Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Flow diagram of the study selection
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Flow diagram of the study selection

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Uric acid (UA)‐lowering drug vs. placebo, outcome: 1.1 systolic 24‐hour ambulatory blood pressure.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 4

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Uric acid (UA)‐lowering drug vs. placebo, outcome: 1.1 systolic 24‐hour ambulatory blood pressure.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Uric acid (UA)‐lowering drug vs. placebo, outcome: 1.2 diastolic 24‐hour ambulatory blood pressure.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 5

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Uric acid (UA)‐lowering drug vs. placebo, outcome: 1.2 diastolic 24‐hour ambulatory blood pressure.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Uric acid (UA)‐lowering drug vs. placebo, outcome: 1.3 Clinic systolic blood pressure.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 6

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Uric acid (UA)‐lowering drug vs. placebo, outcome: 1.3 Clinic systolic blood pressure.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Uric acid (UA)‐lowering drug vs. placebo, outcome: 1.4 clinic diastolic blood pressure.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 7

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Uric acid (UA)‐lowering drug vs. placebo, outcome: 1.4 clinic diastolic blood pressure.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Uric acid (UA)‐lowering drug vs. placebo, outcome: 1.5 serum uric acid.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 8

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Uric acid (UA)‐lowering drug vs. placebo, outcome: 1.5 serum uric acid.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Uric acid (UA)‐lowering drug vs placebo, outcome: 1.6 Withdrawals due to adverse effects.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 9

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Uric acid (UA)‐lowering drug vs placebo, outcome: 1.6 Withdrawals due to adverse effects.

Comparison 1 Uric acid (UA) lowering drug vs placebo, Outcome 1 24h‐Systolic Blood Pressure.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Uric acid (UA) lowering drug vs placebo, Outcome 1 24h‐Systolic Blood Pressure.

Comparison 1 Uric acid (UA) lowering drug vs placebo, Outcome 2 24h‐Diastolic Blood Pressure.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Uric acid (UA) lowering drug vs placebo, Outcome 2 24h‐Diastolic Blood Pressure.

Comparison 1 Uric acid (UA) lowering drug vs placebo, Outcome 3 Clinic Systolic Blood Pressure.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Uric acid (UA) lowering drug vs placebo, Outcome 3 Clinic Systolic Blood Pressure.

Comparison 1 Uric acid (UA) lowering drug vs placebo, Outcome 4 Clinic Diastolic Blood Pressure.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Uric acid (UA) lowering drug vs placebo, Outcome 4 Clinic Diastolic Blood Pressure.

Comparison 1 Uric acid (UA) lowering drug vs placebo, Outcome 5 Serum uric acid.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Uric acid (UA) lowering drug vs placebo, Outcome 5 Serum uric acid.

Comparison 1 Uric acid (UA) lowering drug vs placebo, Outcome 6 Withdrawals due to adverse effects.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Uric acid (UA) lowering drug vs placebo, Outcome 6 Withdrawals due to adverse effects.

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Uric acid (UA) lowering drug compared to placebo for hyperuricemia in hypertensive patients

Uric acid (UA)‐lowering drug compared to placebo for hyperuricemia in hypertensive patients

Patient or population: hyperuricemia in hypertensive patients
Setting: several sites in the USA
Intervention: uric acid (UA)‐lowering drug
Comparison: placebo

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

№ of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with placebo

Risk with Uric acid (UA) lowering drug

24h‐Systolic Blood Pressure

MD 6.19 lower
(12.82 lower to 0.45 higher)

MD ‐6.2 (‐12.8, 0.5)

229
(3 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 1 2

24h‐Diastolic Blood Pressure

MD 3.92 lower
(9.19 lower to 1.36 higher)

MD ‐3.9 (‐9.2, 1.4)

229
(3 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 1 2

Clinic Systolic Blood Pressure

MD 8.43 lower
(15.24 lower to 1.62 lower)

MD ‐8.4 (‐15.2, ‐1.6)

120
(2 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 1 2

Clinic Diastolic Blood Pressure

MD 6.45 lower
(13.6 lower to 0.7 higher)

MD ‐6.5 (‐13.6, 0.7)

120
(2 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 1 2

Serum uric acid

MD 3.09 lower
(3.76 lower to 2.43 lower)

MD ‐3.1 (‐3.8, ‐2.4)

223
(3 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

Withdrawals due to adverse effects

18 per 1,000

34 per 1,000
(8 to 147)

RR 1.86
(0.43 to 8.10)

241
(3 RCTs)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
VERY LOW 1 3 4

NCT01496469 reported only one withdrawal due to adverse events. However, four adverse events were described in the febuxostat group, which might be drug‐related. Therefore, we decided to include all four cases in the assessment of RR for this study.

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio; OR: Odds ratio; RCT: Randomized controlled trial.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

1 Downgraded for wide CIs

2 Downgraded for high unexplained heterogeneity

3 Downgraded for small number of events and incomplete reporting

4 Unclear randomisation processes in the largest trial (highest weight in meta‐analysis)

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Uric acid (UA) lowering drug compared to placebo for hyperuricemia in hypertensive patients
Comparison 1. Uric acid (UA) lowering drug vs placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 24h‐Systolic Blood Pressure Show forest plot

3

229

Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐6.19 [‐12.82, 0.45]

2 24h‐Diastolic Blood Pressure Show forest plot

3

229

Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐3.92 [‐9.19, 1.36]

3 Clinic Systolic Blood Pressure Show forest plot

2

120

Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐8.43 [‐15.24, ‐1.62]

4 Clinic Diastolic Blood Pressure Show forest plot

2

120

Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐6.45 [‐13.60, 0.70]

5 Serum uric acid Show forest plot

3

223

Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐3.09 [‐3.76, ‐2.43]

6 Withdrawals due to adverse effects Show forest plot

3

241

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.86 [0.43, 8.10]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Uric acid (UA) lowering drug vs placebo