Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Study flow diagram.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Idiopathic rest cramps, magnesium versus placebo, outcome: 1.1 % Change in cramp frequency from baseline at 4 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Idiopathic rest cramps, magnesium versus placebo, outcome: 1.1 % Change in cramp frequency from baseline at 4 weeks.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Idiopathic rest cramp efficacy, magnesium versus placebo, outcome: 1.3 Proportion of subjects with a ≥ 25% reduction in cramp frequency at 4 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 4

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Idiopathic rest cramp efficacy, magnesium versus placebo, outcome: 1.3 Proportion of subjects with a ≥ 25% reduction in cramp frequency at 4 weeks.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Idiopathic rest cramps, magnesium versus placebo, outcome: 1.6 Number of cramps per week at 4 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 5

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Idiopathic rest cramps, magnesium versus placebo, outcome: 1.6 Number of cramps per week at 4 weeks.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Idiopathic rest cramp efficacy, magnesium versus placebo, outcome: 1.7 Cramp intensity (pain) on a 3 point scale (1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe) at 4 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 6

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Idiopathic rest cramp efficacy, magnesium versus placebo, outcome: 1.7 Cramp intensity (pain) on a 3 point scale (1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe) at 4 weeks.

Comparison 1 Idiopathic rest cramp efficacy, magnesium versus placebo, Outcome 1 % Change in cramp frequency from baseline at 4 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Idiopathic rest cramp efficacy, magnesium versus placebo, Outcome 1 % Change in cramp frequency from baseline at 4 weeks.

Comparison 1 Idiopathic rest cramp efficacy, magnesium versus placebo, Outcome 2 % Change in cramp frequency from baseline at 12 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Idiopathic rest cramp efficacy, magnesium versus placebo, Outcome 2 % Change in cramp frequency from baseline at 12 weeks.

Comparison 1 Idiopathic rest cramp efficacy, magnesium versus placebo, Outcome 3 Proportion of subjects with a ≥ 25% reduction in cramp frequency at 4 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Idiopathic rest cramp efficacy, magnesium versus placebo, Outcome 3 Proportion of subjects with a ≥ 25% reduction in cramp frequency at 4 weeks.

Comparison 1 Idiopathic rest cramp efficacy, magnesium versus placebo, Outcome 4 Proportion of subjects with a ≥ 25% reduction in cramps at 12 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Idiopathic rest cramp efficacy, magnesium versus placebo, Outcome 4 Proportion of subjects with a ≥ 25% reduction in cramps at 12 weeks.

Comparison 1 Idiopathic rest cramp efficacy, magnesium versus placebo, Outcome 5 Number of cramps per week at 4 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Idiopathic rest cramp efficacy, magnesium versus placebo, Outcome 5 Number of cramps per week at 4 weeks.

Comparison 1 Idiopathic rest cramp efficacy, magnesium versus placebo, Outcome 6 Number of cramps per week at 12 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Idiopathic rest cramp efficacy, magnesium versus placebo, Outcome 6 Number of cramps per week at 12 weeks.

Comparison 1 Idiopathic rest cramp efficacy, magnesium versus placebo, Outcome 7 Cramp intensity (pain) on a 3 point scale (1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe) at 4 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Idiopathic rest cramp efficacy, magnesium versus placebo, Outcome 7 Cramp intensity (pain) on a 3 point scale (1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe) at 4 weeks.

Comparison 1 Idiopathic rest cramp efficacy, magnesium versus placebo, Outcome 8 Cramp intensity (pain) on a 3 point scale (1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe) at 12 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 Idiopathic rest cramp efficacy, magnesium versus placebo, Outcome 8 Cramp intensity (pain) on a 3 point scale (1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe) at 12 weeks.

Comparison 1 Idiopathic rest cramp efficacy, magnesium versus placebo, Outcome 9 Proportion of subjects rating their cramps as moderate or severe (i.e. ≥ 2 on the 3 point intensity scale) at 4 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1 Idiopathic rest cramp efficacy, magnesium versus placebo, Outcome 9 Proportion of subjects rating their cramps as moderate or severe (i.e. ≥ 2 on the 3 point intensity scale) at 4 weeks.

Comparison 1 Idiopathic rest cramp efficacy, magnesium versus placebo, Outcome 10 Proportion of subjects rating their cramps as moderate to severe (i.e. with mean cramp intensity ≥2 on the 3 point intensity scale) at 12 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1 Idiopathic rest cramp efficacy, magnesium versus placebo, Outcome 10 Proportion of subjects rating their cramps as moderate to severe (i.e. with mean cramp intensity ≥2 on the 3 point intensity scale) at 12 weeks.

Comparison 1 Idiopathic rest cramp efficacy, magnesium versus placebo, Outcome 11 Proportion of subjects with the majority of cramp durations ≥ 1 minute at 4 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.11

Comparison 1 Idiopathic rest cramp efficacy, magnesium versus placebo, Outcome 11 Proportion of subjects with the majority of cramp durations ≥ 1 minute at 4 weeks.

Comparison 1 Idiopathic rest cramp efficacy, magnesium versus placebo, Outcome 12 Proportion of subjects with majority of cramp durations ≥ 1 minute at 12 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.12

Comparison 1 Idiopathic rest cramp efficacy, magnesium versus placebo, Outcome 12 Proportion of subjects with majority of cramp durations ≥ 1 minute at 12 weeks.

Comparison 2 Adverse effects of treatment, magnesium versus placebo, Outcome 1 Withdrawals due to adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Adverse effects of treatment, magnesium versus placebo, Outcome 1 Withdrawals due to adverse events.

Comparison 2 Adverse effects of treatment, magnesium versus placebo, Outcome 2 Number of subjects with major adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Adverse effects of treatment, magnesium versus placebo, Outcome 2 Number of subjects with major adverse events.

Comparison 2 Adverse effects of treatment, magnesium versus placebo, Outcome 3 Number of subjects with minor adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Adverse effects of treatment, magnesium versus placebo, Outcome 3 Number of subjects with minor adverse events.

Magnesium for skeletal muscle cramps

Patient or population: Nonpregnant patients with muscle cramps (largely older adults)

Settings: Outpatients recruited through primary care clinics or community advertising

Intervention: Magnesium supplements (oral or intravenous)

Comparison: Placebo

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of Participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Placebo

Magnesium

Percentage change in cramp frequency from baseline at 4 weeks

The mean percentage change in cramp frequency in the control groups was ‐27.8% (i.e. a 27.8% reduction)

The mean percentage change in cramp frequency in the magnesium groups was 3.9% lower

‐3.9%

(‐21.1 to 13.3)

83
(2 studies)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate

This difference was neither clinically nor statistically significant. The 95% confidence interval excludes a 25% reduction beyond placebo

Percentage of participants with a ≥ 25% reduction in their cramp frequency at 4 weeks

The mean percentage of placebo recipients achieving a 25% or better reduction in the frequency of their cramps was 65.9%

The mean percentage of magnesium recipients achieving a 25% or better reduction in the frequency of their cramps was 8% lower

‐8%

(‐28% to 12%)

83
(2 studies)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate

This difference was neither clinically nor statistically significant

Number of cramps per week at 4 weeks

The mean number of cramps per week in the placebo groups while on treatment was 4.35

The mean number of cramps per week in the magnesium groups was 0.01 cramps per week higher

0.01 cramps per week

(‐0.52 to 0.55)

213
(4 studies)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate

This difference was neither clinically nor statistically significant. The 95% confidence interval excludes a 1 cramp per week reduction

Percentage of participants rating their cramps as moderate or severe (i.e. mean cramp intensity ≥ 2 on the 3 point intensity scale) at 4 weeks

The mean percentage of placebo recipients rating their cramps as moderate or severe was 30%

The mean percentage of magnesium recipients rating their cramps as moderate or severe was 9% greater

9%

(‐7% to 25%)

91

(2 studies)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate

This difference was neither clinically nor statistically significant

Percentage of participants with the majority of cramp durations ≥ 1 minute at 4 weeks

The mean percentage of placebo recipients with the majority of cramp durations ≥ 1 minute was 22.7%

The mean percentage of magnesium recipients with the majority of cramp durations ≥ 1 minute was 19% greater

19%

(‐7% to 45%)

46
(1 study)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low

This difference was neither clinically nor statistically significant

Number of participants with major adverse events

1 out of 22

0 out of 24

‐50 per 1000 (‐160 to 70)

46

(1 study)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low

This difference was neither clinically nor statistically significant

Number of participants with minor adverse events

Adverse events were not reported in a way that permitted the number of participants with minor adverse events to be determined. Each study of oral magnesium inferred that side effects were similar in frequency to placebo. Intravenous magnesium was associated with asymptomatic hypotension (3/24 magnesium versus 0/22 placebo recipients), transient light‐headedness (2/24 magnesium versus 0/22 placebo) and burning of the IV site (12/24 magnesium versus 0/22 placebo).

CI: Confidence interval;

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

Downgrading of the quality of evidence is based largely on the number of studies and participants contributing to each estimate. The quality of evidence for the number of participants with major adverse events is considered very low because such events are rare.

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Table 1. Study design of the seven included trials

Study

Number/design/clinical Setting

Mean age (years)

% Female

Magnesium dose and route of administration

Frequency of administration

Treatment and assessment periods
(days)

Washout period
(days)

Comparator

Dahle 1995

N = 73

Parallel

Pregnancy

Not given

(child‐

bearing

years)

100%

5 mmol combination Mg lactate + Mg citrate (122 mg elemental Mg) taken orally

Once each morning and twice each evening

Treatment

21

Assessment

21

Not applicable

Matched placebo tablet

Frusso 1999

N = 45

Cross‐over

Idiopathic

61.6

73.3%

Mg citrate 900 mg tablet (100 mg elemental Mg) taken orally

Twice daily

Treatment

28

Assessment

28

28

Matched placebo tablet

Garrison 2011

N = 46

Parallel

Idiopathic

69.3

69.6%

20 mmol Mg sulfate (486 mg elemental Mg) given intravenously

Once daily over 4 hrs on 5 consecutive days

Treatment

5

Assessment

90

Not applicable

Matched placebo solution

Nygaard 2008

N = 45

Parallel

Pregnancy

30.9

100%

Mg lactate and Mg citrate chewable tablets containing 122 mg elemental Mg taken orally

Once each morning and twice each evening

Treatment

14

Assessment

14

Not applicable

Matched placebo tablet

Roffe 2002

N = 73

Cross‐over

Idiopathic

62.9

54.3%

1830 mg of tri‐magnesium dicitrate powder (300 mg elemental Mg) poured from a sachet into a glass of water taken orally

Once each evening

Treatment

42

Assessment

during last 28 days of treatment

First 14 days of second treatment period considered

as washout

Matched placebo powder

Rosenbaum 2011

N = 40

Parallel

Idiopathic

66.6

57.5%

Slow release tablet of Mg lactate containing 84 mg of elemental Mg

taken orally

Two tablets twice daily

Treatment

30

Assessment

30

Not applicable

Matched placebo tablet

Sohrabvand 2006

N = 84

Parallel

Pregnancy

Not given

(child‐

bearing

years)

100%

7.5 mmol magnesium aspartate (182 mg elemental Mg) taken orally.

Unclear if tablet or powder / solution

Twice daily

Treatment

14

Assessment

28

Not applicable

3 different comparators

1) No treatment

2) 500 mg calcium carbonate tablet once daily

3)100 mg of thiamine (vit B1) plus 40 mg of pyridoxine (vit B6) once daily

vit B1: vitamin B1

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Table 1. Study design of the seven included trials
Comparison 1. Idiopathic rest cramp efficacy, magnesium versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 % Change in cramp frequency from baseline at 4 weeks Show forest plot

2

83

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐3.93 [‐21.12, 13.26]

2 % Change in cramp frequency from baseline at 12 weeks Show forest plot

1

43

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐12.09 [‐40.22, 16.04]

3 Proportion of subjects with a ≥ 25% reduction in cramp frequency at 4 weeks Show forest plot

2

83

Risk Difference (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.08 [‐0.28, 0.12]

4 Proportion of subjects with a ≥ 25% reduction in cramps at 12 weeks Show forest plot

1

43

Risk Difference (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.11 [‐0.19, 0.41]

5 Number of cramps per week at 4 weeks Show forest plot

4

213

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.01 [‐0.52, 0.55]

6 Number of cramps per week at 12 weeks Show forest plot

1

43

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.84 [‐3.23, 1.55]

7 Cramp intensity (pain) on a 3 point scale (1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe) at 4 weeks Show forest plot

3

175

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.04 [‐0.18, 0.11]

8 Cramp intensity (pain) on a 3 point scale (1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe) at 12 weeks Show forest plot

1

43

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.18 [‐0.55, 0.19]

9 Proportion of subjects rating their cramps as moderate or severe (i.e. ≥ 2 on the 3 point intensity scale) at 4 weeks Show forest plot

2

91

Risk Difference (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.09 [‐0.07, 0.25]

10 Proportion of subjects rating their cramps as moderate to severe (i.e. with mean cramp intensity ≥2 on the 3 point intensity scale) at 12 weeks Show forest plot

1

43

Risk Difference (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.06 [‐0.21, 0.10]

11 Proportion of subjects with the majority of cramp durations ≥ 1 minute at 4 weeks Show forest plot

1

46

Risk Difference (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.19 [‐0.07, 0.45]

12 Proportion of subjects with majority of cramp durations ≥ 1 minute at 12 weeks Show forest plot

1

43

Risk Difference (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.14 [‐0.13, 0.42]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Idiopathic rest cramp efficacy, magnesium versus placebo
Comparison 2. Adverse effects of treatment, magnesium versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Withdrawals due to adverse events Show forest plot

4

201

Risk Difference (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.03 [‐0.10, 0.03]

1.1 Idiopathic cramps (largely older adults)

2

86

Risk Difference (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.02 [‐0.06, 0.11]

1.2 Pregnancy‐associated leg cramps

2

115

Risk Difference (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.07 [‐0.17, 0.02]

2 Number of subjects with major adverse events Show forest plot

2

91

Risk Difference (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.02 [‐0.10, 0.05]

2.1 Idiopathic cramps (largely older adults)

1

46

Risk Difference (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.05 [‐0.16, 0.07]

2.2 Pregnancy‐associated leg cramps

1

45

Risk Difference (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [‐0.08, 0.08]

3 Number of subjects with minor adverse events Show forest plot

1

45

Risk Difference (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.27, 0.25]

3.1 Idiopathic cramps (largely older adults)

0

0

Risk Difference (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Pregnancy‐associated leg cramps

1

45

Risk Difference (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.27, 0.25]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Adverse effects of treatment, magnesium versus placebo