Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Evaluación del riesgo para talasemia, anemia de células falciformes, fibrosis quística y enfermedad de Tay‐Sachs antes de la concepción

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010849.pub3Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 14 marzo 2018see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Fibrosis quística y enfermedades genéticas

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2018 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Norita Hussein

    Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

  • Stephen F Weng

    Division of Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

  • Joe Kai

    Division of Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

  • Jos Kleijnen

    Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, UK

    School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands

  • Nadeem Qureshi

    Correspondencia a: Division of Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

    [email protected]

Contributions of authors

Writing the protocol: all authors
Developing the search strategy: NH, NQ, JK and other (not review authors)
Searching for trials: NH and NQ
Selection of trials: NH, NQ, SW and other (not review authors)
Data entry: NH, SW
Analysis: NH, NQ, SW and JK
Interpret analysis: all authors
Draft final review: all authors
Update the review: NH and NQ

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • University of Nottingham, UK.

    The university provided computer and internet access.

External sources

  • National Institute for Health Research, UK.

    This systematic review was supported by the National Institute for Health Research, via Cochrane Infrastructure funding to the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group.

Declarations of interest

Dr Nadeem Qureshi and Dr Joe Kai are investigators on a UK National Institute of Health research project evaluating preconception screening in primary care and plan to pursue further research in this area. Dr Qureshi is also collaborating on a project to evaluate the evidence base relevant to NICE guidelines behind primary care.

Professor Jos Kleijnen declares Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd has received project funding from various pharmaceutical companies for work in unrelated areas.

For the remaining authors there are no known declarations of interest.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to Luke Robles and Richard Birnie for their help in screening and identifying full‐text articles for this review.

This project was supported by the National Institute for Health Research, via Cochrane Infrastructure funding to the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group. The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Systematic Reviews Programme, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2021 Oct 11

Preconception risk assessment for thalassaemia, sickle cell disease, cystic fibrosis and Tay‐Sachs disease

Review

Norita Hussein, Lidewij Henneman, Joe Kai, Nadeem Qureshi

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010849.pub4

2018 Mar 14

Preconception risk assessment for thalassaemia, sickle cell disease, cystic fibrosis and Tay‐Sachs disease

Review

Norita Hussein, Stephen F Weng, Joe Kai, Jos Kleijnen, Nadeem Qureshi

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010849.pub3

2015 Aug 12

Preconception risk assessment for thalassaemia, sickle cell disease, cystic fibrosis and Tay‐Sachs disease

Review

Norita Hussein, Stephen F Weng, Joe Kai, Jos Kleijnen, Nadeem Qureshi

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010849.pub2

2013 Dec 23

Preconception risk assessment for thalassaemia, sickle cell disease, cystic fibrosis and Tay‐Sachs disease

Protocol

Norita Hussein, Nadeem Qureshi, Stephen F Weng, Jos Kleijnen, Joe Kai

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010849

Differences between protocol and review

Hand searching of key journals was originally specified from 1984 to date in the protocol. In the review, hand searching was conducted from 1998 to date for the European Journal of Human Genetics and Genetics in Medicine and from 2010 to date for the Journal of Community Genetics. This change was made because these were the earliest dates that the online table of contents were accessible for these key journals.

Keywords

MeSH

Medical Subject Headings Check Words

Female; Humans;

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Study flow diagram
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram