Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Immunoglobulins secara intravena untuk epilepsi

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Appendices

Appendix 1. Cochrane Epilepsy Group Specialized Register search strategy

#1 MeSH DESCRIPTOR Immunoglobulins, Intravenous Explode All

#2 intravenous immun* OR IV immunoglobulin* OR IVIG OR intravenous IG

#3 intraglobi* OR intravenous antibod* OR IV antibod*

#4 #1 OR #2 OR #3

#5 INREGISTER AND >18/05/2016:CRSCREATED

#6 #4 AND #5

Appendix 2. CENTRAL via CRSO search strategy

#1 MESH DESCRIPTOR Immunoglobulins, Intravenous EXPLODE ALL TREES

#2 (intravenous immun* OR IV immunoglobulin* OR IVIG OR intravenous IG):TI,AB,KY

#3 (intraglobi* OR intravenous antibod* OR IV antibod*):TI,AB,KY

#4 #1 OR #2 OR #3

#5 (epilep* OR seizure* OR convuls*):TI,AB,KY

#6 MESH DESCRIPTOR Epilepsy EXPLODE ALL TREES

#7 MESH DESCRIPTOR Seizures EXPLODE ALL TREES

#8 #5 OR #6 OR #7

#9 * NOT INMEDLINE AND 31/05/2016 TO 28/02/2017:DL

#10 #4 AND #8 AND #9

Appendix 3. MEDLINE (Ovid) search strategy

This strategy is based on the Cochrane Highly Sensitive Search Strategy for identifying randomized trials published in Lefebvre 2011.

1. exp Immunoglobulins, Intravenous/

2. (intravenous immu* or IV immunoglobulin* or IVIG or intravenous IG).tw.

3. (intraglobi* or intravenous antibod* or IV antibod*).tw.

4. 1 or 2 or 3

5. exp Epilepsy/

6. exp Seizures/

7. (epilep$ or seizure$ or convuls$).tw.

8. 5 or 6 or 7

9. exp *Pre‐Eclampsia/ or exp *Eclampsia/

10. 8 not 9

11. (randomized controlled trial or controlled clinical trial or pragmatic clinical trial).pt. or (randomi?ed or placebo or randomly).ab.

12. clinical trials as topic.sh.

13. trial.ti.

14. 11 or 12 or 13

15. exp animals/ not humans.sh.

16. 14 not 15

17. 4 and 10 and 16

18. remove duplicates from 17

19. limit 18 to ed= 20160518‐20170202

Appendix 4. Web of Science search strategy

Timespan=2016‐2017

#5

#3 AND #2 AND #1
Refined by: [excluding]:Databases: (MEDLINE)

#4

#3 AND #2 AND #1

#3

TOPIC: (intravenous immunoglobulin* OR IV immunoglobulin* OR IVIG OR intravenous IG OR intravenous antibod*)

#2

TOPIC: (epilepsy OR seizures)

#1

TOPIC: (random* or placebo* or trial or study)

Appendix 5. Search strategies for other databases

WHO ICTRP

Advanced Search

Condition: epilepsy

Intervention: immunoglobulin OR IVIG

Date of registration between 18/05/2016 and 02/02/2017

ISRCTN registry (formerly Current Controlled Trials)

Condition: epilepsy AND Interventions: immunoglobulin or IVIG

ClinicalTrials.gov

Condition: epilepsy
Intervention: immunoglobulin or IVIG
received from 05/18/2016 to 02/02/2017

Appendix 6. Sources searched and number of hits retrieved

Source

Date range searched

Hits retrieved

CENTRAL (CRSO)

Up to 2 February 2017

44

MEDLINE (Ovid)

Up to 2 February 2017

160

Web of Science (All databases)

Up to 2 February 2017

158

WHO ICTRP

Up to 2 February 2017

2

ISRCTN registry

Up to 2 February 2017

7

ClinicalTrials.gov

Up to 2 February 2017

6

Study flow diagram.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

Comparison 1 IVIg versus placebo, Outcome 1 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency for refractory epilepsy, ITT analysis.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 IVIg versus placebo, Outcome 1 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency for refractory epilepsy, ITT analysis.

Comparison 1 IVIg versus placebo, Outcome 2 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency for refractory epilepsy, per‐protocol.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 IVIg versus placebo, Outcome 2 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency for refractory epilepsy, per‐protocol.

Comparison 1 IVIg versus placebo, Outcome 3 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency for refractory epilepsy, best‐case.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 IVIg versus placebo, Outcome 3 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency for refractory epilepsy, best‐case.

Comparison 1 IVIg versus placebo, Outcome 4 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency for refractory partial epilepsy, ITT analysis.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 IVIg versus placebo, Outcome 4 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency for refractory partial epilepsy, ITT analysis.

Comparison 1 IVIg versus placebo, Outcome 5 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency for refractory partial epilepsy, per‐protocol.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 IVIg versus placebo, Outcome 5 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency for refractory partial epilepsy, per‐protocol.

Comparison 1 IVIg versus placebo, Outcome 6 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency for refractory partial epilepsy, best‐case.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 IVIg versus placebo, Outcome 6 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency for refractory partial epilepsy, best‐case.

Comparison 1 IVIg versus placebo, Outcome 7 Global assessment for refractory epilepsy, ITT analysis.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 IVIg versus placebo, Outcome 7 Global assessment for refractory epilepsy, ITT analysis.

Comparison 1 IVIg versus placebo, Outcome 8 Global assessment for refractory epilepsy, per‐protocol.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 IVIg versus placebo, Outcome 8 Global assessment for refractory epilepsy, per‐protocol.

Comparison 1 IVIg versus placebo, Outcome 9 Global assessment for refractory epilepsy, best‐case.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1 IVIg versus placebo, Outcome 9 Global assessment for refractory epilepsy, best‐case.

Summary of findings for the main comparison. IVIg compared to placebo for refractory epilepsy

IVIg compared to placebo for refractory epilepsy

Patient or population: patients with refractory epilepsy
Settings: three participating hospitals‐Ottignies (Belgium), Zurich (Switzerland) and Kehl‐Kork (Germany)
Intervention: IVIg
Comparison: placebo

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of Participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Placebo

IVIg

Seizure freedom

Not reported

Satisfactory seizure control
50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency for refractory epilepsy

278 per 1000

525 per 1000
(236 to 1000)

RR 1.89
(0.85 to 4.21)

58
(1 study)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low1,2

Incidence of adverse or harmful effects

Not reported

Global assessment

167 per 1000

548 per 1000
(188 to 1000)

RR 3.29
(1.13 to 9.57)

60
(1 study)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low1,2

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1 Unclear risk of selection bias: no information was obtained on generation of the random sequence or concealment of allocation of the randomisation.
2 More trials and patients are needed to allow more precise estimation of the treatment effects of IVIg.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. IVIg compared to placebo for refractory epilepsy
Comparison 1. IVIg versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency for refractory epilepsy, ITT analysis Show forest plot

1

61

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.76 [0.79, 3.93]

2 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency for refractory epilepsy, per‐protocol Show forest plot

1

58

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.89 [0.85, 4.21]

3 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency for refractory epilepsy, best‐case Show forest plot

1

61

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.01 [0.91, 4.43]

4 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency for refractory partial epilepsy, ITT analysis Show forest plot

1

49

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.08 [0.84, 11.34]

5 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency for refractory partial epilepsy, per‐protocol Show forest plot

1

46

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.35 [0.91, 12.30]

6 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency for refractory partial epilepsy, best‐case Show forest plot

1

49

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.57 [0.98, 13.00]

7 Global assessment for refractory epilepsy, ITT analysis Show forest plot

1

61

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.21 [1.10, 9.36]

8 Global assessment for refractory epilepsy, per‐protocol Show forest plot

1

60

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.29 [1.13, 9.57]

9 Global assessment for refractory epilepsy, best‐case Show forest plot

1

61

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.35 [1.15, 9.73]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. IVIg versus placebo