Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Tratamiento antipalúdico preventivo intermitente para niños con anemia

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010767.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 13 enero 2015see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Enfermedades infecciosas

Clasificada:
  1. Pendiente de actualización

    Studies awaiting assessment

    The CIDG is currently examining a new search conducted up to 16 Nov, 2017 for potentially relevant studies. These studies have not yet been incorporated into this Cochrane Review.

    Evaluada: 16 April 2019

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. on behalf of The Cochrane Collaboration.
  2. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐Non‐Commercial Licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Mwaka Athuman

    Correspondencia a: Ifakara Health Institute, Dodoma, Tanzania

    [email protected]

  • Abdunoor M Kabanywanyi

    Ifakara Health Institute, Dar‐es‐salaam, Tanzania

  • Anke C Rohwer

    Centre for Evidence‐based Health Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa

Contributions of authors

MA, AR and AMK developed the protocol. MA and AR screened search outputs, selected trials for inclusion, extracted data, assessed risk of bias, analysed data and prepared the draft manuscript. AMK critically engaged with the manuscript and provided comments. All review authors have seen and approved the final manuscript.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Centre for Evidence‐based Health Care, Stellenbosch University, South Africa.

  • Ifakara Health Institute, Tanzania.

  • Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, UK.

External sources

  • Effective Health Care Research Consortium, UK.

  • Department for International Development (DfID), UK.

Declarations of interest

The review authors have no known conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

We thank Paul Garner, Dave Sinclair, Marty Richardson, Taryn Young and Vittoria Lutje for their comments and support. The editorial base of the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group is funded by UKaid from the UK Government for the benefit of developing countries.

AR is supported in part by the Effective Health Care Research Consortium, which is funded by UKaid from the UK Government.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2015 Jan 13

Intermittent preventive antimalarial treatment for children with anaemia

Review

Mwaka Athuman, Abdunoor M Kabanywanyi, Anke C Rohwer

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010767.pub2

2013 Oct 18

Intermittent preventive antimalarial treatment for children with anaemia

Protocol

Mwaka Athuman, Abdunoor M Kabanywanyi, Anke C Rohwer

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010767

Differences between protocol and review

1. We planned to include only children under the age of five (as stated in protocol), but when screening the studies, we noticed that some of them included children up to the age of nine years and we thus decided to include all children.

2. In the protocol, we prespecified the following outcomes:

Primary outcomes:

  • Mean Hb at follow‐up (g/dL)

  • Mean change in Hb from baseline at follow‐up

Secondary outcomes:

  • Complete recovery from severe anaemia (Hb > 5 g/dL)

  • Complete recovery from moderate anaemia (Hb > 8 g/dL)

  • Blood transfusions

  • All‐cause mortality

  • Admission due to severe anaemia

During our fellowship (MK and AR) at the editorial base of the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group (CIDG) in Liverpool, we discussed these outcomes with some of the CIDG editors. We also consulted Higgins 2011 and agreed that mortality and hospital admission would be more meaningful outcomes to clinicians and decision‐makers, than mean Hb levels. We thus changed the primary and secondary outcomes to the following:

Primary outcomes:

  • All‐cause mortality and hospital admission

Secondary outcomes:

  • Anaemia at follow‐up (Hb < 11 g/dL)

  • Mean change in Hb (g/dL) from baseline to follow‐up

  • Mean Hb at follow‐up (g/dL)

3. We planned to perform the following subgroup analyses:

  • IPTi versus IPTc

  • Additional interventions to treat anaemia (such as, hematinics or folic acid)

  • The use of LLINs or not

Due to the lack of heterogeneity and the limited amount of included trials, we only performed the following subgroup analyses:

  • Additional interventions to treat anaemia (such as, hematinics or folic acid)

  • Hospital recruitment versus community recruitment

4. Due to the limited number of trials included in the analyses, we did not do sensitivity analyses.

Keywords

MeSH

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Study flow diagram.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included trials.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included trials.

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included trial.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included trial.

Comparison 1 IPT versus placebo, Outcome 1 All‐cause mortality plus hospital admissions at 6 months.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 IPT versus placebo, Outcome 1 All‐cause mortality plus hospital admissions at 6 months.

Comparison 1 IPT versus placebo, Outcome 2 Children with anaemia at 12 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 IPT versus placebo, Outcome 2 Children with anaemia at 12 weeks.

Comparison 1 IPT versus placebo, Outcome 3 Mean change in Hb (baseline to 12 weeks).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 IPT versus placebo, Outcome 3 Mean change in Hb (baseline to 12 weeks).

Comparison 1 IPT versus placebo, Outcome 4 Mean Hb at 12 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 IPT versus placebo, Outcome 4 Mean Hb at 12 weeks.

Comparison 2 IPT in high versus low endemic areas, Outcome 1 All cause mortality plus hospital admissions at 6 months.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 IPT in high versus low endemic areas, Outcome 1 All cause mortality plus hospital admissions at 6 months.

Comparison 2 IPT in high versus low endemic areas, Outcome 2 Children with anaemia at 12 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 IPT in high versus low endemic areas, Outcome 2 Children with anaemia at 12 weeks.

Comparison 2 IPT in high versus low endemic areas, Outcome 3 Mean change in Hb (baseline to 12 weeks).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 IPT in high versus low endemic areas, Outcome 3 Mean change in Hb (baseline to 12 weeks).

Comparison 2 IPT in high versus low endemic areas, Outcome 4 Mean Hb at 12 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 IPT in high versus low endemic areas, Outcome 4 Mean Hb at 12 weeks.

Comparison 3 IPT plus Vitamin A and C versus IPT in the presence of iron, Outcome 1 Children with anaemia at 12 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 IPT plus Vitamin A and C versus IPT in the presence of iron, Outcome 1 Children with anaemia at 12 weeks.

Comparison 3 IPT plus Vitamin A and C versus IPT in the presence of iron, Outcome 2 Mean change in Hb (baseline to 12 weeks).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 IPT plus Vitamin A and C versus IPT in the presence of iron, Outcome 2 Mean change in Hb (baseline to 12 weeks).

Comparison 3 IPT plus Vitamin A and C versus IPT in the presence of iron, Outcome 3 Mean Hb at 12 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3 IPT plus Vitamin A and C versus IPT in the presence of iron, Outcome 3 Mean Hb at 12 weeks.

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Summary of findings table 1

Intermittent preventive treatment compared to placebo for children with anaemia

Patient or population: Children with anaemia
Settings: Malaria‐endemic areas
Intervention: IPT (± iron and folic acid)
Comparison: Placebo (± iron and folic acid)

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of participants
(trials)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Placebo

IPT

Death or hospital admission

Follow up at 6 months

34 per 1000

31 per 1000
(24 to 38)

RR 0.9
(0.71 to 1.13)

3160
(3 trials)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate1,2,3,4

Children with anaemia
(Hb < 11 g/dL)

Follow up at 12 weeks

579 per 1000

561 per 1000
(510 to 620)

RR 0.97
(0.88 to 1.07)

2237
(4 trials)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate2,5,6,7

Mean change in Hb from baseline

Follow up: 12 weeks

The mean change ranged across control groups from
0.32 to 5.4 g/dL

The mean change in the intervention groups was
0.32 g/dL higher
(0.19 to 0.45 higher)

1672
(4 trials)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate2,8,9,10

Mean Hb

Follow up at 12 weeks

The mean Hb concentration ranged across control groups from
9.91 to 10.7 g/dL

The mean Hb concentration in the intervention groups was
0.35 g/dL higher
(0.06 to 0.64 higher)

1672
(4 trials)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low8,9,10,11

*The basis for the assumed risk is the median control group risk across trials. The corresponding risk (and its 95% CI) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio; IPT: intermittent preventive treatment; AL: artemether lumefantrine.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1 No serious risk of bias: The largest trial was at low risk of bias. The two smaller trials were at high risk of attrition bias, but exclusion of these trials does not change the result.
2 No serious inconsistency: Statistical heterogeneity was low.
3 No serious indirectness: The three trials were conducted in the Gambia, Kenya and Malawi, one trial gave IPT (AL monthly) to children discharged from hospital following severe malarial anaemia, and two trials gave IPT (SP monthly) to anaemic children attending hospital, outpatient clinics or recruited in the community. There was no significant result for subgroup differences between areas with high versus areas with low endemicity.
4 Downgraded by 1 for serious imprecision: The 95% CI around the absolute risk difference is very narrow and excludes clinically important effects. However, much larger trials would be necessary to fully exclude small benefits with IPT.
5 Downgraded by 1 for serious risk of bias: high risk of attrition bias for Bojang 2010 GMB and Desai 2003 KEN.
6 No serious indirectness: All the trials gave IPT (SP) monthly to anaemic children attending hospital, outpatient clinics or recruited in the community. There was no significant result for subgroup differences between areas with high versus areas with low endemicity.
7 No serious imprecision: No effect was seen and the meta‐analysis is adequately powered to detect an effect.

8 No serious imprecision. A small effect was seen although this disappears when we removed trials at high risk of bias from the analysis.
9 Downgraded by 1 for serious risk of bias: High risk for attrition bias for Bojang 2010 GMB and Desai 2003 KEN.
10 No serious indirectness: Three trials gave IPT (SP) monthly and one trial gave CQ weekly to anaemic children attending hospital, outpatient clinics or recruited in the community. There was no significant result for subgroup differences between areas with high versus areas with low endemicity.
11 Downgraded for serious inconsistency: Heterogeneity (I² statistic = 76%; Chi² statistic = 16.93; P = 0.002) is present. One trial is an outlier (Desai 2003 KEN).

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Summary of findings table 1
Table 1. Summary of trial characteristics

Trial

Bojang 2010 GMB

Cox 2013 GMB

Desai 2003 KEN

Phiri 2012 MWI

Verhoef 2002 KEN

Tomashek 2001 TNZ

Sample size (n randomized)

1200

96

554

1431

328

238

Country

The Gambia (Banjul)

The Gambia

Kenya (Western Kenya)

Malawi (southern Malawi)

Kenya (Eastern province)

Tanzania (Kigoma region)

Endemicity

low*

low*

high*

high*

low*

moderate/high (50% parasitaemia)**

Age

3 months to 9 years

12 to 72 months

2 to 36 months

4 to 59 months

2 to 36 months

6 to 59 months

Anaemia

Hb < 7 g/dL

Hb 69 to 110 g/L

Hb 7.0 to 10.9 g/dL

All children treated for severe malarial anaemia with transfusion and completed the course of intravenous quinine with subsequent Hb > 5g/dL

Hb 60 to 110 g/L

Hb 5.0 to 8.0 g/dL

Malaria

Not criteria for inclusion. Children with malaria were treated

Uncomplicated malaria

No malaria (aparasitaemic) or parasite counts < 20,000 parasites/mm3

No clinical malaria

Not described as part of eligibility

Recruitment

Hospital or OPD admission

Active and passive case finding of children in community

Community: resident children screened

Hospital admissions

Community: randomly selected

Health care worker diagnosed children with clinical anaemia and referred them to the trial

Trial intervention

  1. IPT (SP)

  2. Placebo

  1. IPT (CQ)

  2. Placebo

  1. IPT (SP) + iron

  2. IPT (SP) + iron placebo

  3. Iron + IPT placebo

  4. Iron placebo + IPT placebo

  1. IPT(post discharge): AL

  2. Placebo

  1. IPT (SP) + iron

  2. IPT (SP) + iron placebo

  3. Iron + IPT placebo

  4. Iron placebo + IPT placebo

  1. Vitamin placebo 3X per week

  2. Vitamin placebo + IPT (SP)

  3. VAC + IPT (SP)

Iron and other supplementation during trial period (all participants)

Yes: oral iron for 28 days

No

No ‐ part of trial intervention

Not reported

No – part of trial intervention

Yes: Iron and folic acid for 12 weeks

Baseline treatment for all participants

Some were treated with quinine and SP or CQ and SP. Not all children

Either CQ and SP or AL

Single dose of SP

3 day course of AL
in hospital (6 doses)

None

Single dose of SP; mebendazole for participants > 12 months

*endemicity derived from the Malaria Atlas Project (Gething 2011).

**as reported in the trial (Tomashek 2001 TNZ).

Abbreviations:

Hb: Haemoglobin

OPD: Out patient department

IPT: Intermittent preventive treatment

SP:Sulfadoxine‐pyrimethamine

CQ: Chloroquine

AL: Arthemeter‐lumefantrine

VAC: Vitamin A and C

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Summary of trial characteristics
Table 2. Summary of outcomes reported in trials

Outcomes

Trial

Bojang 2010 GMB

Cox 2013 GMB

Desai 2003 KEN

Phiri 2012 MWI

Verhoef 2002 KEN

Tomashek 2001 TNZ

Haematological outcomes

Mean Hb at end of follow‐up

Mean Hb level at end of transmission period

Hb concentration (measured in g/dL)

Hb concentration at the end of follow‐up (12 weeks)*

Mean Hb

Mean change of Hb from baseline to follow‐up

Mean change of Hb from baseline to follow‐up

Children with anaemia at follow‐up

Proportion of children with moderate or severe anaemia at the end of the transmission period*

Hematological recovery (Hb ≥ 11g/dL before or at week 12)

Severe anaemia (Hb < 7 g/dL before or at week 12)

Anaemia (Hb < 11.0 g/dL)

Prevalence of anaemia (Hb < 11.0 g/dL)

Other

Change in erythropoietic response

Hb change from baseline to follow‐up in two placebo arms to investigate the effect of antimalarial therapy

MCV (measured in fL)

sTfR concentration (measured in µg/mL)

Iron deficiency (serum ferritin concentration < 12 µg/L)

Mean TfR level

Prevalence of iron deficiency (TfR < 8.5 µg/mL)

Malaria outcomes

Clinical malaria

Clinical episodes of malaria during the surveillance period

Clinical malaria (axillary temperature 37.5 with co‐existing malaria parasitaemia)

Proportion of children with at least one malaria attack (defined as presence of fever, that is temperature ≥ 37.5°C, and a positive dipstick result)*

Malaria parasitaemia

Prevalence of parasitaemia and splenomegaly

Prevalence of submicroscopic malaria parasitaemia

Prevalence of malaria parasitaemia

Parasite density (parasites/mm3)

Hospital admissions or clinic visits related to malaria

Hospital re‐admission because of all‐cause severe anaemia or severe malaria

Clinic visits because of microscopically confirmed non‐severe malaria

Other

Time to first occurrence of malaria attack

All‐cause mortality and hospital admission

Composite outcome of all‐cause mortality and hospital readmission because of all‐cause severe anaemia or severe malaria between 1 and 6 months*

All‐cause hospital admission

All‐cause mortality

Visits to healthcare facilities

Outpatient attendance

Clinic visits (incidence, number of episodes)

All‐cause sick child clinic visits

Other

Nutritional status at the end oft he transmission period

Compliance with treatment regimen

Change in urinary neopterin

Adverse drug reactions

*indicates primary outcomes

Abbreviations:

Hb: haemoglobin

TfR: transferrin receptor

Figuras y tablas -
Table 2. Summary of outcomes reported in trials
Comparison 1. IPT versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 All‐cause mortality plus hospital admissions at 6 months Show forest plot

3

3160

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.90 [0.71, 1.13]

1.1 Iron

2

1474

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.96 [0.56, 1.67]

1.2 No iron

2

1686

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.68, 1.14]

2 Children with anaemia at 12 weeks Show forest plot

4

2237

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.97 [0.88, 1.07]

2.1 Iron

4

1801

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.87 [0.74, 1.02]

2.2 No iron

2

436

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.09 [0.96, 1.23]

3 Mean change in Hb (baseline to 12 weeks) Show forest plot

4

1672

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.32 [0.19, 0.45]

3.1 Iron

3

1341

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.30 [0.15, 0.45]

3.2 No iron

2

331

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.38 [0.12, 0.65]

4 Mean Hb at 12 weeks Show forest plot

4

1672

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.35 [0.06, 0.64]

4.1 Iron

3

1341

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.24 [0.08, 0.40]

4.2 No iron

2

331

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.57 [‐0.10, 1.23]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. IPT versus placebo
Comparison 2. IPT in high versus low endemic areas

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 All cause mortality plus hospital admissions at 6 months Show forest plot

3

3160

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.90 [0.71, 1.13]

1.1 High endemicity

2

1960

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.92 [0.71, 1.19]

1.2 Low endemicity

1

1200

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.43, 1.44]

2 Children with anaemia at 12 weeks Show forest plot

4

2237

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.97 [0.88, 1.07]

2.1 High endemicity

2

709

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.02 [0.90, 1.15]

2.2 Low endemicity

2

1528

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.74, 1.07]

3 Mean change in Hb (baseline to 12 weeks) Show forest plot

4

1672

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.32 [0.19, 0.45]

3.1 High endemicity

2

641

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.35 [0.17, 0.53]

3.2 Low endemicity

2

1031

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.29 [0.10, 0.48]

4 Mean Hb at 12 weeks Show forest plot

4

1672

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.35 [0.06, 0.64]

4.1 High endemicity

2

641

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.44 [‐0.03, 0.91]

4.2 Low endemicity

2

1031

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.20 [0.01, 0.40]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. IPT in high versus low endemic areas
Comparison 3. IPT plus Vitamin A and C versus IPT in the presence of iron

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Children with anaemia at 12 weeks Show forest plot

1

138

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.96 [0.75, 1.23]

2 Mean change in Hb (baseline to 12 weeks) Show forest plot

1

138

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [‐0.48, 0.48]

3 Mean Hb at 12 weeks Show forest plot

1

138

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.10 [‐0.65, 0.45]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. IPT plus Vitamin A and C versus IPT in the presence of iron