Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Comparaciones de los enfoques al entrenamiento muscular del suelo pelviano para la incontinencia urinaria en las mujeres

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009508Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 07 diciembre 2011see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:

  1. Grupo Cochrane de Incontinencia

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • E. Jean C Hay‐Smith

    Correspondencia a: Rehabilitation Teaching and Research Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand

    [email protected]

  • Roselien Herderschee

    Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

  • Chantale Dumoulin

    School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada

  • G Peter Herbison

    Department of Preventive & Social Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

Contributions of authors

JHS led the review process, and wrote the first drafts of the protocol and full review. RH and JHS (except where a third person was needed due to JHS's involvement in a study) screened the studies and checked eligibility. RH took the lead role in data extraction and data entry (which JHS cross‐checked). CD and PH commented on all drafts of the review, and PH gave statistical and methodological advice as needed.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • University of Otago, New Zealand.

External sources

  • No sources of support supplied

Declarations of interest

Jean Hay‐Smith and Chantale Dumoulin were first authors of trials considered for inclusion in the review (Dumoulin 2003; Hay‐Smith 2002).

Acknowledgements

The authors of the review would like to thank:

  • R Herbison and R George who helped with screening for studies for eligibility and with data extraction;

  • M Imamura who helped categorise trial comparisons as 'high', 'moderate' or 'low';

  • J Cook for statistical advice on the 'all in one' analysis (Comparison 12);

  • K Bø, B Berghmans, R de Bie, E Hendriks and E van Waalwijk van Doorn for their valuable contribution to the previous review, on which the current review was based;

  • S Wallace for comprehensive and repeated literature searching; and

  • the following trialists who graciously responded to letters or emails: K Bø,T Coombes on behalf of Orelle Corporation Ltd, E Crothers, D Delgado, M Drake, B Fung, M Gallo, S von der Heide, E Hui, C Klingler, M Liebergall‐Wischnitzer, I Nygaard, AM Rodrigues and T Wells.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2011 Dec 07

Comparisons of approaches to pelvic floor muscle training for urinary incontinence in women

Review

E. Jean C Hay‐Smith, Roselien Herderschee, Chantale Dumoulin, G Peter Herbison

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009508

Differences between protocol and review

The protocol included PFMT with or without adjunctive biofeedback. There were so many studies of biofeedback or feedback these became a separate review (see Herderschee 2011). We used a different subgroup analysis than planned (see Subgroup analysis and investigation of heterogeneity and Effects of interventions).