Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Физические упражнения при раковой кахексии у взрослых

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Contraer todo Desplegar todo

Referencias

References to studies excluded from this review

Battaglini 2010 {published data only}

Battaglini C, Groff D, Shields E, et al. Exercise and psychosocial interventions in breast cancer survivors: preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 2010;42(5):344‐5. CENTRAL

Carnaby‐Mann 2012 {published data only}

Carnaby‐Mann G, Crary MA, Schmalfuss I, Amdur R. "Pharyngocise": randomized controlled trial of preventative exercises to maintain muscle structure and swallowing function during head‐and‐neck chemoradiotherapy. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics 2012;83(1):210‐9. CENTRAL

Cheville 2010 {published data only}

Cheville AL, Girardi J, Clark MM, Rummans TA, Pittelkow T, Brown P, et al. Therapeutic exercise during out patient radiation therapy for advanced cancer: feasibility and impact on physical well‐being. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 89;8:611‐9. CENTRAL

Courneya 2009 {published data only}

Courneya KS, Sellar CM, Stevinson C, McNeely ML, Peddle CJ, Friedenreich CM, et al. Randomized controlled trial of the effects of aerobic exercise on physical functioning and quality of life in lymphoma patients. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2009;27(27):4605‐12. CENTRAL

Elter 2009 {published data only}

Elter T, Stipanov M, Heuser E, von Bergwelt‐Baildon M, Bloch W, Hallek M, et al. Is physical exercise possible in patients with critical cytopenia undergoing intensive chemotherapy for acute leukaemia or aggressive lymphoma?. International Journal of Hematology 2009;90(2):199‐204. CENTRAL

Fouladiun 2007 {published data only}

Fouladiun M, Körner U, Gunnebo L, Sixt‐Ammilon P, Bosaeus I, Lundholm K. Daily physical‐rest activities in relation to nutritional state, metabolism, and quality of life in cancer patients with progressive cachexia. Clinical Cancer Research 2007;13(21):6379‐85. CENTRAL

Irwin 2009 {published data only}

Irwin ML, Alvarez‐Reeves M, Cadmus L, Mierzejewski E, Mayne ST, Yu H, et al. Exercise improves body fat, lean mass, and bone mass in breast cancer survivors. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2009;17(8):1534‐41. CENTRAL

Kuehr 2014 {published data only}

Kuehr L, Wiskemann J, Abel U, Ulrich CM, Hummler S, Thomas M. Exercise inpatients with non‐small cell lung cancer. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 2014;46(4):656‐63. CENTRAL

Litterini 2013 {published data only}

Litterini AJ, Fieler VK, Cavanaugh JT, Lee JQ. Differential effects of cardiovascular and resistance exercise on functional mobility in individuals with advanced cancer: a randomized trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2013;94(12):2329‐35. CENTRAL

Mantovani 2010a {published data only}

Mantovani G. Randomised phase III clinical trial of 5 different arms of treatment on 332 patients with cancer cachexia. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences 2010;14(4):292‐301. CENTRAL

Oldervoll 2006 {published data only}

Oldervoll LM, Loge JH, Paltiel H, Asp MB, Vidvei U, Wiken AN, et al. The effect of a physical exercise program in palliative care: A phase II study. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 2006;31(5):421‐30. CENTRAL

Oldervoll 2011 {published data only}

Oldervoll LM, Loge JH, Lydersen S, Paltiel H, Asp MB, Nygaard UV, et al. Physical exercise for cancer patients with advanced disease: a randomized controlled trial. Oncologist 2011;16(11):1649‐57. CENTRAL

Op den Kamp 2012 {published data only}

Op den Kamp CM, Langen RC, Minnaard R, Kelders MC, Snepvangers FJ, Hesselink MK, et al. Pre‐cachexia in patients with stages I‐III non‐small cell lung cancer: systemic inflammation and functional impairment without activation of skeletal muscle ubiquitin proteasome system. Lung Cancer 2012;76(1):112‐7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.09.012]CENTRAL

Saarto 2012 {published data only}

Saarto T. Effect of supervised and home exercise training on bone mineral density among breast cancer patients. A 12‐month randomised controlled trial. Osteoporosis International 2012;23(5):1601‐12. CENTRAL

Schwartz 2007 {published data only}

Schwartz AL, Winters‐Stone K, Gallucci B. Exercise effects on bone mineral density in women with breast cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Oncology Nursing Forum 2007;34(3):627‐33. CENTRAL

Zatarain 2013 {published data only}

Zatarain LA. Body composition in head and neck cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiation. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2013;Suppl 1(31):15. CENTRAL

ACTRN12611000870954 {published data only}

ACTRN12611000870954. Anti‐inflammatory and nutritional support, with simple exercises in lung cancer patients with weight loss. https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=343304 (accessed 24 April 2014). CENTRAL
Rogers ES, MacLeod RD, Stewart J, Bird SP, Keogh JW. A randomised feasibility study of EPA and Cox‐2 inhibitor (Celebrex) versus EPA, Cox‐2 inhibitor (Celebrex), resistance training followed by ingestion of essential amino acids high in leucine in NSCLC cachectic patients‐‐ACCeRT study. BMC Cancer 2011;11:493. CENTRAL

NCT01419145 {published data only}

NCT01419145. A feasibility study of multimodal exercise/nutrition/anti‐inflammatory treatment for cachexia ‐ the Pre‐MENAC study. http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01419145 (accessed 24 April 2014). CENTRAL

NCT01681654 {published data only}

Capozzi LC, Lau H, Reimer RA, McNeely M, Giese‐Davis J, Culos‐Reed SN. Exercise and nutrition for head and neck cancer patients: a patient oriented, clinic‐supported randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer 2012;12:446. CENTRAL
NCT01681654. Exercise and Nutrition for Head and Neck Cancer Patients (ENHANCE). http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01681654 (accessed 24 April 2014). CENTRAL

Antoun 2013

Antoun S, Lanoy E, Iacovelli R, Albiges‐Sauvin L, Loriot Y, Merad‐Taoufik M, et al. Skeletal muscle density predicts prognosis in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with targeted therapies. Cancer 2013;25:2821‐8.

Argilés 2012

Argilés JM, Busquets S, López‐Soriano FJ, Costelli P, Penna F. Are there any benefits of exercise training in cancer cachexia?. Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle 2012;3:73‐6.

Berenstein 2005

Berenstein G, Ortiz Z. Megestrol acetate for treatment of anorexia‐cachexia syndrome. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004310.pub2]

Betof 2013

Betof AS, Dewhirst MW, Jones LW. Effects and potential mechanisms of exercise training on cancer progression: a translational perspective. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity 2013;30:S75‐S87.

Blum 2014

Blum D, Stene GB, Solheim TS, Fayers P, Hjermstad MJ, Baracos VE, et al. Euro‐Impact. Validation of the Consensus‐Definition for Cancer Cachexia and evaluation of a classification model‐‐a study based on data from an international multicentre project (EPCRC‐CSA). Annals of Oncology 2014 Apr 22 [Epub ahead of print].

Deeks 2011

Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG. Chapter 9: Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.

Dewey 2007

Dewey A, Baughan C, Dean TP, Higgins B, Johnson I. Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA, an omega‐3 fatty acid from fish oils) for the treatment of cancer cachexia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004597.pub2]

Dodson 2011

Dodson S, Baracos VE, Jatoi A, Evans WJ, Cella D, Dalton JT, et al. Muscle wasting in cancer cachexia: clinical implications, diagnosis, and emerging treatment strategies. Annual Review of Medicine 2011;62:265‐79.

England 2012

England R, Maddocks M, Manderson C, Wilcock A. Factors influencing exercise performance in thoracic cancer. Respiratory Medicine 2012;106:294‐9.

Evans 2008

Evans, WJ, Morley JE, Argilés J, Bales C, Baracos V, Guttridge D, et al. Cachexia: a new definition. Clinical Nutrition 2008;27:793‐9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2008.06.013]

Fearon 2008

Fearon KC. Cancer cachexia: developing multimodal therapy for a multidimensional problem. European Journal of Cancer 2008;44(8):1124‐32.

Fearon 2011

Fearon K, Strasser F, Anker SD, Bosaeus I, Bruera E, Fainsinger RL, et al. Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus. Lancet Oncology 2011;12(5):489‐95. [PUBMED: 21296615]

Fearon 2012

Fearon KCH, Glass DJ, Guttridge DC. Cancer cachexia: mediators, signalling and metabolic pathways. Cell Metabolism 2012;16:153‐66.

Gleeson 2011

Gleeson M, Bishop NC, Stensel DJ, Lindley MR, Mastana SS, Nimmo MA. The anti‐inflammatory effects of exercise: mechanisms and implications for the prevention and treatment of disease. Nature Reviews. Immunology 11;9:607‐15.

Glover 2010

Glover EI, Phillips SM. Resistance exercise and appropriate nutrition to counteract muscle wasting and promote muscle hypertrophy. Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care 2010;13:630‐4.

Gould 2013

Gould DW, Lahart I, Carmichael AR, Koutedakis Y, Metsios GS. Cancer cachexia prevention via physical exercise: molecular mechanisms. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle 2013;4(2):111‐24. [DOI: 10.1007/s13539‐012‐0096‐0]

Higgins 2002

Higgins JPT, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis. Statistics in Medicine 2002;21:1539‐59.

Higgins 2003

Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta‐analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557‐60.

Higgins 2011a

Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ. Chapter 7: Selecting studies and collecting data. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.

Higgins 2011b

Higgins JPT, Altman DG. Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.

Jones 2012

Jones LW, Hornsby WE, Goetzinger A, Forbes LM, Sherrard EL, Quist M, et al. Prognostic significance of functional capacity and exercise behavior in patients with metastatic non‐small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2012;76:248‐52. [DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.10.009]

Laviano 2005

Laviano A, Meguid MM, Inui A, Muscaritoli M, Rossi‐Fanelli F. Therapy insight: cancer anorexia‐cachexia syndrome‐‐when all you can eat is yourself. Nature Clinical Practice Oncology 2005;2:159‐65.

Lee 2011

Lee SJ, Glass DJ. Treating cancer cachexia to treat cancer. Skeletal Muscle 2011;1(2):1‐5. [DOI: 10.1186/2044‐5040‐1‐2]

Lowe 2009

Lowe SS, Watanabe SM, Courneya KS. Physical activity as a supportive care intervention in palliative cancer patients: a systematic review. Journal of Supportive Oncology 2009;7(1):37‐34.

Maddocks 2011

Maddocks M, Murton AJ, Wilcock A. Improving muscle mass and function in cachexia: non‐drug approaches. Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care 2011;5(4):361‐4. [DOI: 10.1097/SPC.0b013e32834bdde3]

Maddocks 2012

Maddocks M, Murton AJ, Wilcock A. Therapeutic exercise in cancer cachexia. Critical Reviews in Oncogenesis 2012;17:285‐92.

Mantovani 2010

Mantovani G, Macciò A, Madeddu C, Dessì M, Serpe R, Antoni G, et al. Focus on the assessment of physical activity level of patients with cancer cachexia enrolled in a randomized phase III clinical trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, ASCO Annual Meeting Abstracts 2010;28(15):9164.

Marimuthu 2011

Marimuthu K, Murton AJ, Greenhaff PL. Mechanisms regulating muscle mass during disuse atrophy and rehabilitation in humans. Journal of Applied Physiology 2011;110:555‐60.

Martin 2013

Martin L, Birdsell L, Macdonald N, Reiman T, Clandinin MT, McCargar LJ, et al. Cancer cachexia in the age of obesity: skeletal muscle depletion is a powerful prognostic factor, independent of body mass index. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2013;31(12):1539‐47.

McMillan 2013

McMillan DC. The systemic inflammation‐based Glasgow Prognostic Score: a decade of experience in patients with cancer. Cancer Treatment Reviews 2013;39:534‐40.

Moses 2009

Moses AG, Maingay J, Sangster K, Fearon KC, Ross JA. Pro‐inflammatory cytokine release by peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: relationship to acute phase response and survival. Oncology Reports 2009;21:1091‐5.

Muscaritoli 2010

Muscaritoli M, Anker SD, Argiles J, Aversa Z, Bauer JM, Biolo G, et al. Consensus definition of sarcopenia, cachexia and pre‐cachexia: Joint document elaborated by Specialist Interest Groups (SIG) ‘cachexia –anorexia in chronic wasting diseases’ and ‘nutrition in genetics’. Clinical Nutrition 2010;29:154‐9.

Payne 2012

Payne C, Wiffen PJ, Martin S. Interventions for fatigue and weight loss in adults with advanced progressive illness. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008427.pub2]

Prado 2007

Prado CM, Baracos VE, McCargar LJ, Mourtzakis M, Mulder KE, Reiman T, et al. Body composition as an independent determinant of 5‐fluorouracil‐based chemotherapy toxicity. Clinical Cancer Research 2007;13:3264‐8.

Prado 2008

Prado CM, Lieffers JR, McCargar LJ, Reiman T, Sawyer MB, Martin L, et al. Prevalence and clinical implications of sarcopenic obesity in patients with solid tumours of the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts: a population‐based study. Lancet Oncology 2008;9:629‐35.

Prado 2009

Prado CM, Baracos VE, McCargar LJ, Reiman T, Mourtzakis M, Tonkin K, et al. Sarcopenia as a determinant of chemotherapy toxicity and time to tumor progression in metastatic breast cancer patients receiving capecitabine treatment. Clinical Cancer Research 2009;15:2920‐6.

Proctor 2011

Proctor MJ, Morrison DS, Talwar D, Balmer SM, O'Reilly DS, Foulis AK, et al. An inflammation‐based prognostic score (mGPS) predicts cancer survival independent of tumour site: a Glasgow Inflammation Outcome Study. British Journal of Cancer 2011;104:726‐34.

Reid 2012

Reid J, Mills M, Cantwell M, Cardwell CR, Murray LJ, Donnelly M. Thalidomide for managing cancer cachexia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008664.pub2]

RevMan 2012 [Computer program]

The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.2. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2012.

Solheim 2012

Solheim TS, Laird BJ. Evidence base for multimodal therapy in cachexia. Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care 2012;6(4):424‐31.

Spence 2011

Spence RR, Heesch KC, Brown WJ. Colorectal cancer survivors' exercise experiences and preferences: qualitative findings from an exercise rehabilitation programme immediately after chemotherapy. European Journal of Cancer Care (English Language Edition) 2011;20(2):257‐66.

Starkie 2003

Starkie R, Ostrowski SR, Jauffred S, Febbraio M, Pedersen BK. Exercise and IL‐6 infusion inhibit endotoxin‐induced TNFα production in humans. FASEB Journal 2003;17:884‐6.

Stene 2013

Stene GB, Helbostad JL, Balstad TR, Riphagen II, Kaasa S, Oldervoll LM. Effect of physical exercise on muscle mass and strength in cancer patients during treatment‐‐a systematic review. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology 2013;88(3):573‐93. [DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2013.07.001]

Stephens 2012

Stephens NA, Gray C, MacDonald AJ, Tan BH, Gallagher IJ, Skipworth RJ, et al. Sexual dimorphism modulates the impact of cancer cachexia on lower limb muscle mass and function. Clinical Nutrition 2012;31:499‐505.

Thompson 2010

Thompson WR, Gordon NF, Pescatello LS. ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. 8th Edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2010.

Tisdale 2009

Tisdale MJ. Mechanisms of cancer cachexia. Physiology Review 2009;89:381‐410. [DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00016.2008]

Wang 2006

Wang X, Hu Z, J Hu, Du J, Mitch WE. Insulin resistance accelerates muscle protein degradation: activation of the ubiquitin‐proteasome pathway by defects in muscle cell signaling. Endocrinology 2006;147(9):4160‐8.

Weber 2009

Weber MA, Krakowski‐Roosen H, Schroder L, Kinscherf R, Krix M, Kopp‐Schneider A, et al. Morphology, metabolism, microcirculation, and strength of skeletal muscles in cancer‐related cachexia. Acta Oncologica 2009;48:116‐24.

Wilcock 2008

Wilcock A, Maddocks M, Lewis M, England R, Manderson C. Symptoms limiting activity in cancer patients with breathlessness on exertion: ask about muscle fatigue. Thorax 2008;63:91‐2.

References to other published versions of this review

Grande 2013

Grande AJ, Silva V, Maddocks M, Riera R, Medeiros A, Vitoriano SGP, et al. Exercise for cancer cachexia in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 10. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010804]

Characteristics of studies

Characteristics of excluded studies [ordered by study ID]

Study

Reason for exclusion

Battaglini 2010

Authors did not investigate cancer cachexia

Carnaby‐Mann 2012

Authors did not investigate cancer cachexia

Cheville 2010

Authors did not investigate cancer cachexia

Courneya 2009

Authors did not investigate cancer cachexia

Elter 2009

Authors did not investigate cancer cachexia

Fouladiun 2007

This is not a randomised controlled trial with exercise

Irwin 2009

Authors did not investigate cancer cachexia

Kuehr 2014

Authors did not investigate cancer cachexia

Litterini 2013

Authors did not investigate cancer cachexia

Mantovani 2010a

Authors did not investigate cancer cachexia

Oldervoll 2006

Authors did not investigate cancer cachexia

Oldervoll 2011

Authors did not investigate cancer cachexia

Op den Kamp 2012

This is not a randomised controlled trial with exercise

Saarto 2012

Authors did not investigate cancer cachexia

Schwartz 2007

Authors did not investigate cancer cachexia

Zatarain 2013

Authors did not investigate cancer cachexia

Characteristics of ongoing studies [ordered by study ID]

ACTRN12611000870954

Trial name or title

Anti‐inflammatory and nutritional support, with simple exercises in lung cancer patients with weight loss

Methods

After patients complete the screening procedures at the screening visit and the principal investigator has confirmed that all inclusion/exclusion criteria have been met, all eligible patients will be randomly assigned to a treatment arm. Enclosed treatment assignments will be serially numbered in opaque, sealed envelopes and opened sequentially after the participant's name and other details have been written on the appropriate envelope. Enclosed treatment assignments will be serially numbered in opaque, sealed envelopes and opened sequentially after the participant's name and other details have been written on the appropriate envelope. Simple randomisation by using a randomisation table created by computer software (i.e. computerised sequence generation)

Participants

Inclusion criteria:
Patients who have diagnosed NSCLC and have received at least a first‐line anti‐cancer treatment, e.g. surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy or a targeted therapy (i.e. gefitinib, erlotinib and crizotinib) and fulfil the following cachexia definition:
Q1 Has lost 5% of oedema‐free body weight in the previous 12 months or less;
Q2 Mild less than or equal to 5%, Moderate greater than 10%, Severe greater than 15%;
Q3 If no documented weight loss, is BMI of less than 20.0 kg/m2;
Q4 At least 3 out of the following 5:
1. Decreased muscle strength
2. Experiencing fatigue either measured by a VO2 max score or patient confirmed reduced physical activity
3. Anorexia
4. Low fat‐free mass index (low muscle mass)
5. Abnormal biochemistry, CRP greater than 5.0 mg/L, IL‐6 greater than 4.0 pg/ml anaemia, Hb less than 12.0 g/dL, hypoalbuminaemia less than 3.2 g/dL
Inclusion criteria:
1. Patients greater than or equal to 18 years old
2. Histologically confirmed non‐small cell carcinoma of the lung (histological or cytological specimens must be collected via surgical biopsy, brushing, washing or core needle aspiration of a defined lesion; sputum cytology is not acceptable)
3. Patients should be aware of the diagnosis of cancer
4. Patients able to give written informed consent obtained according to local guidelines
5. Fulfils above 'cachectic definition'
6. Karnofsky Score equal to 60 or ECOG Performance Status 0, 1, 2 or 3
7. Recently completed first‐line platinum‐based chemotherapy
8. Laboratory values within the range, as defined below, within 2 weeks of randomisation: 1) Absolute neutrophils count (ANC) greater than 2.0 x 109/L, 2) Platelets greater than or equal to 100 x 109/L, 3) Haemoglobin greater than or equal to 100 g/dL, 4) Serum creatinine less than or equal to 1.5 x ULN (= 120 micro mol/L), 5) Serum bilirubin less than or equal to 1.5 x ULN (= 25 micro mol/L), 6) Aspartate transaminase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT) less than or equal to 2.5 x ULN (less than or equal to 5 x ULN if liver metastases), 7) Electrolyte values (potassium, calcium, magnesium) within greater than 1 x LLN and less than 1 x ULN, 8) Females of child‐bearing potential must have negative serum pregnancy test (confirmation of negative urine pregnancy test within 72 hours prior to initial dosing)
9. Life expectancy greater or equal to 20 weeks

Exclusion criteria:
1. Patients who are, in the opinion of a doctor or nurse in the department, unlikely to be suitable to participate by virtue of mental incapacity, severe current psychological or psychiatric disorder
2. Patients with an estimated prognosis of less than 1 month
3. Concurrent use of other investigational agents and patients who have received investigational agents in the last 4 weeks prior to randomisation
4. Concurrent use of other appetite stimulants e.g. MPA or MA and 4 mg OD dexamethasone or 30 mg OD prednisolone
5. Patients with systolic BP > 160 mmHg and/or diastolic > 90 mmHg
6. Pleural effusion that causes a CTC grade 2 dyspnoea
7. Radiotherapy in the last 2 weeks prior to randomisation. Patients must have recovered from all radiotherapy‐related toxicities
8. Patients with a history of another primary malignancy within last 5 years with the exception of non‐melanoma skin cancer or cervical cancer in situ
9. Patients having CNS metastases (patients having any clinical signs of CNS metastases must have a CT or MRI of the brain performed to rule out CNS metastases in order to be eligible for study participation. Patients who have had brain metastases surgically removed or irradiated with no residual disease confirmed by imaging are allowed)
10. Patients with recent haemoptysis associated with NSCLC (> 1 teaspoon in a single episode within 4 weeks)
11. Patients with an abnormal baseline 12‐lead ECG
12. Concurrent severe and/or uncontrolled medical disease (i.e. uncontrolled diabetes, chronic renal failure, chronic liver disease
Patient unwilling or unable to comply with the study protocol

Age minimum: 18 years

Age maximum: no limit

Gender: both males and females

Interventions

Arm A: 'International best supportive care' is defined as 2 g/day of EPA oral and 300 mg/day of COX‐2 inhibitor (Celebrex) oral for 20 weeks
Arm B: 'Treatment group' is defined as 2 g/day of EPA oral, 300 mg/day of COX‐2 inhibitor (Celebrex) oral; progressive resistance training (2 episodes per week, involving 5 to 10‐minute warm‐up, 10‐ to 15‐minute resistance training followed by 5‐minute cool‐down, approximately 30 minutes increasing in time to 1 hour per session, commencing on a one‐to‐one basis and moving onto group sessions if required by participant, under supervision of a trained exercise therapist) plus 20 g essential amino acids high in leucine over 3 days commencing 1 hour post exercise, oral, for 20 weeks

Outcomes

Primary outcome 1: acceptability of the treatment regimen will be assessed by asking patients to complete a questionnaire asking if they found the regimen acceptable and if they wish to continue with the treatment

Secondary outcome 1: lean body mass assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis (Tanita BC‐418 Segmental Body Composition Analyzer, Tanita)
Secondary outcome 2: MRI thigh skeletal muscle values as assessed (treatment allocation is blinded) by University MRI department

Secondary outcome 3: QoL and fatigue assessed by the following questionnaires MFSI‐SF, FAACT, WHOQOL‐BREF

Secondary outcome 4: serum levels of pro‐inflammatory classic cachexia cytokines (IL‐1, IL‐6 and TNF‐alpha) measured by Bio‐Plex Pro assay, Bio‐Rad)

Secondary outcome5: hand grip strength assessed by hand grip dynamometry of the dominant hand, the average of 3 attempts with 1‐minute rest between attempts

Secondary outcome 6: leg strength assessed by a customised leg extension rig (chair) with a cell load of the right leg, the average of 3 attempts with a 1‐minute rest between attempts

Secondary safety outcome 1: serious adverse events (SAEs) and adverse events (AEs), e.g. cardiac changes on ECG. All symptoms assessed using the NCI CTC

Secondary safety outcome 2: Glasgow Prognotic Score (GPS)

Secondary safety outcome 3: Karnofsky Score (KS)

Secondary safety outcome 4: progression‐free survival (PFS) will be assessed from the date of consent until documented radiology proven (CT) progression

Secondary safety outcome 5: overall compliance will be assessed by returned study medication and the number of PRT sessions attended

Secondary safety outcome 6: RECIST data (if available)

Starting date

5 June 2012

Contact information

Bruce Arroll ‐ [email protected]

Notes

Trial ID ‐ ACTRN12611000870954

NCT01419145

Trial name or title

A feasibility study of multimodal exercise/nutrition/anti‐inflammatory treatment for cachexia ‐ the Pre‐MENAC Study

Methods

This is a multicentre, open, randomised phase II study

The eligibility criteria are:

  • advanced non‐small‐cell lung cancer (stage III‐IV) or pancreatic cancer not eligible for curative therapy

  • due to commence chemo‐ or chemoradiotherapy

  • Karnofsky Performance Score ≥ 70

  • a life expectancy of ≥ 4 months and considered able to complete 2 months of the study

Participants

Men and women of 18 to 80 years old with cancer cachexia

Interventions

Nutritional supplements aimed at optimal energy balance and protein intake (2 cartons of ProSure per day), nutritional advice, home‐based self assisted exercise programme and anti‐inflammatory treatment (300 mg celecoxib) for 6 weeks. The aerobic exercise programme is performed as self administered daily walking sessions, aiming for a minimum of 2 sessions of 30 minutes on a weekly basis. Other aerobic activities could be used instead of walking. The resistance exercise programme should be performed 3 times weekly and last about 20 minutes. The programme is targeting major muscle groups in the upper body and legs with use of weights. The intensity of the exercise and performance of the exercises are adapted to the individual patient's disease burden and physical performance

Outcomes

Feasibility of recruitment and retention.

Starting date

16 August 2011

Contact information

Stein Kaasa, MD, PhD ‐ [email protected]

Ken Fearon, MD, PhD ‐ [email protected]

Notes

NCT01681654

Trial name or title

Exercise and Nutrition for Head and Neck Cancer Patients (ENHANCE)

Methods

Inclusion criteria:

  • Over 18 years of age

  • Has received a diagnosis of nasopharyngeal, oropharyngeal or hypopharyngeal cancer

  • Will receive radiation as part of treatment plan

  • Able to walk without assistance

  • Received clearance for exercise from treating oncologist

  • Lives in Calgary, Alberta area

  • Can speak and write English

  • Is interested in participating in the study

Allocation: randomised

Intervention model: parallel assignment

Masking: single‐blind (outcomes assessor)

Primary purpose: supportive care

Participants

Cancer of head and neck

Interventions

  • Behavioural: Lifestyle Intervention: participants in the Lifestyle Intervention will receive a 12‐week individualised exercise and dietary programme based on their exercise assessment and dual energy x‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan results, will attend twice weekly group exercise classes, and perform their individualised at‐home programme an additional 2 times per week. In addition, participants will be required to attend 6 education sessions during the 12‐week intervention

  • Behavioural: Maintenance Intervention: patients randomised to receive the Maintenance Intervention following treatment will receive a Survivorship Care Plan outlining their physical activity, dietary and health behaviour progress throughout the programme, future goals, individualised maintenance strategies and optional drop‐in exercise sessions

Outcomes

Change from baseline in body composition (time frame: at baseline (diagnosis), and then at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post diagnosis) (designated as safety issue: no)

DXA scan will be used to assess body composition

Quality of life (time frame: at baseline (diagnosis), and then at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post diagnosis) (designated as safety issue: no)

Quality of life will be assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy ‐ Anaemia module (FACT‐AN), and the NCCN‐FACT Fact Head/Neck Symptom Index‐22 (FHNSI‐22)

Physical activity behaviour (time frame: at baseline (diagnosis), and then at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post diagnosis) (designated as safety issue: no)

Physical activity will be assessed using Godin's (Godin 1985) leisure score index (LSI) of the GLTEQ (Godin Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire)

Smoking history (time frame: at baseline (diagnosis), and then at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post diagnosis) (designated as safety issue: no)

Smoking history will be assessed by a self report questionnaire which will classify patients as non‐smokers, former smokers and current smokers

Depression (time frame: at baseline (diagnosis), and then at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post diagnosis) (designated as safety issue: no)

Depression will be assessed using the Center for Epidemiological Studies on Depression Scale (CES‐D)

Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) (time frame: at baseline (diagnosis), and then at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post diagnosis) (designated as safety issue: no)

The Karnofsky Performance Score (KSP) will be used to measure the participant's general ability to accomplish tasks of daily‐living and overall well‐being

Inflammatory markers (time frame: at baseline (diagnosis), and then at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post diagnosis) (designated as safety issue: no)

Inflammatory factors will be evaluated as they are associated with cancer cachexia and muscle wasting and may be modified by exercise (Seruga 2008; Baldwin 2011). An overnight fasted blood draw will be collected at baseline, 3 months post diagnosis, 6 months post diagnosis, 9 months post diagnosis and 12 months post diagnosis. Serum inflammatory cytokine concentrations will be assessed in‐house (Dr. Raylene Reimer's laboratory) according to our established protocols. TNF, IL‐6, IL‐1, IL‐8 and C‐reactive protein will be quantified using Milliplex Human Cytokine kits (Millipore, Billerica, MA). Plate reading will be provided as a fee‐for service through Eve Technologies Inc. (Calgary, AB)

Cancer‐related symptom management (time frame: at baseline (diagnosis) and then 3, 6, 9, 12 months post diagnosis and every week before and after class during the 12‐week intervention) (designated as safety issue: no)

Participants will complete the ESAS bi‐weekly, before and after class. The ESAS is a valid and reliable assessment tool to evaluate the 9 more common symptoms experienced by cancer patients (Chang 2000)

Diet behaviour ‐ 3‐day food record (time frame: at baseline (diagnosis) and 4 and 8 weeks, 3, 6, 9, 12 months post diagnosis) (designated as safety issue: no)

The 3‐day diet record is said to be the most accurate for mean macronutrient content and appropriate for use in studies where participants may consume a wide variety of foods (American Dietetics Association/Dietitians Canada, 2000). Participants are instructed to record their daily consumption over a period of 3 days, 1 of which must be a weekend day. Written instructions and a sample entry are provided to increase accuracy of the daily record

Diet behaviour: PG‐SGA (time frame: at baseline (diagnosis), each week during radiation treatment (6.5 weeks in duration), and 3, 6, 9, 12 months post diagnosis) (Designated as safety issue: No)

The PG‐SGA assessment tool has been show to improve treatment outcomes, decrease side effects and improve weight management in cancer patients, and therefore will be used weekly to assess and identify malnutrition among patients (McMahon 2000; Doyle 2006)

Health‐related fitness measures ‐ resting heart rate (time frame: at baseline (diagnosis), and 3, 6, 9, 12 months post diagnosis.) (designated as safety issue: no)

Resting heart rate will be measured by palpating the radial artery and taking a 15‐second count as per the CPAFLA protocol (CPAFLA 2003)

Health‐related fitness outcome ‐ blood pressure (time frame: at baseline (diagnosis), and 3, 6, 9, 12 months post diagnosis.) (designated as safety issue: no)

A resting blood pressure (mmHg) will be measured in duplicate on the left arm using a sphygmomanometer and stethoscope using standardised procedures (CPAFLA 2003)

Health‐related fitness outcome ‐ 6‐minute walk test (time frame: at baseline (diagnosis), and 3, 6, 9, 12 months post diagnosis.) (designated as safety issue: no)

The 6‐minute walk test (6MWT) will be used to assess changes in functional aerobic capacity. Using the standardised protocol, participants will be asked to walk as far as they can around a 400 m track for 6 minutes. The point reached at 6 minutes will be marked and measured to the nearest 0.5 m. Rating of perceived exertion (Borg scale) will be completed immediately after completion of the functional aerobic capacity test

Health‐related fitness outcome ‐ grip strength (time frame: at baseline (diagnosis) and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post diagnosis.) (designated as safety issue: no)

Muscular strength will be assessed using a combined grip strength of the right and left hands will also be assessed using a hand dynamometer. A sum will be determined in kilograms from the best score of 2 trials recorded for each hand according to the CPAFLA protocol

Health‐related fitness outcome ‐ lower body strength (time frame: at baseline (diagnosis), and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post diagnosis) (designated as safety issue: no)

Lower body strength will be assessed using a 30‐second sit to stand test. The number of times participants can stand from a seated position in 30 seconds will be examined

Health‐related fitness outcome ‐ flexibility (time frame: at baseline (diagnosis) and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post diagnosis) (designated as safety issue: no)

Flexibility will be assessed by a trunk forward flexion sit‐and‐reach test using a Wells‐Dillon flexometer. The test will follow a standard protocol, with 2 trials allowed and the highest score to the nearest 0.5 cm recorded

Health‐related fitness outcome ‐ balance (time frame: at baseline (diagnosis), and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post diagnosis.) (designated as safety issue: no)

Balance will be assessed using a static balance test. The test requires the participant to balance on one foot and then the other as long as they can (length of time to a maximum of 45 seconds) while standing on a 2.54 by 2.54 by 30.5 cm base using a standardised protocol, reported by Fleishman

Starting date

June 2012

Contact information

Nicole Culos‐Reed ‐ [email protected]

Notes

Trial ID ‐ NCT01681654

BMI: body mass index
BP: blood pressure
CNS: central nervous system
CPAFLA: Canadian Physical Activity, Fitness and Lifestyle Approach
CRP: C‐reactive protein
CT: computed tomography
CTC: circulating tumor cells
DXA: dual energy x‐ray absorptiometry
EPA: eicosapentaenoic acid
ECG: electrocardiogram
ECOG: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
ESAS: Edmonton Symptom Assessment System
IL‐1, IL‐6: interleukin‐1, interleukin‐6
LLN: lower limit of normal
MA: megestrol acetate
MPA: methylprednisolone acetate
MRI: magnetic resonance imaging
NSCLC: non‐small cell lung cancer
OD: orexigenic drug
PG‐SGA: Patient‐Generated Subjective Global Assessment
PRT: progressive resistance training
QoL: quality of life
RECIST: Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors
TNF: tumor necrosis factors
ULN: upper limit of normal

Flow diagram: study selection process.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Flow diagram: study selection process.