Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Prone position for acute respiratory failure in adults

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008095Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 07 octubre 2009see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Protocol
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Anestesia

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2010 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Roxanna Bloomfield

    Intensive Care Unit and Department of Anaesthesia, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK

  • David W Noble

    Correspondencia a: Intensive Care Unit and Department of Anaesthesia, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

  • Nigel R Webster

    University of Aberdeen, IMS, Medical School, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK

Contributions of authors

Conceiving the review: Roxanna Bloomfield (RB), David Noble (DN), Nigel Webster (NW)
Co‐ordinating the review: RB, DN.
Undertaking manual searches: RB, DN.
Screening search results: RB, DN.
Organizing retrieval of papers: RB, DN.
Screening retrieved papers against inclusion criteria: RB, DN.
Appraising quality of papers: RB, DN,NW.
Abstracting data from papers: RB, DN.
Writing to authors of papers for additional information:RB, DN.
Providing additional data about papers:
Obtaining and screening data on unpublished studies: RB, DN.
Data management for the review: RB, DN.
Entering data into Review Manager (RevMan 5.0): RB, DN.
RevMan statistical data: RB, DN.
Other statistical analysis not using RevMan:
Double entry of data: (data entered by person one: RB; data entered by person two: DN)
Interpretation of data: RB, DN, NW.
Statistical inferences: RB, DN, NW
Writing the review: RB, DN, NW
Securing funding for the review:
Performing previous work that was the foundation of the present study:
Guarantor for the review (one author) DN
Person responsible for reading and checking review before submission: NW

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • NHS Grampian, UK.

External sources

  • No sources of support supplied

Declarations of interest

Non known.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr Harald Herkner (content editor), Dr Claude Guerin and Dr Spyros D. Mentzelopoulos (peer reviewers) for their help and editorial advice during the preparation of this protocol.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2015 Nov 13

Prone position for acute respiratory failure in adults

Review

Roxanna Bloomfield, David W Noble, Alexis Sudlow

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008095.pub2

2009 Oct 07

Prone position for acute respiratory failure in adults

Protocol

Roxanna Bloomfield, David W Noble, Nigel R Webster

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008095

Keywords

MeSH

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.