Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Metformina durante la inducción de la ovulación con gonadotrofinas seguida del coito programado o la inseminación intrauterina para la subfertilidad asociada con el síndrome de ovario poliquístico

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009090.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 24 enero 2017see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Ginecología y fertilidad

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Esmée M Bordewijk

    University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

  • Marleen Nahuis

    VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands

  • Michael F Costello

    Division of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, School of Women's & Children's Health, Royal Hospital for Women and IVF Australia, Sydney, Australia

  • Fulco Van der Veen

    Center for Reproductive Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

  • Leopoldo O Tso

    Department of Gynecology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

  • Ben Willem J Mol

    Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia

  • Madelon van Wely

    Correspondencia a: Center for Reproductive Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

    [email protected]

Contributions of authors

MC and LT proposed developing a Cochrane review on this topic and developed the title. MvW and MN developed and wrote the draft of the protocol and the intended methods of the review. All review authors agreed and helped to respond to peer reviewers' comments on the protocol.

EB, MvW and MN performed literature searches for the review, selected relevant trials, procured data and information about studies, assessed validity and checked data extracted for each trial; these review authors entered all study information, data and text into RevMan; performed analyses; wrote the abstract, background, methods, results and conclusion sections of the review; and approved the final version.

MC, FV, LT and BM took part in writing the abstract, background, methods, results and conclusion sections of the review and approved the final version.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Internal support, Netherlands.

    Partly internally funded

External sources

  • None, Other.

    No external support

Declarations of interest

MC has received travel costs and honoraria from Merck Sharp and Dohme (MSD) and Merck Serono to attend ART Scientific Meetings to present papers on topics not related to this review. He is a shareholder at a private fertility clinic and undertakes private practice within that facility. FV has received occasional payment for lectures for ESHRE unrelated to the topic of this review. BM and his institution have received payment for consultancy from ObsEva Geneva. BM has received payment for review preparation from the European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, and has received travel/accommodation/meeting expenses for various non‐commercial scientific meetings. MW has received travel/accommodation/meeting expenses from ESHRE or Oxford Press for attendance at scientific meetings.

EB and LT have no interests to declare.

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group for extending to us the opportunity to write a review on this topic. We thank Marian Showell for preparing the search strategy.

Review authors of the 2016 update thank Dr Jur Oosterhuis for his contributions to previous versions of this review.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2017 Jan 24

Metformin during ovulation induction with gonadotrophins followed by timed intercourse or intrauterine insemination for subfertility associated with polycystic ovary syndrome

Review

Esmée M Bordewijk, Marleen Nahuis, Michael F Costello, Fulco Van der Veen, Leopoldo O Tso, Ben Willem J Mol, Madelon van Wely

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009090.pub2

2011 May 11

Metformin co‐administration during follicle stimulating hormone ovulation induction with timed intercourse or intra‐uterine insemination for subfertility associated with polycystic ovary syndrome

Protocol

Marleen Nahuis, Michael F Costello, Fulco Van der Veen, L O Tso, Jur Oosterhuis, Ben Willem J Mol, Madelon van Wely

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009090

Differences between protocol and review

In the protocol, review authors planned to pool process outcomes. However, as all data were reported per cycle, we could not pool results. We provided data on ovulation rate per started cycle, cycle cancellation rate per started cycle, mean duration of stimulation days per cycle and FSH dose per cycle per study without pooling.

In the protocol, review authors intended to pool ongoing pregnancy and live birth rates when an ongoing pregnancy was defined as pregnancy of at least 20 weeks' gestation. However, we defined ongoing pregnancy as a pregnancy of at least 12 weeks' gestation. We present both live birth and ongoing pregnancy data.

We adjusted protocol search strategies and refined them for the review.

After receiving referee comments, we decided to make multiple pregnancy the primary safety outcome. Nowadays, OHSS is a rare event that follows ovulation induction with gonadotrophins in PCOS. Ovulation induction with gonadotrophins is always monitored.

We decided to use the term 'gonadotrophins' rather than 'FSH', as ovulation induction is also possible with HP‐HMG. FSH is present in recombinant FSH, in urinary‐derived highly purified FSH and in highly purified human menopausal gonadotrophins. These FSH‐containing gonadotrophins are usually referred to as gonadotrophins.

Notes

None.

Keywords

MeSH

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Study flow diagram.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 dichotomous outcome, outcome: 1.1 live birth rate (per woman).
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 4

Forest plot of comparison: 1 dichotomous outcome, outcome: 1.1 live birth rate (per woman).

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, outcome: 1.2 Multiple pregnancy rate (per woman).
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 5

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, outcome: 1.2 Multiple pregnancy rate (per woman).

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, outcome: 1.3 Ongoing pregnancy rate (per woman).
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 6

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, outcome: 1.3 Ongoing pregnancy rate (per woman).

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, outcome: 1.4 Clinical pregnancy rate.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 7

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, outcome: 1.4 Clinical pregnancy rate.

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 1 Live birth rate (per woman).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 1 Live birth rate (per woman).

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 2 Multiple pregnancy rate (per woman).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 2 Multiple pregnancy rate (per woman).

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 3 Ongoing pregnancy rate (per woman).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 3 Ongoing pregnancy rate (per woman).

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 4 Clinical pregnancy rate.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 4 Clinical pregnancy rate.

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 5 Miscarriage rate (per clinical pregnancy).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 5 Miscarriage rate (per clinical pregnancy).

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 6 Ovulation rate (per started cycle).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 6 Ovulation rate (per started cycle).

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 7 OHSS rate (per woman).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 7 OHSS rate (per woman).

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 8 Cycle cancellation rate (per started cycle).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 8 Cycle cancellation rate (per started cycle).

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 9 Adverse effects.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 9 Adverse effects.

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 10 FSH dose per cycle.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 10 FSH dose per cycle.

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 11 Duration of stimulation days per cycle.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.11

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction, Outcome 11 Duration of stimulation days per cycle.

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction for subfertility associated with polycystic ovary syndrome

Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction for subfertility associated with polycystic ovary syndrome

Patient or population: patients with subfertility associated with polycystic ovary syndrome
Settings: outpatient
Intervention: metformin vs placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

Number of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Placebo co‐treatment

Metformin co‐treatment

Live birth rate (per woman)
Follow‐up: 3‐6 months

267 per 1000

457 per 1000

190 more per 1000 (42 to 345)

OR 2.31
(1.24 to 4.33)

180
(2 studies)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowa

Multiple pregnancy rate (per woman)

52 per 1000

26 per 1000

23 fewer per 1000 (44 fewer to 25 more)

OR 0.55

(0.15 to 1.95)

232
(4 studies)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowa,b

Ongoing pregnancy rate (per woman)

217 per 1000

393 per 1000

189 more per 1000 (57 to 336)

OR 2.46
(1.36 to 4.46)

232
(4 studies)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowa

Clinical pregnancy rate (per woman)

252 per 1000

444 per 1000

206 more per 1000 (78 to 340)

OR 2.51
(1.46 to 4.31)

264
(5 studies)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowa

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence.
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

aLimited sample size, limited precision, lack of blinding of participants and of outcome assessors.
bMultiple pregnancy had a very low incidence.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction for subfertility associated with polycystic ovary syndrome
Comparison 1. Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Live birth rate (per woman) Show forest plot

2

180

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.31 [1.23, 4.34]

2 Multiple pregnancy rate (per woman) Show forest plot

4

232

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.55 [0.15, 1.95]

3 Ongoing pregnancy rate (per woman) Show forest plot

4

232

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.46 [1.36, 4.46]

4 Clinical pregnancy rate Show forest plot

5

264

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.51 [1.46, 4.31]

5 Miscarriage rate (per clinical pregnancy) Show forest plot

3

84

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.62 [0.19, 2.01]

6 Ovulation rate (per started cycle) Show forest plot

3

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

7 OHSS rate (per woman) Show forest plot

2

180

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.32 [0.01, 8.23]

8 Cycle cancellation rate (per started cycle) Show forest plot

4

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

9 Adverse effects Show forest plot

2

90

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.78 [0.39, 8.09]

10 FSH dose per cycle Show forest plot

4

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

11 Duration of stimulation days per cycle Show forest plot

5

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Metformin versus placebo co‐treatment for assisted reproduction