Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Aripiprazol (intramuscular) para la agresión o agitación inducida por la psicosis (tranquilización rápida)

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008074.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 08 enero 2018see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Esquizofrenia

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2018 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Edoardo G Ostinelli

    Correspondencia a: Department of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy

    [email protected]

  • Salwan Jajawi

    Department of Psychiatry, Rotherham, Doncaster and South Humber NHS Trust, Rotherham, UK

  • Styliani Spyridi

    Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Cyprus University of Technology, Lemesos, Cyprus

    Psychiatry ‐ UK LLP, Dewsbury, UK

  • Kamlaj Sayal

    Wyvern Locked Rehabilitation Unit, Cygnet Hospital Derby, Derby, UK

  • Mahesh B Jayaram

    Department of Psychiatry, Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Melbourne, Australia

Contributions of authors

EGO: screened and retrieved papers against eligibility criteria, appraised quality of papers, extracted data from papers, entered data into RevMan and analysed data, interpreted data and took the lead in writing and finalising the review (2014 search, 2017 search).

Salwan Jajawi: study selection, data extraction, entered data into RevMan and analysed data, and writing up first draft of review (2014 search).

Styliani Spyridi: help with study selection, help with extraction (2014 search).

Kamlaj Sayal: help with study selection (2014 search).

Mahesh Jayaram ‐ developing and writing up (protocol only).

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.

    Employs lead author Edoardo G Ostinelli.

  • Rotherham, Doncaster and South Humber NHS Foundation Trust, Rotherham, UK.

    Employs review author Salwan Jajawi.

  • Cyprus University of Technology, Lemesos, Cyprus.

    Employs review author Styliani Spyridi.

  • UK LLP, Dewsbury, UK.

    Employs review author Styliani Spyridi.

  • Cygnet Hospital Derby, UK.

    Employs review author Kamlaj Sayal.

  • Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Melbourne, Australia.

    Employs review author Mahesh B Jayaram.

External sources

  • No sources of support supplied

Declarations of interest

Edoardo G Ostinelli: none known.
Salwan Jajawi: none known.
Styliani Spyridi: has received financial support from pharmaceutical companies to attend scientific conferences, no direct conflict of interest for this review.
Kamlaj Sayal: none known.
Mahesh Jayaram: none known.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the support we received from the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group editorial base, Nottingham, UK. We have used their methods template for the Data collection and analysis section. We would also like to thank Lopamudra Mitra and Bhuvaneshwar Pagadala for their contribution to writing the protocol.

We would like to thank Tarek Nassif and Ayesha Kotecha for peer reviewing the review version.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2018 Jan 08

Aripiprazole (intramuscular) for psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation (rapid tranquillisation)

Review

Edoardo G Ostinelli, Salwan Jajawi, Styliani Spyridi, Kamlaj Sayal, Mahesh B Jayaram

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008074.pub2

2009 Oct 07

Aripiprazole for psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation

Protocol

Bhuvaneshwar Pagadala, Mahesh B Jayaram, Lopamudra Mitra

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008074

Differences between protocol and review

Title change: addition of 'intramuscular' and 'rapid tranquillisation' to title.

Objectives: slight change in wording to clarify intervention

Protocol objectives: To evaluate the effects of intramuscular aripiprazole in the treatment of psychosis‐induced agitation and aggression.

Review objectives: To evaluate the effects of intramuscular (IM) aripiprazole in the treatment of psychosis‐induced aggression and agitation (rapid tranquillisation).

Use of new methods template. Since publication of the protocol, Cochrane methodology has evolved (for example, the inclusion of 'Summary of findings' tables and GRADE). The Cochrane Schizophrenia group maintain a methods template for use in their reviews. We have updated our methods section with this template.

Outcomes: We have clarified the timings of the secondary outcome ‐ not tranquil or asleep to include > 30 minutes (IM) or > 60 minutes (orally) to distinguish it from our pre‐stated primary outcome of not tranquil or asleep by 30 minutes (IM) or 60 minutes (orally). We have renamed global outcomes to global state, and some outcomes are now measured as 'improvement' rather than 'no improvement'. This is in line with the methods template of the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group where avoidance of double negatives is encouraged. We have clarified the 'Summary of findings' outcomes list.

Keywords

MeSH

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Aripiprazole structure
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Aripiprazole structure

Study flow diagram (2014 search).
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Study flow diagram (2014 search).

Study flow diagram (2017 search).
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Study flow diagram (2017 search).

'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 4

'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 5

'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Comparison 1 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs PLACEBO/NIL, Outcome 1 Repeated need for tranquillisation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs PLACEBO/NIL, Outcome 1 Repeated need for tranquillisation.

Comparison 1 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs PLACEBO/NIL, Outcome 2 Specific behaviour: 1a. Agitation ‐ clinically important change (PANSS‐EC reduction ≥ 40% from baseline).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs PLACEBO/NIL, Outcome 2 Specific behaviour: 1a. Agitation ‐ clinically important change (PANSS‐EC reduction ≥ 40% from baseline).

Comparison 1 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs PLACEBO/NIL, Outcome 3 Specific behaviour: 1b. Agitation ‐ average scores ‐ i. up to 2 hours.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs PLACEBO/NIL, Outcome 3 Specific behaviour: 1b. Agitation ‐ average scores ‐ i. up to 2 hours.

Comparison 1 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs PLACEBO/NIL, Outcome 4 Global state: 1. Various.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs PLACEBO/NIL, Outcome 4 Global state: 1. Various.

Comparison 1 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs PLACEBO/NIL, Outcome 5 Global state: 2. Average scores ‐ i. up to 2 hours.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs PLACEBO/NIL, Outcome 5 Global state: 2. Average scores ‐ i. up to 2 hours.

Comparison 1 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs PLACEBO/NIL, Outcome 6 Mental state: 1. Average scores ‐ i. up to 2 hours.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs PLACEBO/NIL, Outcome 6 Mental state: 1. Average scores ‐ i. up to 2 hours.

Comparison 1 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs PLACEBO/NIL, Outcome 7 Adverse effects: 1a. General.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs PLACEBO/NIL, Outcome 7 Adverse effects: 1a. General.

Comparison 1 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs PLACEBO/NIL, Outcome 8 Adverse effects: 1b. General ‐ serious.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs PLACEBO/NIL, Outcome 8 Adverse effects: 1b. General ‐ serious.

Comparison 1 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs PLACEBO/NIL, Outcome 9 Adverse effects: 2a. Specific ‐ arousal.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs PLACEBO/NIL, Outcome 9 Adverse effects: 2a. Specific ‐ arousal.

Comparison 1 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs PLACEBO/NIL, Outcome 10 Adverse effects: 2b. Specific ‐ cardiovascular.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs PLACEBO/NIL, Outcome 10 Adverse effects: 2b. Specific ‐ cardiovascular.

Comparison 1 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs PLACEBO/NIL, Outcome 11 Adverse effects: 2c. Specific ‐ movement disorders.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.11

Comparison 1 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs PLACEBO/NIL, Outcome 11 Adverse effects: 2c. Specific ‐ movement disorders.

Comparison 1 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs PLACEBO/NIL, Outcome 12 Adverse effects: 2d. Specific ‐ miscellaneous.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.12

Comparison 1 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs PLACEBO/NIL, Outcome 12 Adverse effects: 2d. Specific ‐ miscellaneous.

Comparison 1 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs PLACEBO/NIL, Outcome 13 Leaving the study early.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.13

Comparison 1 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs PLACEBO/NIL, Outcome 13 Leaving the study early.

Comparison 2 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: a. HALOPERIDOL (intramuscular), Outcome 1 Repeated need for tranquillisation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: a. HALOPERIDOL (intramuscular), Outcome 1 Repeated need for tranquillisation.

Comparison 2 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: a. HALOPERIDOL (intramuscular), Outcome 2 Specific behaviour: 1a. Agitation ‐ clinically important change (PANSS‐ EC reduction ≥ 40% from baseline).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: a. HALOPERIDOL (intramuscular), Outcome 2 Specific behaviour: 1a. Agitation ‐ clinically important change (PANSS‐ EC reduction ≥ 40% from baseline).

Comparison 2 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: a. HALOPERIDOL (intramuscular), Outcome 3 Specific behaviour: 1b. Agitation ‐ average scores ‐ i. up to 2 hours.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: a. HALOPERIDOL (intramuscular), Outcome 3 Specific behaviour: 1b. Agitation ‐ average scores ‐ i. up to 2 hours.

Comparison 2 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: a. HALOPERIDOL (intramuscular), Outcome 4 Global state: 1. Various.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: a. HALOPERIDOL (intramuscular), Outcome 4 Global state: 1. Various.

Comparison 2 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: a. HALOPERIDOL (intramuscular), Outcome 5 Global outcome: 2. Average scores ‐ i. up to 2 hours.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.5

Comparison 2 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: a. HALOPERIDOL (intramuscular), Outcome 5 Global outcome: 2. Average scores ‐ i. up to 2 hours.

Comparison 2 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: a. HALOPERIDOL (intramuscular), Outcome 6 Mental state: 1. Average scores ‐ i. up to 2 hours.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.6

Comparison 2 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: a. HALOPERIDOL (intramuscular), Outcome 6 Mental state: 1. Average scores ‐ i. up to 2 hours.

Comparison 2 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: a. HALOPERIDOL (intramuscular), Outcome 7 Adverse effects: 1a. General.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.7

Comparison 2 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: a. HALOPERIDOL (intramuscular), Outcome 7 Adverse effects: 1a. General.

Comparison 2 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: a. HALOPERIDOL (intramuscular), Outcome 8 Adverse effects: 1b. General ‐ serious.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.8

Comparison 2 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: a. HALOPERIDOL (intramuscular), Outcome 8 Adverse effects: 1b. General ‐ serious.

Comparison 2 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: a. HALOPERIDOL (intramuscular), Outcome 9 Adverse effects: 2a. Specific ‐ arousal.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.9

Comparison 2 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: a. HALOPERIDOL (intramuscular), Outcome 9 Adverse effects: 2a. Specific ‐ arousal.

Comparison 2 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: a. HALOPERIDOL (intramuscular), Outcome 10 Adverse effects: 2b. Specific ‐ cardiovascular.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.10

Comparison 2 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: a. HALOPERIDOL (intramuscular), Outcome 10 Adverse effects: 2b. Specific ‐ cardiovascular.

Comparison 2 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: a. HALOPERIDOL (intramuscular), Outcome 11 Adverse effects: 2c. Specific ‐ movement disorders.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.11

Comparison 2 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: a. HALOPERIDOL (intramuscular), Outcome 11 Adverse effects: 2c. Specific ‐ movement disorders.

Comparison 2 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: a. HALOPERIDOL (intramuscular), Outcome 12 Adverse effects: 2d. Specific ‐ miscellaneous.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.12

Comparison 2 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: a. HALOPERIDOL (intramuscular), Outcome 12 Adverse effects: 2d. Specific ‐ miscellaneous.

Comparison 2 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: a. HALOPERIDOL (intramuscular), Outcome 13 Leaving the study early.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.13

Comparison 2 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: a. HALOPERIDOL (intramuscular), Outcome 13 Leaving the study early.

Comparison 3 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: b. OLANZAPINE (intramuscular), Outcome 1 Specific behaviour: 1a. Agitation ‐ clinically important change (PANSS‐ EC reduction ≥ 40% from baseline).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: b. OLANZAPINE (intramuscular), Outcome 1 Specific behaviour: 1a. Agitation ‐ clinically important change (PANSS‐ EC reduction ≥ 40% from baseline).

Comparison 3 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: b. OLANZAPINE (intramuscular), Outcome 2 Specific behaviour: 1b. Agitation ‐ average scores ‐ i. up to 2 hours.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: b. OLANZAPINE (intramuscular), Outcome 2 Specific behaviour: 1b. Agitation ‐ average scores ‐ i. up to 2 hours.

Comparison 3 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: b. OLANZAPINE (intramuscular), Outcome 3 Global state: 1. Average scores ‐ i. up to 2 hours.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: b. OLANZAPINE (intramuscular), Outcome 3 Global state: 1. Average scores ‐ i. up to 2 hours.

Comparison 3 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: b. OLANZAPINE (intramuscular), Outcome 4 Adverse effects: 1a. General.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.4

Comparison 3 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: b. OLANZAPINE (intramuscular), Outcome 4 Adverse effects: 1a. General.

Comparison 3 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: b. OLANZAPINE (intramuscular), Outcome 5 Adverse effects: 1b. General ‐ serious.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.5

Comparison 3 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: b. OLANZAPINE (intramuscular), Outcome 5 Adverse effects: 1b. General ‐ serious.

Comparison 3 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: b. OLANZAPINE (intramuscular), Outcome 6 Adverse effects: 2a. Specific ‐ arousal.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.6

Comparison 3 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: b. OLANZAPINE (intramuscular), Outcome 6 Adverse effects: 2a. Specific ‐ arousal.

Comparison 3 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: b. OLANZAPINE (intramuscular), Outcome 7 Adverse effects: 2b. Specific ‐ cardiovascular.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.7

Comparison 3 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: b. OLANZAPINE (intramuscular), Outcome 7 Adverse effects: 2b. Specific ‐ cardiovascular.

Comparison 3 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: b. OLANZAPINE (intramuscular), Outcome 8 Adverse effects: 2c. Specific ‐ movement disorders ‐ i. dichotomous.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.8

Comparison 3 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: b. OLANZAPINE (intramuscular), Outcome 8 Adverse effects: 2c. Specific ‐ movement disorders ‐ i. dichotomous.

Comparison 3 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: b. OLANZAPINE (intramuscular), Outcome 9 Adverse effects: 2d. Specific ‐ movement disorders ‐ ii. average scores.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.9

Comparison 3 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: b. OLANZAPINE (intramuscular), Outcome 9 Adverse effects: 2d. Specific ‐ movement disorders ‐ ii. average scores.

Comparison 3 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: b. OLANZAPINE (intramuscular), Outcome 10 Adverse effects: 2e. Specific ‐ miscellaneous.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.10

Comparison 3 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: b. OLANZAPINE (intramuscular), Outcome 10 Adverse effects: 2e. Specific ‐ miscellaneous.

Comparison 3 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: b. OLANZAPINE (intramuscular), Outcome 11 Leaving the study early.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.11

Comparison 3 ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: b. OLANZAPINE (intramuscular), Outcome 11 Leaving the study early.

Table 2. Suggested design for a trial

Methods

Allocation: randomised, clearly described, concealed.
Blindness: double, described and tested.
Duration: 2 weeks.

Participants

Diagnosis: thought to be psychoses.
N = 300.*
Age: any.
Sex: both.

History: acutely ill, aggressive and/or agitated.

Interventions

1. Aripiprazole IM: dose flexible within recommended limits. N = 150.
2. Haloperidol IM: dose flexible within recommended limits. N = 150.

Outcomes

All outcomes are grouped by time: by 30 minutes, up to two hours, up to four hours, up to 24 hours, and over 24 hours.

Tranquillisation or asleep ‐ tranquil; asleep.

Repeated need for tranquillisation ‐ needing additional injections.
Specific behaviours ‐ self‐harm, including suicide, injury to others.
Global outcomes ‐ patient satisfaction; use of restraint or seclusion.
Service outcomes ‐ length of hospitalisation; readmission rate.
Mental state ‐ effect of medication on mental state.
Adverse effects ‐ medication significant side effects.
Leaving the study early ‐ detailed reasons provided.

Quality of life outcomes.
Economic outcomes.

Notes

* Powered to be able to identify a difference of ˜20% between groups for primary outcome with adequate degree of certainty

IM: intramuscular

Figuras y tablas -
Table 2. Suggested design for a trial
Table 3. Additional reviews relevant to aggression and suggested from excluded studies

Aripiprazole

Combination

Comparison #1

Comparison #2

Excluded study

Suggested title of review

Cochrane review

IM

Short acting

+ quetiapine

aripiprazole + olanzapine

quetiapine + olanzapine

Wang 2014

Antipsychotic combinations for psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation (rapid tranquillisation)

None

Long acting (441mg)

Long acting (882 mg)

placebo

NCT0146903*

Aripiprazole for long‐term aggression in psychosis; Placebo for long‐term aggression in psychosis

None

Oral

aripiprazole + magnesium valproate

Li 2009, Liu 2012, Xie 2011

Magnesium valproate (+/‐aripiprazole) for psychosis‐induced aggression

None

oral olanzapine

Chen 2009, Kinon 2008

Aripiprazole (oral) for psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation (rapid tranquillisation); Olanzapine (oral) for psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation (rapid tranquillisation);

? expansion of this review

+ clonazepam

oral clozapine

Bao 2007

Aripiprazole plus benzodiazepines for psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation (rapid tranquillisation); Clozapine for psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation (rapid tranquillisation);

? expansion of this review; Toal 2012

Non‐aripiprazole

IM haloperidol + lorazepam + benztropine

oral quetiapine

Simpson 2010

Benzodiazepines for psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation (rapid tranquillisation); Haloperidol for psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation (rapid tranquillisation); Quetiapine for psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation (rapid tranquillisation)

Gillies 2015;Ostinelli 2017;Wilkie 2012

* One sub‐study with people with aggression/agitation.

Figuras y tablas -
Table 3. Additional reviews relevant to aggression and suggested from excluded studies
Summary of findings for the main comparison. ARIPIPRAZOLE (IM) compared to PLACEBO/NIL for psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation (rapid tranquillisation)

ARIPIPRAZOLE compared to PLACEBO/NIL for psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation (rapid tranquillisation)

Patient or population: psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation (rapid tranquillisation)
Setting: hospital
Intervention: ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular)
Comparison: PLACEBO/NIL

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

№ of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with PLACEBO/NIL

Risk with ARIPIPRAZOLE

Tranquillisation or asleep

Not reported

Repeated need for tranquillisation ‐ needing additional injections during 24 hours

Low

RR 0.69
(0.56 to 0.85)

382
(2 RCTs)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
VERY LOW 1, 2

250 per 1.000

173 per 1.000
(140 to 213)

Moderate

600 per 1.000

414 per 1.000
(336 to 510)

High

750 per 1.000

518 per 1.000
(420 to 638)

Specific behaviour: Agitation ‐ clinically important change (PANSS ‐EC reduction ≥ 40% from baseline) ‐ up to 2 hours

Low

RR 1.50
(1.17 to 1.92)

382
(2 RCTs)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
VERY LOW 1, 2

100 per 1.000

150 per 1.000
(117 to 192)

Moderate

350 per 1.000

525 per 1.000
(410 to 672)

High

700 per 1.000

1000 per 1.000
(819 to 1.000)

Global state: non‐responders to the first injection

Low

RR 0.49
(0.34 to 0.71)

263
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 2

200 per 1.000

98 per 1.000
(68 to 142)

Moderate

450 per 1.000

221 per 1.000
(153 to 320)

High

700 per 1.000

343 per 1.000
(238 to 497)

Adverse effects: one or more adverse events during 24 hours (only reported if occurred in ≥ 5% of people)

Study population

RR 1.51
(0.93 to 2.46)

117
(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
VERY LOW 1, 2

295 per 1.000

446 per 1.000
(274 to 726)

Economic outcomes

Not reported

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its CI).

CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

1 Risk of bias: rated 'serious' (downgraded by 1) ‐ randomisation procedure is not reported for both the included studies, and allocation concealment procedure is not consistently reported in Bristol‐Myers 2005. While for the 'randomisation' bias, studies are at least reported as 'randomised', as for the latter that allocation concealment was correctly handled could not be implied.

2 Indirectness: rated 'very serious' (downgraded by 2) ‐ participants included in the studies had levels of agitation not so pronounced by inclusion criteria, potentially under‐estimating or more likely over‐estimating true effectiveness.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. ARIPIPRAZOLE (IM) compared to PLACEBO/NIL for psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation (rapid tranquillisation)
Summary of findings 2. ARIPIPRAZOLE (IM) compared to OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: a. HALOPERIDOL for psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation (rapid tranquillisation)

ARIPIPRAZOLE compared to OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: a. HALOPERIDOL for psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation (rapid tranquillisation)

Patient or population: psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation (rapid tranquillisation)
Setting: hospital
Intervention: ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular)
Comparison: OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: a. HALOPERIDOL

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

№ of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: a. HALOPERIDOL

Risk with ARIPIPRAZOLE

Tranquillisation or asleep

Not reported

Repeated need for tranquillisation ‐ needing additional injections during 24 hours

Low

RR 1.28
(1.00 to 1.63)

477
(2 RCTs)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
VERY LOW 1, 2

,

100 per 1.000

128 per 1.000
(100 to 163)

Moderate

300 per 1.000

384 per 1.000
(300 to 489)

High

500 per 1.000

640 per 1.000
(500 to 815)

Specific behaviour: Agitation ‐ clinically important change (PANSS ‐EC reduction ≥ 40% from baseline) ‐ up to 2 hours

Study population

RR 0.94
(0.80 to 1.11)

477
(2 RCTs)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
VERY LOW 1 ,2

576 per 1.000

541 per 1.000
(460 to 639)

Global state: non‐responders to the first injection

Study population

RR 1.18
(0.78 to 1.79)

360
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 2

184 per 1.000

217 per 1.000
(143 to 329)

Adverse effects: one or more adverse events during 24 hours (only reported if occurred in ≥ 5% of people)

Study population

RR 0.91
(0.61 to 1.35)

113
(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
VERY LOW 1, 2

491 per 1.000

447 per 1.000
(300 to 663)

Adverse effects: movement disorders ‐ EPS during 24 hours (only reported if occurred in ≥ 5% of people)

Low

RR 0.29
(0.12 to 0.70)

471
(2 RCTs)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
VERY LOW 1, 2

50 per 1.000

14 per 1.000
(6 to 35)

Moderate

100 per 1.000

29 per 1.000
(12 to 70)

High

300 per 1.000

87 per 1.000
(36 to 210)

Economic outcomes

Not reported

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its CI).

CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

1 Risk of bias: rated 'serious' (downgraded by 1) ‐ randomisation procedure is not reported for both the included studies, and allocation concealment procedure is not consistently reported in Bristol‐Myers 2005. While for the 'randomisation' bias studies are at least reported as 'randomised', as for the latter that allocation concealment was correctly handled could not be implied.

2 Indirectness: rated 'very serious' (downgraded by 2) ‐ participants included in the studies had levels of agitation not so pronounced by inclusion criteria, potentially under‐estimating or more likely over‐estimating true effectiveness.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 2. ARIPIPRAZOLE (IM) compared to OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: a. HALOPERIDOL for psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation (rapid tranquillisation)
Summary of findings 3. ARIPIPRAZOLE (IM) compared to OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: b. OLANZAPINE for psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation (rapid tranquillisation)

ARIPIPRAZOLE compared to OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: b. OLANZAPINE for psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation (rapid tranquillisation)

Patient or population: psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation (rapid tranquillisation)
Setting: hospital
Intervention: ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular)
Comparison: OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: b. OLANZAPINE

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

№ of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: b. OLANZAPINE

Risk with ARIPIPRAZOLE

Tranquillisation or asleep

Not reported

Repeated need for tranquillisation

Not reported

Specific behaviour: Agitation ‐ clinically important change (PANSS ‐EC reduction ≥ 40% from baseline) ‐ up to 2 hours

Low

RR 0.77
(0.60 to 0.99)

80
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW1, 3

500 per 1.000

385 per 1.000
(300 to 495)

Moderate

800 per 1.000

616 per 1.000
(480 to 792)

High

900 per 1.000

693 per 1.000
(540 to 891)

Global state: CGI‐S change score up to 2 hours

MD 0.58
(0.01 higher to 1.15 higher)

80
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 1, 3

Adverse effects: one or more adverse effects during 24 hours

Study population

RR 0.75
(0.45 to 1.24)

80
(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
VERY LOW 2, 3

500 per 1.000

375 per 1.000
(225 to 620)

Adverse effects: somnolence during 24 hours

Low

RR 0.25
(0.08 to 0.82)

80
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 1, 3

100 per 1.000

25 per 1.000
(8 to 82)

Moderate

300 per 1.000

75 per 1.000
(24 to 246)

High

700 per 1.000

175 per 1.000
(56 to 574)

Economic outcomes

Not reported

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its CI).

CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

1 Imprecision ‐ rated 'serious' (downgraded by 1): Optimal Information Size (OIS) criterion is not met meaning that imprecision of effect estimates could not be properly handled.

2 Imprecision ‐ rated 'very serious' (downgraded by 2): Optimal Information Size (OIS) criterion is not met and CI overlaps no effect. High imprecision of effect estimates could not be properly excluded.

3 Indirectness ‐ rated 'serious' (downgraded by 1): attribution to the intervention drugs is suspected but can not be confirmed since in the study results it is showed that almost all the participants were administered with 'treatment as usual' drugs.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 3. ARIPIPRAZOLE (IM) compared to OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: b. OLANZAPINE for psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation (rapid tranquillisation)
Table 1. Other relevant Cochrane reviews

Focus of review

Reference

Completed and maintained reviews

'As required' medication regimens for seriously mentally ill people in hospital

Douglas‐Hall 2015

Benzodiazepines for psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation

Gillies 2015

Chlorpromazine for psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation

Ahmed 2010

Clotiapine for acute psychotic illnesses

Berk 2004

Containment strategies for people with serious mental illness

Muralidharan 2006

De‐escalation techniques for psychosis‐induced aggression

Du 2017

Droperidol for acute psychosis

Khokhar 2016

Haloperidol for long‐term aggression in psychosis

Khushu 2016

Haloperidol for psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation (rapid tranquillisation)

Ostinelli 2017

Haloperidol plus promethazine for psychosis‐induced aggression

Huf 2016

Olanzapine IM or velotab for acutely disturbed/agitated people with suspected serious mental illnesses

Belgamwar 2005

Seclusion and restraint for serious mental illnesses

Sailas 2000

Zuclopenthixol acetate for acute schizophrenia and similar serious mental illnesses

Jayakody 2012

Reviews in the process of being completed

Risperidone for psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation

Ahmed 2011

Loxapine inhaler for psychosis‐induced aggression

Vangala 2012

Clozapine for people with psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation

Toal 2012

Quetiapine for psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation

Wilkie 2012

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Other relevant Cochrane reviews
Comparison 1. ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs PLACEBO/NIL

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Repeated need for tranquillisation Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 needing additional injections during 24 hours

2

382

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.69 [0.56, 0.85]

1.2 needing 1 additional injection during 24 hours

1

119

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.38 [0.69, 2.80]

1.3 needing 2 additional injections during 24 hours

1

119

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.36 [0.19, 0.70]

2 Specific behaviour: 1a. Agitation ‐ clinically important change (PANSS‐EC reduction ≥ 40% from baseline) Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 up to 2 hours

2

382

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.50 [1.17, 1.92]

3 Specific behaviour: 1b. Agitation ‐ average scores ‐ i. up to 2 hours Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 change score (ABS, high=worse)

2

380

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐3.77 [‐5.39, ‐2.16]

3.2 change score (ACES, low=agitated, high=sedated)

2

380

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.71 [‐1.15, ‐0.28]

3.3 change score (PANSS‐EC, high=worse)

1

261

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.49 [‐4.28, ‐0.70]

3.4 change score (PANSS‐EC, high=worse, schizophrenia subgroup)

2

263

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.55 [‐3.78, ‐1.32]

3.5 change score (PANSS‐EC, high=worse, non‐sedated patients subgroup based on ACES)

2

355

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.68 [‐3.75, ‐1.62]

3.6 change score (PANSS‐EC, high=worse, non‐sedated patients subgroup based on AEs)

2

365

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.83 [‐3.92, ‐1.75]

4 Global state: 1. Various Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1 non‐responders to the first injection

1

263

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.49 [0.34, 0.71]

4.2 need for benzodiazepine up to 24 hours

2

382

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.48 [0.28, 0.80]

5 Global state: 2. Average scores ‐ i. up to 2 hours Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

5.1 endpoint score (CGI‐I, high=worse)

2

380

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.73 [‐0.97, ‐0.49]

5.2 endpoint score (CGI‐I, high=worse, schizophrenia subgroup

1

75

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.71 [‐1.17, ‐0.25]

5.3 change score (CGI‐S, high=worse)

2

380

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.56 [‐0.86, ‐0.26]

6 Mental state: 1. Average scores ‐ i. up to 2 hours Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

6.1 change score up to 2 hours (BPRS total, high=worse)

1

110

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐3.39 [‐7.03, 0.25]

6.2 change score up to 2 hours (BPRS positive subscale, high=worse)

1

110

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.62 [‐1.65, 0.41]

7 Adverse effects: 1a. General Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

7.1 one or more drug related adverse events during 24 hours

1

117

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.51 [0.93, 2.46]

7.2 onset or increased severity of adverse effects after 2nd injection

1

262

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.40 [1.36, 4.23]

8 Adverse effects: 1b. General ‐ serious Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

8.1 death

1

262

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.2 rated as serious

2

379

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.77 [0.63, 22.60]

8.3 tonic clonic seizure

1

117

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.26 [0.14, 78.49]

9 Adverse effects: 2a. Specific ‐ arousal Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

9.1 insomnia during 24 hours

1

262

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.62 [0.25, 1.52]

9.2 "over" sedated during 24 hours

1

262

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.59 [0.60, 4.20]

9.3 somnolence during 24 hours

2

379

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.52 [0.57, 4.00]

10 Adverse effects: 2b. Specific ‐ cardiovascular Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

10.1 dizziness during 24 hours

2

379

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.77 [0.66, 4.70]

10.2 sinus tachycardia during 24 hours

1

117

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.36 [0.02, 8.72]

10.3 tachycardia during 24 hours

1

117

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.36 [0.50, 37.82]

11 Adverse effects: 2c. Specific ‐ movement disorders Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

11.1 akathisia during 24 hours

1

117

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.61 [0.40, 144.21]

11.2 dystonia during 24 hours

1

117

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.26 [0.14, 78.49]

11.3 EPS during 24 hours

1

262

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.5 [0.06, 36.45]

12 Adverse effects: 2d. Specific ‐ miscellaneous Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

12.1 agitation during 24 hours

2

379

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.33, 2.37]

12.2 headache during 24 hours

2

379

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.66 [0.74, 3.71]

12.3 pain at injection site

2

379

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.10 [0.30, 3.94]

12.4 nausea during 24 hours

2

379

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.97 [1.13, 13.92]

12.5 vomiting during 24 hours

1

117

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.18 [0.20, 23.37]

13 Leaving the study early Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

13.1 any reason

2

382

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.29 [0.35, 4.74]

13.2 lack of efficacy

2

382

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.47 [0.07, 3.06]

13.3 withdrew consent

2

382

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.68 [0.23, 12.46]

13.4 adverse effects

2

382

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.25 [0.25, 20.54]

13.5 other

2

382

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.05 [0.15, 7.44]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs PLACEBO/NIL
Comparison 2. ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: a. HALOPERIDOL (intramuscular)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Repeated need for tranquillisation Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 needing additional injections during 24 hours

2

477

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.28 [1.00, 1.63]

1.2 needing 1 additional injection during 24 hours

1

117

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.34 [0.66, 2.70]

1.3 needing 2 additional injections during 24 hours

1

117

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.37 [0.77, 7.26]

2 Specific behaviour: 1a. Agitation ‐ clinically important change (PANSS‐ EC reduction ≥ 40% from baseline) Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 up to 2 hours

2

477

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.94 [0.80, 1.11]

3 Specific behaviour: 1b. Agitation ‐ average scores ‐ i. up to 2 hours Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 change score (ABS, high=worse)

2

473

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.55 [‐1.00, 2.10]

3.2 change score (ACES, low=agitated, high=sedated)

2

473

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.12 [‐0.30, 0.55]

3.3 change score (PANSS‐EC, high=worse)

1

357

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.48 [‐1.16, 2.12]

3.4 change score (PANSS‐EC, high=worse, schizophrenia subgroup)

2

336

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.07 [‐0.99, 1.13]

3.5 change score (PANSS‐EC, high=worse, non‐sedated patients subgroup based on ACES)

2

422

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.12 [‐0.82, 1.06]

3.6 change score (PANSS‐EC, high=worse, non‐sedated patients subgroup based on AEs)

2

448

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.26 [‐0.68, 1.19]

4 Global state: 1. Various Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1 non‐responders to the first injection

1

360

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.18 [0.78, 1.79]

4.2 need for benzodiazepine up to 24 hours

2

477

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.79 [0.46, 1.35]

5 Global outcome: 2. Average scores ‐ i. up to 2 hours Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

5.1 endpoint score (CGI‐I, high=worse)

2

473

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.02 [‐0.19, 0.23]

5.2 endpoint score (CGI‐I, high=worse, schizophrenia subgroup

1

79

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.02 [‐0.44, 0.48]

5.3 change score (CGI‐S, high=worse)

2

473

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.07 [‐0.36, 0.22]

6 Mental state: 1. Average scores ‐ i. up to 2 hours Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

6.1 change score up to 2 hours (BPRS total, high=worse)

1

102

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.03 [‐1.70, 5.76]

6.2 change score up to 2 hours (BPRS positive subscale, high=worse)

1

103

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.23 [‐0.82, 1.28]

7 Adverse effects: 1a. General Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

7.1 one or more drug related adverse events during 24 hours

1

113

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.61, 1.35]

7.2 onset or increased severity of adverse effects after 2nd injection

1

358

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.74 [0.57, 0.96]

8 Adverse effects: 1b. General ‐ serious Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

8.1 death

1

358

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.2 rated as serious

2

471

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.73 [0.54, 5.52]

8.3 tonic clonic seizure

1

113

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.05 [0.13, 73.38]

9 Adverse effects: 2a. Specific ‐ arousal Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

9.1 insomnia during 24 hours

1

358

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.48 [0.23, 0.97]

9.2 "over" sedated during 24 hours

1

358

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.60 [0.34, 1.07]

9.3 somnolence during 24 hours

2

471

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.81 [0.41, 1.58]

10 Adverse effects: 2b. Specific ‐ cardiovascular Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

10.1 dizziness during 24 hours

2

471

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.41 [0.66, 3.01]

10.2 sinus tachycardia during 24 hours

1

113

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.15 [0.01, 2.75]

10.3 tachycardia during 24 hours

1

113

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.07 [0.47, 35.31]

11 Adverse effects: 2c. Specific ‐ movement disorders Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

11.1 akathisia during 24 hours

1

113

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.13, 1.94]

11.2 dystonia during 24 hours

1

113

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.25 [0.03, 2.21]

11.3 EPS during 24 hours

2

471

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.29 [0.12, 0.70]

12 Adverse effects: 2d. Specific ‐ miscellaneous Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

12.1 agitation during 24 hours

2

471

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.04 [0.42, 2.58]

12.2 headache during 24 hours

2

471

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.16 [0.62, 2.18]

12.3 pain at injection site

2

471

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.12 [0.75, 12.91]

12.4 nausea during 24 hours

2

471

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.52 [1.63, 18.70]

12.5 vomiting during 24 hours

1

113

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.04 [0.19, 21.82]

13 Leaving the study early Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

13.1 any reason

2

477

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.49 [0.20, 1.18]

13.2 lack of efficacy

2

477

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.05 [0.15, 7.43]

13.3 withdrew consent

2

477

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.35 [0.10, 1.28]

13.4 adverse effects

2

477

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.06 [0.18, 6.04]

13.5 other

2

477

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.75 [0.15, 3.78]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: a. HALOPERIDOL (intramuscular)
Comparison 3. ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: b. OLANZAPINE (intramuscular)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Specific behaviour: 1a. Agitation ‐ clinically important change (PANSS‐ EC reduction ≥ 40% from baseline) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 up to 2 hours

1

80

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.77 [0.60, 0.99]

2 Specific behaviour: 1b. Agitation ‐ average scores ‐ i. up to 2 hours Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 change score (ACES, low=agitated, high=sedated)

1

80

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.58 [0.10, 1.06]

2.2 change score (PANSS‐EC, high=worse)

1

80

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.30 [1.25, 5.35]

3 Global state: 1. Average scores ‐ i. up to 2 hours Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 change score (CGI‐S, high=worse)

1

80

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.58 [0.01, 1.15]

4 Adverse effects: 1a. General Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1 one or more drug related adverse events during 24 hours

1

80

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.75 [0.45, 1.24]

5 Adverse effects: 1b. General ‐ serious Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

5.1 rated as serious

1

80

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Adverse effects: 2a. Specific ‐ arousal Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

6.1 somnolence during 24 hours

1

80

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.25 [0.08, 0.82]

7 Adverse effects: 2b. Specific ‐ cardiovascular Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

7.1 systolic blood pressure change up to 2 hours

1

80

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.85 [‐6.77, 12.47]

7.2 diastolic blood pressure change up to 2 hours

1

80

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.05 [‐8.09, 5.99]

7.3 pulse rate change up to 2 hours

1

80

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.67 [‐6.80, 5.46]

7.4 systolic blood pressure change up to 24 hours

1

80

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.37 [‐5.43, 12.17]

7.5 diastolic blood pressure change up to 24 hours

1

80

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.30 [‐8.55, 5.95]

7.6 pulse rate change up to 24 hours

1

80

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐6.05 [‐13.43, 1.33]

8 Adverse effects: 2c. Specific ‐ movement disorders ‐ i. dichotomous Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

8.1 akathisia up to 24 hours

1

80

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.2 dystonia up to 24 hours

1

80

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.3 rigidity up to 24 hours

1

80

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.33 [0.32, 5.58]

8.4 tremor up to 24 hours

1

80

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.5 [0.26, 8.50]

9 Adverse effects: 2d. Specific ‐ movement disorders ‐ ii. average scores Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

9.1 SAS change score up to 2 hours (high=worse)

1

80

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.05 [‐0.26, 0.16]

9.2 SAS change score up to 24 hours (high=worse)

1

80

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.03 [‐0.29, 0.23]

10 Adverse effects: 2e. Specific ‐ miscellaneous Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

10.1 headache during 24 hours

1

80

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.0 [0.19, 21.18]

10.2 pain at injection site during 24 hours

1

80

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.67 [0.76, 9.33]

10.3 nausea during 24 hours

1

80

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.0 [0.13, 71.51]

11 Leaving the study early Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. ARIPIPRAZOLE (intramuscular) vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: b. OLANZAPINE (intramuscular)