Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Ejercicio para la caquexia del cáncer en adultos

Esta versión no es la más reciente

ver la versión actual 18 marzo 2021

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010804.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 26 noviembre 2014see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:

  1. Grupo Cochrane de Dolor y cuidados paliativos

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2016 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Antonio Jose Grande

    Correspondencia a: Laboratory of Evidence‐Based Practice, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Criciuma, Brazil

    [email protected]

  • Valter Silva

    Department of Medicine, Centro Universitário Tiradentes (UNIT‐AL), Maceió, Brazil

  • Rachel Riera

    Centro de Estudos em Medicina Baseada em Evidências e Avaliação Tecnológica em Saúde, Brazilian Cochrane Centre, São Paulo, Brazil

  • Alessandra Medeiros

    Department of Bioscience, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Santos, Brazil

  • Simone GP Vitoriano

    APS Santa Marcelina, São Paulo, Brazil

  • Maria S Peccin

    Department of Human Movement Sciences, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Santos, Brazil

  • Matthew Maddocks

    Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, UK

Contributions of authors

Antonio Jose Grande (AJG) co‐ordinated the retrieval of papers and wrote the background, methods, results, discussion and conclusions. Valter Silva (VS) participated in the retrieval of papers and co‐wrote the background, methods, results, discussion and conclusions. Rachel Riera (RR) co‐wrote the background and methods, and critically reviewed the current review. Alessandra Medeiros (AM) critically reviewed the current review. Maria Stella Peccin (MSP) co‐wrote the background, methods, results, discussion and conclusions. Simone GP Vitoriano (SGPV) critically reviewed the current review. Matthew Maddocks (MM) participated in the retrieval of papers and co‐wrote the background, methods, results, discussion and conclusions.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • None, Other.

External sources

  • None, Other.

Declarations of interest

Antonio Jose Grande has no relevant conflicts of interest to declare. Valter Silva has no relevant conflicts of interest to declare. Rachel Riera has no relevant conflicts of interest to declare. Alessandra Medeiros has no conflicts of interest to declare. Simone GP Vitoriano has no relevant conflicts of interest to declare. Maria S Peccin has no relevant conflicts of interest to declare. Matthew Maddocks is funded by an NIHR Post‐Doctoral Fellowship award; the views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Dr Fiona Cramp and Yvonne Roy for their comments on the protocol and Jane Hayes for developing the search strategy. We thank the Cochrane Handbook Study Group from the Brazilian Cochrane Centre for the opportunity to discuss Cochrane methodology.

Cochrane Review Group funding acknowledgement: The National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) is the largest single funder of the Cochrane PaPaS Group. Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the NIHR, National Health Service (NHS) or the Department of Health.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2021 Mar 18

Exercise for cancer cachexia in adults

Review

Antonio Jose Grande, Valter Silva, Larissa Sawaris Neto, João Pedro Teixeira Basmage, Maria S Peccin, Matthew Maddocks

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010804.pub3

2014 Nov 26

Exercise for cancer cachexia in adults

Review

Antonio Jose Grande, Valter Silva, Rachel Riera, Alessandra Medeiros, Simone GP Vitoriano, Maria S Peccin, Matthew Maddocks

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010804.pub2

2013 Oct 27

Exercise for cancer cachexia in adults

Protocol

Antonio Jose Grande, Valter Silva, Matthew Maddocks, Rachel Riera, Alessandra Medeiros, Simone G P Vitoriano, Maria S Peccin

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010804

Differences between protocol and review

None.

Notes

At May 2016, a new search is not likely to identify any potentially relevant studies likely to change the conclusions. The authors are not aware of any new studies that would change the conclusions, and the ongoing studies cited have not yet been published. Therefore, this review has now been stabilised following discussion with the authors and editors. The review will be re‐assessed for updating in 2017.

Keywords

MeSH

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) Keywords

Medical Subject Headings Check Words

Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged;

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Flow diagram: study selection process.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Flow diagram: study selection process.

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva