Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Cama de compañía en la unidad neonatal para la promoción del crecimiento y el desarrollo neurológico en gemelos prematuros estables

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008313.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 12 diciembre 2012see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Neonatología

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2012 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Nai Ming Lai

    Correspondencia a: Department of Paediatrics, Paediatric and Child Health Research Group, University of Malaya Medical Center, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

  • Siew Cheng Foong

    Paediatrics, Penang Medical College, Penang, Malaysia

  • Wai Cheng Foong

    Paediatrics, Penang Medical College, Penang, Malaysia

  • Kenneth Tan

    Monash Newborn, Monash Medical Centre/Monash University, Clayton, Australia

Contributions of authors

NML, SCF, WCF and KTAN drafted the protocol.

NML, SCF and WCF performed the search and identified relevant articles.
NML and SCF acquired full texts for articles identified to be potentially suitable.
NML and SCF independently assessed the eligibility of the articles identified.
NML, SCF, WCF and KTAN wrote the description of studies, the results, discussion and conclusions.
NML wrote the abstract.

NML and SCF wrote the plain language summary

All authors approved the final draft.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No sources of support supplied

External sources

  • SEA‐ORCHID (South East Asian Optimising Reproductive and Child Health Outcomes for Developing Countries) Project, Malaysia.

    A five year (2003‐2008) project, funded by National Medical Research Council of Australia and Wellcome Trust, and supported by Cochrane Australasian Centre, involving four South East Asian countries (Indonesia, Malaysia, Philipines and Thailand) aiming to promote the synthesis and use of high‐level clinical evidence particularly for topics in maternal and child health that are relevant to this part of the world.

  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, USA.

    The Cochrane Neonatal Review Group has been funded in part with Federal funds from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, USA, under Contract No. HHSN267200603418C

Declarations of interest

None declared by the review authors.

Acknowledgements

We thank Drs Roger Soll, John Sinclair, Jeffrey Horbar, G Suresh and Michael Bracken for their comments on the draft protocol and draft review. We thank Ms Diane Haugthon, Managing Editor and Ms Yolanda Montage, Trials Search Coordinator of the Neonatal Review Group for their assistance leading to the publication of this review.

We are also grateful to the lead authors of our included studies, Susan DiNonno Chin and Kathryn Hayward for generously giving additional information about their studies following our requests.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2016 Apr 14

Co‐bedding in neonatal nursery for promoting growth and neurodevelopment in stable preterm twins

Review

Nai Ming Lai, Siew Cheng Foong, Wai Cheng Foong, Kenneth Tan

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008313.pub3

2012 Dec 12

Co‐bedding in neonatal nursery for promoting growth and neurodevelopment in stable preterm twins

Review

Nai Ming Lai, Siew Cheng Foong, Wai Cheng Foong, Kenneth Tan

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008313.pub2

2010 Jan 20

Co‐bedding in neonatal nursery for promoting growth and neurodevelopment in stable preterm twins

Protocol

Nai Ming Lai, Siew Cheng Foong, Wai Cheng Foong, Kenneth Tan

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008313

Differences between protocol and review

We have revised the following outcomes following feedback from the external referee on our draft review:

  1. Primary outcome number 4: Neurobehaviour ‐ we have added "infant co‐regulation" and "stress response" in our statement.

  2. Secondary outcome number 14: Adverse effects ‐ we have added "and other patient‐safety related outcomes as defined by the individual studies."

  3. A new outcome added: secondary outcome number 15 ‐ Incidence of co‐bedding post‐discharge .

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.