Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cjepiva za sprječavanje herpesa zostera u starijih osoba

Contraer todo Desplegar todo

Background

Herpes zoster, commonly known as shingles, is a neurocutaneous disease caused by the reactivation of the virus that causes varicella (chickenpox). After resolution of the varicella episode, the virus can remain latent in the sensitive dorsal ganglia of the spine. Years later, with declining immunity, the varicella zoster virus (VZV) can reactivate and cause herpes zoster, an extremely painful condition that can last many weeks or months and significantly compromise the quality of life of the affected person. The natural process of ageing is associated with a reduction in cellular immunity, and this predisposes older adults to herpes zoster. Vaccination with an attenuated form of the VZV activates specific T‐cell production avoiding viral reactivation. Two types of herpes zoster vaccines are currently available. One of them is the single‐dose live attenuated zoster vaccine (LZV), which contains the same live attenuated virus used in the chickenpox vaccine, but it has over 14‐fold more plaque‐forming units of the attenuated virus per dose. The other is the recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) which does not contain the live attenuated virus, but rather a small fraction of the virus that cannot replicate but can boost immunogenicity. The recommended schedule for the RZV is two doses two months apart.

This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2010, and updated in 2012, 2016, and 2019.

Objectives

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of vaccination for preventing herpes zoster in older adults.

Search methods

For this 2022 update, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2022, Issue 10), MEDLINE (1948 to October 2022), Embase (2010 to October 2022), CINAHL (1981 to October 2022), LILACS (1982 to October 2022), and three trial registries.

Selection criteria

We included studies involving healthy older adults (mean age 60 years or older). We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi‐RCTs comparing zoster vaccine (any dose and potency) versus any other type of intervention (e.g. varicella vaccine, antiviral medication), placebo, or no intervention (no vaccine). Outcomes were cumulative incidence of herpes zoster, adverse events (death, serious adverse events, systemic reactions, or local reaction occurring at any time after vaccination), and dropouts.

Data collection and analysis

We used the standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane.

Main results

We included two new studies involving 1736 participants in this update. The review now includes a total of 26 studies involving 90,259 healthy older adults with a mean age of 63.7 years. Only three studies assessed the cumulative incidence of herpes zoster in groups that received vaccines versus placebo. Most studies were conducted in high‐income countries in Europe and North America and included healthy Caucasians (understood to be white participants) aged 60 years or over with no immunosuppressive comorbidities. Two studies were conducted in Japan and one study was conducted in the Republic of Korea. Sixteen studies used LZV. Ten studies tested an RZV.

The overall certainty of the evidence was moderate, which indicates that the intervention probably works. Most data for the primary outcome (cumulative incidence of herpes zoster) and secondary outcomes (adverse events and dropouts) came from studies that had a low risk of bias and included a large number of participants.

The cumulative incidence of herpes zoster at up to three years of follow‐up was lower in participants who received the LZV (one dose subcutaneously) than in those who received placebo (risk ratio (RR) 0.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.43 to 0.56; risk difference (RD) 2%; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 50; moderate‐certainty evidence) in the largest study, which included 38,546 participants. There were no differences between the vaccinated and placebo groups for serious adverse events (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.21) or deaths (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.11; moderate‐certainty evidence). The vaccinated group had a higher cumulative incidence of one or more adverse events (RR 1.71, 95% CI 1.38 to 2.11; RD 23%; number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome (NNTH) 4.3) and injection site adverse events (RR 3.73, 95% CI 1.93 to 7.21; RD 28%; NNTH 3.6; moderate‐certainty evidence) of mild to moderate intensity. These data came from four studies with 6980 participants aged 60 years or older.

Two studies (29,311 participants for safety evaluation and 22,022 participants for efficacy evaluation) compared RZV (two doses intramuscularly, two months apart) versus placebo. Participants who received the new vaccine had a lower cumulative incidence of herpes zoster at 3.2 years follow‐up (RR 0.08, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.23; RD 3%; NNTB 33; moderate‐certainty evidence), probably indicating a favourable profile of the intervention. There were no differences between the vaccinated and placebo groups in cumulative incidence of serious adverse events (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.03) or deaths (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.04; moderate‐certainty evidence). The vaccinated group had a higher cumulative incidence of adverse events, any systemic symptom (RR 2.23, 95% CI 2.12 to 2.34; RD 33%; NNTH 3.0), and any local symptom (RR 6.89, 95% CI 6.37 to 7.45; RD 67%; NNTH 1.5). Although most participants reported that their symptoms were of mild to moderate intensity, the risk of dropouts (participants not returning for the second dose, two months after the first dose) was higher in the vaccine group than in the placebo group (RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.39; RD 1%; NNTH 100, moderate‐certainty evidence).

Only one study reported funding from a non‐commercial source (a university research foundation). All other included studies received funding from pharmaceutical companies.

We did not conduct subgroup and sensitivity analyses

Authors' conclusions

LZV (single dose) and RZV (two doses) are probably effective in preventing shingles disease for at least three years. To date, there are no data to recommend revaccination after receiving the basic schedule for each type of vaccine. Both vaccines produce systemic and injection site adverse events of mild to moderate intensity. The conclusions did not change in relation to the previous version of the systematic review.

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Cjepiva za sprječavanje herpesa zostera u starijih osoba

Istraživačko pitanje

Procijenili smo učinkovitost i sigurnost cjepiva za sprječavanje herpes zostera u starijih zdravih ljudi.

Dosadašnje spoznaje

Virus koji uzrokuje vodene kozice, varicella zoster virus (VZV), može dugo ostati pritajen (neaktivan) u živčanim stanicama. Virus se može ponovno aktivirati, putovati putem živaca do kože, te uzrokovati plikove duž puta živca. Ovo se stanje naziva herpes zoster, a uglavnom pogađa ljude slabog imuniteta, poput starijih ljudi. Prije pojave plikova, mogu se javiti simptomi poput svrbeži, ukočenosti, trnaca, ili lokalne boli. Herpes zoster uzrokuje upalu živca i jake bolove koji mogu utjecati na kvalitetu života. Stopa pojavnosti herpes zostera kreće se od 2,08 do 6,20 slučajeva na 1000 osoba‐godina (tj. broj novih slučajeva po rizičnoj populaciji u određenom vremenskom razdoblju). Taj se broj povećava, dijelom i zato što ljudi žive duže.

Ovo je obnovljena verzija Cochraneovog sustavnog pregleda, zadnji put obnovljenog 2016. godine.

Datum pretraživanja dokaza

31. siječnja 2019. godine.

Značajke istraživanja

U ovu obnovljenu inačicu sustavnog pregleda uključili smo 11 novih istraživanja, koja uključuju 18,615 ispitanika; pregled sada uključuje dokaze iz 24 istraživanja u kojima je sudjelovao 88,531 ispitanik. Većina istraživanja provedena je u zemljama s visokim prihodima u Europi i Sjevernoj Americi, dok su dva istraživanja provedena u Japanu. Ispitanici su bili zdrave odrasle osobe u dobi od 60 godina ili više, bez poteškoća u borbi protiv infekcije, a većina su bile žene bijele rase. Praćenje je trajalo od 28 dana do 7 godina. Sva izvješća o istraživanjima objavljena su na engleskom jeziku.

Izvori financiranja uključenih istraživanja

Većinu istraživanja financirale su farmaceutske tvrtke; jedno je istraživanje dobilo financiranje od sveučilišne istraživačke zaklade.

Ključni rezultati

Jedno veliko, visokokvalitetno istraživanje koje je uključivalo 38,546 ispitanika u dobi od 60 godina i više uspoređivalo je živo cjepivo (engl. live zoster vaccine, LZV) s lažnim (placebo) cjepivima (jedna doza primijenjena u obliku potkožne injekcije) i otkrila je da živo cjepivo može spriječiti herpes zoster do tri godine. Neželjeni učinci cjepiva bili su uglavnom blagi do umjereni, kako za sustavne simptome, tako i za reakcije na mjestu injekcije.

Rekombinantno (engl. recombinant zoster vaccine, RZV) je novo cjepivo koje sadrži mali dio varicella zoster virusa zajedno s adjuvansom. Adjuvans je tvar koja pomaže tijelu u obrani tako da pojačava reakciju tijela na podražaj (bakterije, virusi i tvari koje se čine stranim i štetnim). Za ovo cjepivo potrebne su ukupno dvije intramuskularne doze, s razmakom od dva do šest mjeseci. Dva istraživanja (29,311 ispitanika za procjenu sigurnosti i 22,022 ispitanika za procjenu učinkovitosti) uspoređivala su RZV s placebom i izvijestila da su ljudi koji su primili RZV imali manje epizoda herpes zostera, ali više sustavnih simptoma i reakcija na mjestu injekcije. Većina ispitanika izvijestila je da su ovi štetni učinci bili blagog do umjerenog intenziteta. Važno je napomenuti da je broj sudionika koji nisu primili drugu dozu bio veći u skupini koja je uzimala cjepivo, nego u skupini koja je primala placebo.

Kvaliteta dokaza

Ukupnu kvalitetu dokaza ocijenili smo umjerenom, jer su istraživanja uključivala veliki broj sudionika.