Aspiración y escleroterapia versus hidrocelectomía para el tratamiento del hidrocele
Información
- DOI:
- https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009735.pub2Copiar DOI
- Base de datos:
-
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Versión publicada:
-
- 13 noviembre 2014see what's new
- Tipo:
-
- Intervention
- Etapa:
-
- Review
- Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
-
Grupo Cochrane de Riñón y trasplante
- Copyright:
-
- Copyright © 2014 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Cifras del artículo
Altmetric:
Citado por:
Autores
Contributions of authors
-
Draft the protocol: BS, KH, AJ, KA
-
Study selection: BS, AJ
-
Extract data from studies: BS, AJ
-
Enter data into RevMan: BS
-
Carry out the analysis: BS, KH
-
Interpret the analysis: BS, KH
-
Draft the final review: BS, KH, AJ, KA
-
Disagreement resolution: KA
-
Update the review: BS
Sources of support
Internal sources
-
Students' Scientific Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
-
Department of Urology, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
External sources
-
No sources of support supplied
Declarations of interest
None known.
Acknowledgements
We wish to thank the following people.
-
The Cochrane Renal Group for their invaluable comments on designing and preparation of this study.
-
The referees for their feedback and advice during the preparation of this review.
-
Shirin Irani for her invaluable comments on the preparation of review.
Version history
| Published | Title | Stage | Authors | Version |
| 2014 Nov 13 | Aspiration and sclerotherapy versus hydrocoelectomy for treating hydrocoeles | Review | Behnam Shakiba, Kazem Heidari, Arsia Jamali, Kourosh Afshar | |
| 2012 Mar 14 | Aspiration and sclerotherapy versus hydrocoelectomy for treating hydrocoeles | Protocol | Behnam Shakiba, Kazem Heidari, Arsia Jamali, Kourosh Afshar | |
Keywords
MeSH
Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) Keywords
Medical Subject Headings Check Words
Adolescent; Adult; Humans; Male;
Study selection flow diagram.
Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Comparison 1 Aspiration and sclerotherapy versus hydrocoelectomy, Outcome 1 Clinical cure.
Comparison 1 Aspiration and sclerotherapy versus hydrocoelectomy, Outcome 2 Recurrence.
Comparison 1 Aspiration and sclerotherapy versus hydrocoelectomy, Outcome 3 Fever.
Comparison 1 Aspiration and sclerotherapy versus hydrocoelectomy, Outcome 4 Infection.
Comparison 1 Aspiration and sclerotherapy versus hydrocoelectomy, Outcome 5 Haematoma.
Comparison 1 Aspiration and sclerotherapy versus hydrocoelectomy, Outcome 6 Time to work resumption.
Comparison 1 Aspiration and sclerotherapy versus hydrocoelectomy, Outcome 7 Satisfaction.
| Outcome or subgroup title | No. of studies | No. of participants | Statistical method | Effect size |
| 1 Clinical cure Show forest plot | 3 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | Subtotals only | |
| 1.1 One round of sclerotherapy | 3 | 215 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 0.45 [0.18, 1.10] |
| 1.2 Two rounds of sclerotherapy | 2 | 129 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 0.58 [0.21, 1.65] |
| 1.3 Osman 1994 removed (one round of sclerotherapy) | 2 | 136 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 0.74 [0.64, 0.85] |
| 2 Recurrence Show forest plot | 3 | 189 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 9.43 [1.82, 48.77] |
| 2.1 Follow‐up at 3 months | 2 | 110 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 5.26 [1.04, 26.75] |
| 2.2 Follow‐up at 6 months | 1 | 79 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 25.55 [3.66, 178.47] |
| 3 Fever Show forest plot | 1 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | Totals not selected | |
| 4 Infection Show forest plot | 4 | 275 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 0.31 [0.09, 1.06] |
| 5 Haematoma Show forest plot | 3 | 189 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 0.57 [0.17, 1.90] |
| 6 Time to work resumption Show forest plot | 1 | Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) | Totals not selected | |
| 7 Satisfaction Show forest plot | 1 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | Totals not selected | |
| 7.1 At 3 months | 1 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 0.0 [0.0, 0.0] | |
| 7.2 At 6 months | 1 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 0.0 [0.0, 0.0] | |
