Administración sistemática de diferentes clases de antibióticos a las mujeres para la prevención de la infección en la cesárea
Información
- DOI:
- https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008726Copiar DOI
- Base de datos:
-
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Versión publicada:
-
- 06 octubre 2010see what's new
- Tipo:
-
- Intervention
- Etapa:
-
- Review
- Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
-
Grupo Cochrane de Embarazo y parto
- Copyright:
-
- Copyright © 2010 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Cifras del artículo
Altmetric:
Citado por:
Autores
Contributions of authors
Gill Gyte (GG) drafted the protocol with Zarko Alfirevic (ZA) and Lei Dou (LD) providing comments. GG and LD did the data extraction and GG entered the data with LD checking the data entry. GG drafted the results and conclusions and both ZA and LD checked and provided amendments.
Sources of support
Internal sources
-
The University of Liverpool, UK.
External sources
-
National Institute for Health Research, UK.
NIHR NHS Cochrane Collaboration Programme Grant Scheme award for NHS‐prioritised centrally‐managed, pregnancy and childbirth systematic reviews: CPGS02
Declarations of interest
None known.
Acknowledgements
We wish to thank Laura Hopkins and Fiona Smaill for all their work on the previous version of this review. Also we would like to thank Tim Neal for providing guidance on the updating, and Neil Hotham and Wendy Jones who provided guidance on the classification of the antibiotics.
Thanks to Austin Anderson Leirvik for translating Fugere 1983; Anne‐Marie Grant for translating Luttkus 1997; Danping He for translating Xu 1997; Alison Jenner for translating Warnecke 1982; Andrew MacDonald for translating Voto 1986; Cathryn Siegel‐Bergman for translating Koppel 1992; Tamara Stampalija for translating Mansani 1984 and Mansueto 1989; Caroline Summers for translating Wagner 2006; and Elizabeth Whiteley for translating Patacchiola 2000 and Rosaschino 1988.
As part of the pre‐publication editorial process, this review has been commented on by two peers (an editor and referee who is external to the editorial team), a member of the Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's international panel of consumers and the Group's Statistical Adviser.
Version history
| Published | Title | Stage | Authors | Version |
| 2021 Mar 04 | Different classes of antibiotics given to women routinely for preventing infection at caesarean section | Review | Myfanwy J Williams, Carolina Carvalho Ribeiro do Valle, Gillian ML Gyte | |
| 2014 Nov 17 | Different classes of antibiotics given to women routinely for preventing infection at caesarean section | Review | Gillian ML Gyte, Lixia Dou, Juan C Vazquez | |
| 2010 Oct 06 | Different classes of antibiotics given to women routinely for preventing infection at caesarean section | Review | Zarko Alfirevic, Gillian ML Gyte, Lixia Dou | |
Differences between protocol and review
From the original protocol, this review has been separated into three reviews as described in the updated protocol sections of this review and a further two reviews will provide information on this topic.
-
Different classes of antibiotics given to women routinely for preventing infection after caesarean section.
-
Different regimens of penicillin antibiotic given to women routinely for preventing infection after caesarean section.
-
Different regimens of cephalosporin antibiotic given to women routinely for preventing infection after caesarean section.
-
Timing of prophylactic antibiotics for preventing infectious morbidity in women undergoing caesarean section (review in preparation).
-
Routes of administration for antibiotic given to women routinely for preventing infection after caesarean section.
We have added subgroup analyses for all outcomes for Comparison 1, 'Cephalosporins versus penicillins', according to whether single or combination drugs were used.
We have added two further outcomes 'Post‐discharge infections ‐ to 30 days' and 'Maternal readmissions to hospital'.
Notes
This review updates part of the currently published review (Hopkins 1999). Once the other reviews, which complete the split of the original review, are published, we will withdraw Hopkins 1999 from publication.
