its 95% CI) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; RR: risk ratio.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: we are very uncertain about the estimate.

1. Pre‐specified adverse events of 'Increased incidence of priapism' and 'The risk of masking cobalamin deficiency with consequent neuropsychiatric manifestations (nanogram per litre (ng/L))' were not assessed in the included trial (Rabb 1983). In the included trial, there was no difference between the folic acid and placebo groups for growth, determined by height‐for‐age and weight‐for‐age as well as height and growth velocity.

2. Reason for downgrading evidence to low ‐ very serious risk of bias (two domains of high risk of bias).

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 1. Summary of findings
Comparison 1. Folic acid supplementation versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1.1 Acute splenic sequestration Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

1.2 Painful episodes Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

1.3 Minor Infections Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

1.4 Major Infection Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

1.5 Dactylitis Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Folic acid supplementation versus placebo