Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Maternal and foetal outcomes following natural vaginal versus caesarean section (c‐section) delivery in women with bleeding disorders and carriers

This is not the most recent version

Information

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011059.pub3Copy DOI
Database:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Version published:
  1. 04 August 2017see what's new
Type:
  1. Intervention
Stage:
  1. Review
Cochrane Editorial Group:
  1. Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Article metrics

Altmetric:

Cited by:

Cited 0 times via Crossref Cited-by Linking

Collapse

Authors

  • Laxminarayan Karanth

    Correspondence to: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Melaka Manipal Medical College, Melaka, Malaysia

    [email protected]

  • Sachchithanantham Kanagasabai

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Melaka Manipal Medical College, Melaka, Malaysia

  • Adinegara BL Abas

    Department of Community Medicine, Melaka‐Manipal Medical College, Melaka, Malaysia

Contributions of authors

 Roles and responsibilities

TASK

WHO WILL UNDERTAKE THE TASK?

Protocol stage: draft the protocol

Karanth KL

Review stage: select which trials to include (2 + 1 arbiter)

Karanth KL, Sachchithananthum K + Adinegara BL Abas

Review stage: extract data from trials (2 people)

Karanth KL, Adinegara BL Abas

Review stage: enter data into RevMan

Karanth KL

Review stage: carry out the analysis

Karanth KL, Adinegara BL Abas

Review stage: interpret the analysis

Karanth KL

Review stage: draft the final review

Karanth KL, Sachchithananthum K, Adinegara BL Abas

Update stage: update the review

Karanth KL, Sachchithananthum K, Adinegara BL Abas

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No sources of support supplied

External sources

  • National Institute for Health Research, UK.

    This systematic review was supported by the National Institute for Health Research, via Cochrane Infrastructure funding to the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group.

Declarations of interest

All authors: none known.

Acknowledgements

We thank the management of Melaka Manipal Medical College, Melaka, Malaysia, Manipal University, India for giving us the opportunity to be involved in the development of this protocol.

The authors would like to thank Tracey Remmington of the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group for the help and support during the course of this review.

This project was supported by the National Institute for Health Research, via Cochrane Infrastructure funding to the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group. The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Systematic Reviews Programme, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2021 Dec 09

Maternal and foetal outcomes following natural vaginal versus caesarean section (c‐section) delivery in women with bleeding disorders and carriers

Review

Laxminarayan Karanth, Adinegara BL Abas

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011059.pub4

2017 Aug 04

Maternal and foetal outcomes following natural vaginal versus caesarean section (c‐section) delivery in women with bleeding disorders and carriers

Review

Laxminarayan Karanth, Sachchithanantham Kanagasabai, Adinegara BL Abas

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011059.pub3

2015 Apr 03

Maternal and foetal outcomes following natural vaginal versus caesarean section (c‐section) delivery in women with bleeding disorders and carriers

Review

Laxminarayan Karanth, Sachchithanantham Kanagasabai, Adinegara BL Abas

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011059.pub2

2014 Apr 09

Maternal and foetal outcomes following natural vaginal versus caesarean section (c‐section) delivery in carriers and women with bleeding disorders

Protocol

Laxminarayan Karanth, Sachchithanantham Kanagasabai, Adinegara BL Abas

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011059

Keywords

MeSH

Medical Subject Headings Check Words

Adult; Female; Humans; Pregnancy;

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.