Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Hasil ibu dan fetus berikutan kelahiran semulajadi faraj berbanding pembedahan caesarean (c‐section) dalam kalangan wanita dengan gangguan pendarahan dan wanita pembawa

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011059.pub3Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 04 agosto 2017see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Fibrosis quística y enfermedades genéticas

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Laxminarayan Karanth

    Correspondencia a: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Melaka Manipal Medical College, Melaka, Malaysia

    [email protected]

  • Sachchithanantham Kanagasabai

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Melaka Manipal Medical College, Melaka, Malaysia

  • Adinegara BL Abas

    Department of Community Medicine, Melaka‐Manipal Medical College, Melaka, Malaysia

Contributions of authors

 Roles and responsibilities

TASK

WHO WILL UNDERTAKE THE TASK?

Protocol stage: draft the protocol

Karanth KL

Review stage: select which trials to include (2 + 1 arbiter)

Karanth KL, Sachchithananthum K + Adinegara BL Abas

Review stage: extract data from trials (2 people)

Karanth KL, Adinegara BL Abas

Review stage: enter data into RevMan

Karanth KL

Review stage: carry out the analysis

Karanth KL, Adinegara BL Abas

Review stage: interpret the analysis

Karanth KL

Review stage: draft the final review

Karanth KL, Sachchithananthum K, Adinegara BL Abas

Update stage: update the review

Karanth KL, Sachchithananthum K, Adinegara BL Abas

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No sources of support supplied

External sources

  • National Institute for Health Research, UK.

    This systematic review was supported by the National Institute for Health Research, via Cochrane Infrastructure funding to the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group.

Declarations of interest

All authors: none known.

Acknowledgements

We thank the management of Melaka Manipal Medical College, Melaka, Malaysia, Manipal University, India for giving us the opportunity to be involved in the development of this protocol.

The authors would like to thank Tracey Remmington of the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group for the help and support during the course of this review.

This project was supported by the National Institute for Health Research, via Cochrane Infrastructure funding to the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group. The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Systematic Reviews Programme, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2021 Dec 09

Maternal and foetal outcomes following natural vaginal versus caesarean section (c‐section) delivery in women with bleeding disorders and carriers

Review

Laxminarayan Karanth, Adinegara BL Abas

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011059.pub4

2017 Aug 04

Maternal and foetal outcomes following natural vaginal versus caesarean section (c‐section) delivery in women with bleeding disorders and carriers

Review

Laxminarayan Karanth, Sachchithanantham Kanagasabai, Adinegara BL Abas

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011059.pub3

2015 Apr 03

Maternal and foetal outcomes following natural vaginal versus caesarean section (c‐section) delivery in women with bleeding disorders and carriers

Review

Laxminarayan Karanth, Sachchithanantham Kanagasabai, Adinegara BL Abas

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011059.pub2

2014 Apr 09

Maternal and foetal outcomes following natural vaginal versus caesarean section (c‐section) delivery in carriers and women with bleeding disorders

Protocol

Laxminarayan Karanth, Sachchithanantham Kanagasabai, Adinegara BL Abas

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011059

Keywords

MeSH

Medical Subject Headings Check Words

Adult; Female; Humans; Pregnancy;

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.