Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

比较经胎盘给药与直接胎儿注射糖皮质激素治疗对有早产风险的孕妇促进胎肺成熟的效果

Contraer todo Desplegar todo

Abstract

研究背景

尽管医疗技术取得了重大进展,但早产的发病率仍然很高。通过对有早产风险的妇女进行肌肉注射糖皮质激素,这种产前给药的使用减少了呼吸窘迫综合症的发病率,并提高了早产儿的生存率。然而, 这种干预方法也有自身的风险和副作用。动物研究以及早前对有早产风险孕妇的研究报告了使用替代的给药途径,通过超声引导下直接给胎儿肌肉注射糖皮质激素,以尽量减少副作用。在安全性和有效性方面,直接给胎儿注射糖皮质激素的方法可能优于母体给药。

研究目的

为评估不同的糖皮质激素给药途径(母体与直接胎儿给药)是否对妇女及其婴儿的健康结局有影响,

检索策略

我们检索了Cochrane妊娠和分娩小组的试验注册库(2017年10月25日)、ClinicalTrials.gov、WHO国际临床试验注册平台(ICTRP)(2017年10月25日)和检索研究的参考文献清单。

标准/纳入排除标准

纳入比较产前母体与直接胎儿注射糖皮质激素这两种途径对有早产风险妇女影响的随机对照试验。

数据收集与分析

两位研究者独立评估研究的质量。在本综述的之后更新中,至少要有两名研究者提取数据并评估纳入研究中的偏倚风险。我们也将采用GRADE方法评估证据的质量。

主要结果

我们没有确定任何符合条件的随机对照试验纳入本综述。

作者结论

迄今为止对动物和人类进行的临床研究表明, 在超声引导下直接肌肉注射糖皮质激素是可行的,但缺乏有关健康结局的数据。因此,哪种方法能提供更好的疗效和安全性仍然存在不确定性。需要进行随机对照试验,重点关注经胎盘与直接胎儿糖皮质激素治疗的利弊。在不确定性得到解决之前,建议保持目前的产前经胎盘母体给予糖皮质激素的治疗标准。

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Plain language summary

当母亲有早产风险时,将糖皮质激素进行母体注射与直接注射到胎儿以改善胎儿预后的比较

问题是什么?

早产婴儿 (怀孕37周前) 由于他们的肺部没有完全发育,而有死亡风险, 大脑出血和呼吸问题, 。在早产前给予母亲的糖皮质激素治疗已被证明可有效预防这些问题,并已成为许多国家的标准治疗。糖皮质激素常用的给药方法是母体的肌肉注射。糖皮质激素进入母体然后通过胎盘转移给 (称为胎盘转移) 胎儿。这种治疗有其自身的风险, 例如限制胎儿生长和大脑发育, 以及增加婴儿患糖尿病和高血压等疾病风险。超声引导下将糖皮质激素直接注射入胎儿是可行的。

为什么这很重要?

与将糖皮质激素注射到母亲的肌肉中相比,直接注射到胎儿体内,可以防止母亲血压升高、血糖升高和败血症易感性的风险。它也可能减少所需的糖皮质激素的用量。然而, 它带来子宫感染和胎儿损伤的风险, 并可能导致早产和分娩。我们发现,与注射入母体相比, 没有研究评估直接注射入胎儿的益处和危害。

我们发现了什么证据?

我们在2017年10月25日检索了证据,没有发现任何已完成的随机对照试验,研究对于有早产风险的妇女,评估与注射到母体相比,直接给胎儿注射糖皮质激素的利与弊。我们发现了两项研究,但其中一项不是随机对照试验,在另一项研究中,方法尚不清楚,因此我们已经联系了研究作者以获得进一步的信息。

这意味着什么?

我们需要进一步的研究, 来评估与母体肌肉注射相比,直接对胎儿注射糖皮质激素的效果。这些试验中的婴儿需要长时间随访,以便我们能够监测糖皮质激素对儿童发育的影响,包括诸如脑瘫等损伤或残疾。我们需要高质量的随机试验,以确定一种方法是否优于另一种方法。

Authors' conclusions

Implications for practice

As there has been a lack of research completed in this area and as there is an absence of randomised controlled trial data, it is advisable to stay with the current standard of transplacental maternally administered corticosteroid treatment.

Implications for research

The available animal studies of direct fetal corticosteroid treatment provide some insight into the potential benefits of this intervention. Randomised controlled trials are required, however, to provide the most reliable evidence about any potential benefits and harms of giving pregnant women at risk of preterm birth direct fetal corticosteroid treatment. Such trials must be of high quality, and of a sufficient sample size to assess the comparative effects on fetal, infant and child mortality and morbidity, maternal outcomes, and the use of health services.

Background

Description of the condition

The World Health Organization (WHO) defines preterm birth as birth before 37 weeks of gestation (WHO 2015) and this condition is associated with high neonatal morbidity and mortality. Prematurity is the main cause of perinatal mortality and morbidity in high‐income countries (Evans 1993; Goldenberg 2007). In 2013, preterm birth accounted for 16% of all perinatal mortality in Australia (AIHW 2015). Despite advances in medical technology, the primary cause of early neonatal death in preterm infants remains respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) as a consequence of immature lung development and surfactant insufficiency. With increasing gestational age, organ systems are more mature and this increases the survival rate (Doyle 2001; Saigal 2007). Preterm infants who survive the neonatal period are at increased risk of chronic disability, including but not limited to neurological disability and chronic pulmonary disease (Doyle 2001; Evans 1993). As preterm birth is associated with high mortality and long‐term adverse health impact compared with birth at term, this clearly signifies a prominent clinical as well as economic burden on healthcare resources (Goldenberg 2007; WHO 2015).

Description of the intervention

Single (Roberts 2017) or multiple (Crowther 2015) courses of antenatal corticosteroid in women at risk of preterm birth have been shown to reduce the incidence of RDS, as first described by Liggins 1972. Corticosteroid is a steroid hormone that acts by increasing protein and phospholipid synthesis, increasing levels of surfactant in the fetal lung and accelerating maturation of the fetal lung (Ballard 1995; Evans 1993). In addition to reducing the incidence of RDS, antenatal corticosteroid treatment prior to preterm birth has been shown to reduce the risk of perinatal death, neonatal death, intraventricular haemorrhage, infections, intensive care unit admission and developmental delay in childhood (Roberts 2017). These outcomes also depend on the gestational age of the pregnancy. Antenatal corticosteroids have become the standard of care for women at risk of preterm birth in many countries (Antenatal Corticosteroid Guidelines Panel 2015; Haram 2003; Jobe 2004; NIH 1995; WHO 2015).

However, the short‐ and long‐term safety profile of antenatal corticosteroid treatment is still debatable, especially in multiple corticosteroid administrations. Corticosteroids are known to inhibit cell growth and DNA replication. Animal studies have demonstrated that maternal corticosteroid administration at the minimal effective dose inhibits fetal growth, increases fetal blood pressure and perhaps modifies neurodevelopment (Fowden 1996; Jobe 1998; Moss 2003). The severity increases as the dose and number of administrations increase (Moss 2003). The known short‐term effects of antenatal corticosteroids in the fetus are decreased fetal breathing and movements, and a reduction in the amniotic fluid volume (Babovic 2009; Jackson 2003). Exposure to high levels of cortisol in a normally low fetal cortisol environment, in addition to other stress hormones produced with growth restriction, may have lifelong effects, leading to fetal programming for adult diseases, such as hypertension, insulin resistance, diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome (Benediktsson 1993; Dalziel 2005; Newnham 1999). Maternal administration of corticosteroid (orally, intramuscularly or intravascularly) not only affects the fetus but has the potential for negative maternal side effects, such as elevation of maternal blood pressure (Babovic 2009) and blood glucose concentrations, increasing susceptibility to sepsis (Evans 1993).

There remains variation in clinical practice on issues regarding the use of antenatal corticosteroids, including the type of corticosteroid to use, the dose and the optimal route of administration (Brownfoot 2013; Jobe 2004). The common route of administration is intramuscularly to the mother, with transplacental transfer to the fetus (Roberts 2017). Animal studies and early studies in pregnant women at risk of preterm birth have reported the use of an alternative route of administration, by direct intramuscular injection of corticosteroid into the fetus under ultrasound guidance, in an attempt to minimise the side‐effect profile. These early studies indicate that direct fetal administration may be feasible in humans but further research still needs to be conducted (Moss 2003).

How the intervention might work

Direct fetal ultrasound‐guided injection of corticosteroid is believed to induce lung maturation of the preterm fetus, with different side‐effect profiles compared to indirect administration. The most important advantages of direct administration could include the avoidance of maternal toxicity and the metabolic side effects, as well as increasing the efficacy of bypassing the placenta and therefore inducing a more rapid fetal lung maturation (Evans 1993; Jobe 1993).

One of the first few animal studies of direct fetal corticosteroid treatment used ultrasound to deliver direct fetal injection of corticosteroid or saline control to 36 pregnant ewes. The preterm lambs were delivered at 128 days gestational age, to assess the postnatal lung function (Jobe 1993). The authors found that relative to the saline control group, corticosteroid given as a single injection 48 hours before birth resulted in a significant improvement in postnatal lung function (Jobe 1993).

Another animal study comparing direct fetal against maternal administration of corticosteroid showed that administration of repeated doses of corticosteroid directly to the fetus did not produce the growth restriction induced by maternal administration (Newnham 1999). There was no reduction in the fetal birthweight or weights of major organs, with the exception of the liver (Newnham 1999).

The first human study (a single‐arm trial) administered direct intramuscular fetal therapy to six women at risk of preterm birth (Ljubic 1999). In five cases, there was an uneventful outcome of fetuses, indicating that direct fetal corticosteroid treatment improved postnatal lung function in preterm fetuses. Another single‐arm trial involving 41 women at risk of preterm birth found that direct intramuscular fetal corticosteroid administration led to an increase in fetal breathing but no change in fetal movement and growth parameters (Babovic 2009).

In an animal study involving direct corticosteroid administration, higher corticosteroid peak concentrations were found in the fetal circulation compared with maternal intramuscular administration of the same dose (Moss 2003). However, the duration of maternal and fetal exposure to corticosteroid has been shown to be shorter after direct fetal injection (Babovic 2009). These differences in corticosteroid concentration and length of exposure are thought to lead to a reduced risk of growth retardation and other maternal and fetal complications (Moss 2003). Neurodevelopmental outcomes and long‐term effects on the risk of hypertension, diabetes and metabolic syndrome in relation to direct corticosteroid treatment are as yet unknown.

As an invasive procedure, direct fetal administration of corticosteroids carries additional risks which are not present with maternal administration. These risks are likely to be similar to those of amniocentesis, which carries a 1:1000 risk of intrauterine infection and 1:100 risk of pregnancy loss (RCOG 2010). In addition, there are potential risks of fetal injury, initiation of preterm labour (Newnham 1999), preterm prelabour rupture of membranes, placental abruption and maternal‐fetal haemorrhage (Gordon 2002).

Why it is important to do this review

Despite the major advances in medical technology, the incidence of preterm birth remains high. This could be due multiple factors such as increasing rates of multiple pregnancies, greater use of reproductive technologies, increases in maternal age and changes in clinical practice (Beck 2010). Preterm birth has significant impacts on maternal health, neonatal and childhood health, families and the economy (Goldenberg 2007; Saigal 2007). The introduction of the use of antenatal corticosteroid administered by intramuscular injection to women at risk of preterm birth has reduced the incidence of RDS and increased the survival rates of preterm infants. However, this intervention also comes with its own risks and side effects. There remains uncertainty about the type of corticosteroid to use and the optimal method of administration (Brownfoot 2013). Direct fetal corticosteroid administration may have benefits over maternal administration in terms of safety and efficacy. This review assesses the effects of direct corticosteroid administration to the preterm fetus, compared with maternal administration, using the best available evidence.

Objectives

To assess if different routes of corticosteroid administration (maternal versus direct fetal) have effects on health outcomes for women and their babies.

Methods

Criteria for considering studies for this review

Types of studies

All randomised controlled trials comparing maternal with direct fetal routes of antenatal corticosteroid administration in women at risk of preterm birth. We planned not to include quasi‐randomised trials, cluster‐randomised trials or cross‐over trials. We intended to consider studies presented only as abstracts.

Types of participants

All women at risk of preterm birth (less than 37 weeks) receiving any antenatal corticosteroid treatment prior to birth, by any maternal transplacental or direct fetal route of administration.

Types of interventions

Transplacental (oral, intramuscular or intravascular) versus direct fetal corticosteroid treatment given to women at risk of preterm birth (less than 37 weeks). We planned to consider any type, dose and regimen of corticosteroid treatment.

Types of outcome measures

Primary outcomes
Maternal

  • Maternal sepsis (as defined by authors)

Infant

  • Death (stillborn or death of a live‐born infant prior to primary hospital discharge)

  • Respiratory distress syndrome

Child

  • Survival free of any disability (as defined by authors)

  • Neurodevelopmental impairment (as defined by authors)

Child as an adult

  • Survival free of cardiometabolic disease

  • Neurodevelopmental impairment (as defined by authors)

Secondary outcomes
Maternal

  • Chorioamnionitis

  • Pyrexia after trial entry requiring the use of antibiotics

  • Intrapartum pyrexia

  • Postnatal pyrexia

  • Intensive care unit admission

  • Glucose tolerance (as defined by authors)

  • Hypertension (as defined by authors)

  • Breastfeeding

Infant

  • Gestational age at birth

  • Low Apgar score (less than seven at five minutes)

  • Intraventricular haemorrhage

  • Periventricular leukomalacia

  • Body size (birthweight, head circumference, length and skinfold thickness)

  • Placental weight

  • Neonatal blood pressure

  • Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (chronic lung disease) (as defined by authors)

  • Necrotising enterocolitis

  • Admission to neonatal intensive care

  • Composite of serious infant outcomes (as defined by authors)

  • Systemic infection in the first 48 hours of life

  • Hypothalamo‐pituitary‐adrenal axis function (as defined by authors)

Child

  • Total deaths

  • Body size measurements (including z scores for weight, height, head circumference and body mass index (BMI))

  • Asthma/wheeze

  • Risk factors for cardiovascular disease

  • Emotional and behavioural problems

Child as an adult

  • Growth measurements (including weight, head circumference, height, skin fold thickness and BMI)

  • Age at puberty

  • Abnormal lung function (including z scores for forced expiratory volume in one second, forced vital capacity and forced expiratory flow at 25% to 75% of forced vital capacity)

  • Health‐related quality of life

  • Employment status

Health services

  • Length of antenatal hospitalisation for women

  • Length of postnatal hospitalisation for women

  • Length of neonatal hospitalisation

  • Cost of maternal care

  • Cost of neonatal care

Search methods for identification of studies

The following methods section of this review is based on a standard template used by Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth.

Electronic searches

We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth’s Trials Register by contacting their Information Specialist (25 October 2017)

The Register is a database containing over 23,000 reports of controlled trials in the field of pregnancy and childbirth. For full search methods used to populate Pregnancy and Childbirth’s Trials Register including the detailed search strategies for CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL; the list of handsearched journals and conference proceedings, and the list of journals reviewed by the current awareness service, please follow this link to the editorial information about the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth in the Cochrane Library and select the ‘Specialized Register ’ section from the options on the left side of the screen.

Briefly, Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth’s Trials Register is maintained by their Information Specialist and contains trials identified from:

  1. monthly searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL);

  2. weekly searches of MEDLINE (Ovid);

  3. weekly searches of Embase (Ovid);

  4. monthly searches of CINAHL (EBSCO);

  5. handsearches of 30 journals and the proceedings of major conferences;

  6. weekly current awareness alerts for a further 44 journals plus monthly BioMed Central email alerts.

Two people screen the search results and review the full text of all relevant trial reports identified through the searching activities described above. Based on the intervention described, each trial report is assigned a number that corresponds to a specific Pregnancy and Childbirth review topic (or topics), and is then added to the Register. The Information Specialist searches the Register for each review using this topic number rather than keywords. This results in a more specific search set that has been fully accounted for in the relevant review sections (Excluded studies; Studies awaiting classification).

We also searched the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) and ClinicalTrials.gov (25 October 2017). See Appendix 1 for search terms used.

Searching other resources

We searched the reference lists of retrieved studies.

We did not apply any language or date restrictions.

Data collection and analysis

There are no included studies in this review. SeeAppendix 2 for full methods of data collection and analysis to be used in future updates of this review, as more data become available.

Selection of studies

Two review authors independently assessed for inclusion the potential studies identified by the search strategy. We resolved any disagreement through discussion, or consulted a third person.

Results

Description of studies

Results of the search

In the previous version of this review, we identified only one potential abstract (Ljubic 2000). The Ljubic 2000 study compared the efficacy and safety of transplacental versus direct fetal corticosteroid treatment for accelerating fetal lung maturation. The authors examined effects of single‐dose, ultrasound‐guided fetal administration of 4 mg dexamethasone compared with standard transplacental maternal administration of 24 mg dexamethasone. We contacted the author about the study design and await further information. The study is currently listed under Studies awaiting classification.

The updated search in 2017 identified one potential study (Babovic 2015) which we have excluded from the review as it was a non‐randomised trial (see: Excluded studies).

Our search of the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) and ClinicalTrials.gov in October 2017 did not identify any further trials.

See: Figure 1.


Study flow diagram.

Study flow diagram.

Excluded studies

The Babovic 2015 study assessed the short‐term effects (0 to 4 hours) of transplacental versus direct fetal corticosteroid treatment on the fetal biophysical profile, baseline fetal heart rate, non‐stress test and perinatal outcomes. The authors assessed the effects of a single‐dose, ultrasound‐guided fetal administration of 4 mg dexamethasone compared with standard transplacental maternal administration of 24 mg dexamethasone (Babovic 2015). We contacted the trial author, who responded and provided clarity about the study's methodology.

Risk of bias in included studies

There are no included studies in this review.

Effects of interventions

There are no included studies in this review.

Discussion

We did not identify any randomised controlled trials for inclusion in this review comparing the benefits and harms of transplacental versus direct fetal corticosteroid treatment for accelerating fetal lung maturation where there is a risk of preterm birth.

The available studies carried out so far on animals and humans have shown that direct intramuscular injection of corticosteroid into the fetus under ultrasound guidance is feasible, but good‐quality data on health outcomes are lacking.

In the absence of sufficient data on which to base a clinical decision, uncertainty persists as to which method could provide better efficacy and safety. Randomised controlled trials are needed, focusing on the benefits and harms of maternal administration of transplacental corticosteroid treatment versus direct fetal corticosteroid treatment. Until the uncertainties have been addressed, it is advisable to stay with the current standard of transplacental maternally administered corticosteroid treatment (Roberts 2017).

Study flow diagram.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.