Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Glucocorticosteroides para lactantes con atresia biliar posterior a la portoenterostomía de Kasai

Contraer todo Desplegar todo

Referencias

References to studies included in this review

Bezerra 2014 {published and unpublished data}

Bezerra JA, Spino C, Magee JC, Shneider BL, Rosenthal P, Wang KS, et al. Use of corticosteroids after hepatoportoenterostomy for bile drainage in infants with biliary atresia: the START randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2014;311(7):1750‐9. CENTRAL

Davenport 2007 {published and unpublished data}

Davenport M, Stringer MD, Tizzard SA, McClean P, Mieli‐Vergani G, Hadzic N. Randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial of corticosteroids after Kasai portoenterostomy for biliary atresia. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) 2007;46(6):1821‐7. CENTRAL

References to studies excluded from this review

Alberti 2011 {published data only}

Alberti D, Colusso M, Cheli M, Stroppa P, Bravi M, Casotti V, et al. Efficacy of high versus low dose adjuvant corticosteroid treatment in children with biliary atresia: a single‐centre, controlled study. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition 2011;52(Suppl 1):54. CENTRAL

Chen 2015 {published data only}

Chen Y, Nah SA, Chiang L, Krishnaswamy G, Low Y. Postoperative steroid therapy for biliary atresia: systematic review and meta‐analysis. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 2015;50(9):1590‐4. CENTRAL

Chung 2008 {published data only}

Chung HY, Kak Yuen Wong K, Cheun Leung Lan L, Kwong Hang Tam P. Evaluation of a standardized protocol in the use of steroids after Kasai operation. Pediatric Surgery International 2008;24(9):1001‐4. CENTRAL

Davenport 2013 {published data only}

Davenport M, Parsons C, Tizzard S, Hadzic N. Steroids in biliary atresia: single surgeon, single centre, prospective study. Journal of Hepatology 2013;59(5):1054‐8. CENTRAL

DeRusso 2003 {published data only}

DeRusso PA. Adjuvant medical therapies after portoenterostomy for biliary atresia: time for a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition 2003;35(5):634‐5. CENTRAL

Dong 2013 {published data only}

Dong R, Song Z, Chen G, Zheng S, Xiao XM. Improved outcome of biliary atresia with postoperative high‐dose steroid. Gastroenterology Research and Practice 2013;2013:902431. CENTRAL

Escobar 2006 {published data only}

Escobar MA, Jay CL, Brooks RM, West KW, Rescorla FJ, Molleston JP, et al. Effect of corticosteroid therapy on outcomes in biliary atresia after Kasai portoenterostomy. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 2006;41:99‐103. CENTRAL

Foroutan 2007 {published data only}

Foroutan HR, Hosseini AH, Dehghani SM, Banani SA, Bahador A, Haghighat M, et al. Peri‐operative high‐dose v post‐operative low dose steroid therapy in the management of biliary atresia: a preliminary report. Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences 2008;33(2):79‐83. CENTRAL

Japanese Biliary Atresia Society 2013 {published data only}

Japanese Biliary Atresia Society, Nio M, Muraji T. Multicenter randomized trial of postoperative corticosteroid therapy for biliary atresia. Pediatric Surgery International 2013;29(11):1091‐5. CENTRAL

Kobayashi 2005 {published data only}

Kobayashi H, Yamataka A, Koga H, Okazaki T, Tamura T, Urao M, et al. Optimum prednisolone usage in patients with biliary atresia postportoenterostomy. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 2005;40(2):327‐30. CENTRAL

Lao 2010 {published data only}

Lao OB, Larison C, Garrison M, Healey PJ, Goldin AB. Steroid use after the kasai procedure for biliary atresia. American Journal of Surgery 2010;199(5):680‐4. CENTRAL

Meyers 2003 {published data only}

Meyers RL, Book LS, O'Gorman MA, Jackson WD, Black RE, Johnson DG, et al. High‐dose steroids, ursodeoxycholic acid, and chronic intravenous antibiotics improve bile flow after Kasai procedure in infants with biliary atresia. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 2003;38:406‐11. CENTRAL

Petersen 2008 {published data only}

Petersen C, Harder D, Melter M, Becker T, Wasielewski RV, Leonhardt J, et al. Postoperative high‐dose steroids do not improve mid‐term survival with native liver in biliary atresia. American Journal of Gastroenterology 2008;103(3):712‐9. CENTRAL

Shimadera 2007 {published data only}

Shimadera S, Iwai N, Deguchi E, Kimura O, Fumino S, Ono S. The significance of steroid therapy after hepatoportoenterostomy in infants with biliary atresia. European Journal of Pediatric Surgery 2007;17(2):100‐3. CENTRAL

Shneider 2012 {published data only}

Shneider BL, Magee JC, Bezerra JA, Haber B, Karpen SJ, Raghunathan T, et al. the Childhood Liver Disease Research Education Network (ChiLDREN). Efficacy of fat‐soluble vitamin supplementation in infants with biliary atresia. Pediatrics 2012;130(3):e607‐14. CENTRAL

Shneider 2016 {published data only}

Shneider BL, Magee JC, Karpen SJ, Rand EB, Narkewicz MR, Bass LM, et al. Childhood Liver Disease Research Network (ChiLDReN). Total serum bilirubin within 3 months of hepatoportoenterostomy predicts short‐term outcomes in biliary atresia. Journal of Pediatrics 2016;170:211‐7. e2. CENTRAL

Sokol 2007 {published data only}

Sokol RJ. Corticosteroid treatment in biliary atresia: tonic or toast?. Hepatology 2007;46(6):1675‐8. CENTRAL

Stringer 2007 {published data only}

Stringer MD, Davison SM, Rajwal SR, McClean P. Kasai portoenterostomy: 12‐year experience with a novel adjuvant therapy regimen. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 2007;42(8):1324‐8. CENTRAL

Tyraskis 2016 {published data only}

Tyraskis A, Davenport M. Steroids after the Kasai procedure for biliary atresia: the effect of age at Kasai portoenterostomy. Pediatric Surgery International 2016;32(3):193‐200. CENTRAL

Zeng 2014 {unpublished data only}

Zhen S, Lu X. The effect of adjuvant steroid therapy post‐Kasai portoenterostomy in biliary atresia. www.chictr.org.cn/showprojen.aspx?proj=10065 (accessed 18 December 2017). CENTRAL

Altman 2003

Altman DG, Bland JM. Interaction revisited: the difference between two estimates. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 2003;326:219.

Brok 2008

Brok J, Thorlund K, Gluud C, Wetterslev J. Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta‐analyses. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2008;61(8):763‐9.

Brok 2009

Brok J, Thorlund K, Wetterslev J, Gluud C. Apparently conclusive meta‐analyses may be inconclusive — Trial sequential analysis adjustment of random error risk due to repetitive testing of accumulating data in apparently conclusive neonatal meta‐analyses. International Journal of Epidemiology 2009;38(1):287‐98.

Davenport 2004

Davenport M, De Ville de Goyet J, Stringer MD, Mieli‐Vergani G, Kelly DA, McClean P, et al. Seamless management of biliary atresia in England and Wales (1999‐2002). Lancet 2004;363:1354‐7.

Davenport 2006

Davenport M, Tizzard SA, Underhill J, Mieli‐Vergani G, Portmann B, Hadzic N. The biliary atresia splenic malformation syndrome: a 28‐year single‐center retrospective study. Journal of Pediatrics 2006;149:393‐400.

Davenport 2008

Davnport M, Caponcelli E, Livesey E, Hadzic N, Howard E. Surgical outcome in biliary atresia: etiology affects the influence of age at surgery. Annals of Surgery 2008;247(4):694‐8.

Davenport 2011

Davenport M, Ong E, Sharif K, Alizai N, McClean P, Hadzic N, et al. Biliary atresia in England and Wales: results of centralization and new benchmark. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 2011;46(9):1689‐94.

Egger 1997

Egger M, Davey Smith G, Sneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta‐analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ (Clinical Rearch Ed.) 1997;315:629‐34.

Gluud 2017

Gluud C, Nikolova D, Klingenberg SL. Cochrane Hepato‐Biliary Group. About Cochrane (Cochrane Review Groups (CRGs)) 2017, Issue 11. Art. No.: LIVER.

Hartley 2009

Hartley JL, Davnport M, Kelly DA. Biliary atresia. Lancet 2009;374(9702):1704‐13.

Higgins 2003

Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta‐analyses. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 2003;327:557‐60.

Higgins 2011

Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.

Hill 2015

Hill R, Quaglia A, Hussain M, Hadzic N, Mieli‐Vergani G, Vergani D, et al. Th‐17 cells infiltrate the liver in human biliary atresia and are related to surgical outcome. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 2015;50(8):1297‐303.

ICH‐GCP 1997

International Conference on Harmonisation Expert Working Group. International conference on harmonisation of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human use. ICH harmonised tripartite guideline. Guideline for good clinical practice CFR & ICH Guidelines. Vol. 1, Philadelphia (PA): Barnett International/PAREXEL, 1997.

Jakobsen 2014

Jakobsen J, Wetterslev J, Winkel P, Lange T, Gluud C. Thresholds for statistical and clinical significance in systematic reviews with meta‐analytic methods. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2014;14:120.

Karrer 1985

Karrer FM, Lilly JR. Corticosteroid therapy in biliary atresia. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 1985;20(6):693‐5.

Kasai 1968

Kasai M, Kimura S, Asakura Y, Suzuk H, Taira Y, Ohashi E. Surgical treatment of biliary atresia. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 1968;3(6):665‐75.

Kasai 1978

Kasai M, Suzuki H, Ohashi E, Ohi R, Chiba T, Okamoto A. Technique and results of operative management of biliary atresia. World Journal of Surgery 1978;2(5):571‐9.

Kjaergard 2001

Kjaergard LL, Villumsen J, Gluud C. Reported methodologic quality and discrepancies between large and small randomized trials in meta‐analyses. Annals of Internal Medicine 2001;135(11):982‐9.

Lundh 2017

Lundh A, Lexchin J, Mintzes B, Schroll JB, Bero L. Industry sponsorship and research outcome. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.MR000033.pub3]

Macaskill 2001

Macaskill P, Walter SD, Irwig L. A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta‐analysis. Statistics in Medicine 2001;20:641‐54.

McKiernan 2000

McKiernan PJ, Baker PJ, Kelly DA. The frequency and outcome of biliary atresia in the UK and Ireland. Lancet 2000;355:25‐9.

Moher 1998

Moher D, Pham B, Jones A, Cook DJ, Jadad AR, Moher M, et al. Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta‐analyses?. Lancet 1998;352(9128):609‐13.

Muraji 2004

Muraji T, Nio M, Ohhama Y, Hashimoto T, Iwanaka T, Takamatsu H, et al. Postoperative corticosteroid therapy for bile drainage in biliary atresia‐‐a nationwide survey. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 2004;39(12):1803‐5.

Narayanaswamy 2007

Narayanaswamy B, Gonde C, Tredger JM, Hussain M, Vergani D, Davenport M. Serial circulating markers of inflammation in biliary atresia ‐ evolution of the post‐operative inflammatory process. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) 2007;46:180‐7.

RevMan 2014 [Computer program]

Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.

Royle 2003

Royle P, Milne R. Literature searching for randomized controlled trials used in Cochrane reviews: rapid versus exhaustive searches. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2003;19(4):591‐603.

Savović 2012a

Savović J, Jones HE, Altman DG, Harris RJ, Jüni P, Pildal J, et al. Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomized, controlled trials. Annals of Internal Medicine 2012;157(6):429‐38.

Savović 2012b

Savović J, Jones HE, Altman DG, Harris RJ, Jüni P, Pildal J, et al. Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomized, controlled trials. Health Technology Assessment 2012;16(35):1‐82.

Schulz 1995

Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 1995;273(5):408‐12.

SPIRIT 2013a

Chan A‐W, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gøtzsche PC, Krleža‐Jerić K, et al. SPIRIT 2013 Statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Annals of Internal Medicine 2013;158(3):200‐7.

SPIRIT 2013b

Chan A‐W, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin J, et al. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols or clinical trials. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 2013;346:e7586.

Sweeting 2004

Sweeting MJ, Sutton AJ, Lambert PC. What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta‐analysis of sparse data. Statistics in Medicine 2004;23(9):1351‐75.

Thorlund 2009

Thorlund K, Devereaux PJ, Wetterslev J, Guyatt G, Ioannidis JP, Thabane L, et al. Can trial sequential monitoring boundaries reduce spurious inferences from meta‐analyses?. International Journal of Epidemiology 2009;38(1):276‐86.

Thorlund 2010

Thorlund K, Anema A, Mills E. Interpreting meta‐analysis according to the adequacy of sample size. An example using isoniazid chemoprophylaxis for tuberculosis in purified protein derivative negative HIV‐infected individuals. Clinical Epidemiology 2010;2:57‐66.

Thorlund 2011

Thorlund K, Engstrøm J, Wetterslev J, Brok J, Imberger G, Gluud C. User manual for Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA). ctu.dk/tsa/files/tsa_manual.pdf 2011 (accessed 17 June 2016).

TSA 2011 [Computer program]

Copenhagen Trial Unit. TSA ‐ Trial Sequential Analysis. Version 0.9.5.10 Beta. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Trial Unit, 2011.

Wetterslev 2008

Wetterslev J, Thorlund K, Brok J, Gluud C. Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta‐analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2008;61(1):64‐75.

Wetterslev 2009

Wetterslev J, Thorlund K, Brok J, Gluud C. Estimating required information size by quantifying diversity in a random‐effects meta‐analysis. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2009;9:86.

Wetterslev 2017

Wetterslev J, Jakobsen JC, Gluud C. Trial Sequential Analysis in systematic reviews with meta‐analysis. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2017;17(1):39.

Wood 2008

Wood L, Egger M, Gluud LL, Schulz KF, Jüni P, Altman DG, et al. Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta‐epidemiological study. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 2008;336(7644):601‐5.

Zani 2015

Zani A, Quaglia A, Hadzic N, Zuckerman M, Davenport M. Cytomegalovirus‐associated biliary atresia: an aetiological and prognostic subgroup. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 2015;50(10):1739‐45.

References to other published versions of this review

Parsons 2010

Parsons C, Davenport M. Glucocorticosteroids for infants with biliary atresia following Kasai portoenterostomy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 10. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008735]

Thyraskis 2016

Tyraskis A, Parsons C, Davenport M. Glucocorticosteroids for infants with biliary atresia following Kasai portoenterostomy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2016, Issue 8. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008735.pub2]

Characteristics of studies

Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]

Bezerra 2014

Methods

Multicentre, double‐blind trial comparing glucocorticosteroid administration versus placebo

Participants

140 infants (70 in the treatment group and 70 in the placebo group) from multiple US centres

Age in months at surgery, mean (standard deviation)

Treatment: 2.3 (0.9)

Placebo: 2.3 (0.8)

Percentage of infants with biliary atresia splenic malformation syndrome

Treatment: 3%

Placebo: 4%

Bilirubin, mean (standard deviation (SD)) [original units]

Treatment: 128µmol/L (44) [7.5 mg/dl (2.6)]

Placebo: 135µmol/L (48) [7.9 mg/dl (2.8)]

Other biochemical indicators of liver injury and synthetic function were balanced between the 2 groups (exact values not stated).

Interventions

Starting the first day after Kasai portoenterostomy, trial participants received either intravenous methylprednisolone (4 mg/kg/day) or oral prednisolone (4 mg/kg/day) for the first 2 weeks, then oral prednisolone (2 mg/kg/day) for 2 weeks, followed by a tapering protocol for 9 weeks (n = 70) or placebo (n = 70) initiated within 72 hours of Kasai portoenterostomy.

Outcomes

Primary outcomes:

  • percentage of participants with serum total bilirubin level of < 1.5 mg/dL with native liver at 6 months.

Secondary outcomes:

  • survival with native liver until 24 months of age;

  • proportion of ascites at 12 and 24 months;

  • need for liver transplantation;

  • death;

  • safety outcome.

Notes

Subgroup of infants operated on at age of less than 70 days was reported.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Quote: "participants were randomized with equal probability to a 13‐week course of steroid therapy or matching placebo... The data coordinating center generated treatment randomization codes with permutated block sizes of 4 (stratified by site) and provided the central pharmacy with a list of assignments for each study site."

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Quote: "participants were randomized with equal probability to a 13‐week course of steroid therapy or matching placebo."

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Quote: "Study medications were labelled and put into a kit by the central pharmacy and distributed to study site research pharmacists who were instructed to dispense the kits to participants enrolled sequentially."

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Comment: the authors confirmed that outcome assessors were blinded.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Comment: Overall 5 infants were lost to follow‐up in the treatment group (2 withdrew and 3 were lost for other reasons) and 8 in the placebo group (4 withdrew and 4 were lost for other reasons). Imputation was used to account for missing data.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Low risk

Comment: authors reported on all outcomes in accordance with their methods, and a study protocol was available. Some of the outcomes from the study protocol were reported in other publications but these were not of interest to our review.

Other bias

Low risk

None identified

Davenport 2007

Methods

Double‐blind trial comparing glucocorticosteroid administration versus placebo, in two UK centres

Participants

73 infants from 2 UK centres

34 male, 39 female infants were included.

Age in days at surgery, median (interquartile range)

Treatment: 60 (50 to 71)

Placebo: 54 (45 to 70)

Preoperative bilirubin (μmol/L), median (interquartile range (IQR))

Treatment: 132 (112 to 166)

Placebo: 158 (125 to 183)

Preoperative AST (IU/L), median (IQR)

Treatment: 163 (118 to 202)

Placebo: 54 (99 to 220)

Preoperative ΓGT (IU/L), median (IQR)

Treatment: 420 (275 to 898)

Placebo: 54 (304 to 992)

Interventions

Participants received either oral prednisolone 2 mg/kg/day on days 7 to 21 following Kasai portoenterostomy, then 1 mg/kg/day on days 22 to 28 following Kasai portoenterostomy (n = 34) or placebo (n = 37).

Outcomes

Primary outcomes:

  • clearance of jaundice (defined as the achievement of a plasma total bilirubin level of ≤ 20 μmol/L at 6 and 12 months);

  • the proportion of infants surviving with their native liver at 6 and 12 months.

Secondary outcomes:

  • biochemical liver function tests 1, 6, and 12 months after the operation: total bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), γ‐glutamyl‐transpeptidase (ΓGT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and albumin.

Notes

Two‐year native liver survival was reported in a graph and the exact values were confirmed with the author. Subgroup of infants who were operated on by day 70 of life was reported.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Quote: "Participating infants were randomized to receive either oral prednisolone or placebo"

Comment: sequence generation was performed by a centralised agency within the pharmacy and was performed independently of the study investigators.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Comment: medications or placebo were prepared and concealed but the respective pharmacies of the hospitals included in the study. Investigators were unable to identify if glucocorticosteroid or placebo was being given to any particular patient.

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Quote: "Double blinded"

Comment: methodology was clarified upon contacting author and investigators and clinical personnel were blinded as the administered medication was not identifiable as placebo or glucocorticosteroids by clinical staff or investigators.

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Comment: the authors confirmed that outcome assessors were blinded.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Comment: no significant incomplete reporting was identified. Two infants excluded from the trial due to the finding that they had factors which excluded them from eligibility after already being enrolled.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Low risk

Comment: all predefined outcomes from the protocol were reported on.

Other bias

Low risk

None identified

AST: aspartate aminotransferase
IU/L: international units per litre
ΓGT: γ‐glutamyl‐transpeptidase

Characteristics of excluded studies [ordered by study ID]

Study

Reason for exclusion

Alberti 2011

Non‐randomised trial comparing groups of different glucocorticosteroid doses

Chen 2015

Meta‐analysis with no data from any new infants

Chung 2008

Non‐randomised trial

Davenport 2013

Non‐randomised trial

DeRusso 2003

Review article

Dong 2013

Non‐randomised trial comparing groups of different glucocorticosteroid doses

Escobar 2006

Non‐randomised trial

Foroutan 2007

Non‐randomised trial comparing groups of different glucocorticosteroid doses

Japanese Biliary Atresia Society 2013

Randomised trial comparing groups of different glucocorticosteroid doses with no placebo control group

Kobayashi 2005

Non‐randomised trial

Lao 2010

Non‐randomised trial

Meyers 2003

Non‐randomised trial

Petersen 2008

Non‐randomised trial

Shimadera 2007

Non‐randomised trial

Shneider 2012

Groups not separated into glucocorticosteroid and placebo but were pooled together for outcome reporting.

Shneider 2016

Groups not separated into glucocorticosteroid and placebo but were pooled together for outcome reporting.

Sokol 2007

Review article

Stringer 2007

Non‐randomised trial

Tyraskis 2016

Review article with some prospective data

Characteristics of ongoing studies [ordered by study ID]

Zeng 2014

Trial name or title

The effect of adjuvant steroid therapy post‐Kasai portoenterostomy in biliary atresia

Methods

Single‐centre open label randomised parallel controlled trial

Participants

Aims to recruit 100 infants in each group (glucocorticosteroid and control)

Interventions

Methylprednisolone, unspecified dose, duration or weaning regimen

Outcomes

Study ongoing, none reported

Starting date

1 January 2015

Contact information

Clinical lead: Sah Zheng

Address: 399 Wanyuan Rd, Shanghai, China, 201102

Notes

Data and analyses

Open in table viewer
Comparison 1. Primary outcomes

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 All‐cause mortality Show forest plot

2

211

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.0 [0.14, 6.90]

Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Primary outcomes, Outcome 1 All‐cause mortality.

Comparison 1 Primary outcomes, Outcome 1 All‐cause mortality.

2 Serious adverse event Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Primary outcomes, Outcome 2 Serious adverse event.

Comparison 1 Primary outcomes, Outcome 2 Serious adverse event.

Open in table viewer
Comparison 2. Secondary outcomes

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Infants who did not clear jaundice at six months Show forest plot

2

211

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.67, 1.17]

Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Secondary outcomes, Outcome 1 Infants who did not clear jaundice at six months.

Comparison 2 Secondary outcomes, Outcome 1 Infants who did not clear jaundice at six months.

2 All‐cause mortality or liver transplantation at two years Show forest plot

2

211

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.72, 1.39]

Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Secondary outcomes, Outcome 2 All‐cause mortality or liver transplantation at two years.

Comparison 2 Secondary outcomes, Outcome 2 All‐cause mortality or liver transplantation at two years.

3 Non‐serious adverse events

0

0

Risk Difference (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Subgroup analysis of infants operated on at age of < 70 days who did not clear their jaundice by six months post KPE Show forest plot

2

127

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.77 [0.46, 1.29]

Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 Secondary outcomes, Outcome 4 Subgroup analysis of infants operated on at age of < 70 days who did not clear their jaundice by six months post KPE.

Comparison 2 Secondary outcomes, Outcome 4 Subgroup analysis of infants operated on at age of < 70 days who did not clear their jaundice by six months post KPE.

5 Subgroup analysis of infants operated on at age of > 69 days who did not clear their jaundice by six months post KPE Show forest plot

2

84

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.09 [0.74, 1.62]

Analysis 2.5

Comparison 2 Secondary outcomes, Outcome 5 Subgroup analysis of infants operated on at age of > 69 days who did not clear their jaundice by six months post KPE.

Comparison 2 Secondary outcomes, Outcome 5 Subgroup analysis of infants operated on at age of > 69 days who did not clear their jaundice by six months post KPE.

Study flow diagram
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Trial Sequential Analysis of no clearance of jaundice by six months post Kasai portoenterostomy
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 4

Trial Sequential Analysis of no clearance of jaundice by six months post Kasai portoenterostomy

Trial Sequentil Analysis for all‐cause mortality or liver transplantation at two years
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 5

Trial Sequentil Analysis for all‐cause mortality or liver transplantation at two years

Trial Sequential Analysis of no clearance of jaundice at six months in the subgroup of infants who were less than 70 days old at the time of Kasai portoenterostomy
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 6

Trial Sequential Analysis of no clearance of jaundice at six months in the subgroup of infants who were less than 70 days old at the time of Kasai portoenterostomy

Comparison 1 Primary outcomes, Outcome 1 All‐cause mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Primary outcomes, Outcome 1 All‐cause mortality.

Comparison 1 Primary outcomes, Outcome 2 Serious adverse event.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Primary outcomes, Outcome 2 Serious adverse event.

Comparison 2 Secondary outcomes, Outcome 1 Infants who did not clear jaundice at six months.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Secondary outcomes, Outcome 1 Infants who did not clear jaundice at six months.

Comparison 2 Secondary outcomes, Outcome 2 All‐cause mortality or liver transplantation at two years.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Secondary outcomes, Outcome 2 All‐cause mortality or liver transplantation at two years.

Comparison 2 Secondary outcomes, Outcome 4 Subgroup analysis of infants operated on at age of < 70 days who did not clear their jaundice by six months post KPE.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 Secondary outcomes, Outcome 4 Subgroup analysis of infants operated on at age of < 70 days who did not clear their jaundice by six months post KPE.

Comparison 2 Secondary outcomes, Outcome 5 Subgroup analysis of infants operated on at age of > 69 days who did not clear their jaundice by six months post KPE.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.5

Comparison 2 Secondary outcomes, Outcome 5 Subgroup analysis of infants operated on at age of > 69 days who did not clear their jaundice by six months post KPE.

Glucocorticosteroids for infants with biliary atresia following Kasai portoenterostomy

Patient or population: infants with biliary atresia

Settings: hospitals

Intervention: glucocorticosteroids

Comparison: placebo

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Risk Ratio
(95% CI)

Number (no) of infants
(no of RCTs)

Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Placebo

Glucocorticosteroids

All‐cause mortality

six months after Kasai portoenterostomy

19 per 1000

19 per 1000
(3 to 131)

1.00

(0.14 to 6.90)

104 placebo

107 treatment
(2 RCTs, Bezerra 2014; Davenport 2007)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low1

Serious adverse event,

two years follow‐up

800 per 1000

814 per 1000
(708 to 977)

1.02

(0.87 to 1.20)

70 placebo

70 treatment
(1 RCT, Bezerra 2014)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low2

A significantly higher proportion of the treatment group had their first serious adverse event in the first 30 days after their Kasai portoenterostomy.

Health‐related quality of life

There are no data for this outcome in the included trials.

Infants who did not clear jaundice at six months

514 per 1000

452 per 1000
(303 to 529)

0.89

(0.67 to 1.17)

107 placebo

104 treatment
(2 RCTs, Bezerra 2014; Davenport 2007)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low1

The required information size for significance for the Trial Sequential Analysis was 540. The number of infants included in this meta‐analysis was 211, corresponding to 39.1% of the required information size.

All‐cause mortality or liver transplantation at two years

402 per 1000

404 per 1000
(291 to 562)

1.00 (0.72 to 1.39)

107 placebo

104 treatment
(2 RCTs, Bezerra 2014; Davenport 2007)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low1

The required information size for significance for the Trial Sequential Analysis was 1774. The number of infants included in this meta‐analysis was 211, corresponding to 11.9% of the required information size.

Subgroup analysis of infants operated on at less than 70 days of age who did not clear their jaundice by six months after Kasai portoenterostomy

516 per 1000

381 per 1000
(210 to 423)

0.75 (0.55 to 1.11)

64 placebo

63 treatment
(2 RCTs, Bezerra 2014; Davenport 2007)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low1

The required information size for significance for the Trial Sequential Analysis was 538. The number of infants included in this meta‐analysis was 127, corresponding to 23.6% of the required information size.

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval. RCT: randomised clinical trial.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence

  • High certainty: this research provides a very good indication of the likely effect; the likelihood that the effect will be substantially different is low.

  • Moderate certainty: this research provides a good indication of the likely effect; the likelihood that the effect will be substantially different is moderate.

  • Low certainty: this research provides some indication of the likely effect; however, the likelihood that it will be substantially different is high.

  • Very low certainty: this research does not provide a reliable indication of the likely effect; the likelihood that the effect will be substantially different is very high.

1 Downgraded two levels due to imprecision of the evidence: Trial Sequential Analysis determined that the sample size was insufficient to detect a difference between the two groups.

2 Downgraded one level due to imprecision of the evidence and another level due to inconsistency of the evidence: there was heterogeneity between the trials and there were inconsistent assessments of what constituted a significant adverse event. Trial Sequential Analysis determined that the sample size was insufficient to detect a difference between the two groups.

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Primary outcomes

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 All‐cause mortality Show forest plot

2

211

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.0 [0.14, 6.90]

2 Serious adverse event Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Primary outcomes
Comparison 2. Secondary outcomes

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Infants who did not clear jaundice at six months Show forest plot

2

211

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.67, 1.17]

2 All‐cause mortality or liver transplantation at two years Show forest plot

2

211

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.72, 1.39]

3 Non‐serious adverse events

0

0

Risk Difference (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Subgroup analysis of infants operated on at age of < 70 days who did not clear their jaundice by six months post KPE Show forest plot

2

127

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.77 [0.46, 1.29]

5 Subgroup analysis of infants operated on at age of > 69 days who did not clear their jaundice by six months post KPE Show forest plot

2

84

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.09 [0.74, 1.62]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Secondary outcomes