Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Не‐хирургические вмешательства в лечении тяжелых менструальных кровотечений (меноррагии) у женщин с нарушениями свертываемости крови

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010338.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 26 noviembre 2014see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Fibrosis quística y enfermedades genéticas

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2015 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Sujoy Ray

    Correspondencia a: Department of Psychiatry, St. John's Medical College and Hospital, Bangalore, India

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

  • Amita Ray

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Srinivas Medical College, Mukka, Surathkal, India

Contributions of authors

Sujoy Ray: conceptualising the review topic; developing and drafting the final version of the protocol; searching for additional references and subsequently developing and drafting the final version of the review.
Amita Ray: conceptualising the review topic; developing the protocol; providing citations and full text articles for the 'Background' and 'Objectives' sections and drafting the final version of the review.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • None, Other.

External sources

  • South Asian Cochrane Network and Centre, BV Moses and ICMR centre for Advanced Research and Training Christian Medical College Vellore, Tamilnadu, India, India.

Declarations of interest

None known.

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the contribution of Ms Gurpreet Rana, Medical Librarian, University of Michigan, USA for designing and conducting the Embase search for this review.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2016 Nov 10

Non‐surgical interventions for treating heavy menstrual bleeding (menorrhagia) in women with bleeding disorders

Review

Sujoy Ray, Amita Ray

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010338.pub3

2014 Nov 26

Non‐surgical interventions for treating heavy menstrual bleeding (menorrhagia) in women with bleeding disorders

Review

Sujoy Ray, Amita Ray

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010338.pub2

2013 Jan 31

Non‐surgical interventions for treating heavy menstrual bleeding (menorrhagia) in women with bleeding disorders

Protocol

Sujoy Ray, Amita Ray, Aneesh Thomas George

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010338

Keywords

MeSH

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Study flow diagram.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 DDAVP Vs Placebo, outcome: 1.1 Adverse effects.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 4

Forest plot of comparison: 1 DDAVP Vs Placebo, outcome: 1.1 Adverse effects.

Forest plot of comparison: 2 Desmopressin versus Tranaxemic Acid, outcome: 2.1 Adverse effects.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 5

Forest plot of comparison: 2 Desmopressin versus Tranaxemic Acid, outcome: 2.1 Adverse effects.

Comparison 1 Desmopressin versus placebo, Outcome 1 Adverse effects.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Desmopressin versus placebo, Outcome 1 Adverse effects.

Comparison 2 Desmopressin versus tranexamic acid, Outcome 1 Adverse effects.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Desmopressin versus tranexamic acid, Outcome 1 Adverse effects.

Comparison 1. Desmopressin versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Adverse effects Show forest plot

2

88

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.04 [0.73, 1.49]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Desmopressin versus placebo
Comparison 2. Desmopressin versus tranexamic acid

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Adverse effects Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Desmopressin versus tranexamic acid