Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Methodological quality graph: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Methodological quality graph: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Methodological quality summary: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Methodological quality summary: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item for each included study.

Comparison 1 Amisulpride versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 1 No clinically important response to treatment (as defined by original study).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Amisulpride versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 1 No clinically important response to treatment (as defined by original study).

Comparison 1 Amisulpride versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 2 Global state: no clinically important change ‐ CGI.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Amisulpride versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 2 Global state: no clinically important change ‐ CGI.

Comparison 1 Amisulpride versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 3 Mental state: 1a. Depressive symptoms ‐ no clinically important change ‐ MADRS.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Amisulpride versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 3 Mental state: 1a. Depressive symptoms ‐ no clinically important change ‐ MADRS.

Comparison 1 Amisulpride versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 4 Mental state: 1b. Depressive symptoms ‐ no clinically important change ‐ HAM‐D.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Amisulpride versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 4 Mental state: 1b. Depressive symptoms ‐ no clinically important change ‐ HAM‐D.

Comparison 1 Amisulpride versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 5 Mental state: 1c. Depressive symptoms ‐ MADRS score at endpoint.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Amisulpride versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 5 Mental state: 1c. Depressive symptoms ‐ MADRS score at endpoint.

Comparison 1 Amisulpride versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 6 Mental state: 1d. Depressive symptoms ‐ HAM‐D score at endpoint.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Amisulpride versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 6 Mental state: 1d. Depressive symptoms ‐ HAM‐D score at endpoint.

Comparison 1 Amisulpride versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 7 Leaving the study early.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Amisulpride versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 7 Leaving the study early.

Comparison 1 Amisulpride versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 8 Adverse effects: 1. At least one adverse effect.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 Amisulpride versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 8 Adverse effects: 1. At least one adverse effect.

Comparison 2 Aripiprazole added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 1 No clinically important response (as defined by original study).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Aripiprazole added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 1 No clinically important response (as defined by original study).

Comparison 2 Aripiprazole added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 2 Global state: no clinically important change ‐ CGI.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Aripiprazole added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 2 Global state: no clinically important change ‐ CGI.

Comparison 2 Aripiprazole added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 3 Remission ‐ number of people without remission ‐ as defined by the original study.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Aripiprazole added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 3 Remission ‐ number of people without remission ‐ as defined by the original study.

Comparison 2 Aripiprazole added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 4 Mental state: 1a. Depressive symptoms ‐ MADRS score at endpoint.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 Aripiprazole added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 4 Mental state: 1a. Depressive symptoms ‐ MADRS score at endpoint.

Comparison 2 Aripiprazole added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 5 Leaving the study early.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.5

Comparison 2 Aripiprazole added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 5 Leaving the study early.

Comparison 2 Aripiprazole added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 6 Adverse effects: 1. At least one adverse effect.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.6

Comparison 2 Aripiprazole added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 6 Adverse effects: 1. At least one adverse effect.

Comparison 2 Aripiprazole added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 7 Adverse effects: 2. Death.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.7

Comparison 2 Aripiprazole added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 7 Adverse effects: 2. Death.

Comparison 2 Aripiprazole added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 8 Adverse effects: 3a. Extrapyramidal effects.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.8

Comparison 2 Aripiprazole added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 8 Adverse effects: 3a. Extrapyramidal effects.

Comparison 2 Aripiprazole added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 9 Adverse effects: 4a. Significant weight gain.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.9

Comparison 2 Aripiprazole added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 9 Adverse effects: 4a. Significant weight gain.

Comparison 2 Aripiprazole added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 10 Adverse effects: 4b. Weight ‐ change from baseline in kg.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.10

Comparison 2 Aripiprazole added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 10 Adverse effects: 4b. Weight ‐ change from baseline in kg.

Comparison 2 Aripiprazole added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 11 Adverse effects: 5. Sedation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.11

Comparison 2 Aripiprazole added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 11 Adverse effects: 5. Sedation.

Comparison 3 Olanzapine versus placebo for psychotic depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 1 No clinically important response to treatment (as defined by original study).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Olanzapine versus placebo for psychotic depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 1 No clinically important response to treatment (as defined by original study).

Comparison 3 Olanzapine versus placebo for psychotic depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 2 Remission ‐ number of participants without remission ‐ as defined by the original study.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 Olanzapine versus placebo for psychotic depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 2 Remission ‐ number of participants without remission ‐ as defined by the original study.

Comparison 3 Olanzapine versus placebo for psychotic depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 3 Mental state: 1. Depressive symptoms ‐ HAM‐D score at endpoint.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3 Olanzapine versus placebo for psychotic depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 3 Mental state: 1. Depressive symptoms ‐ HAM‐D score at endpoint.

Comparison 3 Olanzapine versus placebo for psychotic depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 4 Mental state: 2. Anxiety symptoms ‐ HAM‐A score at endpoint.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.4

Comparison 3 Olanzapine versus placebo for psychotic depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 4 Mental state: 2. Anxiety symptoms ‐ HAM‐A score at endpoint.

Comparison 3 Olanzapine versus placebo for psychotic depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 5 Leaving the study early.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.5

Comparison 3 Olanzapine versus placebo for psychotic depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 5 Leaving the study early.

Comparison 3 Olanzapine versus placebo for psychotic depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 6 Adverse effects: 1. At least one adverse effect.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.6

Comparison 3 Olanzapine versus placebo for psychotic depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 6 Adverse effects: 1. At least one adverse effect.

Comparison 3 Olanzapine versus placebo for psychotic depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 7 Adverse effects: 2. Prolactin increase ‐ number of participants with significant increase ‐ as defined by the original study.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.7

Comparison 3 Olanzapine versus placebo for psychotic depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 7 Adverse effects: 2. Prolactin increase ‐ number of participants with significant increase ‐ as defined by the original study.

Comparison 3 Olanzapine versus placebo for psychotic depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 8 Adverse effects: 3a. Significant weight gain ‐ spontaneously reported.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.8

Comparison 3 Olanzapine versus placebo for psychotic depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 8 Adverse effects: 3a. Significant weight gain ‐ spontaneously reported.

Comparison 3 Olanzapine versus placebo for psychotic depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 9 Adverse effects: 3b. Weight ‐ change from baseline in kg.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.9

Comparison 3 Olanzapine versus placebo for psychotic depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 9 Adverse effects: 3b. Weight ‐ change from baseline in kg.

Comparison 3 Olanzapine versus placebo for psychotic depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 10 Adverse effects: 4. Sedation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.10

Comparison 3 Olanzapine versus placebo for psychotic depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 10 Adverse effects: 4. Sedation.

Comparison 4 Olanzapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 1 No clinically important response to treatment (as defined by original study).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Olanzapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 1 No clinically important response to treatment (as defined by original study).

Comparison 4 Olanzapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 2 Remission ‐ number of participants without remission ‐ as defined by the original study.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 Olanzapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 2 Remission ‐ number of participants without remission ‐ as defined by the original study.

Comparison 4 Olanzapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 3 Mental state: 1a. Depressive symptoms ‐ no clinically important change ‐ at least 50% MADRS reduction.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.3

Comparison 4 Olanzapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 3 Mental state: 1a. Depressive symptoms ‐ no clinically important change ‐ at least 50% MADRS reduction.

Comparison 4 Olanzapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 4 Mental state: 1b. Depressive symptoms ‐ MADRS score at endpoint.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.4

Comparison 4 Olanzapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 4 Mental state: 1b. Depressive symptoms ‐ MADRS score at endpoint.

Comparison 4 Olanzapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 5 Mental state: 1c. Depressive symptoms ‐ HAM‐D score at endpoint.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.5

Comparison 4 Olanzapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 5 Mental state: 1c. Depressive symptoms ‐ HAM‐D score at endpoint.

Comparison 4 Olanzapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 6 Mental state: 2. Anxiety symptoms ‐ HAM‐A score at endpoint.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.6

Comparison 4 Olanzapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 6 Mental state: 2. Anxiety symptoms ‐ HAM‐A score at endpoint.

Comparison 4 Olanzapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 7 Leaving the study early.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.7

Comparison 4 Olanzapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 7 Leaving the study early.

Comparison 4 Olanzapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 8 Adverse effects: 1. At least one adverse effect.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.8

Comparison 4 Olanzapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 8 Adverse effects: 1. At least one adverse effect.

Comparison 4 Olanzapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 9 Adverse effects: 2. Death ‐ natural cause.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.9

Comparison 4 Olanzapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 9 Adverse effects: 2. Death ‐ natural cause.

Comparison 4 Olanzapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 10 Adverse effects: 3. Extrapyramidal effects ‐ tremor.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.10

Comparison 4 Olanzapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 10 Adverse effects: 3. Extrapyramidal effects ‐ tremor.

Comparison 4 Olanzapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 11 Adverse effects: 4. Prolactin ‐ change from baseline in ng/ml.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.11

Comparison 4 Olanzapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 11 Adverse effects: 4. Prolactin ‐ change from baseline in ng/ml.

Comparison 4 Olanzapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 12 Adverse effects: 5a. Significant weight gain.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.12

Comparison 4 Olanzapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 12 Adverse effects: 5a. Significant weight gain.

Comparison 4 Olanzapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 13 Adverse effects: 5b. Weight ‐ change from baseline in kg.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.13

Comparison 4 Olanzapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 13 Adverse effects: 5b. Weight ‐ change from baseline in kg.

Comparison 4 Olanzapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 14 Adverse effects: 6. Sedation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.14

Comparison 4 Olanzapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 14 Adverse effects: 6. Sedation.

Comparison 5 Olanzapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 1 No clinically important response ‐ as defined by original study.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.1

Comparison 5 Olanzapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 1 No clinically important response ‐ as defined by original study.

Comparison 5 Olanzapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 2 Remission ‐ number of people without remission ‐ as defined by the original study.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.2

Comparison 5 Olanzapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 2 Remission ‐ number of people without remission ‐ as defined by the original study.

Comparison 5 Olanzapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 3 Mental state: 1a. No clinically important change ‐ at least 50% MADRS total score reduction.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.3

Comparison 5 Olanzapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 3 Mental state: 1a. No clinically important change ‐ at least 50% MADRS total score reduction.

Comparison 5 Olanzapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 4 Mental state: 1b. Depressive symptoms ‐ MADRS score at endpoint.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.4

Comparison 5 Olanzapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 4 Mental state: 1b. Depressive symptoms ‐ MADRS score at endpoint.

Comparison 5 Olanzapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 5 Mental state: 1c. Depressive symptoms ‐ HAM‐D score at endpoint.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.5

Comparison 5 Olanzapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 5 Mental state: 1c. Depressive symptoms ‐ HAM‐D score at endpoint.

Comparison 5 Olanzapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 6 Mental state: 2. Anxiety symptoms ‐ HAM‐A score at endpoint.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.6

Comparison 5 Olanzapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 6 Mental state: 2. Anxiety symptoms ‐ HAM‐A score at endpoint.

Comparison 5 Olanzapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 7 Leaving the study early.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.7

Comparison 5 Olanzapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 7 Leaving the study early.

Comparison 5 Olanzapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 8 Adverse effects: 1. At least one adverse effect.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.8

Comparison 5 Olanzapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 8 Adverse effects: 1. At least one adverse effect.

Comparison 5 Olanzapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 9 Adverse effects: 2. Death.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.9

Comparison 5 Olanzapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 9 Adverse effects: 2. Death.

Comparison 5 Olanzapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 10 Adverse effects: 3. Extrapyramidal effects ‐ tremor.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.10

Comparison 5 Olanzapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 10 Adverse effects: 3. Extrapyramidal effects ‐ tremor.

Comparison 5 Olanzapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 11 Adverse effects: 4. Prolactin ‐ change from baseline in ng/ml.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.11

Comparison 5 Olanzapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 11 Adverse effects: 4. Prolactin ‐ change from baseline in ng/ml.

Comparison 5 Olanzapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 12 Adverse effects: 5a. Significant weight gain.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.12

Comparison 5 Olanzapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 12 Adverse effects: 5a. Significant weight gain.

Comparison 5 Olanzapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 13 Adverse effects: 5b. Weight ‐ change from baseline in kg.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.13

Comparison 5 Olanzapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 13 Adverse effects: 5b. Weight ‐ change from baseline in kg.

Comparison 5 Olanzapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 14 Adverse effects: 6. Sedation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.14

Comparison 5 Olanzapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 14 Adverse effects: 6. Sedation.

Comparison 6 Quetiapine versus placebo for major depression, Outcome 1 Non‐response to treatment ‐ as defined by the original study.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.1

Comparison 6 Quetiapine versus placebo for major depression, Outcome 1 Non‐response to treatment ‐ as defined by the original study.

Comparison 6 Quetiapine versus placebo for major depression, Outcome 2 Global state: no clinically important change ‐ CGI.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.2

Comparison 6 Quetiapine versus placebo for major depression, Outcome 2 Global state: no clinically important change ‐ CGI.

Comparison 6 Quetiapine versus placebo for major depression, Outcome 3 Remission ‐ number of participants without remission ‐ as defined by the original study.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.3

Comparison 6 Quetiapine versus placebo for major depression, Outcome 3 Remission ‐ number of participants without remission ‐ as defined by the original study.

Comparison 6 Quetiapine versus placebo for major depression, Outcome 4 Relapse.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.4

Comparison 6 Quetiapine versus placebo for major depression, Outcome 4 Relapse.

Comparison 6 Quetiapine versus placebo for major depression, Outcome 5 Mental state: 1a. Depressive symptoms ‐ no clinically important change‐ MADRS.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.5

Comparison 6 Quetiapine versus placebo for major depression, Outcome 5 Mental state: 1a. Depressive symptoms ‐ no clinically important change‐ MADRS.

Comparison 6 Quetiapine versus placebo for major depression, Outcome 6 Mental state: 1b. Depressive symptoms ‐ MADRS score at endpoint.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.6

Comparison 6 Quetiapine versus placebo for major depression, Outcome 6 Mental state: 1b. Depressive symptoms ‐ MADRS score at endpoint.

Comparison 6 Quetiapine versus placebo for major depression, Outcome 7 Mental state: 1c. Depressive symptoms ‐ HAM‐D score at endpoint.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.7

Comparison 6 Quetiapine versus placebo for major depression, Outcome 7 Mental state: 1c. Depressive symptoms ‐ HAM‐D score at endpoint.

Comparison 6 Quetiapine versus placebo for major depression, Outcome 8 Mental state: 2. Anxiety symptoms ‐ HAM‐A score at endpoint.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.8

Comparison 6 Quetiapine versus placebo for major depression, Outcome 8 Mental state: 2. Anxiety symptoms ‐ HAM‐A score at endpoint.

Comparison 6 Quetiapine versus placebo for major depression, Outcome 9 Leaving the study early ‐ due to adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.9

Comparison 6 Quetiapine versus placebo for major depression, Outcome 9 Leaving the study early ‐ due to adverse events.

Comparison 6 Quetiapine versus placebo for major depression, Outcome 10 Adverse effects: 1. Death ‐ suicidal thoughts ‐ MADRS item 10 of at least 4.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.10

Comparison 6 Quetiapine versus placebo for major depression, Outcome 10 Adverse effects: 1. Death ‐ suicidal thoughts ‐ MADRS item 10 of at least 4.

Comparison 6 Quetiapine versus placebo for major depression, Outcome 11 Adverse effects: 2. Extrapyramidal effects ‐ general EPS.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.11

Comparison 6 Quetiapine versus placebo for major depression, Outcome 11 Adverse effects: 2. Extrapyramidal effects ‐ general EPS.

Comparison 6 Quetiapine versus placebo for major depression, Outcome 12 Adverse effects: 3. Prolactin ‐ change from baseline in ng/ml.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.12

Comparison 6 Quetiapine versus placebo for major depression, Outcome 12 Adverse effects: 3. Prolactin ‐ change from baseline in ng/ml.

Comparison 6 Quetiapine versus placebo for major depression, Outcome 13 Adverse effects: 4a. Significant weight gain.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.13

Comparison 6 Quetiapine versus placebo for major depression, Outcome 13 Adverse effects: 4a. Significant weight gain.

Comparison 6 Quetiapine versus placebo for major depression, Outcome 14 Adverse effects: 4b. Weight ‐ change from baseline in kg.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.14

Comparison 6 Quetiapine versus placebo for major depression, Outcome 14 Adverse effects: 4b. Weight ‐ change from baseline in kg.

Comparison 6 Quetiapine versus placebo for major depression, Outcome 15 Adverse effects: 5. Sedation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.15

Comparison 6 Quetiapine versus placebo for major depression, Outcome 15 Adverse effects: 5. Sedation.

Comparison 7 Quetiapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 1 No clinically important response to treatment (as defined by original study).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.1

Comparison 7 Quetiapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 1 No clinically important response to treatment (as defined by original study).

Comparison 7 Quetiapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 2 Global state: no clinically important change ‐ CGI.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.2

Comparison 7 Quetiapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 2 Global state: no clinically important change ‐ CGI.

Comparison 7 Quetiapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 3 Remission ‐ number of participants without remission.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.3

Comparison 7 Quetiapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 3 Remission ‐ number of participants without remission.

Comparison 7 Quetiapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 4 Mental state: 1a. No clinically important change‐ MADRS.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.4

Comparison 7 Quetiapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 4 Mental state: 1a. No clinically important change‐ MADRS.

Comparison 7 Quetiapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 5 Mental state: 1b. Depressive symptoms ‐ MADRS score at endpoint.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.5

Comparison 7 Quetiapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 5 Mental state: 1b. Depressive symptoms ‐ MADRS score at endpoint.

Comparison 7 Quetiapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 6 Mental state: 1c. Depressive symptoms ‐ HAM‐D score at endpoint.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.6

Comparison 7 Quetiapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 6 Mental state: 1c. Depressive symptoms ‐ HAM‐D score at endpoint.

Comparison 7 Quetiapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 7 Mental state: 2. Anxiety symptoms ‐ HAM‐A score at endpoint.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.7

Comparison 7 Quetiapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 7 Mental state: 2. Anxiety symptoms ‐ HAM‐A score at endpoint.

Comparison 7 Quetiapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 8 Leaving the study early ‐ due to adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.8

Comparison 7 Quetiapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 8 Leaving the study early ‐ due to adverse events.

Comparison 7 Quetiapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 9 Adverse effects: 1. Extrapyramidal effects ‐ general EPS.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.9

Comparison 7 Quetiapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 9 Adverse effects: 1. Extrapyramidal effects ‐ general EPS.

Comparison 7 Quetiapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 10 Adverse effects: 2. Prolactin ‐ change from baseline in ng/ml.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.10

Comparison 7 Quetiapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 10 Adverse effects: 2. Prolactin ‐ change from baseline in ng/ml.

Comparison 7 Quetiapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 11 Adverse effects: 3a. Significant weight gain ‐ ≥7% from baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.11

Comparison 7 Quetiapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 11 Adverse effects: 3a. Significant weight gain ‐ ≥7% from baseline.

Comparison 7 Quetiapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 12 Adverse effects: 3b. Weight ‐ change from baseline in ng/ml.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.12

Comparison 7 Quetiapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 12 Adverse effects: 3b. Weight ‐ change from baseline in ng/ml.

Comparison 7 Quetiapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 13 Adverse effects: 4. Sedation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.13

Comparison 7 Quetiapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 13 Adverse effects: 4. Sedation.

Comparison 8 Quetiapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 1 No clinically important response (as defined by original study).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.1

Comparison 8 Quetiapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 1 No clinically important response (as defined by original study).

Comparison 8 Quetiapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 2 Global state: no clinically important change ‐ CGI.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.2

Comparison 8 Quetiapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 2 Global state: no clinically important change ‐ CGI.

Comparison 8 Quetiapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 3 Remission ‐ number of people without remission ‐ as defined by the original study.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.3

Comparison 8 Quetiapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 3 Remission ‐ number of people without remission ‐ as defined by the original study.

Comparison 8 Quetiapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 4 Mental state: 1a. Depressive symptoms ‐ no clinically important change ‐ MADRS.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.4

Comparison 8 Quetiapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 4 Mental state: 1a. Depressive symptoms ‐ no clinically important change ‐ MADRS.

Comparison 8 Quetiapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 5 Mental state: 1b. Depressive symptoms ‐ MADRS score at endpoint.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.5

Comparison 8 Quetiapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 5 Mental state: 1b. Depressive symptoms ‐ MADRS score at endpoint.

Comparison 8 Quetiapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 6 Mental state: 1c. Depressive symptoms ‐ no clinically important change ‐ HAM‐D.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.6

Comparison 8 Quetiapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 6 Mental state: 1c. Depressive symptoms ‐ no clinically important change ‐ HAM‐D.

Comparison 8 Quetiapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 7 Mental state: 1d. Depressive symptoms ‐ HAM‐D score at endpoint.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.7

Comparison 8 Quetiapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 7 Mental state: 1d. Depressive symptoms ‐ HAM‐D score at endpoint.

Comparison 8 Quetiapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 8 Mental state: 2a. Anxiety symptoms ‐ no clinically important change ‐ HAM‐A.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.8

Comparison 8 Quetiapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 8 Mental state: 2a. Anxiety symptoms ‐ no clinically important change ‐ HAM‐A.

Comparison 8 Quetiapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 9 Mental state: 2b. Anxiety symptoms ‐ HAM‐A score at endpoint.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.9

Comparison 8 Quetiapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 9 Mental state: 2b. Anxiety symptoms ‐ HAM‐A score at endpoint.

Comparison 8 Quetiapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 10 Leaving the study early.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.10

Comparison 8 Quetiapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 10 Leaving the study early.

Comparison 8 Quetiapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 11 Adverse effects: 1. Extrapyramidal symptoms.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.11

Comparison 8 Quetiapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 11 Adverse effects: 1. Extrapyramidal symptoms.

Comparison 8 Quetiapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 12 Adverse effects: 2. Prolactin ‐ change from baseline in ng/ml.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.12

Comparison 8 Quetiapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 12 Adverse effects: 2. Prolactin ‐ change from baseline in ng/ml.

Comparison 8 Quetiapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 13 Adverse effects: 3a. Significant weight gain.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.13

Comparison 8 Quetiapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 13 Adverse effects: 3a. Significant weight gain.

Comparison 8 Quetiapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 14 Adverse effects: 3b. Weight ‐ change from baseline in kg.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.14

Comparison 8 Quetiapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 14 Adverse effects: 3b. Weight ‐ change from baseline in kg.

Comparison 8 Quetiapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 15 Adverse effects: 4. Sedation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.15

Comparison 8 Quetiapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 15 Adverse effects: 4. Sedation.

Comparison 9 Risperidone added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression, Outcome 1 No clinically important response (as defined by original study).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.1

Comparison 9 Risperidone added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression, Outcome 1 No clinically important response (as defined by original study).

Comparison 9 Risperidone added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression, Outcome 2 Remission ‐ number of participants without remission ‐ as defined by the original study.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.2

Comparison 9 Risperidone added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression, Outcome 2 Remission ‐ number of participants without remission ‐ as defined by the original study.

Comparison 9 Risperidone added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression, Outcome 3 Relapse (as defined by the original study).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.3

Comparison 9 Risperidone added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression, Outcome 3 Relapse (as defined by the original study).

Comparison 9 Risperidone added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression, Outcome 4 Mental state: 1a. Depressive symptoms ‐ MADRS score at endpoint.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.4

Comparison 9 Risperidone added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression, Outcome 4 Mental state: 1a. Depressive symptoms ‐ MADRS score at endpoint.

Comparison 9 Risperidone added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression, Outcome 5 Mental state: 1b. Depressive symptoms ‐ no clinically important change ‐ HAM‐D.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.5

Comparison 9 Risperidone added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression, Outcome 5 Mental state: 1b. Depressive symptoms ‐ no clinically important change ‐ HAM‐D.

Comparison 9 Risperidone added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression, Outcome 6 Mental state: 1c. Depressive symptoms ‐ HAM‐D score at endpoint.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.6

Comparison 9 Risperidone added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression, Outcome 6 Mental state: 1c. Depressive symptoms ‐ HAM‐D score at endpoint.

Comparison 9 Risperidone added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression, Outcome 7 Leaving the study early.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.7

Comparison 9 Risperidone added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression, Outcome 7 Leaving the study early.

Comparison 9 Risperidone added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression, Outcome 8 Adverse effects: 1. At least one adverse effect.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.8

Comparison 9 Risperidone added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression, Outcome 8 Adverse effects: 1. At least one adverse effect.

Comparison 9 Risperidone added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression, Outcome 9 Adverse effects: 2a. Extrapyramidal effects ‐ tremor.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.9

Comparison 9 Risperidone added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression, Outcome 9 Adverse effects: 2a. Extrapyramidal effects ‐ tremor.

Comparison 9 Risperidone added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression, Outcome 10 Adverse effects: 3a. Prolactin increase ‐ associated effects.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.10

Comparison 9 Risperidone added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression, Outcome 10 Adverse effects: 3a. Prolactin increase ‐ associated effects.

Comparison 9 Risperidone added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression, Outcome 11 Adverse effects: 3b. Prolactin ‐ change from baseline in ng/ml ‐ endpoint.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.11

Comparison 9 Risperidone added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression, Outcome 11 Adverse effects: 3b. Prolactin ‐ change from baseline in ng/ml ‐ endpoint.

Comparison 9 Risperidone added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression, Outcome 12 Adverse effects: 4a. Significant weight gain.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.12

Comparison 9 Risperidone added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression, Outcome 12 Adverse effects: 4a. Significant weight gain.

Comparison 9 Risperidone added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression, Outcome 13 Adverse effects: 4b. Weight ‐ change from baseline in kg.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.13

Comparison 9 Risperidone added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression, Outcome 13 Adverse effects: 4b. Weight ‐ change from baseline in kg.

Comparison 9 Risperidone added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression, Outcome 14 Adverse effects: 5. Sedation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.14

Comparison 9 Risperidone added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression, Outcome 14 Adverse effects: 5. Sedation.

Comparison 10 Amisulpride versus placebo for dysthymia, Outcome 1 No clinically important response (as defined by original study).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.1

Comparison 10 Amisulpride versus placebo for dysthymia, Outcome 1 No clinically important response (as defined by original study).

Comparison 10 Amisulpride versus placebo for dysthymia, Outcome 2 Global state: no clinically important change ‐ CGI.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.2

Comparison 10 Amisulpride versus placebo for dysthymia, Outcome 2 Global state: no clinically important change ‐ CGI.

Comparison 10 Amisulpride versus placebo for dysthymia, Outcome 3 Mental state: 1a. Depressive symptoms ‐ no clinically important change‐ MADRS < 7.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.3

Comparison 10 Amisulpride versus placebo for dysthymia, Outcome 3 Mental state: 1a. Depressive symptoms ‐ no clinically important change‐ MADRS < 7.

Comparison 10 Amisulpride versus placebo for dysthymia, Outcome 4 Mental state: 1b. Depressive symptoms ‐ MADRS score at endpoint.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.4

Comparison 10 Amisulpride versus placebo for dysthymia, Outcome 4 Mental state: 1b. Depressive symptoms ‐ MADRS score at endpoint.

Comparison 10 Amisulpride versus placebo for dysthymia, Outcome 5 Mental state: 1c. Depressive symptoms ‐ HAM‐D score at endpoint.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.5

Comparison 10 Amisulpride versus placebo for dysthymia, Outcome 5 Mental state: 1c. Depressive symptoms ‐ HAM‐D score at endpoint.

Comparison 10 Amisulpride versus placebo for dysthymia, Outcome 6 Leaving the study early.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.6

Comparison 10 Amisulpride versus placebo for dysthymia, Outcome 6 Leaving the study early.

Comparison 10 Amisulpride versus placebo for dysthymia, Outcome 7 Adverse effects: 1. At least one adverse effect.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.7

Comparison 10 Amisulpride versus placebo for dysthymia, Outcome 7 Adverse effects: 1. At least one adverse effect.

Comparison 10 Amisulpride versus placebo for dysthymia, Outcome 8 Adverse effects: 2. Extrapyramidal effects.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.8

Comparison 10 Amisulpride versus placebo for dysthymia, Outcome 8 Adverse effects: 2. Extrapyramidal effects.

Comparison 10 Amisulpride versus placebo for dysthymia, Outcome 9 Adverse effects: 3. Prolactin associated effects.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.9

Comparison 10 Amisulpride versus placebo for dysthymia, Outcome 9 Adverse effects: 3. Prolactin associated effects.

Comparison 10 Amisulpride versus placebo for dysthymia, Outcome 10 Adverse effects: 4. Significant weight gain ‐ spontaneously reported.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.10

Comparison 10 Amisulpride versus placebo for dysthymia, Outcome 10 Adverse effects: 4. Significant weight gain ‐ spontaneously reported.

Comparison 11 Amisulpride versus antidepressants for dysthymia, Outcome 1 No clinically important response ‐ as defined by original study.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.1

Comparison 11 Amisulpride versus antidepressants for dysthymia, Outcome 1 No clinically important response ‐ as defined by original study.

Comparison 11 Amisulpride versus antidepressants for dysthymia, Outcome 2 Global state: no clinically important change ‐ CGI.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.2

Comparison 11 Amisulpride versus antidepressants for dysthymia, Outcome 2 Global state: no clinically important change ‐ CGI.

Comparison 11 Amisulpride versus antidepressants for dysthymia, Outcome 3 Service use ‐ number of patients rehospitalised.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.3

Comparison 11 Amisulpride versus antidepressants for dysthymia, Outcome 3 Service use ‐ number of patients rehospitalised.

Comparison 11 Amisulpride versus antidepressants for dysthymia, Outcome 4 Mental state: 1a. Depressive symptoms ‐ MADRS ‐ score at endpoint.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.4

Comparison 11 Amisulpride versus antidepressants for dysthymia, Outcome 4 Mental state: 1a. Depressive symptoms ‐ MADRS ‐ score at endpoint.

Comparison 11 Amisulpride versus antidepressants for dysthymia, Outcome 5 Mental state: 1b. No clinically important change ‐ at least 50% HAM‐D reduction.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.5

Comparison 11 Amisulpride versus antidepressants for dysthymia, Outcome 5 Mental state: 1b. No clinically important change ‐ at least 50% HAM‐D reduction.

Comparison 11 Amisulpride versus antidepressants for dysthymia, Outcome 6 Mental state: 1c. No clinically important change ‐ at least 25% HAM‐D reduction.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.6

Comparison 11 Amisulpride versus antidepressants for dysthymia, Outcome 6 Mental state: 1c. No clinically important change ‐ at least 25% HAM‐D reduction.

Comparison 11 Amisulpride versus antidepressants for dysthymia, Outcome 7 Mental state: 1d. Depressive symptoms ‐ HAM‐D score at endpoint.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.7

Comparison 11 Amisulpride versus antidepressants for dysthymia, Outcome 7 Mental state: 1d. Depressive symptoms ‐ HAM‐D score at endpoint.

Comparison 11 Amisulpride versus antidepressants for dysthymia, Outcome 8 Mental state: 2. Anxiety symptoms‐ HAM‐A score at endpoint.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.8

Comparison 11 Amisulpride versus antidepressants for dysthymia, Outcome 8 Mental state: 2. Anxiety symptoms‐ HAM‐A score at endpoint.

Comparison 11 Amisulpride versus antidepressants for dysthymia, Outcome 9 Leaving the study early.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.9

Comparison 11 Amisulpride versus antidepressants for dysthymia, Outcome 9 Leaving the study early.

Comparison 11 Amisulpride versus antidepressants for dysthymia, Outcome 10 Adverse effects: 1. At least one adverse effect.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.10

Comparison 11 Amisulpride versus antidepressants for dysthymia, Outcome 10 Adverse effects: 1. At least one adverse effect.

Comparison 11 Amisulpride versus antidepressants for dysthymia, Outcome 11 Adverse effects: 2.Death ‐ suicide attempt.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.11

Comparison 11 Amisulpride versus antidepressants for dysthymia, Outcome 11 Adverse effects: 2.Death ‐ suicide attempt.

Comparison 11 Amisulpride versus antidepressants for dysthymia, Outcome 12 Adverse effects: 3. Extrapyramidal effects.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.12

Comparison 11 Amisulpride versus antidepressants for dysthymia, Outcome 12 Adverse effects: 3. Extrapyramidal effects.

Comparison 11 Amisulpride versus antidepressants for dysthymia, Outcome 13 Adverse effects: 4. Significant weight gain.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.13

Comparison 11 Amisulpride versus antidepressants for dysthymia, Outcome 13 Adverse effects: 4. Significant weight gain.

Comparison 11 Amisulpride versus antidepressants for dysthymia, Outcome 14 Adverse effects: 5. Prolactin associated effects ‐ amenorrhoea.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.14

Comparison 11 Amisulpride versus antidepressants for dysthymia, Outcome 14 Adverse effects: 5. Prolactin associated effects ‐ amenorrhoea.

Comparison 11 Amisulpride versus antidepressants for dysthymia, Outcome 15 Adverse effects: 6. Sedation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.15

Comparison 11 Amisulpride versus antidepressants for dysthymia, Outcome 15 Adverse effects: 6. Sedation.

Comparison 12 Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed statistics excluded ‐ 3. Quetiapine versus placebo for major depression, Outcome 1 Mental state: 1b. Depressive symptoms ‐ MADRS score at endpoint.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 12.1

Comparison 12 Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed statistics excluded ‐ 3. Quetiapine versus placebo for major depression, Outcome 1 Mental state: 1b. Depressive symptoms ‐ MADRS score at endpoint.

Comparison 12 Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed statistics excluded ‐ 3. Quetiapine versus placebo for major depression, Outcome 2 Mental state: 1c. Depressive symptoms ‐ HAM‐D score at endpoint.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 12.2

Comparison 12 Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed statistics excluded ‐ 3. Quetiapine versus placebo for major depression, Outcome 2 Mental state: 1c. Depressive symptoms ‐ HAM‐D score at endpoint.

Comparison 12 Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed statistics excluded ‐ 3. Quetiapine versus placebo for major depression, Outcome 3 Mental state: 2. Anxiety symptoms ‐ HAM‐A score at endpoint.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 12.3

Comparison 12 Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed statistics excluded ‐ 3. Quetiapine versus placebo for major depression, Outcome 3 Mental state: 2. Anxiety symptoms ‐ HAM‐A score at endpoint.

Comparison 13 Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed statistics excluded ‐ 4. Amisulpride versus antidepressants for dysthymia, Outcome 1 Mental state: 1a. Depressive symptoms ‐ MADRS ‐ score at endpoint.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 13.1

Comparison 13 Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed statistics excluded ‐ 4. Amisulpride versus antidepressants for dysthymia, Outcome 1 Mental state: 1a. Depressive symptoms ‐ MADRS ‐ score at endpoint.

Comparison 14 Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed statistics excluded ‐ 6. Olanzapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 1 Mental state: 1b. Depressive symptoms ‐ MADRS score at endpoint.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 14.1

Comparison 14 Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed statistics excluded ‐ 6. Olanzapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 1 Mental state: 1b. Depressive symptoms ‐ MADRS score at endpoint.

Comparison 14 Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed statistics excluded ‐ 6. Olanzapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 2 Mental state: 2. Anxiety symptoms ‐ HAM‐A score at endpoint.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 14.2

Comparison 14 Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed statistics excluded ‐ 6. Olanzapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 2 Mental state: 2. Anxiety symptoms ‐ HAM‐A score at endpoint.

Comparison 14 Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed statistics excluded ‐ 6. Olanzapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 3 Adverse effects: 4. Prolactin ‐ change from baseline in ng/ml.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 14.3

Comparison 14 Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed statistics excluded ‐ 6. Olanzapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 3 Adverse effects: 4. Prolactin ‐ change from baseline in ng/ml.

Comparison 15 Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed statistics excluded ‐ 9. Olanzapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 1 Mental state: 1b. Depressive symptoms ‐ MADRS score at endpoint.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 15.1

Comparison 15 Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed statistics excluded ‐ 9. Olanzapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 1 Mental state: 1b. Depressive symptoms ‐ MADRS score at endpoint.

Comparison 15 Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed statistics excluded ‐ 9. Olanzapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 2 Mental state: 2. Anxiety symptoms ‐ HAM‐A score at endpoint.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 15.2

Comparison 15 Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed statistics excluded ‐ 9. Olanzapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 2 Mental state: 2. Anxiety symptoms ‐ HAM‐A score at endpoint.

Comparison 15 Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed statistics excluded ‐ 9. Olanzapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 3 Adverse effects: 4. Prolactin ‐ change from baseline in ng/ml.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 15.3

Comparison 15 Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed statistics excluded ‐ 9. Olanzapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 3 Adverse effects: 4. Prolactin ‐ change from baseline in ng/ml.

Comparison 16 Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed statistics excluded ‐ 10. Quetiapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 1 Mental state: 1b. Depressive symptoms ‐ MADRS score at endpoint.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 16.1

Comparison 16 Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed statistics excluded ‐ 10. Quetiapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 1 Mental state: 1b. Depressive symptoms ‐ MADRS score at endpoint.

Comparison 16 Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed statistics excluded ‐ 10. Quetiapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 2 Mental state: 1d. Depressive symptoms‐ HAM‐D score at endpoint.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 16.2

Comparison 16 Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed statistics excluded ‐ 10. Quetiapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 2 Mental state: 1d. Depressive symptoms‐ HAM‐D score at endpoint.

Comparison 16 Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed statistics excluded ‐ 10. Quetiapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 3 Mental state: 2b. Anxiety symptoms ‐ HAM‐A score at endpoint.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 16.3

Comparison 16 Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed statistics excluded ‐ 10. Quetiapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 3 Mental state: 2b. Anxiety symptoms ‐ HAM‐A score at endpoint.

Comparison 16 Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed statistics excluded ‐ 10. Quetiapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 4 Adverse effects: 3b. Weight ‐ change from baseline in kg.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 16.4

Comparison 16 Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed statistics excluded ‐ 10. Quetiapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term, Outcome 4 Adverse effects: 3b. Weight ‐ change from baseline in kg.

Comparison 17 Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed statistics excluded ‐ 11. Risperidone added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression, Outcome 1 Mental state: 1c. Depressive symptoms ‐ HAM‐D score at endpoint.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 17.1

Comparison 17 Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed statistics excluded ‐ 11. Risperidone added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression, Outcome 1 Mental state: 1c. Depressive symptoms ‐ HAM‐D score at endpoint.

Comparison 1. Amisulpride versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 No clinically important response to treatment (as defined by original study) Show forest plot

1

277

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.55 [0.87, 2.76]

2 Global state: no clinically important change ‐ CGI Show forest plot

1

277

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.17 [0.63, 2.17]

3 Mental state: 1a. Depressive symptoms ‐ no clinically important change ‐ MADRS Show forest plot

1

277

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.20 [0.67, 2.15]

4 Mental state: 1b. Depressive symptoms ‐ no clinically important change ‐ HAM‐D Show forest plot

1

277

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.55 [0.87, 2.76]

5 Mental state: 1c. Depressive symptoms ‐ MADRS score at endpoint Show forest plot

1

272

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.20 [‐0.78, 3.18]

6 Mental state: 1d. Depressive symptoms ‐ HAM‐D score at endpoint Show forest plot

1

272

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.90 [‐0.69, 2.49]

7 Leaving the study early Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

7.1 due to any reason

1

277

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.14 [0.57, 2.26]

7.2 due to adverse events

1

277

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.83 [0.25, 2.80]

7.3 due to inefficacy

1

277

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.29, 3.56]

8 Adverse effects: 1. At least one adverse effect Show forest plot

1

277

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.67 [0.40, 1.12]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Amisulpride versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term
Comparison 2. Aripiprazole added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 No clinically important response (as defined by original study) Show forest plot

3

1092

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.48 [0.37, 0.63]

2 Global state: no clinically important change ‐ CGI Show forest plot

1

362

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.34, 0.78]

3 Remission ‐ number of people without remission ‐ as defined by the original study Show forest plot

3

1092

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.48 [0.36, 0.64]

4 Mental state: 1a. Depressive symptoms ‐ MADRS score at endpoint Show forest plot

3

1077

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐3.04 [‐4.09, 0.00]

5 Leaving the study early Show forest plot

3

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

5.1 due to any reason

3

1092

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.21 [0.86, 1.71]

5.2 due to adverse events

3

1092

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.59 [1.18, 5.71]

5.3 due to inefficacy

3

1092

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.36, 2.66]

6 Adverse effects: 1. At least one adverse effect Show forest plot

2

743

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.53 [1.81, 3.52]

7 Adverse effects: 2. Death Show forest plot

3

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

7.1 due to natural causes

2

711

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.2 due to suicide

1

349

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.3 suicide attempt

1

362

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.4 suicidal ideation

2

711

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.24 [0.03, 2.23]

8 Adverse effects: 3a. Extrapyramidal effects Show forest plot

3

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

8.1 EPS in general

1

362

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.53 [1.95, 6.41]

8.2 akathisia

3

1092

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

6.77 [4.22, 10.84]

8.3 tremor

1

381

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.48 [0.86, 7.18]

9 Adverse effects: 4a. Significant weight gain Show forest plot

3

1092

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

5.93 [2.15, 16.36]

10 Adverse effects: 4b. Weight ‐ change from baseline in kg Show forest plot

3

1087

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.07 [0.30, 1.84]

11 Adverse effects: 5. Sedation Show forest plot

2

711

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.42 [0.66, 17.81]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Aripiprazole added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term
Comparison 3. Olanzapine versus placebo for psychotic depression ‐ all data short‐term

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 No clinically important response to treatment (as defined by original study) Show forest plot

2

201

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.84 [0.46, 1.54]

2 Remission ‐ number of participants without remission ‐ as defined by the original study Show forest plot

2

200

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.84 [0.35, 2.05]

3 Mental state: 1. Depressive symptoms ‐ HAM‐D score at endpoint Show forest plot

2

184

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐2.86 [‐6.19, 0.47]

4 Mental state: 2. Anxiety symptoms ‐ HAM‐A score at endpoint Show forest plot

2

184

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.38 [‐3.46, 0.69]

5 Leaving the study early Show forest plot

2

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

5.1 due to any reason

2

201

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.87 [0.50, 1.52]

5.2 due to adverse events

2

201

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.67 [0.30, 9.34]

5.3 due to inefficacy

2

201

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.39 [0.18, 0.86]

6 Adverse effects: 1. At least one adverse effect Show forest plot

1

201

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.45, 1.79]

7 Adverse effects: 2. Prolactin increase ‐ number of participants with significant increase ‐ as defined by the original study Show forest plot

1

201

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

6.59 [2.41, 17.97]

8 Adverse effects: 3a. Significant weight gain ‐ spontaneously reported Show forest plot

1

201

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

5.99 [1.29, 27.76]

9 Adverse effects: 3b. Weight ‐ change from baseline in kg Show forest plot

1

201

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

3.4 [1.40, 5.40]

10 Adverse effects: 4. Sedation Show forest plot

1

201

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

4.40 [1.57, 12.31]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. Olanzapine versus placebo for psychotic depression ‐ all data short‐term
Comparison 4. Olanzapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 No clinically important response to treatment (as defined by original study) Show forest plot

5

749

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.59 [0.98, 2.58]

2 Remission ‐ number of participants without remission ‐ as defined by the original study Show forest plot

4

766

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.35 [0.89, 2.03]

3 Mental state: 1a. Depressive symptoms ‐ no clinically important change ‐ at least 50% MADRS reduction Show forest plot

2

302

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.18 [0.69, 2.00]

4 Mental state: 1b. Depressive symptoms ‐ MADRS score at endpoint Show forest plot

5

747

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.56 [‐1.15, 2.27]

5 Mental state: 1c. Depressive symptoms ‐ HAM‐D score at endpoint Show forest plot

1

13

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐2.10 [‐11.18, 6.98]

6 Mental state: 2. Anxiety symptoms ‐ HAM‐A score at endpoint Show forest plot

4

734

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.39 [‐0.63, 1.42]

7 Leaving the study early Show forest plot

4

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

7.1 due to any reason

4

748

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.12 [0.80, 1.57]

7.2 due to adverse events

3

735

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.03 [1.55, 5.91]

7.3 due to inefficacy

3

735

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.03 [0.57, 1.88]

8 Adverse effects: 1. At least one adverse effect Show forest plot

1

283

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.10 [0.57, 2.14]

9 Adverse effects: 2. Death ‐ natural cause Show forest plot

2

355

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10 Adverse effects: 3. Extrapyramidal effects ‐ tremor Show forest plot

2

516

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.05 [0.49, 2.23]

11 Adverse effects: 4. Prolactin ‐ change from baseline in ng/ml Show forest plot

2

584

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

4.46 [2.17, 6.75]

12 Adverse effects: 5a. Significant weight gain Show forest plot

2

434

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

4.58 [1.84, 11.37]

12.1 ≥ 10% weight gain from baseline

1

283

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

13.09 [0.73, 234.67]

12.2 spontaneously reported

1

151

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

4.07 [1.56, 10.63]

13 Adverse effects: 5b. Weight ‐ change from baseline in kg Show forest plot

2

296

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

4.07 [2.71, 5.44]

14 Adverse effects: 6. Sedation Show forest plot

1

151

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.53 [0.92, 6.94]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 4. Olanzapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term
Comparison 5. Olanzapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 No clinically important response ‐ as defined by original study Show forest plot

5

808

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.70 [0.48, 1.02]

2 Remission ‐ number of people without remission ‐ as defined by the original study Show forest plot

4

793

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.60 [0.39, 0.92]

3 Mental state: 1a. No clinically important change ‐ at least 50% MADRS total score reduction Show forest plot

4

793

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.73 [0.51, 1.04]

4 Mental state: 1b. Depressive symptoms ‐ MADRS score at endpoint Show forest plot

5

808

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐2.84 [‐5.48, ‐0.20]

5 Mental state: 1c. Depressive symptoms ‐ HAM‐D score at endpoint Show forest plot

1

15

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐7.90 [‐16.63, 0.83]

6 Mental state: 2. Anxiety symptoms ‐ HAM‐A score at endpoint Show forest plot

4

793

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.44 [‐2.81, ‐0.06]

7 Leaving the study early Show forest plot

4

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

7.1 due to any reason

4

807

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.22 [0.82, 1.83]

7.2 due to adverse events

3

792

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.51 [1.58, 7.80]

7.3 due to inefficacy

3

792

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.58 [0.28, 1.21]

8 Adverse effects: 1. At least one adverse effect Show forest plot

1

217

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.30 [0.58, 2.93]

9 Adverse effects: 2. Death Show forest plot

2

575

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.38 [0.02, 9.47]

10 Adverse effects: 3. Extrapyramidal effects ‐ tremor Show forest plot

1

302

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.21 [0.53, 2.75]

11 Adverse effects: 4. Prolactin ‐ change from baseline in ng/ml Show forest plot

2

518

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

4.19 [‐0.18, 8.56]

12 Adverse effects: 5a. Significant weight gain Show forest plot

3

792

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

4.77 [1.82, 12.50]

12.1 ≥ 10% weight gain from baseline

1

217

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

12.14 [0.70, 208.95]

12.2 spontaneously reported

2

575

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

4.22 [1.29, 13.77]

13 Adverse effects: 5b. Weight ‐ change from baseline in kg Show forest plot

2

519

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

4.58 [4.06, 5.09]

14 Adverse effects: 6. Sedation Show forest plot

2

575

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.53 [1.64, 7.60]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 5. Olanzapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term
Comparison 6. Quetiapine versus placebo for major depression

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Non‐response to treatment ‐ as defined by the original study Show forest plot

3

1342

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.52 [0.41, 0.66]

2 Global state: no clinically important change ‐ CGI Show forest plot

3

1342

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.56 [0.44, 0.71]

3 Remission ‐ number of participants without remission ‐ as defined by the original study Show forest plot

3

1337

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.65 [0.49, 0.86]

4 Relapse Show forest plot

1

776

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.34 [0.24, 0.48]

5 Mental state: 1a. Depressive symptoms ‐ no clinically important change‐ MADRS Show forest plot

3

1342

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.52 [0.41, 0.66]

6 Mental state: 1b. Depressive symptoms ‐ MADRS score at endpoint Show forest plot

4

2069

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐2.59 [‐3.50, ‐1.69]

6.1 short‐term

3

1298

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐3.36 [‐4.62, ‐2.10]

6.2 long‐term

1

771

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.88 [‐1.00, ‐0.76]

7 Mental state: 1c. Depressive symptoms ‐ HAM‐D score at endpoint Show forest plot

3

1298

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐2.52 [‐3.66, ‐1.37]

8 Mental state: 2. Anxiety symptoms ‐ HAM‐A score at endpoint Show forest plot

4

2069

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.40 [‐1.97, ‐0.84]

8.1 short‐term

3

1298

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.42 [‐2.20, ‐0.64]

8.2 long‐term

1

771

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.38 [‐2.20, ‐0.56]

9 Leaving the study early ‐ due to adverse events Show forest plot

4

2118

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.33 [1.37, 3.98]

9.1 short‐term

3

1342

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.03 [1.91, 4.80]

9.2 long‐term

1

776

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.25 [0.68, 2.28]

10 Adverse effects: 1. Death ‐ suicidal thoughts ‐ MADRS item 10 of at least 4 Show forest plot

1

723

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.48 [0.18, 1.27]

11 Adverse effects: 2. Extrapyramidal effects ‐ general EPS Show forest plot

4

2118

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.74 [1.01, 3.02]

11.1 short‐term

3

1342

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.84 [0.94, 3.60]

11.2 long‐term

1

776

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.56 [0.60, 4.08]

12 Adverse effects: 3. Prolactin ‐ change from baseline in ng/ml Show forest plot

1

309

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.76 [‐0.19, 1.71]

13 Adverse effects: 4a. Significant weight gain Show forest plot

4

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

13.1 ≥7% weight gain from baseline ‐ short‐term

4

2118

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.12 [1.13, 3.99]

13.2 spontaneously reported

1

776

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

6.80 [2.84, 16.28]

14 Adverse effects: 4b. Weight ‐ change from baseline in kg Show forest plot

4

2027

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.65 [0.11, 1.18]

14.1 short‐term

3

1306

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.60 [‐0.09, 1.29]

14.2 long‐term

1

721

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.8 [0.13, 1.47]

15 Adverse effects: 5. Sedation Show forest plot

4

2118

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

5.76 [2.32, 14.32]

15.1 short‐term

3

1342

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

4.94 [1.97, 12.36]

15.2 long‐term

1

776

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

31.74 [1.89, 532.38]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 6. Quetiapine versus placebo for major depression
Comparison 7. Quetiapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 No clinically important response to treatment (as defined by original study) Show forest plot

1

303

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.94 [0.60, 1.47]

2 Global state: no clinically important change ‐ CGI Show forest plot

1

303

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.94 [0.60, 1.47]

3 Remission ‐ number of participants without remission Show forest plot

1

303

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.08 [0.66, 1.77]

4 Mental state: 1a. No clinically important change‐ MADRS Show forest plot

1

303

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.72 [0.46, 1.13]

5 Mental state: 1b. Depressive symptoms ‐ MADRS score at endpoint Show forest plot

1

288

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.41 [‐2.65, 1.83]

6 Mental state: 1c. Depressive symptoms ‐ HAM‐D score at endpoint Show forest plot

1

288

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.20 [‐2.99, 0.59]

7 Mental state: 2. Anxiety symptoms ‐ HAM‐A score at endpoint Show forest plot

1

288

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.26 [‐1.39, 1.91]

8 Leaving the study early ‐ due to adverse events Show forest plot

1

303

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

16.82 [3.93, 72.02]

9 Adverse effects: 1. Extrapyramidal effects ‐ general EPS Show forest plot

1

303

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.64 [0.26, 1.62]

10 Adverse effects: 2. Prolactin ‐ change from baseline in ng/ml Show forest plot

1

301

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.07 [‐1.21, 1.35]

11 Adverse effects: 3a. Significant weight gain ‐ ≥7% from baseline Show forest plot

1

303

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

4.05 [0.45, 36.70]

12 Adverse effects: 3b. Weight ‐ change from baseline in ng/ml Show forest plot

1

301

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.65 [1.13, 2.17]

13 Adverse effects: 4. Sedation Show forest plot

1

303

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.27 [1.89, 5.63]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 7. Quetiapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term
Comparison 8. Quetiapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 No clinically important response (as defined by original study) Show forest plot

3

995

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.66 [0.51, 0.87]

2 Global state: no clinically important change ‐ CGI Show forest plot

2

937

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.64 [0.49, 0.84]

3 Remission ‐ number of people without remission ‐ as defined by the original study Show forest plot

3

847

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.52 [0.38, 0.71]

4 Mental state: 1a. Depressive symptoms ‐ no clinically important change ‐ MADRS Show forest plot

2

937

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.68 [0.52, 0.90]

5 Mental state: 1b. Depressive symptoms ‐ MADRS score at endpoint Show forest plot

2

919

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐2.67 [‐4.00, ‐1.34]

6 Mental state: 1c. Depressive symptoms ‐ no clinically important change ‐ HAM‐D Show forest plot

1

58

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.41 [0.14, 1.22]

7 Mental state: 1d. Depressive symptoms ‐ HAM‐D score at endpoint Show forest plot

3

977

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐2.67 [‐3.79, ‐1.55]

8 Mental state: 2a. Anxiety symptoms ‐ no clinically important change ‐ HAM‐A Show forest plot

1

58

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.23 [0.08, 0.70]

9 Mental state: 2b. Anxiety symptoms ‐ HAM‐A score at endpoint Show forest plot

3

977

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐2.62 [‐4.69, ‐0.55]

10 Leaving the study early Show forest plot

3

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

10.1 due to any reason

1

58

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.75 [0.26, 2.14]

10.2 due to adverse events

3

995

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

5.59 [1.47, 21.26]

10.3 due to inefficacy

1

58

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.04 [0.00, 0.66]

11 Adverse effects: 1. Extrapyramidal symptoms Show forest plot

1

446

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.95 [0.71, 5.32]

12 Adverse effects: 2. Prolactin ‐ change from baseline in ng/ml Show forest plot

1

491

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.33 [‐1.00, 2.34]

13 Adverse effects: 3a. Significant weight gain Show forest plot

3

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

13.1 ≥ 7% weight gain from baseline

3

995

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.06 [1.22, 7.68]

13.2 Increase in body weight from baseline to week 8

1

58

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.39 [1.01, 11.41]

13.3 spontaneously reported

1

446

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

6.17 [0.79, 47.90]

14 Adverse effects: 3b. Weight ‐ change from baseline in kg Show forest plot

3

959

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.11 [0.56, 1.66]

15 Adverse effects: 4. Sedation Show forest plot

3

995

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

8.79 [4.90, 15.77]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 8. Quetiapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term
Comparison 9. Risperidone added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 No clinically important response (as defined by original study) Show forest plot

2

371

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.57 [0.36, 0.89]

2 Remission ‐ number of participants without remission ‐ as defined by the original study Show forest plot

2

371

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.39 [0.22, 0.69]

3 Relapse (as defined by the original study) Show forest plot

1

243

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.57, 1.57]

4 Mental state: 1a. Depressive symptoms ‐ MADRS score at endpoint Show forest plot

2

264

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.85 [‐9.17, 5.47]

4.1 short‐term

1

23

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐7.11 [‐16.50, 2.28]

4.2 medium‐term

1

241

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.80 [‐2.21, 3.81]

5 Mental state: 1b. Depressive symptoms ‐ no clinically important change ‐ HAM‐D Show forest plot

2

371

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.60 [0.38, 0.95]

6 Mental state: 1c. Depressive symptoms ‐ HAM‐D score at endpoint Show forest plot

2

509

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.69 [‐4.13, 0.74]

6.1 short‐term

1

268

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐2.80 [‐4.14, ‐1.46]

6.2 medium‐term

1

241

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.30 [‐2.43, 1.83]

7 Leaving the study early Show forest plot

4

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

7.1 due to any reason

4

637

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.04 [0.59, 1.83]

7.2 due to adverse events

2

517

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.11 [0.79, 5.68]

7.3 due to inefficacy

2

517

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.59, 1.51]

8 Adverse effects: 1. At least one adverse effect Show forest plot

2

371

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.75 [0.48, 1.16]

9 Adverse effects: 2a. Extrapyramidal effects ‐ tremor Show forest plot

2

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

9.1 EPS general ‐ medium‐term

1

243

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.98 [0.36, 11.04]

9.2 akathisia ‐ short‐term

1

274

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.85 [0.12, 70.59]

9.3 dystonia ‐ short‐term

1

274

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.31 [0.01, 7.73]

9.4 tremor ‐ short‐term

1

274

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.94 [0.06, 15.23]

9.5 use of antiparkinson medication ‐ short‐term

1

274

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10 Adverse effects: 3a. Prolactin increase ‐ associated effects Show forest plot

1

243

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

7.0 [0.36, 136.98]

11 Adverse effects: 3b. Prolactin ‐ change from baseline in ng/ml ‐ endpoint Show forest plot

2

256

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

29.42 [19.49, 39.34]

11.1 short‐term

1

15

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

40.42 [‐2.67, 83.51]

11.2 medium‐term

1

241

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

28.8 [18.60, 39.00]

12 Adverse effects: 4a. Significant weight gain Show forest plot

3

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

12.1 ≥ 7% weight gain from baseline

2

340

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.32 [0.99, 11.12]

12.2 spontaneously reported

2

371

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.12 [0.55, 8.16]

13 Adverse effects: 4b. Weight ‐ change from baseline in kg Show forest plot

4

633

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.09 [‐2.22, 2.04]

13.1 short‐term

3

392

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐2.77 [‐8.03, 2.49]

13.2 medium‐term

1

241

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.80 [0.95, 2.65]

14 Adverse effects: 5. Sedation Show forest plot

4

637

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.10 [0.31, 3.99]

14.1 short‐term

3

394

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.21 [0.17, 8.46]

14.2 medium‐term

1

243

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.73 [0.16, 3.31]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 9. Risperidone added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression
Comparison 10. Amisulpride versus placebo for dysthymia

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 No clinically important response (as defined by original study) Show forest plot

2

322

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.29 [0.18, 0.46]

2 Global state: no clinically important change ‐ CGI Show forest plot

2

322

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.29 [0.18, 0.46]

3 Mental state: 1a. Depressive symptoms ‐ no clinically important change‐ MADRS < 7 Show forest plot

1

212

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.28 [0.15, 0.51]

4 Mental state: 1b. Depressive symptoms ‐ MADRS score at endpoint Show forest plot

2

284

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐4.90 [‐6.67, ‐3.12]

5 Mental state: 1c. Depressive symptoms ‐ HAM‐D score at endpoint Show forest plot

1

39

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐7.20 [‐10.08, ‐4.32]

6 Leaving the study early Show forest plot

3

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

6.1 due to any reason

3

361

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.65 [0.38, 1.11]

6.2 due to adverse events

3

361

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.85 [0.96, 15.39]

6.3 due to inefficacy

3

361

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.40 [0.20, 0.83]

7 Adverse effects: 1. At least one adverse effect Show forest plot

3

361

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.39 [0.71, 2.73]

7.1 short‐term

1

39

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

4.58 [0.81, 25.80]

7.2 medium‐term

2

322

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.20 [0.67, 2.15]

8 Adverse effects: 2. Extrapyramidal effects Show forest plot

2

149

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.58 [0.74, 17.40]

8.1 tremor

1

39

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

5.27 [0.24, 117.26]

8.2 EPS in general

1

110

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.13 [0.50, 19.63]

9 Adverse effects: 3. Prolactin associated effects Show forest plot

2

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

9.1 galactorrhoea

1

212

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

11.99 [0.65, 219.71]

9.2 menstrual disorder

1

212

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

10.14 [1.26, 81.50]

9.3 general

1

84

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

8.65 [1.01, 73.75]

10 Adverse effects: 4. Significant weight gain ‐ spontaneously reported Show forest plot

1

212

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

6.55 [0.77, 55.38]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 10. Amisulpride versus placebo for dysthymia
Comparison 11. Amisulpride versus antidepressants for dysthymia

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 No clinically important response ‐ as defined by original study Show forest plot

4

957

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.61 [0.38, 0.99]

1.1 short‐term

1

313

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.61 [0.35, 1.07]

1.2 medium‐term

3

644

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.60 [0.30, 1.19]

2 Global state: no clinically important change ‐ CGI Show forest plot

4

957

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.52 [0.32, 0.86]

2.1 short‐term

1

313

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.50 [0.28, 0.90]

2.2 medium‐term

3

644

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.52 [0.26, 1.06]

3 Service use ‐ number of patients rehospitalised Show forest plot

2

528

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

5.91 [0.73, 48.09]

4 Mental state: 1a. Depressive symptoms ‐ MADRS ‐ score at endpoint Show forest plot

4

902

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.28 [‐2.75, 0.18]

4.1 short‐term

1

306

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.10 [‐2.84, 0.64]

4.2 medium‐term

3

596

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.60 [‐3.97, 0.78]

5 Mental state: 1b. No clinically important change ‐ at least 50% HAM‐D reduction Show forest plot

1

313

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.61 [0.35, 1.07]

6 Mental state: 1c. No clinically important change ‐ at least 25% HAM‐D reduction Show forest plot

1

313

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.20 [0.09, 0.41]

7 Mental state: 1d. Depressive symptoms ‐ HAM‐D score at endpoint Show forest plot

1

306

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.90 [‐2.24, 0.44]

8 Mental state: 2. Anxiety symptoms‐ HAM‐A score at endpoint Show forest plot

3

824

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.98 [‐2.33, 0.38]

8.1 short‐term

1

306

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.90 [‐2.25, 0.45]

8.2 medium‐term

2

518

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.04 [‐3.69, 1.60]

9 Leaving the study early Show forest plot

4

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

9.1 due to any reason

4

957

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.74 [0.55, 1.00]

9.2 due to adverse events

4

957

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.17 [0.74, 1.86]

9.3 due to inefficacy

3

644

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.93 [0.30, 2.83]

10 Adverse effects: 1. At least one adverse effect Show forest plot

4

957

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.73, 1.25]

10.1 short‐term

1

313

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.57, 1.39]

10.2 medium‐term

3

644

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.96 [0.63, 1.46]

11 Adverse effects: 2.Death ‐ suicide attempt Show forest plot

1

253

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.17 [0.01, 4.30]

12 Adverse effects: 3. Extrapyramidal effects Show forest plot

3

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

12.1 tremor

1

253

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.05 [0.00, 0.82]

12.2 EPS in general

3

644

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.68 [0.09, 4.86]

13 Adverse effects: 4. Significant weight gain Show forest plot

2

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

13.1 ≥ 5% weight gain from baseline

2

534

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.23 [1.21, 4.13]

13.2 spontaneously reported

1

253

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.29 [0.65, 2.57]

14 Adverse effects: 5. Prolactin associated effects ‐ amenorrhoea Show forest plot

2

236

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

7.07 [1.60, 31.29]

15 Adverse effects: 6. Sedation Show forest plot

2

531

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.70 [0.08, 6.42]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 11. Amisulpride versus antidepressants for dysthymia
Comparison 12. Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed statistics excluded ‐ 3. Quetiapine versus placebo for major depression

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Mental state: 1b. Depressive symptoms ‐ MADRS score at endpoint Show forest plot

2

1070

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐2.18 [‐3.35, ‐1.00]

1.1 short‐term

1

299

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐3.39 [‐5.95, ‐0.83]

1.2 long‐term

1

771

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.88 [‐1.00, ‐0.76]

2 Mental state: 1c. Depressive symptoms ‐ HAM‐D score at endpoint Show forest plot

1

299

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐2.40 [‐5.79, 0.99]

3 Mental state: 2. Anxiety symptoms ‐ HAM‐A score at endpoint Show forest plot

2

1070

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.39 [‐2.11, ‐0.68]

3.1 short‐term

1

299

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.44 [‐2.88, ‐0.00]

3.2 long‐term

1

771

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.38 [‐2.20, ‐0.56]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 12. Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed statistics excluded ‐ 3. Quetiapine versus placebo for major depression
Comparison 13. Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed statistics excluded ‐ 4. Amisulpride versus antidepressants for dysthymia

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Mental state: 1a. Depressive symptoms ‐ MADRS ‐ score at endpoint Show forest plot

3

824

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.89 [‐2.01, 0.23]

1.1 short‐term

1

306

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.10 [‐2.84, 0.64]

1.2 medium‐term

2

518

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.74 [‐2.20, 0.73]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 13. Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed statistics excluded ‐ 4. Amisulpride versus antidepressants for dysthymia
Comparison 14. Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed statistics excluded ‐ 6. Olanzapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Mental state: 1b. Depressive symptoms ‐ MADRS score at endpoint Show forest plot

2

302

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.38 [‐1.86, 2.62]

2 Mental state: 2. Anxiety symptoms ‐ HAM‐A score at endpoint Show forest plot

2

302

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.78 [‐0.77, 2.34]

3 Adverse effects: 4. Prolactin ‐ change from baseline in ng/ml Show forest plot

1

301

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

4.1 [1.35, 6.85]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 14. Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed statistics excluded ‐ 6. Olanzapine versus antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term
Comparison 15. Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed statistics excluded ‐ 9. Olanzapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Mental state: 1b. Depressive symptoms ‐ MADRS score at endpoint Show forest plot

2

303

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐3.50 [‐7.62, 0.61]

2 Mental state: 2. Anxiety symptoms ‐ HAM‐A score at endpoint Show forest plot

2

303

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.27 [‐4.41, 1.86]

3 Adverse effects: 4. Prolactin ‐ change from baseline in ng/ml Show forest plot

1

301

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

2.5 [0.41, 4.59]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 15. Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed statistics excluded ‐ 9. Olanzapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term
Comparison 16. Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed statistics excluded ‐ 10. Quetiapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Mental state: 1b. Depressive symptoms ‐ MADRS score at endpoint Show forest plot

1

432

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐2.46 [‐4.33, ‐0.59]

2 Mental state: 1d. Depressive symptoms‐ HAM‐D score at endpoint Show forest plot

1

432

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐2.28 [‐3.97, ‐0.59]

3 Mental state: 2b. Anxiety symptoms ‐ HAM‐A score at endpoint Show forest plot

1

432

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.30 [‐2.72, 0.12]

4 Adverse effects: 3b. Weight ‐ change from baseline in kg Show forest plot

1

491

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.49, 1.41]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 16. Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed statistics excluded ‐ 10. Quetiapine added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression ‐ all data short‐term
Comparison 17. Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed statistics excluded ‐ 11. Risperidone added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Mental state: 1c. Depressive symptoms ‐ HAM‐D score at endpoint Show forest plot

1

241

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.30 [‐2.43, 1.83]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 17. Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed statistics excluded ‐ 11. Risperidone added to antidepressants versus placebo added to antidepressants for major depression