Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Arteméter para el paludismo grave

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010678.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 11 septiembre 2014see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Enfermedades infecciosas

Clasificada:
  1. Pendiente de actualización

    Authors currently updating

    The update is due to be published in 2019.

    Evaluada: 22 March 2019

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2014 The Authors. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. on behalf of The Cochrane Collaboration.
  2. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐Non‐Commercial Licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Ekpereonne Esu

    Correspondencia a: Department of Public Health, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

  • Emmanuel E Effa

    Internal Medicine, College of Medical Sciences, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria

  • Oko N Opie

    Department of General Studies, Federal College of Education, Obudu, Nigeria

  • Amirahobu Uwaoma

    Department of Paediatrics, University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Cross River State, Nigeria

  • Martin M Meremikwu

    Department of Paediatrics, University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Calabar, Nigeria

Contributions of authors

Ekpereonne Esu (EE) and Emmanuel E. Effa (EEE) identified and extracted data from eligible trials for this review. EE entered data into Review Manager (RevMan). EEE and EE performed risk of bias assessment and analysed data. EE prepared the 'Summary of findings' tables and the first draft of the review. All authors read, gave input to all sections and approved the final version.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • University of Calabar, Nigeria.

  • Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, UK.

External sources

  • Department for International Development, UK.

Declarations of interest

None known.

Acknowledgements

The academic editor for this review was Dr Michael Eisenhut; Dr David Sinclair provided support in the preparing the 'Summary of findings' tables.

The protocol for this review was developed during the Reviews for Africa Fellowship Programme organized by the Nigerian Branch of the South Africa Cochrane Centre in July 2012. The UK Department for International Development (DFID) supports this programme through the Effective Health Care Research Consortium (EHCRC) at the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (LSTM). This document is an output from a project funded by UKaid for the benefit of developing countries. The views expressed are not necessarily those of UKAid or the Department for International Development (DFID).

The editorial base for the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group is funded by UKaid from the UK Government for the benefit of developing countries.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2019 Jun 18

Artemether for severe malaria

Review

Ekpereonne B Esu, Emmanuel E Effa, Oko N Opie, Martin M Meremikwu

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010678.pub3

2014 Sep 11

Artemether for severe malaria

Review

Ekpereonne Esu, Emmanuel E Effa, Oko N Opie, Amirahobu Uwaoma, Martin M Meremikwu

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010678.pub2

2013 Aug 12

Artemether intramuscular injection for severe malaria in children

Protocol

Ekpereonne Esu, Emmanuel E Effa, Oko N Opie, Amirahobu Uwaoma, Martin M Meremikwu

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010678

Differences between protocol and review

In the protocol, we specified that we would include only trials in children (aged < 15 years). However, we amended the inclusion criteria to include trials in adults and children.

We said we would explore data by drug regimen, type of severe malaria (cerebral versus non‐cerebral malaria), time since admission to hospital, length of follow‐up and geographical region, but data were insufficient.

Keywords

MeSH

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Study flow diagram.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included trial.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included trial.

Comparison 1 Artemether versus quinine, Outcome 1 Death.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Artemether versus quinine, Outcome 1 Death.

Comparison 1 Artemether versus quinine, Outcome 2 Death: Time since admission to hospital.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Artemether versus quinine, Outcome 2 Death: Time since admission to hospital.

Comparison 1 Artemether versus quinine, Outcome 3 Coma resolution time (hours).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Artemether versus quinine, Outcome 3 Coma resolution time (hours).

Comparison 1 Artemether versus quinine, Outcome 4 Neurological sequelae at discharge.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Artemether versus quinine, Outcome 4 Neurological sequelae at discharge.

Comparison 1 Artemether versus quinine, Outcome 5 Neurological sequelae at follow‐up.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Artemether versus quinine, Outcome 5 Neurological sequelae at follow‐up.

Comparison 1 Artemether versus quinine, Outcome 6 Parasite clearance time.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Artemether versus quinine, Outcome 6 Parasite clearance time.

Comparison 1 Artemether versus quinine, Outcome 7 Proportion with parasite clearance.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Artemether versus quinine, Outcome 7 Proportion with parasite clearance.

Comparison 1 Artemether versus quinine, Outcome 8 Fever clearance time (hours).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 Artemether versus quinine, Outcome 8 Fever clearance time (hours).

Comparison 1 Artemether versus quinine, Outcome 9 Need for blood transfusion.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1 Artemether versus quinine, Outcome 9 Need for blood transfusion.

Comparison 1 Artemether versus quinine, Outcome 10 Episodes of hypoglycaemia.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1 Artemether versus quinine, Outcome 10 Episodes of hypoglycaemia.

Comparison 1 Artemether versus quinine, Outcome 11 Adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.11

Comparison 1 Artemether versus quinine, Outcome 11 Adverse events.

Comparison 2 Artemether versus artesunate, Outcome 1 Death.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Artemether versus artesunate, Outcome 1 Death.

Comparison 2 Artemether versus artesunate, Outcome 2 Need for blood transfusion.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Artemether versus artesunate, Outcome 2 Need for blood transfusion.

Comparison 2 Artemether versus artesunate, Outcome 3 Episodes of hypoglycaemia.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Artemether versus artesunate, Outcome 3 Episodes of hypoglycaemia.

Comparison 2 Artemether versus artesunate, Outcome 4 Adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 Artemether versus artesunate, Outcome 4 Adverse events.

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Summary of findings table 1

Artemether compared with quinine for treating children with severe malaria

Patient or population: Children with severe malaria
Settings: Malaria‐endemic countries
Intervention: Intramuscular artemether
Comparison: Intravenous or intramuscular quinine

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of participants
(trials)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Quinine

Artemether

Death

170 per 1000

164 per 1000
(129 to 204)

RR 0.96
(0.76 to 1.2)

1447
(12 trials)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate1,2,3,4

Coma resolution time

The mean coma resolution time ranged across control groups from
17.4 to 42.4 hours

The mean coma resolution time in the intervention groups was
5.45 hours shorter
(7.90 to 3.00 shorter)

358
(6 trials)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low3,5,6,7

Neurological sequelae at discharge

220 per 1000

185 per 1000
(145 to 235)

RR 0.84
(0.66 to 1.07)

968
(7 trials)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low
1,2,3,8

Parasite clearance time

The mean parasite clearance time ranged across control groups from
22.4 to 61.25 hours

The mean parasite clearance time in the intervention groups was
9.03 hours shorter
(11.43 to 6.63 shorter)

420
(7 trials)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate1,3,7,9

Fever clearance time

The mean fever clearance time ranged across control groups from
18 to 61.25 hours

The mean fever clearance time in the intervention groups was
3.73 shorter
(6.55 to 0.92 shorter)

457
(8 trials)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low3,10,11,12

*The assumed risk is the median control group risk across studies. The corresponding risk (and its 95% CI) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1 No serious risk of bias: Trials were variable in their risk of bias, but exclusion of the trials at high or unclear risk of selection bias did not change this result.
2 No serious inconsistency: None of the individual trials found statistically significant effects, and there was no statistical heterogeneity between trials.
3 No serious indirectness: Trials were from West Africa, East Africa and one from India. All were in children with severe malaria (aged under 15 years), and most compared the standard dose of intramuscular artemether with the WHO recommended dose of intravenous quinine.
4 Downgraded by 1 for serious imprecision: These trials, and the overall meta‐analysis are underpowered to detect a difference or to prove equivalence.
5 Downgraded by 2 for serious risk of bias: Four of the six trials were at unclear risk of selection bias. When these four trials are excluded the result becomes non‐significant.
6 No serious inconsistency: Statistically significant differences were only seen in two of the six trials. However, statistical heterogeneity between trials was low and the overall meta‐analysis is statistically significant.
7 No serious imprecision: The result is statistically significant and the overall meta‐analysis is adequately powered to detect this effect.
8 Downgraded by 2 for very serious imprecision: These trials, and the overall meta‐analysis are underpowered to detect a difference or to prove equivalence. The 95% CI is very wide and includes clinically important differences and no effect.
9 Downgraded by 1 for serious inconsistency: The mean difference in parasite clearance time ranged from a two hour increase with artemether to a 15 hour decrease.
10 Downgraded by 1 for serious risk of bias: Four of the seven trials were at unclear risk of selection bias. When these four trials are excluded the result becomes non‐significant.
11 Downgraded by 1 for serious inconsistency: The mean difference in fever clearance time ranged from a 25 hour increase with artemether to an 18 hour decrease.
12 No serious imprecision: The overall meta‐analysis is powered to detect this effect. The result is statistically significant but may not be clinically important.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Summary of findings table 1
Summary of findings 2. Summary of findings table 2

Artemether compared with quinine for treating adults with severe malaria

Patient or population: Adults with severe malaria
Settings: Malaria endemic countries
Intervention: Intramuscular artemether
Comparison: Intravenous or intramuscular quinine

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of participants
(trials)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Quinine

Artemether

Death

208 per 1000

123 per 1000
(87 to 173)

RR 0.59
(0.42 to 0.83)

716
(4 trials)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate1,2,3,4

Coma resolution time

Not pooled. Little difference.

657
(2 trials)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low1,5,6, 7

Neurological sequelae at discharge

4 per 1000

12 per 1000

(1 to 111)

RR 2.92
(0.31 to 27.86)

560
(1 trial)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low7,8

Parasite clearance time

Not pooled. Little difference apparent.

716
(4 trials)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate1,3,6,9

Fever clearance time

Not pooled. Little difference apparent.

716
(4 trials)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low1,3,6,10

*The assumed risk is the median control group risk across studies. The corresponding risk (and its 95% CI) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1 No serious risk of bias: Trials are generally well conducted and at low risk of bias.
2 No serious inconsistency: Statistically significant differences were only seen in one of the four trials. However, statistical heterogeneity between trials was low and the overall meta‐analysis is statistically significant.
3 No serious indirectness: All four trials compared intramuscular artemether with intravenous quinine in adults; two trials from Thailand, one each from Vietnam and Papua New Guinea
4 Downgraded by 1 for serious imprecision: These trials, and the overall meta‐analysis are very underpowered to detect a difference in mortality or to prove equivalence.
5Hien 1996 VNM and Karbwang 1995 THA reported median coma time for artemether vs. quinine (Hien 1996 VNM: 66 vs. 48, P = 0.003; Karbwang 1995 THA: 48 vs. 48). Downgraded by 1 for inconsistency: One trial found a shorter median coma resolution time with quinine, and one trial found no difference.
6 Downgraded by 1 for imprecision: The data could not be pooled.

7 No serious risk of bias: This single trial was at low risk of bias.

8 Downgraded by 1 for serious imprecision: Neurological sequelae in adults were uncommon. This trial is underpowered to detect or exclude clinically important differences.
9 Two trials found no significant difference between parasite clearance time for artemether vs. quinine (Karbwang 1992 THA: mean 63.6 vs. 61.6, P = 0.85 and Seaton 1998 PNG: median 48 vs. 52, P = 0.381). Two other trials reported significantly shorter median parasite clearance times for artemether vs. quinine (Hien 1996 VNM: 72 vs. 90 P < 0.001 and Karbwang 1995 THA: 54 vs.78, P = 0.007). No serious inconsistency: The two largest trials both found shorter median clearance times with artemether.
10 Three trials (Hien 1996 VNM, Seaton 1998 PNG and Karbwang 1995 THA) reported median fever clearance time for artemether vs. quinine (127 vs. 90, P < 0.001; 32 vs. 48, P =  0.034 and 79 vs. 84, no significant difference). Karbwang 1992 THAreported mean fever clearance time and found a statistically significant reduction of about 30 hours with artemether. Downgraded by 1 for inconsistency: One trial found a shorter median fever clearance time with quinine, and two trials found a shorter time with artemether.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 2. Summary of findings table 2
Summary of findings 3. Summary of findings table 3

Artemether compared with artesunate for treating adults with severe malaria

Patient or population: Adults with severe malaria
Settings: Malaria endemic countries
Intervention: Intramuscular artemether
Comparison: Intravenous or intramuscular artesunate

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of participants
(trials)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Artesunate

Artemether

Death

87 per 1000

156 per 1000
(95 to 258)

RR 1.80
(1.09 to 2.97)

494
(2 trials)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate1,2,3,4

Coma resolution time

Not pooled. No significant difference

494
(2 trials)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate1,3,5,6

Neurological sequelae at discharge

0
(0 trials)

Parasite clearance time

Not pooled. No significant difference

494
(2 trials)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate1,3,6,7

Fever clearance time

Not pooled. No significant difference

494
(2 trials)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low1,3,6,8

*The assumed risk is the median control group risk across studies. The corresponding risk (and its 95% CI) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1 No serious risk of bias: Trials were generally well conducted and at low risk of bias.
2 No serious inconsistency: There is no statistical heterogeneity
3 No serious indirectness: The two trials were conducted in Vietnam and Thailand and both compared intramuscular artemether with intravenous artesunate in adults.
4 Downgraded by 1 for serious imprecision: These trials, and the overall meta‐analysis are very underpowered to detect a difference in mortality or to prove equivalence.
5Phu 2010 VNM and Vinh 1997 VNM reported median coma resolution time for artemether vs. artesunate (Phu 2010 VNM: 72 vs. 60, P = 0.11; Vinh 1997 VNM: 47 (artemether) vs. 30 (artesunate IM) vs. 24 (artesunate IV). No serious inconsistency: Both trials suggest an advantage with artesunate although not statistically significant.
6 Downgraded by 1 for serious imprecision: We could not pool these data as median data were presented for both trials.
7Phu 2010 VNM and Vinh 1997 VNM reported median parasite clearance time (Phu 2010 VNM: 72 vs. 72, P = 0.97; Vinh 1997 VNM: 30 (artemether) vs. 24 (artesunate IM) vs. 24 (artesunate IV). No serious inconsistency: Both trials found no difference between treatments.
8Phu 2010 VNM and Vinh 1997 VNM reported median fever clearance time (Phu 2010 VNM: 108 vs. 108, P = 0.27; Vinh 1997 VNM: 48 (artemether) vs. 36 (artesunate IM) vs. 30 (artesunate IV). No serious inconsistency: Both trials found no statistically significant difference between artemether and artesunate.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 3. Summary of findings table 3
Table 1. Search strategy

Search set

CIDG SR1

CENTRAL

MEDLINE2

Embase2

LILACS2

ISI Web of Science

1

malaria

Malaria ti, ab, MeSH

Malaria ti, ab, MeSH

Malaria ti, ab, Emtree

malaria

malaria

2

artemether

Artemether ti, ab

Artemether ti, ab

Artemether ti, ab, Emtree

artemether

artemether

3

Artemisinin*

Artemisinin* ti, ab

Artemisinin* ti, ab

Artemisinin* ti, ab

Artemisinin*

Artemisinin*

4

intramuscular

Intramuscular ti, ab

Intramuscular ti, ab

Intramuscular ti, ab

intramuscular

intramuscular

5

parenteral

Injections, Intramuscular [MeSH]

Injections, Intramuscular [MeSH]

Intramuscular drug administration [Emtree]

parenteral

parenteral

6

2 or 3

Parenteral ti, ab

Parenteral ti, ab

Parenteral drug administration [Emtree]

2 or 3

2 or 3

7

4 or 5

2 or 3

2 or 3

2 or 3

4 or 5

4 or 5

8

1 and 5 and 7

4 or 5 or 6

4 or 5 or 6

4 or 5 or 6

1 and 5 and 7

1 and 5 and 7

9

1 and 7 and 8

1 and 7 and 8

1 and 7 and 8

Randomised clinical trial*

10

8 and 9

1Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register.
2Search terms used in combination with the search strategy for retrieving trials developed by The Cochrane Collaboration (Lefebvre 2011).

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Search strategy
Table 2. Characteristics of trials comparing artemether and quinine in children

Trial ID

Year of study

Age limits

Quinine dosing schedule

Artemether dosing schedule

Loading dose

Maintainance

Follow‐on therapy

Loading dose

Maintainance

Follow‐on therapy

Adam 2002 SDN

2002

'Children'

20 mg/kg IV

10 mg/kg IV every eight hours for 72 hours

Oral quinine for 7 days

3.2 mg/kg IM

1.6 mg/kg IM once daily for 4 days

None

Aguwa 2010 NGA

2007

6 months to 12 yrs

20 mg/kg IV or IM

10 mg/kg IV/IM every eight hours

None

3.2 mg/kg IM

1.6 mg/kg IM once daily for 2 days

None

Huda 2003 IND

2001

< 14 yrs

20 mg/kg IV

10 mg/kg IV every eight hours

Quinine to complete 7 days

1.6 mg/kg IM twice daily

1.6 mg/kg IM once daily for 5 days

None

Minta 2005 MLI

2004

3 months to 15 yrs

20 mg/kg IV

10 mg/kg IV every eight hours

Quinine 10 mg/kg every eight hours

3.2mg/kg IM twice daily

1.6 mg/kg IM once daily for 4 days

None

Murphy 1996 KEN

1996

5 months to 12 yrs

20 mg/kg IV

10 mg/kg IV every eight hours

SP once

3.2 mg/kg IM

1.6 mg/kg IM once daily for 4 days

SP once

Ojuawo 1998 NGA

1998

Mean age about 4 yrs

10 mg/kg IV

10 mg/kg IV every eight hours

Quinine to complete 7 days

3.2 mg/kg IM

1.6 mg/kg IM 12 hrs later, then once daily for 2 days

None

Olumese 1999 NGA

1999

11 months to 5 yrs

20mg/kg IV

10mg/kg IV every eight hours

Quinine to complete 7 days

3.2 mg/kg IM

1.6 mg/kg IM once daily for 4 days

None

Osonuga 2009 NGA

2009

1 to 12yrs

10 mg/kg IV

10 mg/kg IV every eight hours

Quinine to complete 7 days

1.6 mg/kg IM twice daily

1.6 mg/kg IM once daily for 4 days

None

Satti 2002 SDN

1996

3 months to 15yrs

10 mg/kg IV

10 mg/kg IV every eight hours

Quinine to complete 7 days

1.6 mg/kg IM twice daily

1.6 mg/kg IM once daily for 4 days

None

Taylor 1998 MWI

1994

Mean age of 3 yrs

20 mg/kg IV

10 mg/kg IV every eight hours for at least 2 doses

SP once

3.2 mg/kg IM

1.6 mg/kg IM once daily for 2 days at least

SP once

van Hensbroek 1996 GMB

1994

1 to 9yrs

20 mg/kg IV

10 mg/kg IV every twelve hours

Quinine to complete 5 days

3.2 mg/kg IM

1.6 mg/kg IM once daily for 3 days

SP once1

Walker 1993 NGA

1993

1 to 5yrs

20 mg/kg IV

10 mg/kg IV every eight hours

Quinine to complete 7 days

3.2 mg/kg IM

1.6 mg/kg IM once daily for 4 days

None

IM = intramuscular; IV = intravenous; SP = sulphadoxine‐pyrimethamine.

1Only in the second and third years of the study.

Figuras y tablas -
Table 2. Characteristics of trials comparing artemether and quinine in children
Table 3. Characteristics of trials comparing artemether and quinine in adults

Trial ID

Year of study

Age limits

Quinine dosing schedule

Artemether dosing schedule

Loading dose

Maintainance

Follow‐on therapy

Loading dose

Maintainance

Follow‐on therapy

Hien 1996 VNM

1996

15 to 79 yrs

20 mg/kg IM

10 mg/kg IM every eight hours

Quinine or mefloquine to complete 7 days

4 mg/kg IM

2 mg/kg IM once daily for 4 days

Quinine or mefloquine to complete 7 days

Karbwang 1992 THA

1991

15 to 45 yrs

20 mg/kg IV

10 mg/kg every eight hours for 7 days

Quinine to complete 7 days

160 mg IM

80 mg IM once daily for 6 days

None

Karbwang 1995 THA

1994

15 to 55 yrs

20 mg/kg IV

10 mg/kg every eight hours for 7 days

Quinine to complete 7 days

160 mg IM

80 mg IM once daily for 6 days

None

Seaton 1998 PNG

1995

> 12 yrs

20 mg/kg IV

10 mg/kg IV every eight hours

Quinine to complete 7 days

3.2 mg/kg IM

1.6 mg/kg IM once daily for 4 days

None

IM = intramuscular; IV = intravenous.

Figuras y tablas -
Table 3. Characteristics of trials comparing artemether and quinine in adults
Table 4. Characteristics of studies comparing artemether and artesunate in adults

Trial ID

Year of study

Age limits

Artemether dosing schedule

Artesunate dosing schedule

Loading dose

Maintainance

Follow‐on therapy

Loading dose

Maintainance

Follow‐on therapy

Phu 2010 VNM

2003

15 to 77 yrs

3.2 mg/kg IM

1.6 mg/kg IM daily

None

2.4 mg/kg IM

1.2 mg/kg IM once daily

2 mg/kg of artesunate to complete 7 days

Vinh 1997 VNM

1994

15 to 66 yrs

200 mg IM

100 mg IM once daily for 3 days

Mefloquine once

120 mg IM or IV

60 mg IM or IV once daily for 3 days

Mefloquine once

IM = intramuscular; IV = intravenous.

Figuras y tablas -
Table 4. Characteristics of studies comparing artemether and artesunate in adults
Table 5. Definitions of outcome measures used in the review

Trial ID

Coma resolution time

Fever clearance time

Parasite clearance time

Hypoglycaemia

Adam 2002 SDN

Mean value (h) reported and defined as a Blantyre coma score of 5 recorded for at least 24 hours

Mean value (h) reported and defined as the time after which the temperature remained normal (axillary temperature < 37.5°C)

Mean value (h) reported and defined as the time passed from admission and start of treatment until two consecutive negative smears. Blood films repeated every 8 hours.

Number of episodes (n/N) reported but not defined

Aguwa 2010 NGA

Proportions with coma resolution on D3 reported but not defined

Proportions with fever clearance on D3 and D14 reported and defined as body temperature ≤ 37.5°C after commencement of treatment

Proportions with parasite clearance on D3 and D14. Parasite clearance was taken as adequate clinical and parasitological response (ACPR)
at days 3 and 14. Parasite count taken on D0, D3 and D14.

Not reported

Hien 1996 VNM

Median value (h) reported and defined as the time to reach a score of 15 on the Glasgow Coma Scale

Median value (h) reported but not defined.

Median value (h) reported and defined as the time to Assessed every 4 hours for the first 24 hours and every 6 hours until three consecutive negative blood smears

Number of episodes (n/N) reported but not defined

Huda 2003 IND

Glasgow coma scale was used in grading the level of consciousness of the patients

every eight hours

Mean value (h) reported and defined as time to clearance of fever

Mean value (h) reported but not defined

Not reported

Karbwang 1992 THA

Unclear if values reported are means or medians (h)

Mean value (h) reported and defined as time for the temperature to fall below 37.5°C and remain that value for 72 hours

Mean value (h) reported and defined as the time for the parasite count to fall below the level of microscopic detection (thick film)

Not reported

Karbwang 1995 THA

Median value (h) reported and defined as the time taken for the patients to recover completely from unconciousness

Mean value (h) reported and defined as time for the temperature to fall below 37.5°C and remain that value for 72 hours

Median value (h) reported and defined as the time taken for parasite count to fall below the level of microscopic detection (thick film)

Not reported

Minta 2005 MLI

Mean value (h) reported and defined as the time to normalization of consciousness

Mean value (h) reported but not defined

Mean value (h) reported and defined as time till negative parasitaemia result

Not reported

Murphy 1996 KEN

Median value (h) reported but not described

Median value (h) reported but not described

Median value (h) reported but not described. Every four hours until clearance

Not reported

Ojuawo 1998 NGA

Mean value (h) reported and defined as the interval between onset of therapy and the attainment of full consciousness

Mean value (h) reported and defined as the interval between the onset of therapy and the time the body temperature is ≤ 37°C and remained so

Defined as two successive thick blood films done at 12 hours interval are negative for asexual forms of plasmodium species

Not reported

Olumese 1999 NGA

Mean value (h) reported and defined as time to regain full consciousness

Mean value (h) reported and defined as the time for temperature to fall below 37.5°C and remain so for at least 48 hours

Mean value (h) reported and defined as

the time from start of drug administration to the first of two consecutive negative thick smears remaining negative until day 7

Not reported

Osonuga 2009 NGA

Mean value (h) reported and defined as time to attainment of a Blantyre score of 5 for at least 24 hours from initiation of treatment

Mean value (h) reported but not defined

Mean value (h) reported but not defined. Thick and thin film done on D0 and repeated on Days 3, 7 and 14

Not reported

Phu 2010 VNM

Median value (h) reported and defined as time to Glasgow coma score of 15.

Median value (h) reported and defined as the time for temperature to fall below 37.5°C and remain so

Median value (h) reported and defined as the time to clear all parasites

Number of episodes (n/N) reported but not defined

Satti 2002 SDN

Mean value (h) reported and defined as time to regaining consciousness

Mean value (h) reported and defined as the time for temperature to fall below 37.5°C

Mean value (h) reported and defined as time to clear parasites measured every six hours till clearance

Not reported

Seaton 1998 PNG

Median value (h) reported but not defined

Median value (h) reported and defined as a temperature <37.5 °C on two successive readings

Median value (h) reported and defined as as the time at which the blood films were negative for P. falciparum for at least eight hours

Number of episodes (n/N) reported but not defined

Taylor 1998 MWI

Median value (h) reported and defined as time required for a

child to achieve a Blantyre Coma Score of 5

Median value (h) reported and defined as the time at which the rectal or axillary temperature dropped below 37.5°C and remained < 37.5°C for 24 consecutive hours

Median value (h) reported and defined as the time at which the first of two negative (0 parasites/200 WBC) thick blood films was prepared. Every four hours till clearance

Not reported

van Hensbroek 1996 GMB

Median value (h) reported and defined as time to regain full consciousness

Median value (h) reported and defined as time needed for the rectal temperature to fall below
38.0°C for at least 24 hours

Median value (h) reported and defined as time needed for all parasites to clear relative to parasite density at admission and assessed every 12 hours till clearance

Number of episodes (n/N) reported and defined as a blood glucose level below 40 mg/dL (2.2 mmol/L)

Vinh 1997 VNM

Median value (h) reported and defined as time to regain full consciousness

Median value (h) reported and defined as time for axillary temperature to fall to, and remain for ≥ 24 hours at 37.5°C or lower

Median value (h) reported and defined as time to clear parasites

Not reported

Walker 1993 NGA

Mean value (h) reported but not defined

Mean value (h) reported

Mean value (h) reported and defined as the time for parasitaemia to be cleared and to remain so up to Day 7. Assessed every six hours during period of coma and then every 12 hours.

Not reported

WBC = white blood cell.

Figuras y tablas -
Table 5. Definitions of outcome measures used in the review
Table 6. Optimal information size calculations; dichotomous outcomes

Outcome

Type of test

Proportion in control group3

Proportion in Intervention group

Estimated RR

Total sample size1,2

Death

Superiority

0.17

0.136

0.80

3514

Equivalence

0.17

0.14 to 0.204

6592

Neurological sequelae

Superiority

0.25

0.20

0.80

2184

Equivalence

0.25

0.22 to 0.284

8760

1 These calculation were performed using a power calculator available at: http://www.sealedenvelope.com/power/
2 All calculation were performed for a power of 80% and an α error of 0.05.
3 The proportion in the control group is taken from the median control group risk across trials.
4 A maximum 3% risk difference was chosen to represent equivalence.

Figuras y tablas -
Table 6. Optimal information size calculations; dichotomous outcomes
Table 7. Optimal information size calculations; continuous outcomes

Outcome

Type of test

Mean in control group3

Mean in Intervention group4

SD of outcome

Total sample size1,2

Coma resolution time

Superiority

25

19

20

350

Equivalence

25

19 to 31

20

382

Parasite clearance time

Superiority

42

36

20

350

Equivalence

42

36 to 48

20

382

Fever clearance time

Superiority

48

42

20

350

Equivalence

48

36 to 54

20

382

1 These calculations were performed using a power calculator available at: http://www.sealedenvelope.com/power/
2 All calculation were performed for a power of 80% and an α error of 0.05.
3 The mean in the control group is taken from the median control group across studies.
4 A six‐hour time difference was chosen to represent a clinically important benefit.

Figuras y tablas -
Table 7. Optimal information size calculations; continuous outcomes
Table 8. Additional data: Artemether versus quinine in children

Pre‐specified outcome

Trial reported outcome

Trial

No. of participants

Artemether

Quinine

Comparative results reported in article

Coma resolution time (h)

Median

(IQR)

Murphy 1996 KEN

160

12
(2.8 to 96)

13
(2.8 to 96)

Not significantly different

Median

(IQR)

van Hensbroek 1996 GMB

576

26
(15 to 48)

20
(12 to 43)

P = 0.046

Median

(IQR)

Taylor 1998 MWI

164

18
(8 to 30)

20
(10 to 54)

Not significantly different

Coma recovery (%) on Day 3

Aguwa 2010 NGA

90

15.9%

21.4%

RR = 0.763 (95% CI 0.065 to 9.015)

Mean (SD)

Osonuga 2009 NGA

32

4.5 (13.05)

9 (24.59)

P = 0.523

Mean (SD)

Minta 2005 MLI

67

30.57 (29.02)

25.15 (31.62)

P = 0.53

Time to hospital discharge

% spending less than one week in

hospital

Aguwa 2010 NGA

90

61.76%

71.74%

P = 0.829

Fever clearance (h)

Median

(IQR)

Murphy 1996 KEN

160

32
(4 to 86)

32
(4 to 96)

Not significantly different

van Hensbroek 1996 GMB

576

30
(16 to 48)

33
(12‐60)

P = 0.8

Taylor 1998 MWI

164

31
(24 to 52)

45
(33 to 60)

"Significant"

Fever clearance (%) on Day 3

Aguwa 2010 NGA

90

90.0%

87.7%

P = 0.753

Parasite clearance (h)

Median

(IQR)

Murphy 1996 KEN

160

39.5
(24 to 45)

48

(37 to 56)

P < 0.001

van Hensbroek 1996 GMB

576

48
(36 to 60)

60
(48 to 72)

P < 0.001

Taylor 1998 MWI

164

32
(25 to 36)

40
(32 to 48)

'significant'

Parasite clearance (%) on Day 3

Aguwa 2010 NGA

90

99.0%

n = 44

96.8%

n = 46

P = 0.422

Needing blood transfusion

van Hensbroek 1996 GMB

"The two groups were similar in terms of the need for blood transfusions,and the incidence of secondary bacterial infections (data not shown)."

IQR = interquartile range.

Figuras y tablas -
Table 8. Additional data: Artemether versus quinine in children
Table 9. Adverse event monitoring and reporting

Study ID

Sample size

Clinical symptoms monitoring

Biochemistry

Haematological

Electrocardiogram

Additional comments on adverse events

Adam 2002 SDN

41

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

"Neurological deficits were not observed in any patient during the follow‐up period"

Aguwa 2010 NGA

90

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

None

Hien 1996 VNM

560

Clinical assessment every 4 hours for the first 24 hours and 6 hourly afterwards

Blood glucose, lactate and cytokine levels measured 4, 8, 12 and 24 hours after admission

Full blood count on admission

Pre‐treatment and 12 hours after initiation of treatment on Day 0, 4 hours after last dose and at discharge

None

Huda 2003 IND

46

Lumbar puncture

Chest x‐ray on day 0

Blood Glucose, Renal Function Test,

Liver Function Test and Serum Electrolyte on Days 0 and 3

Full Blood Count on Days 0 and 3

Day 0

"No serious side effects of either of the drugs were observed in our study...... Closer and more frequent monitoring and larger sample size would have probably revealed more subtle adverse drug effects."

Karbwang 1992 THA

26

Clinical evaluation daily for at least 7 days

Lumbar puncture

Chest x‐ray on day 0

Biochemistry on Days 0, 2, 4 and 7

Full Blood Count on Days 0, 2, 4 and 7

On admission for all patients; then once daily and every six hours for quinine and artemether patients respectively

"The side effects in the quinine group were dizziness and vertigo. No side effects were detected with artemether".

Karbwang 1995 THA

102

Clinical evaluation on admission and twice daily for at least 7 days

Lumbar puncture

Chest x‐ray on day 0

Biochemistry on Days 0, 2, 4 and 7

FBC on Days 0, 2, 4 and 7

On admission for all patients; then once daily and every six hours for quinine and artemether patients respectively

QTc prolongation and tinnitus were the major adverse events in Quinine arm.

Mild transient pain at injection site for approximately 15 mins after artemether treatment.

Minta 2005 MLI

67

Clinical examination daily on Days 1 to7, and 14

Blood glucose on Days 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 and 14

Urea and Serum Electrolyte, transaminases, phosphatases on Days 1, 3, 5, 7 and 14

FBC on Days 1, 3, 5, 7 and 14

Once daily on Days 1, 3, 5, 7 and 14

None

Murphy 1996 KEN

160

Clinical assessment on admission, then at six, then 12 hour intervals till discharge

Blood glucose, urea, electrolytes, blood gases and when clinically indicated

FBC on Day 0 and when clinically indicated

Blood cultures on Day 0

On admission and at 6, 24, 30, 48 and 54 hours

None

Ojuawo 1998 NGA

37

Clinical assessment on Day 0

Urea and electrolyte

Blood sugar and liver function test on Day 0

FBC on Day 0

None

None

Olumese 1999 NGA

103

Clinical assessments on Days 0, 3, 7, 14, 28

Blood glucose, Urea and creatinine, electrolytes on Days 0, 3, 7, 14, 28

WBC count on Days 0, 3, 7, 14, 28

None

"No adverse reactions to the two drugs were recorded during the study".

Osonuga 2009 NGA

32

Clinical examination on Days 0 to 7 and 14

None

None

None

None

Phu 2010 VNM

370

Clinical examination on admission

Chest x‐ray on admission

Lumbar puncture

Blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine transaminase, plasma lactate

Full blood count on admission

None

None

Satti 2002 SDN

77

Clinical evaluation on admission and every six hours on Days 0 to 4, and then once daily on Days 14, 21 and 28

Blood glucose, serum creatinine, serum aspartate, aminotransferase on Day 0

WBC, Haemoglobin on Days 0 and 3

None

None

Seaton 1998 PNG

33

Chest X‐ray on admission

Renal and Liver function tests on admission, Days 3 and 7

Full Blood Count on Days 0, 3 and 7

None

None

Taylor 1998 MWI

183

CSF collected on admission

Blood glucose,

Blood pH, on D0 (every four hours for the first 24 hours

Haematocrit every eight hours

Full Blood Count, urea and electrolytes on Days 0, 3, 7 and 28

On admission, 6, 48,54 and 96 hours

"Of the initial 127 patients on whom serial electrocardiographic tracings were made, more patients in the quinine group
showed prolongation of the corrected QT intervals after treatment, but the differences were not statistically or clinically significant."

"There were no significant differences between the two treatment groups in terms of adverse effects associated with
antimalarial treatment (i.e. new signs and symptoms which develop within seven days of the start of treatment)."

van Hensbroek 1996 GMB

576

Clinical examination on Day 0

Lumbar puncture on admission

Blood glucose on admission, after 4hours and 12 hours

PCV, Haemoglobin, Blood culture on Day 0

None

None

Vinh 1997 VNM

124

Clinical examination on admission

Blood glucose, serum creatinine, serum bilirubin on admission

Full blood count on admission

None

None

Walker 1993 NGA

54

Clinical examination twice daily

Spinal taps

Urea and Electrolyte, on days 3, 7, 14, 28

PCV on days 3, 7, 14, 28

On admission, at 4 and 6 hours

None

Figuras y tablas -
Table 9. Adverse event monitoring and reporting
Table 10. Additional data: Artemether versus quinine in adults

Pre‐specified outcome

Trial reported outcome

Trial

No. of participants

Artemether

Quinine

Comparative results reported in article

Coma resolution time (h)

Median (IQR)

Hien 1996 VNM

560

66 (30 to 132)

48 (20 to 84)

P = 0.003

Median (Range)

Karbwang 1995 THA

97

48 (6 to 144)

48 (6 to 144)

Not significantly different

Fever clearance (h)

Median (IQR)

Hien 1996 VNM

560

127 (60 to 216)

90 (54 to 144)

< 0.001

Median (Range)

Seaton 1998 PNG

33

32 (20 to 112)

48 (28 to 88)

P = 0.034

Median (Range)

Karbwang 1995 THA

97

79 (16 to 147)

84 (36 to 144)

Not significantly different

Parasite clearance (h)

Median (IQR)

Hien 1996 VNM

560

72 (54 to 102)

90 (66 to 108)

< 0.001

Median (range)

Seaton 1998 PNG

33

48(4 to 72)

52 (12 to112)

P = 0.381

Median (Range)

Karbwang 1995 THA

97

54 (30 to 164)

78 (18 to 168)

P = 0.007

IQR = interquartile range.

Figuras y tablas -
Table 10. Additional data: Artemether versus quinine in adults
Table 11. Additional data: Artemether versus artesunate in adults

Pre‐specified outcome

Trial reported outcome

Trial

No. of participants

Artemether

Artesunate IM

Artesunate IV

Comparative results reported in article

Coma resolution time (h)

Median (range)

Phu 2010 VNM

370

72(2 to 2232) n = 184

60(4 to 2136) n = 186

P = 0.11

Median (95% CI)

Vinh 1997 VNM

124

47 (31 to 63)

30 (18 to 42)

24 (4 to 44)

Fever clearance (h)

Median (range)

Phu 2010 VNM

370

108 (0 to 888) n = 184

108 (0 to 888) n = 186

P = 0.27

Median (95% CI)

Vinh 1997 VNM

124

48 (38 to 58)

36 (30 to 42)

30 (18 to 42)

Parasite clearance (h)

Median (range)

Phu 2010 VNM

370

72

(2 to 204)

72

(7 to 330)

P = 0.97

Median (95% CI)

Vinh 1997 VNM

124

30 (26 to 34)

24 (15 to 33)

24 (15 to 33)

Not statistically significant

IM = intramuscular; IV = intravenous.

Figuras y tablas -
Table 11. Additional data: Artemether versus artesunate in adults
Comparison 1. Artemether versus quinine

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Death Show forest plot

16

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Children

12

1447

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.96 [0.76, 1.20]

1.2 Adults

4

716

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.59 [0.42, 0.83]

2 Death: Time since admission to hospital Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 Death within 24 hours

1

41

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.35 [0.02, 8.10]

3 Coma resolution time (hours) Show forest plot

6

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 Children

6

358

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐5.45 [‐7.90, ‐1.00]

4 Neurological sequelae at discharge Show forest plot

8

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1 Children

7

968

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.84 [0.66, 1.07]

4.2 Adults

1

560

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.92 [0.31, 27.86]

5 Neurological sequelae at follow‐up Show forest plot

2

566

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.82 [0.49, 1.38]

5.1 Day 7

1

134

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.76 [0.27, 2.14]

5.2 Day 28

1

432

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.84 [0.46, 1.53]

6 Parasite clearance time Show forest plot

8

446

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐8.82 [‐11.20, ‐6.45]

6.1 Children

7

420

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐9.03 [‐11.43, ‐6.63]

6.2 Adults

1

26

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.70 [‐15.56, 18.96]

7 Proportion with parasite clearance Show forest plot

1

74

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.75, 1.04]

7.1 At 72 hours

1

37

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.70, 1.11]

7.2 At 7 days

1

37

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.70, 1.11]

8 Fever clearance time (hours) Show forest plot

9

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

8.1 Children

8

457

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐3.73 [‐6.55, ‐0.92]

8.2 Adults

1

26

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐29.70 [‐54.14, ‐5.26]

9 Need for blood transfusion Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

9.1 Children

1

103

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.27 [0.62, 2.59]

9.2 Adults

1

560

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.97 [0.73, 1.29]

10 Episodes of hypoglycaemia Show forest plot

3

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

10.1 Children

2

617

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.68 [0.44, 1.05]

10.2 Adults

1

560

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.44 [0.30, 0.64]

11 Adverse events Show forest plot

6

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

11.1 QT prolongation

2

229

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.10 [1.33, 7.19]

11.2 Local skin reactions

1

576

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.12 [0.03, 0.50]

11.3 Abscess

2

1136

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.20 [0.04, 0.90]

11.4 Urticarial rash

1

576

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.01, 8.15]

11.5 Supraventricular tachycardia

1

54

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.23 [0.01, 4.59]

11.6 Pruritus

1

67

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.34 [0.01, 8.13]

11.7 Urinary tract infection

1

54

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.46 [0.15, 81.36]

11.8 Induration at injection site

1

33

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

15.44 [0.94, 253.49]

11.9 Leg discomfort

1

560

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.69 [0.22, 2.16]

11.10 Chest infection

1

560

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.11 [0.81, 1.53]

11.11 GI bleeding

1

560

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.79 [0.52, 1.20]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Artemether versus quinine
Comparison 2. Artemether versus artesunate

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Death Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Adults

2

494

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.80 [1.09, 2.97]

2 Need for blood transfusion Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 Adults

1

370

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.78, 1.32]

3 Episodes of hypoglycaemia Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

4 Adverse events Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

4.1 Spontaneous bleeding

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Artemether versus artesunate