Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Topical treatment for facial burns

Esta versión no es la más reciente

ver la versión actual 29 julio 2020

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008058Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 07 octubre 2009see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Protocol
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:

  1. Grupo Cochrane de Heridas

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2010 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Margriet E Van Baar

    Correspondencia a: Burn Centre, Maasstad Hospital, Association of Dutch Burn Centres, Rotterdam, Netherlands

    [email protected]

  • Irma MMH Oen

    Burn Centre, Maasstad Hospital, Association of Dutch Burn Centres, Rotterdam, Netherlands

  • Esther Middelkoop

    Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery/Free University Medical Centre Amsterdam, Association of Dutch Burn Centres, Beverwijk, Netherlands

  • Marianne K Nieuwenhuis

    Burn Centre Groningen, Martini Hospital, Association of Dutch Burn Centres, Groningen, Netherlands

Contributions of authors

Margriet van Baar: developed and coordinated the protocol, advised on and completed the first draft of the protocol. Approved the final version of the protocol prior to submission. Made an intellectual contribution to the protocol and is guarantor of the work.
Irma Oen: conceived the review question, advised and developed the protocol. Completed and edited the first draft of the protocol. Made an intellectual contribution to the protocol and approved the final version prior to submission.
Esther Middelkoop: conceived the review question and secured funding. Advised and developed the protocol. Completed and edited the first draft of the protocol. Made an intellectual contribution to the protocol and approved the final version prior to submission.
Marianne Nieuwenhuis: conceived the review question, advised and developed the protocol. Completed and edited the first draft of the protocol. Made an intellectual contribution to the protocol and approved the final version prior to submission.

Contributions of editorial base:

Nicky Cullum: edited the protocol; advised on methodology, interpretation and protocol content. Approved the final protocol prior to submission.
Sally Bell‐Syer: coordinated the editorial process. Advised on methodology, interpretation and content. Edited and copy edited the protocol.
Ruth Foxlee: designed the search strategy and edited the search methods section.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No sources of support supplied

External sources

  • The Association of Dutch Burn Centres, Netherlands.

Declarations of interest

Esther Middelkoop and Marianne Nieuwenhuis are involved in the conduct of a trial which may be eligible for inclusion in this review.
No other conflicts of interest declared.

Acknowledgements

The review authors would like to thank the peer referees, Wounds Group Editors: Andrew Jull, Liz McInnes, Dirk Ubbink, Statistician: Gill Worthy and referees Heather Cleland, Mary Mondozzi and Jane Nadel for their comments on the protocol.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2020 Jul 29

Topical treatment for facial burns

Review

Cornelis J Hoogewerf, M Jenda Hop, Marianne K Nieuwenhuis, Irma MMH Oen, Esther Middelkoop, Margriet E Van Baar

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008058.pub3

2013 Jan 31

Topical treatment for facial burns

Review

Cornelis J Hoogewerf, Margriet E Van Baar, M Jenda Hop, Marianne K Nieuwenhuis, Irma MMH Oen, Esther Middelkoop

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008058.pub2

2009 Oct 07

Topical treatment for facial burns

Protocol

Margriet E Van Baar, Irma MMH Oen, Esther Middelkoop, Marianne K Nieuwenhuis

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008058

Keywords

MeSH

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) Keywords

Medical Subject Headings Check Words

Humans;

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.