Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Badania kontrole ogólnego stanu zdrowia u dorosłych w celu zmniejszeniu zachorowalności i umieralności z powodu chorób

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009009.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 17 octubre 2012see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Práctica y organización sanitaria efectivas

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2013 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Lasse T Krogsbøll

    Correspondencia a: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

  • Karsten Juhl Jørgensen

    The Nordic Cochrane Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark

  • Christian Grønhøj Larsen

    The Nordic Cochrane Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark

  • Peter C Gøtzsche

    The Nordic Cochrane Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark

Contributions of authors

PCG initiated the project, LTK drafted the protocol and KJJ and PCG provided comments. LTK, KJJ and CGL screened titles and abstracts and made decisions about inclusion of trials. LTK and KJJ extracted data, LTK analysed data and drafted the review, and KJJ, PCG and CGL contributed to the revisions.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Nordic Cochrane Centre, Denmark.

    Salary and facilities

External sources

  • Trygfonden, Denmark.

    Part of salary for LTK

Declarations of interest

None

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank the trialists who helped us: Guy De Backer, Walter W Holland, Sven‐Olof Isacsson, Torben Jørgensen, Olof Lannerstad, Torsten Lauritzen, David Murray, Charlotta Pisinger, Lennart Welin, and Lars Wilhelmsen for additional information on their trials; and David Mant, Alice Fuller, Holger Theobald, and Janus L Thomsen for providing unpublished outcome data.

We also wish to thank the EPOC Trials Search Co‐ordinator, Michelle Fiander, for designing, conducting and updating the searches, and the peer reviewers for their valuable comments.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2019 Jan 31

General health checks in adults for reducing morbidity and mortality from disease

Review

Lasse T Krogsbøll, Karsten Juhl Jørgensen, Peter C Gøtzsche

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009009.pub3

2012 Oct 17

General health checks in adults for reducing morbidity and mortality from disease

Review

Lasse T Krogsbøll, Karsten Juhl Jørgensen, Christian Grønhøj Larsen, Peter C Gøtzsche

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009009.pub2

2011 Feb 16

General health checks for reducing morbidity and mortality from disease

Protocol

Lasse T Krogsbøll, Karsten Juhl Jørgensen, Peter C Gøtzsche

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009009

Differences between protocol and review

We originally expected to include trials of geriatric screening but found that the intervention in most of these differed too much from our perception of what consitutes a health check. The actual medical screening was usually a minor component in a complex intervention involving other important interventions, for example screening for functional status; social, financial or legal needs; or home safety; or interventions such as specialist revision of individual medication or falls prevention. Consequently, it would not be possible to isolate the effect of the screening and we therefore chose not to include trials which were described as targeting an elderly population or which only included people over 65 years of age. Complex interventions directed at elderly people, including geriatric assessments, have been reviewed by Beswick and colleagues (Beswick 2008).

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.