Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Parto temprano programado versus manejo expectante para los trastornos hipertensivos de la semana 34 del embarazo al término

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009273.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 15 enero 2017see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Embarazo y parto

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Catherine Cluver

    Correspondencia a: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University and Tygerberg Hospital, Tygerberg, South Africa

    [email protected]

  • Natalia Novikova

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University and Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa

  • Corine M Koopmans

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands

  • Helen M West

    Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

Contributions of authors

CC helped develop the protocol, extracted the data, checked data entry, helped write the review and is the guarantor for the review.
NN prepared the original protocol assisted and with the preparation of this review.
CK assisted with the preparation the protocol and review.
HW extracted the data, entered the data and helped write this review.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • (NN) Walter Sisulu Univeristy, East London Hospital Complex, South Africa.

    NN was employed by East London Hospital Complex attached to Walter Sisulu University.

  • (HW) Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group, Department of Women's and Children's Health, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

  • (CC) Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.

    Cathy Cluver is registered for PhD at Stellenbosch University

External sources

  • NIHR Cochrane Programme Grant Project: 13/89/05 – Pregnancy and childbirth systematic reviews to support clinical guidelines, UK.

  • (CC) Discovery Foundation, South Africa.

    CC has been awarded the Discovery Accademic Fellowship

  • (CC) South African Medical Association, South Africa.

    CC has been awarded the SAMA Fellowship

Declarations of interest

CK is an author of an included study in this review (Koopmans 2009). All decisions relating to this study (assessment for inclusion/exclusion, risk of bias and data extraction) were carried out by the other members of the review team who are not directly involved in the study.

HW is paid to work on Cochrane reviews by a grant to Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth. The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Systematic Reviews Programme, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health.

CC: none known.

NN: none known.

Acknowledgements

Denise Atherton for administrative assistance; Lynn Hampson for the literature search.

CC's contribution to this project was supported by the Discovery Foundation and the South African Medical Association.

HW's contribution to this project was supported by the National Institute for Health Research, via Cochrane Programme Grant funding to Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth. The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Systematic Reviews Programme, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health.

The Cochrane generic protocol on Interventions for preventing pre‐eclampsia and its consequences (Meher 2005) was used in preparation of the protocol for this review.

As part of the pre‐publication editorial process, this review has been commented on by three peers (an editor and two referees who are external to the editorial team) and the Group's Statistical Adviser.

This project was supported by the National Institute for Health research, via Cochrane Infrastructure and Cochrane Programme Grant funding to Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth. The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Systematic Reviews Programme, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2017 Jan 15

Planned early delivery versus expectant management for hypertensive disorders from 34 weeks gestation to term

Review

Catherine Cluver, Natalia Novikova, Corine M Koopmans, Helen M West

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009273.pub2

2011 Aug 10

Delivery versus expectant management for hypertensive disorders from 34 weeks gestation to term

Protocol

Natalia Novikova, Catherine Cluver, Corine M Koopmans

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009273

Differences between protocol and review

We have edited the review title from 'Delivery versus expectant management for hypertensive disorders from 34 weeks gestation to term' to 'Planned early delivery versus expectant management for hypertensive disorders from 34 weeks gestation to term'.

Our Types of studies and Types of interventions sections have been edited to incorporate 'planned early delivery' as per the modified title.

The methods have been updated to reflect current standard methods text of Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth and we have updated some sections of the background.

We have used the GRADEpro Guideline Development Tool to assess the quality of the evidence included in this review. We have also include a summary of findings Table for the main comparison.

Respiratory distress syndrome was analysed by subgroup, in addition to the prespecified composite maternal and infant outcomes, as the composite infant outcomes is not yet available by gestational age for Broekhuijsen 2015.

Changes to outcomes

Changes to maternal outcomes

We have made a number of changes to our protocol outcomes for maternal outcomes.

Primary outcome

The nature of the maternal composite outcome has been further clarified at the review stage:

  • Protocol = Composite maternal outcome including maternal mortality (death during pregnancy or up to 42 days after end of pregnancy) and severe morbidity (eclampsia, stroke, renal or liver failure as defined below), haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets syndrome (HELLP), disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), pulmonary oedema, thromboembolic disease, cardiac arrest, abruption of the placenta or antepartum haemorrhage).

  • Review = ' Composite maternal outcome including maternal mortality (death during pregnancy or up to 42 days after delivery) and severe morbidity (eclampsia, cerebral vascular event, pulmonary oedema as defined by trial authors, severe renal impairment defined as a creatinine level greater than 125 μmol/l or a need for dialysis or urine output less than 0.5 mL/kg/hour for four hours unresponsive to hydration with two intravenous boluses, or as defined by trial authors, liver haematoma or rupture, liver failure defined as the rapid impairment of synthetic function and development of encephalopathy or as defined by trial authors, haemolysis elevated liver enzymes and low platelets (HELLP) syndrome, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), thromboembolic disease and abruptio placentae defined as a retroplacental clot of more than 15% of the maternal surface or as defined by trial authors.

Secondary outcomes

Our secondary outcomes edited accordingly:

  • 'Death as defined above' has been edited to 'Maternal mortality as described above'

  • 'Eclampsia (fitting)' has been edited to 'Eclampsia'

  • Stroke (brain damage) has been edited to 'Cerebrovascular event'

  • 'Pulmonary oedema (fluid in the lungs)' has been edited to 'Pulmonary oedema'

  • 'Kidney failure (defined as rise in serum creatine concentration by > 1 mg/dL over baseline) and/or urine output less than 0.5 mL/kg/hr for two hours unresponsive to hydration with two intravenous boluses of 500 mL fluid), or as defined by trial authors' has been edited to 'Severe renal impairment as defined above'

  • 'Liver failure (the rapid impairment of synthetic function and development of encephalopathy) or as defined by trial authors' has been edited to 'Liver failure as defined above'

  • 'Abruption of the placenta or antepartum haemorrhage' has been split into two separate outcomes, 'Abruptio placentae' and 'Antepartum haemorrhage'

  • 'Postpartum haemorrhage (blood loss 500 mL or more' has been edited to 'Postpartum haemorrhage (blood loss of more than 500 mL within 24 hours of delivery'

The following secondary outcomes have been added at the review stage:

  • 'Liver haematoma or rupture'

  • 'Admission to a high care or intensive care unit'

Changes to fetal/neonatal outcomes

We have made a number of changes to our protocol outcomes for fetal/neonatal outcomes:

Primary outcome

The nature of the perinatal composite outcome has been further clarified at the review stage:

  • Protocol = Composite perinatal outcome (perinatal death (stillbirth or death in the first seven days of life), small‐for‐gestational age (growth below the third centile or lowest centile reported), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), necrotising enterocolitis (NEC), cerebral haemorrhage, Apgar score less than seven or very low (less than four) at five minutes, cord blood pH less than 7.1, neonatal seizures, intraventricular haemorrhage)

  • Review = 'Composite perinatal outcome including fetal or neonatal death (within six weeks after the expected due date or as defined by trial authors), grade III or IV intraventricular or intracerebral haemorrhage, necrotising enterocolitis (NEC), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or grade III/IV hyaline membrane disease, small‐for‐gestational age (growth below the 10th centile or as defined by trial authors) and neonatal seizures.

Secondary outcomes

Our secondary outcomes edited accordingly:

  • 'Stillbirth', 'perinatal death' and 'neonatal death' have been replaced with 'fetal death', neonatal death (as defined in the primary outcome above).

  • 'Intraventricular haemorrhage' has been edited to 'Grade III or IV intraventricular or intracerebral haemorrhage'.

  • 'ARDS' has been edited to 'ARDS or grade III/IV hyaline membrane disease'

  • The outcome 'small‐for‐gestational age' was changed to 'small‐for‐gestational age as defined by trial authors', with definitions given in the footnotes of the data

  • 'Apgar score at five minutes: low (less than seven), very low (less than four) or lowest reported' has been replaced with 'Apgar score less than seven at five minutes'

  • 'Cord blood pH less than 7.1' has been edited to 'Cord blood pH less than 7.1 or as defined by the trial authors'

  • 'Endotracheal intubation or use of mechanical ventilation' has been edited to 'Intubation and mechanical ventilation or continuous positive airway pressure support'

The following secondary outcomes have been added at the review stage:

  • 'Early neonatal sepsis'

  • 'Surfactant use'

  • 'Neonatal intensive care unit use or high care unit admission'

Keywords

MeSH

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Study flow diagram.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 1 Composite maternal mortality and morbidity.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 1 Composite maternal mortality and morbidity.

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 2 Composite infant mortality and morbidity.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 2 Composite infant mortality and morbidity.

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 3 Maternal mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 3 Maternal mortality.

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 4 Eclampsia.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 4 Eclampsia.

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 5 Pulmonary oedema.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 5 Pulmonary oedema.

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 6 Severe renal impairment.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 6 Severe renal impairment.

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 7 HELLP syndrome.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 7 HELLP syndrome.

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 8 Thromboembolic disease.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 8 Thromboembolic disease.

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 9 Abruptio placentae.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 9 Abruptio placentae.

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 10 Postpartum haemorrhage.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 10 Postpartum haemorrhage.

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 11 Severe hypertension.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.11

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 11 Severe hypertension.

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 12 Caesarean section.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.12

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 12 Caesarean section.

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 13 Assisted delivery (ventouse/forceps).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.13

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 13 Assisted delivery (ventouse/forceps).

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 14 Maternal morbidity of caesarean section.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.14

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 14 Maternal morbidity of caesarean section.

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 15 Maternal morbidity related to induction of labour.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.15

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 15 Maternal morbidity related to induction of labour.

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 16 Admission to a high care or intensive care unit.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.16

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 16 Admission to a high care or intensive care unit.

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 17 Fetal death.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.17

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 17 Fetal death.

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 18 Neonatal death.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.18

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 18 Neonatal death.

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 19 Grade III or IV intraventricular or intracerebral haemorrhage.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.19

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 19 Grade III or IV intraventricular or intracerebral haemorrhage.

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 20 Nectrotising enterocolitis.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.20

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 20 Nectrotising enterocolitis.

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 21 Respiratory distress syndrome.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.21

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 21 Respiratory distress syndrome.

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 22 Small‐for‐gestational age.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.22

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 22 Small‐for‐gestational age.

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 23 Neonatal seizures.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.23

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 23 Neonatal seizures.

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 24 Apgar score less than seven at five minutes.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.24

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 24 Apgar score less than seven at five minutes.

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 25 Cord blood pH less than 7.1 or as defined by trial authors.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.25

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 25 Cord blood pH less than 7.1 or as defined by trial authors.

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 26 Surfactant use.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.26

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 26 Surfactant use.

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 27 Neonatal intensive care unit or high care unit admission.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.27

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 27 Neonatal intensive care unit or high care unit admission.

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 28 Early neonatal sepsis.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.28

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 28 Early neonatal sepsis.

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 29 Duration of hospital stay after delivery for mother (days).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.29

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 29 Duration of hospital stay after delivery for mother (days).

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 30 Duration of hospital stay after delivery for baby (days).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.30

Comparison 1 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women), Outcome 30 Duration of hospital stay after delivery for baby (days).

Comparison 2 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (by gestational age), Outcome 1 Composite maternal mortality and morbidity.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (by gestational age), Outcome 1 Composite maternal mortality and morbidity.

Comparison 2 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (by gestational age), Outcome 2 Respiratory distress syndrome.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (by gestational age), Outcome 2 Respiratory distress syndrome.

Comparison 2 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (by gestational age), Outcome 3 Composite infant mortality and morbidity.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (by gestational age), Outcome 3 Composite infant mortality and morbidity.

Comparison 3 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (by each gestational week), Outcome 1 Composite maternal mortality and morbidity.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (by each gestational week), Outcome 1 Composite maternal mortality and morbidity.

Comparison 3 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (by each gestational week), Outcome 2 Respiratory distress syndrome.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (by each gestational week), Outcome 2 Respiratory distress syndrome.

Comparison 3 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (by each gestational week), Outcome 3 Composite infant mortality and morbidity.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (by each gestational week), Outcome 3 Composite infant mortality and morbidity.

Comparison 4 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (by condition), Outcome 1 Composite maternal mortality and morbidity.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (by condition), Outcome 1 Composite maternal mortality and morbidity.

Comparison 4 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (by condition), Outcome 2 Respiratory distress syndrome.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 Planned early delivery versus expectant management (by condition), Outcome 2 Respiratory distress syndrome.

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Planned early delivery versus expectant management for hypertensive disorders from 34 weeks' gestation to term

Planned early delivery versus expectant management for hypertensive disorders from 34 weeks' gestation to term

Patient or population: pregnant women with hypertensive disorders from 34 weeks' gestation to term
Setting: 2 studies in the Netherlands, 1 in India, and 1 in the USA
Intervention: planned early delivery
Comparison: expectant management

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

№ of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with placebo

Risk with GRADE

Composite maternal mortality and morbidity

Study population

RR 0.69
(0.57 to 0.83)

1459
(2 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

242 per 1000

167 per 1000
(138 to 201)

Moderate

235 per 1000

162 per 1000
(134 to 195)

Composite infant mortality and morbidity

not pooled

1459
(2 RCTs)

This outcome was not pooled, due to substantial statistical heterogeneity (I2 = 87%, Tau2 = 0.98)

Caesarean section

Study population

RR 0.91
(0.78 to 1.07)

1728
(4 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 1

267 per 1000

243 per 1000
(208 to 285)

Moderate

302 per 1000

275 per 1000
(236 to 324)

Duration of hospital stay after delivery for mother (days)

The mean duration of hospital stay after delivery for mother (days) was 0

The mean duration of hospital stay after delivery for mother (days) in the intervention group was 0.16 fewer (0.46 fewer to 0.15 more)

925
(2 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 1

Duration of hospital stay after delivery for baby (days)

The mean duration of hospital stay after delivery for baby (days) was 0

The mean duration of hospital stay after delivery for baby (days) in the intervention group was 0.2 days fewer (0.57 fewer to 0.17 more)

756
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 1

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio; OR: Odds ratio;

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

1Wide confidence interval crossing the line of no effect.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Planned early delivery versus expectant management for hypertensive disorders from 34 weeks' gestation to term
Comparison 1. Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Composite maternal mortality and morbidity Show forest plot

2

1459

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.69 [0.57, 0.83]

2 Composite infant mortality and morbidity Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3 Maternal mortality Show forest plot

2

1457

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Eclampsia Show forest plot

2

1459

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.20 [0.01, 4.14]

5 Pulmonary oedema Show forest plot

2

1459

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.20 [0.01, 4.17]

6 Severe renal impairment Show forest plot

1

100

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.36 [0.14, 0.92]

7 HELLP syndrome Show forest plot

3

1628

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.40 [0.17, 0.93]

8 Thromboembolic disease Show forest plot

2

1459

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.67 [0.22, 12.58]

9 Abruptio placentae Show forest plot

3

1535

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.64 [0.17, 2.34]

10 Postpartum haemorrhage Show forest plot

1

741

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.57, 1.35]

11 Severe hypertension Show forest plot

3

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

12 Caesarean section Show forest plot

4

1728

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.78, 1.07]

13 Assisted delivery (ventouse/forceps) Show forest plot

2

1459

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.93 [0.70, 1.24]

14 Maternal morbidity of caesarean section Show forest plot

1

756

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.75 [0.17, 3.35]

14.1 Endometritis

1

756

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.75 [0.17, 3.35]

15 Maternal morbidity related to induction of labour Show forest plot

1

756

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.1 Uterine rupture

1

756

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16 Admission to a high care or intensive care unit Show forest plot

1

708

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.41 [0.16, 1.07]

17 Fetal death Show forest plot

1

756

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18 Neonatal death Show forest plot

3

1535

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.0 [0.19, 21.14]

19 Grade III or IV intraventricular or intracerebral haemorrhage Show forest plot

1

674

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.92 [0.36, 133.41]

20 Nectrotising enterocolitis Show forest plot

2

1338

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.14, 6.89]

21 Respiratory distress syndrome Show forest plot

3

1511

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.24 [1.20, 4.18]

22 Small‐for‐gestational age Show forest plot

3

1001

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.58 [0.89, 2.79]

23 Neonatal seizures Show forest plot

1

699

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.97 [0.45, 35.30]

24 Apgar score less than seven at five minutes Show forest plot

2

1454

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.11 [0.60, 2.05]

25 Cord blood pH less than 7.1 or as defined by trial authors Show forest plot

2

1145

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.58 [0.31, 1.09]

26 Surfactant use Show forest plot

1

639

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

27 Neonatal intensive care unit or high care unit admission Show forest plot

4

1585

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.65 [1.13, 2.40]

28 Early neonatal sepsis Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

29 Duration of hospital stay after delivery for mother (days) Show forest plot

2

925

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.16 [‐0.46, 0.15]

30 Duration of hospital stay after delivery for baby (days) Show forest plot

1

756

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.20 [‐0.57, 0.17]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Planned early delivery versus expectant management (all women)
Comparison 2. Planned early delivery versus expectant management (by gestational age)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Composite maternal mortality and morbidity Show forest plot

2

1459

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.68 [0.57, 0.83]

1.1 34 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks GA at randomisation

2

778

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.77 [0.48, 1.24]

1.2 37 + 0 to 38 + 6 weeks GA at randomisation

1

380

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.69 [0.53, 0.90]

1.3 39 + 0 to 41 + 0 weeks GA at randomisation

1

301

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.64 [0.47, 0.88]

2 Respiratory distress syndrome Show forest plot

2

1459

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.53 [1.16, 5.55]

2.1 34 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks GA at randomisation

2

778

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.32 [1.35, 8.18]

2.2 37 + 0 to 38 + 6 weeks GA at randomisation

1

380

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.32 [0.01, 7.72]

2.3 39 + 0 to 41 + 0 weeks GA at randomisation

1

301

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.12 [0.07, 17.74]

3 Composite infant mortality and morbidity Show forest plot

1

756

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.77 [0.46, 1.28]

3.1 36 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks GA at randomisation

1

75

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.63 [0.29, 24.10]

3.2 37 + 0 to 38 + 6 weeks GA at randomisation

1

380

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.68 [0.31, 1.49]

3.3 39 + 0 to 41 + 0 weeks GA at randomisation

1

301

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.72 [0.35, 1.49]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Planned early delivery versus expectant management (by gestational age)
Comparison 3. Planned early delivery versus expectant management (by each gestational week)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Composite maternal mortality and morbidity Show forest plot

2

1459

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.69 [0.57, 0.83]

1.1 34 + 0 to 34 + 6 weeks GA at randomisation

1

154

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.75 [0.23, 97.34]

1.2 35 + 0 to 35 + 6 weeks GA at randomisation

1

236

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.14 [0.02, 1.10]

1.3 36 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks GA at randomisation

2

388

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.59, 1.62]

1.4 37 + 0 to 37 + 6 weeks GA at randomisation

1

188

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.75 [0.52, 1.08]

1.5 38 + 0 to 38 + 6 weeks GA at randomisation

1

192

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.63 [0.43, 0.94]

1.6 39 + 0 to 39 + 6 weeks GA at randomisation

1

186

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.53, 1.14]

1.7 40 + 0 to 41 + 0 weeks GA at randomisation

1

115

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.46 [0.26, 0.79]

2 Respiratory distress syndrome Show forest plot

1

703

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.32 [1.38, 8.01]

2.1 34 + 0 to 34 + 6 weeks GA at randomisation

1

154

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.37 [0.78, 7.24]

2.2 35 + 0 to 35 + 6 weeks GA at randomisation

1

236

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.62 [0.93, 62.27]

2.3 36 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks GA at randomisation

1

313

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.41 [0.39, 30.15]

3 Composite infant mortality and morbidity Show forest plot

1

756

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.77 [0.46, 1.29]

3.1 36 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks GA at randomisation

1

75

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.63 [0.29, 24.10]

3.2 37 + 0 to 37 + 6 weeks GA at randomisation

1

188

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.48 [0.17, 1.35]

3.3 38 + 0 to 38 + 6 weeks GA at randomisation

1

192

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.17 [0.33, 4.24]

3.4 39 + 0 to 39 + 6 weeks GA at randomisation

1

186

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.79 [0.32, 1.95]

3.5 40 + 0 to 41 + 0 weeks GA at randomisation

1

115

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.63 [0.19, 2.12]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. Planned early delivery versus expectant management (by each gestational week)
Comparison 4. Planned early delivery versus expectant management (by condition)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Composite maternal mortality and morbidity Show forest plot

2

1445

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.70 [0.58, 0.85]

1.1 Gestational hypertension

2

678

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.61, 1.00]

1.2 Mild pre‐eclampsia

2

570

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.60 [0.45, 0.81]

1.3 Chronic hypertension

1

197

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.54 [0.10, 2.86]

2 Respiratory distress syndrome Show forest plot

1

703

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.36 [1.36, 8.31]

2.1 Gestational hypertension

1

182

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.91 [0.45, 34.34]

2.2 Mild pre‐eclampsia

1

324

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.82 [1.07, 21.65]

2.3 Chronic hypertension

1

197

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.15 [0.55, 8.35]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 4. Planned early delivery versus expectant management (by condition)