Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Aspirina con o sin antiemético para la migraña aguda en adultos

Contraer todo Desplegar todo

Referencias

References to studies included in this review

Boureau 1994 {published data only}

Boureau F, Joubert JM, Lasserre V, Prum B, Delecoeuillerie G. Double‐blind comparison of an acetaminophen 400 mg‐codeine 25 mg combination versus aspirin 1000 mg and placebo in acute migraine attack. Cephalalgia 1994;14(2):156‐61. CENTRAL

Chabriat 1994 {published data only}

Chabriat H, Joire JE, Danchot J, Grippon P, Bousser MG. Combined oral lysine acetylsalicylate and metoclopramide in the acute treatment of migraine: a multicentre double‐blind placebo‐controlled study. Cephalalgia 1994;14(4):297‐300. CENTRAL

Diener 2004a {published data only}

Diener HC, Eikermann A, Gessner U, Göbel H, Haag G, Lange R, et al. Efficacy of 1,000 mg effervescent acetylsalicylic acid and sumatriptan in treating associated migraine symptoms. European Neurology 2004;52(1):50‐6. [DOI: 10.1159/000079544]CENTRAL

Diener 2004b {published data only}

Diener HC, Bussone G, de Liano H, Eikermann A, Englert R, Floeter T, et al. EMSASI Study Group. Placebo‐controlled comparison of effervescent acetylsalicylic acid, sumatriptan and ibuprofen in the treatment of migraine attacks. Cephalalgia 2004;24(11):947‐54. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1468‐2982.2004.00783.x]CENTRAL

Geraud 2002 {published data only}

Geraud G, Compagnon A, Rossi A, COZAM Study Group. Zolmitriptan versus a combination of acetylsalicylic acid and metoclopramide in the acute oral treatment of migraine: a double‐blind, randomised, three‐attack study. European Neurology 2002;47(2):88‐98. CENTRAL

Henry 1995 {published data only}

Henry P, Hiesse‐Provost O, Dillenschneider A, Ganry H, Insuasty J. Efficacy and tolerance of an effervescent aspirin‐metoclopramide combination in the treatment of a migraine attack. Randomized double‐blind study using a placebo [Efficacite et tolerance de l'association effervescente aspirine‐metoclopramide dans le traitement de la crise de migraine sans aura. Essai randomise en double aveugle contre placebo]. Presse Medicale 1995;24(5):254‐8. CENTRAL

Lange 2000 {published data only}

Lange R, Schwarz JA, Hohn M. Acetylsalicylic acid effervescent 1000 mg (Aspirin) in acute migraine attacks; a multicentre, randomized, double‐blind, single‐dose, placebo‐controlled parallel group study. Cephalalgia 2000;20(7):663‐7. CENTRAL

Le Jeunne 1998 {published data only}

Le Jeunne C, Pascual Gómez J, Pradalier A, Titus i Albareda F, Joffroy A, Liaño H, et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of calcium carbasalate plus metoclopramide versus ergotamine tartrate plus caffeine in the treatment of acute migraine attacks. European Neurology 1999;41(1):37‐43. CENTRAL

Lipton 2005 {published data only}

Lipton RB, Goldstein J, Baggish JS, Yataco AR, Sorrentino JV, Quiring JN. Aspirin is efficacious for the treatment of acute migraine. Headache 2005;45(4):283‐92. CENTRAL

MacGregor 2002 {published data only}

MacGregor EA, Dowson A, Davies PT. Mouth‐dispersible aspirin in the treatment of migraine: a placebo‐controlled study. Headache 2002;42(4):249‐55. CENTRAL

Tfelt‐Hansen 1995 {published data only}

Tfelt‐Hansen P, Henry P, Mulder LJ, Scheldewaert RG, Schoenen J, Chazot G. The effectiveness of combined oral lysine acetylsalicylate and metoclopramide compared with oral sumatriptan for migraine. Lancet 1995;346(8980):923‐6. CENTRAL

Thomson 1992 {published data only}

Thomson CJ, The Oral Sumatriptan and Aspirin plus Metoclopramide Comparative Study Group. A study to compare oral sumatriptan with oral aspirin plus oral metoclopramide in the acute treatment of migraine. European Neurology 1992;32(3):177‐84. CENTRAL

Titus 2001 {published data only}

Titus F, Escamilla C, Gomes da Costa Palmeira MM, Leira R, Pereira Monteiro JM. A double‐blind comparison of lysine acetylsalicylate plus metoclopramide vs ergotamine plus caffeine in migraine: effects on nausea, vomiting and headache symptoms. Clinical Drug Investigation 2001;21(2):87‐94. CENTRAL

References to studies excluded from this review

Chabriat 1993 {published data only}

Chabriat H, Joire JE, Danchot J, Bousser MG. Association of aspirin and metoclopramide in the treatment of migraine attacks. Cephalagia 1993;13(13):96. CENTRAL

Diener 2005 {published data only}

Diener HC, Pfaffenrath V, Pageler L, Peil H, Aicher B. The fixed combination of acetylsalicylic acid, paracetamol and caffeine is more effective than single substances and dual combination for the treatment of headache: a multicentre, randomized, double‐blind, single‐dose, placebo‐controlled parallel group study. Cephalalgia 2005;25(10):776‐87. CENTRAL

Limmroth 1999 {published data only}

Limmroth V, May A, Diener H. Lysine‐acetylsalicylic acid in acute migraine attacks. European Neurology 1999;41(2):88‐93. CENTRAL

Nebe 1995 {published data only}

Nebe J, Heier M, Diener HC. Low‐dose ibuprofen in self‐medication of mild to moderate headache: a comparison with acetylsalicylic acid and placebo. Cephalalgia 1995;15(6):531‐5. CENTRAL

Tfelt‐Hansen 1980 {published data only}

Tfelt‐Hansen P, Olesen J. Paracetamol (acetaminophen) versus acetylsalicylic acid in migraine. European Neurology 1980;19(3):163‐5. CENTRAL

Tfelt‐Hansen 1984 {published data only}

Tfelt‐Hansen P, Olesen J. Effervescent metoclopramide and aspirin (Migravess) versus effervescent aspirin or placebo for migraine attacks: a double‐blind study. Cephalalgia 1984;4(2):107‐11. CENTRAL

Ayzenberg 2012

Ayzenberg I, Katsarava Z, Sborowski A, Chernysh M, Osipova V, Tabeeva G, et al. The prevalence of primary headache disorders in Russia: a countrywide survey. Cephalalgia 2012;32(5):373‐81. [DOI: 10.1177/0333102412438977]

Bigal 2008

Bigal ME, Serrano D, Reed M, Lipton RB. Chronic migraine in the population: burden, diagnosis, and satisfaction with treatment. Neurology 2008;71(8):559‐66. [DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000323925.29520.e7]

Bloudek 2012

Bloudek LM, Stokes M, Buse DC, Wilcox TK, Lipton RB, Goadsby PJ, et al. Cost of healthcare for patients with migraine in five European countries: results from the International Burden of Migraine Study (IBMS). Journal of Headache and Pain 2012;13(5):361‐78. [DOI: 10.1007/s10194‐012‐0460‐7]

Buse 2011

Buse D, Manack A, Serrano D, Reed M, Varon S, Turkel C, et al. Headache impact of chronic and episodic migraine: results from the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention study. Headache 2012;52(1):3‐17. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1526‐4610.2011.02046.x]

Collins 1997

Collins SL, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. The visual analogue pain intensity scale: what is moderate pain in millimetres?. Pain 1997;72(1‐2):95‐7. [DOI: 10.1016/S0304‐3959(97)00005‐5]

Colman 2004

Colman I, Brown MD, Innes GD, Grafstein E, Roberts TE, Rowe BH. Parenteral metoclopramide for acute migraine: meta‐analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2004;329(7479):1369‐73. [DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38281.595718.7C]

Cook 1995

Cook RJ, Sackett DL. The number needed to treat: a clinically useful measure of treatment effect. BMJ 1995;310(6977):452‐4.

Derry 2000

Derry S, Loke YK. Risk of gastrointestinal haemorrhage with long term use of aspirin: meta‐analysis. BMJ 2000;321(7270):1183‐7.

Derry 2012b

Derry CJ, Derry S, Moore RA. Sumatriptan (oral route of administration) for acute migraine attacks in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008615.pub2]

Derry 2013a

Derry S, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. Paracetamol (acetaminophen) with or without an antiemetic for acute migraine headaches in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008040.pub3]

Derry 2013b

Derry S, Rabbie R, Moore RA. Diclofenac with or without an antiemetic for acute migraine headaches in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008783.pub3]

Diamond 2007

Diamond S, Bigal ME, Silberstein S, Loder E, Reed M, Lipton RB. Patterns of diagnosis and acute and preventive treatment for migraine in the United States: results from the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention study. Headache 2007;47(3):355‐63. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1526‐4610.2006.00631.x]

Diener 2006

Diener HC, Lampl C, Reimnitz P, Voelker M. Aspirin in the treatment of acute migraine attacks. Expert Reviews of Neurotherapeutics 2006;6(4):563‐73. [DOI: 10.1586/14737175.6.4.563]

Elbourne 2002

Elbourne DR, Altman DG, Higgins JPT, Curtin F, Worthington HV, Vail A. Meta‐analyses involving cross‐over trials: methodological issues. International Journal of Epidemiology 2002;31(1):140‐9. [DOI: 10.1093/ije/31.1.140]

Evers 2009

Evers S, Afra J, Frese A, Goadsby PJ, Linde M, May A, et al. EFNS guideline on the drug treatment of migraine‐‐revised report of an EFNS task force. European Journal of Neurology 2009;16(9):968‐81. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1468‐1331.2009.02748.x]

Gendolla 2008

Gendolla A. Early treatment in migraine: how strong is the current evidence?. Cephalalgia 2008;28 Suppl 2:28‐35. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1468‐2982.2008.01688.x]

Haag 2011

Haag G, Diener HC, May A, Meyer C, Morck H, Straube A. Self‐medication of migraine and tension‐type headache: summary of the evidence‐based recommendations of the Deutsche Migräne und Kopfschmerzgesellschaft (DMKG), the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurologie (DGN), the Österreichische Kopfschmerzgesellschaft (ÖKSG) and the Schweizerische Kopfwehgesellschaft (SKG). Journal of Headache and Pain 2011;12(2):201‐17. [DOI: 10.1007/s10194‐010‐0266‐4]

Hazard 2009

Hazard E, Munakata J, Bigal ME, Rupnow MF, Lipton RB. The burden of migraine in the United States: current and emerging perspectives on disease management and economic analysis. Value in Health 2009;12(1):55‐64. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1524‐4733.2008.00404.x]

Higgins 2011

Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Sterne JAC editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.

IHS 1988

Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgias and facial pain. Cephalalgia 1988;8 Suppl 7:1‐96.

IHS 2000

International Headache Society Clinical Trials Subcommittee. Guidelines for controlled trials of drugs in migraine: second edition. Cephalalgia 2000;20(9):765‐86.

IHS 2004

Headache Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache Society. The International Classification of Headache Disorders: 2nd edition. Cephalalgia 2004;24 Suppl 1:1‐160.

Jadad 1996a

Jadad AR, Carroll D, Moore A, McQuay H. Developing a database of published reports of randomised clinical trials in pain research. Pain 1996;66(2‐3):239‐46.

Jadad 1996b

Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJM, Gavaghan DJ, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?. Controlled Clinical Trials 1996;17(1):1‐12.

L'Abbé 1987

L'Abbé KA, Detsky AS, O'Rourke K. Meta‐analysis in clinical research. Annals of Internal Medicine 1987;107(2):224‐33.

Lampl 2007

Lampl C, Voelker M, Diener HC. Efficacy and safety of 1,000 mg effervescent aspirin: individual patient data meta‐analysis of three trials in migraine headache and migraine accompanying symptoms. Journal of Neurology 2007;254(6):705‐12. [DOI: 10.1007/s00415‐007‐0547‐2]

Leonardi 2005

Leonardi M, Steiner TJ, Scher AT, Lipton RB. The global burden of migraine: measuring disability in headache disorders with WHO's Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Journal of Headache and Pain 2005;6(6):429‐40. [DOI: 10.1007/s10194‐005‐0252‐4]

Linde 2012

Linde M, Gustavsson A, Stovner LJ, Steiner TJ, Barré J, Katsarava Z, et al. The cost of headache disorders in Europe: the Eurolight project. European Journal of Neurology 2012;19(5):703‐11. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1468‐1331.2011.03612.x]

Lipton 1999

Lipton RB, Stewart WF. Acute migraine therapy: do doctors understand what patients with migraine want from therapy?. Headache 1999;39 Suppl 2:S20‐6.

Lipton 2007

Lipton RB, Bigal ME, Diamond M, Freitag F, Reed ML, AMPP Advisory Group, et al. Migraine prevalence, disease burden, and the need for preventive therapy. Neurology 2007;68(5):343‐9.

Lucas 2006

Lucas C, Géraud G, Valade D, Chautard MH, Lantéri‐Minet M. Recognition and therapeutic management of migraine in 2004, in France: results of FRAMIG 3, a French nationwide population‐based survey. Headache 2006;46(5):715‐25. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1526‐4610.2006.00430.x]

Mett 2008

Mett A, Tfelt‐Hansen P. Acute migraine therapy: recent evidence from randomized comparative trials. Current Opinion in Neurology 2008;21(3):331‐7. [DOI: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e3282fee843]

Moore 1998

Moore RA, Gavaghan D, Tramer MR, Collins SL, McQuay HJ. Size is everything ‐ large amounts of information are needed to overcome random effects in estimating direction and magnitude of treatment effects. Pain 1998;78(3):209‐16.

Moore 2008

Moore RA, Barden J, Derry S, McQuay HJ. Managing potential publication bias. In: McQuay HJ, Kalso E, Moore RA editor(s). Systematic Reviews in Pain Research: Methodology Refined. Seattle: IASP Press, 2008:15‐24. [ISBN: 978‐0‐931092‐69‐5]

Morris 1995

Morris JA, Gardner MJ. Calculating confidence intervals for relative risk, odds ratios and standardised ratios and rates. In: Gardner MJ, Altman DG editor(s). Statistics with confidence ‐ confidence intervals and statistical guidelines. London: British Medical Journal, 1995:50‐63.

Munakata 2009

Munakata J, Hazard E, Serrano D, Klingman D, Rupnow MF, Tierce J, et al. Economic burden of transformed migraine: results from the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention (AMPP) Study. Headache 2009;49(4):498‐508. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1526‐4610.2009.01369.x]

Oldman 2002

Oldman AD, Smith LA, McQuay HJ, Moore RA. Pharmacological treatments for acute migraine: quantitative systematic review. Pain 2002;97(3):247‐57. [DOI: 10.1016/S0304‐3959(02)00024‐6]

Rabbie 2013

Rabbie R, Derry S, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. Ibuprofen with or without an antiemetic for acute migraine headaches in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008039.pub3]

Radtke 2009

Radtke A, Neuhauser H. Prevalence and burden of headache and migraine in Germany. Headache 2009;49(1):79‐89. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1526‐4610.2008.01263.x]

RevMan 2012 [Computer program]

The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.2. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2012.

Ross‐Lee 1983

Ross‐Lee LM, Eadie MJ, Heazlewood V, Bochner F, Tyrer JH. Aspirin pharmacokinetics in migraine. The effect of metoclopramide. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 1983;24(6):777‐85.

Salazar‐Tortolero 2008

Salazar‐Tortolero G, Huertas‐Campistol A, Vergez‐Pinto L, Ramos‐Brunet A, Lluch‐López J. Metoclopramide as a painkiller for intense migraine headache in emergency departments [Metoclopramida como analgésicoen la cefalea migrañosa intensa en urgencias]. Revista de Neurologia 2008;47(10):506‐8.

Steiner 2009

Steiner TJ, Voelker M. Gastrointestinal tolerability of aspirin and the choice of over‐the‐counter analgesia for short‐lasting acute pain. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics 2009;34(2):177‐86. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1365‐2710.2008.00989.x]

Stovner 2010

Stovner LJ, Andree C. Prevalence of headache in Europe: a review for the Eurolight project. Journal of Headache and Pain 2010;11(4):289‐99. [DOI: 10.1007/s10194‐010‐0217‐0]

Tfelt‐Hansen 2008

Tfelt‐Hansen P. Triptans vs other drugs for acute migraine. Are there differences in efficacy? A comment. Headache 2008;48(4):601‐5. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1526‐4610.2008.01064.x]

Tramèr 1997

Tramèr MR, Reynolds DJM, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. Impact of covert duplicate results on meta‐analysis: a case study. BMJ 1997;315(7109):635‐40.

Vane 1971

Vane JR. Inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis as a mechanism of action for aspirin‐like drugs. Nature: New Biology 1971;231(25):232‐5.

Victor 2010

Victor TW, Hu X, Campbell JC, Buse DC, Lipton RB. Migraine prevalence by age and sex in the United States: a life‐span study. Cephalalgia 2010;30(9):1065‐72.

Volans 1974

Volans GN. Absorption of effervescent aspirin during migraine. British Medical Journal 1974;4(5939):265‐8.

Volans 1975

Volans GN. The effect of metoclopramide on the absorption of effervescent aspirin in migraine. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 1975;2(1):57‐63.

Vos 2012

Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, Lozano R, Michaud C, Ezzati M, et al. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990‐2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012;380(9859):2163‐96. [DOI: 1016/S0140‐6736(12)61729‐2]

WHO 2011

World Health Organization. WHO Model List of Essential Medicines. www.who.int/medicines/publications/essentialmedicines/en/index.html (accessed 7th February 2013)2011; Vol. 17.

Yu 2012

Yu S, Liu R, Zhao G, Yang X, Qiao X, Feng J, et al. The prevalence and burden of primary headaches in China: a population‐based door‐to‐door survey. Headache 2012;52(4):582‐91. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1526‐4610.2011.02061.x]

References to other published versions of this review

Kirthi 2010

Kirthi V, Derry S, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. Aspirin with or without an antiemetic for acute migraine headaches in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008041.pub2]

Characteristics of studies

Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]

Boureau 1994

Methods

Multicentre, randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, double‐dummy, three‐period, cross‐over. Single oral dose of each treatment for each of three migraine attacks

Assessments at 0 and 2 hours

If pain not controlled, participants asked to wait 2 hours before taking rescue medication

Participants

Aged 18‐65 years, meeting IHS criteria for migraine without aura. At least 12‐month history of migraine, with age of onset before 50 years and two to six attacks per month. Prophylaxis permitted if stable for ≥ 2 months

Excluded participants with other types of headache. Included participants with 'slight' migraine at baseline, but reported primary outcomes for those with ≥ moderate pain separately

N = 247 (198 treated three attacks and analysed for efficacy)

M = 57, F = 190

Mean age = 40 years

36.8% of randomised participants were taking prophylactic therapy

Interventions

Aspirin 1000 mg, n = 198

Acetaminophen 400 mg plus codeine 25 mg, n = 198

Placebo, n = 198

Outcomes

Headache relief at 2 hours

Pain‐free at 2 hours

PI: 100 mm VAS

Mean PID at 2 hours (from baseline)

Relief of nausea and vomiting

Use of rescue medication

Patient preference for medication

Adverse events

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R1, DB2, W1. Total = 4

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Not described

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Not described

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Double‐dummy design

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Completer analysis (participants treating all three attacks), but adequate reasons for exclusion given for all others

Study size

Unclear risk

50 to 200 participants per treatment group

Chabriat 1994

Methods

Multicentre, randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group. Single oral dose per attack. Participants treated two migraine attacks

Medication taken when migraine headache pain of moderate or severe intensity

Assessments at 0 and 2 hours

If pain not controlled, participants asked to wait 2 hours before taking rescue medication

Participants

Aged 18‐65 years, meeting IHS criteria for migraine with or without aura. At least 12‐month history of migraine, with two to six attacks per month for three months prior to inclusion in study Prophylaxis permitted if stable for ≥ 3 months

Excluded participants whose migraine headache was never accompanied by nausea or vomiting

N = 266 (250 analysed for efficacy, 16 did not take medication)

M = 46, F = 220

Mean age 37 years

Interventions

Lysine acetylsalicylate 1650 mg (equivalent to 900 mg aspirin) plus metoclopramide 10 mg, n = 126

Placebo, n = 124

Outcomes

Headache relief at 2 hours

Pain‐free at 2 hours

PI: 4‐point scale

Presence of nausea and vomiting

Headache recurrence at 24 hours

PGE: 4‐point scale

Use of rescue medications

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R1, DB1, W1. Total = 3

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Not described

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Not described

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Not described

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Drop‐outs described

Study size

Unclear risk

50 to 200 participants per treatment group

Diener 2004a

Methods

Multicentre, randomised, double‐blind, three‐arm, parallel‐group, double‐dummy. Single oral dose

Medication taken when migraine headache pain of moderate or severe intensity

Assessments at 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2 and 24 hours

If pain not controlled, participants asked to wait 2 hours before taking rescue medication

Participants

Aged 18‐65 years, meeting IHS criteria for migraine with and without aura. At least 12‐month history of migraine, with one to six attacks per month

N = 433

M = 66, F = 367

Mean age 42 years

Interventions

Effervescent acetylsalicylic acid 1000 mg, n = 146

Sumatriptan 50 mg, n = 135

Placebo, n = 152

Outcomes

Headache relief at 1 and 2 hours

Pain‐free at 2 hours

24‐hour sustained relief

Adverse events

Remission of associated symptoms: nausea, photophobia, phonophobia

Overall impression of study medication

Need for rescue medication

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R2, DB2, W1. Total = 5

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

"Computer‐generated randomisation list"

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Not described

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

"Matching effervescent or tablet placebo"

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Drop‐outs described

Study size

Unclear risk

50 to 200 participants per treatment group

Diener 2004b

Methods

Multicentre, randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, three‐fold cross‐over, double‐dummy. Single oral dose per attack. Each participant treated three migraine attacks with different treatments.

Medication taken when migraine headache pain of moderate or severe intensity

Assessments at 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2 and 24 hours

If pain not controlled, participants encouraged to wait 2 hours before taking rescue medication

Participants instructed to leave a minimum of 48 hours between consecutive study treatments to ensure that new attack and not migraine recurrence was being treated

Participants

Aged 18‐65 years, meeting IHS criteria for migraine with and without aura. At least 12‐month history of migraine, with one to six attacks per month

N = 312

M = 59, F = 253

Mean age 38 years

Interventions

Effervescent acetylsalicylic acid 1000 mg, n = 222

Ibuprofen 400 mg, n = 212

Sumatriptan 50 mg, n = 226

Placebo, n = 222

Outcomes

Pain intensity at 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2 hours

Nausea, vomiting, photophobia and phonophobia at same time points

Global assessment of medication on 4‐point categorical scale

Use of 'escape medication'

Time when headache disappeared

Recurrence within 24 hours

Adverse events

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R2, DB2, W1. Total = 5

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

"Treatment was assigned by a predetermined randomisation code"

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Not described

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Double dummy design

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Drop‐outs described

Study size

Low risk

> 200 participants per treatment group

Geraud 2002

Methods

Multicentre, randomised, double‐blind, parallel‐group, double‐dummy. Single oral dose. Each participant treated three migraine attacks.

Medication taken when migraine headache pain of moderate or severe intensity, provided it was within 6 hours of headache onset, and participants had been free from any previous migraine attack for at least 24 hours

Assessments at 0 and 2 hours

If pain not controlled, participants encouraged to wait 2 hours before taking rescue medication

Patients returned to study centre after treating first attack, and were then given medication and diary cards for treating two further attacks

Participants

Aged 18‐65 years, meeting IHS criteria for migraine with and without aura. At least 12‐month history of migraine, with age of onset before 50 years and one to six attacks per month of moderate to severe intensity, for three months prior to inclusion in study

Excluded participants with basilar, ophthalmoplegic or hemiplegic migraine, and those with non‐migraine headache on more than 10 days per month for preceding 6 months

Approximately half of participants in each treatment arm had previously been treated with acetylsalicylic acid plus metoclopramide, with 'good' or 'fair' response reported in roughly 55% of participants in each group

Approximately 80% of participants had previously received or were currently receiving acetylsalicylic acid or NSAIDs alone, with 'good' or 'fair' response reported in approximately 45% of participants in both groups

N = 666

M = 100, F = 566

Mean age 41 years

Interventions

Acetylsalicylic acid 900 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg, n = 340

Zolmitriptan 2.5 mg, n = 326

Outcomes

Headache response at 2 hours in all three attacks

Pain‐free at 2 hours after first dose in all three attacks

Relief of migraine‐associated symptoms (nausea, vomiting, photophobia, phonophobia)

PI: standard 4‐point scale

Use of escape medication

Headache recurrence

Adverse events

PGE: standard 4‐point scale

Time to onset of meaningful migraine relief

Notes

Oxford Quality Scale: R2, DB2, W1. Total = 5

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

"Computer‐generated randomisation list"

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Not described

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Double‐dummy design

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Drop‐outs described

Study size

Low risk

> 200 participants per treatment group

Henry 1995

Methods

Multicentre, randomised, double‐blind, parallel‐group. Single oral dose

Medication taken when migraine headache pain was of moderate or severe intensity

Assessments at 0, 2 and 24 hours

Participants

Aged 18 to 65 years, meeting IHS criteria for migraine

Excluded attacks of migraine with aura. Excluded participants with tension headache

N = 303

M = 35, F = 268

Mean age = 40 years

Interventions

Effervescent aspirin 900 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg, n = 152

Placebo, n = 151

Outcomes

Headache relief at 2 hours

Pain‐free at 2 hours

24‐hour sustained relief

Use of rescue medication

Relief of associated symptoms

Functional disability

PGE

Adverse events

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R1, DB1, W1. Total = 3

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

"Patients were randomised after drawing lots"

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Not described

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Not described

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Drop‐outs described, but 16% (aspirin) and 13% (placebo) not included in 2 h efficacy analyses because they were asleep

Study size

Unclear risk

50 to 200 participants per treatment group

Lange 2000

Methods

Multicentre, randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group. Single oral dose

Participants instructed to take medication only if attack of at least moderate intensity, and within 6 hours of onset of symptoms

Assessments at 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 24 hours

If pain not controlled, participants asked to wait 2 hours before taking rescue medication

Participants

Aged 18‐65 years, meeting IHS criteria for migraine. At least 12‐month history of migraine, with one to six attacks per month

Excluded participants usually so incapacitated as to require bed rest during attacks, and those who vomited more than 20% of time during attacks

N = 374 (343 analysed for efficacy, 31 did not take medication)

M = 62, F = 312

Mean age = 42 years

Interventions

Effervescent acetylsalicylic acid 2 x 500 mg, n = 169

Placebo, n = 174

Outcomes

Headache relief at 2 hours

Pain‐free after 2 hours

Relief of migraine‐associated symptoms: nausea, vomiting, photophobia, phonophobia (4‐point scale)

PI : 4‐point scale

PGE: 4‐point scale

Headache recurrence within 24 hours

Use of rescue medication

Adverse events

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R1, DB1, W1. Total = 3

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Not described

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Not described

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Not described

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Drop‐outs described

Study size

Unclear risk

50 to 200 participants per treatment group

Le Jeunne 1998

Methods

Multicentre, randomised, double‐blind, double‐dummy, parallel‐group. Single oral dose

Each participant to treat two attacks, as soon as intensity was moderate or severe

Assessments at 0, 2 and 24 hours

If pain not controlled, participants encouraged to wait 2 hours before taking rescue medication

Participants

Aged 18‐65 years, meeting IHS criteria for migraine with and without aura. At least 12‐month history of migraine, with one to six attacks moderate or severe attacks per month. Prophylaxis permitted if stable for ≥3 months

N = 296 randomised (268 took study medication)

M = 47, F = 249

Mean age 37 years

Interventions

Calcium carbasalate 1145 mg (equivalent to 900 mg aspirin) plus metoclopramide 10 mg, n = 136

Ergotamine 1 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg, n = 132

Outcomes

Headache relief at 2 hours

Pain‐free after 2 hours

Relief of nausea

PGE: 4‐point scale

Headache recurrence within 24 hours

Use of rescue medication

Adverse events

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R1, DB2, W1. Total = 4

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Predetermined randomisation list

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Not described

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Double‐dummy method, using tablet and sachet

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Drop‐outs described

Study size

Unclear risk

50 to 200 participants per treatment group

Lipton 2005

Methods

Multicentre, randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group. Single oral dose

Medication administered when migraine headache pain of moderate or severe intensity

Assessments at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 24 hours

If pain not controlled, participants asked to wait 2 hours before taking rescue medication

Participants

Aged 18‐50 years, meeting IHS criteria for migraine with and without aura. At least 12‐month history of migraine, with one to six attacks per month of at least moderate pain intensity. Prophylaxis permitted if stable for ≥ 3 months

N = 409 (401 with confirmed migraine)

M = 85, F = 316

Mean age 38 years

Interventions

Aspirin 1000 mg, n = 205

Placebo, n = 204

Outcomes

Headache relief at 1 and 2 hours

Pain‐free at 2 hours

24 hour sustained relief

Adverse events

Relief of associated symptoms: nausea, photophobia, phonophobia

Need for rescue medication

PI: standard 4‐point scale

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R1, DB2, W1. Total = 4

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Not described

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Not described

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

"Matched placebo"

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Drop‐outs described

Study size

Low risk

> 200 participants per treatment group

MacGregor 2002

Methods

Multicentre, randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, two‐period cross‐over. Single oral dose of each medication for each of two attacks

Medication administered when migraine headache pain of moderate or severe intensity

Assessments at 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 hours post‐treatment

If pain not controlled, participants asked to wait 2 hours before taking rescue medication

Participants

Aged > 18 years, meeting IHS criteria for migraine with and without aura. At least 12‐month history of migraine, with one to six attacks per month within previous three months

Excluded participants who vomited during the majority of their migraine attacks

Excluded participants who regularly used NSAIDs or other drugs that could interact with trial medications

N = 101 (73 treated two attacks and analysed for efficacy)

M = 11, F = 90

Mean age 44 years

Interventions

Mouth‐dispersible aspirin 900 mg, n = 73

Placebo, n = 73

Outcomes

Headache relief at all assessment time points

Pain‐free at all assessment time points

PI: standard 4‐point scale

Functional disability: standard 4‐point scale

Presence/absence of associated symptoms

Headache recurrence at 24 hours

Use of rescue medication

Participants' and investigators' global assessments

Palatability and convenience of study medication

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R1, DB2, W1. Total score = 4

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Not described

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Not described

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

"Placebo tablets formulated and manufactured to be indistinguishable from aspirin tablets, with respect to appearance, taste and dispersion in mouth"

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Completer analysis (participants treating both attacks), but adequate reasons for exclusion given for others

Study size

Unclear risk

50 to 200 participants per treatment group

Tfelt‐Hansen 1995

Methods

Multicentre, randomised, double‐blind, three parallel groups. Single oral dose per attack. Two attacks treated

Medication taken when migraine headache pain of moderate or severe intensity

Assessments at 0 and 2 hours

If pain not controlled, participants asked to wait 2 hours before taking rescue medication

Participants

Aged 18‐65 years, meeting IHS criteria for migraine with or without aura. At least 12‐month history of migraine, with two to six attacks per month during three months prior to study

N = 421 (385 experienced ≥ 1 attack and analysed for efficacy)

M = 94, F = 327

Mean age = 39 years

Interventions

Lysine acetylsalicylate 1620 mg (equivalent to 900 mg aspirin) plus metoclopramide 10 mg, n = 137

Sumatriptan 100 mg, n = 122

Placebo, n = 126

Outcomes

Headache relief at 2 hours

PI: 4‐point scale

Pain‐free at 2 hours

24‐hour sustained relief

Headache recurrence at 24 hours

Relief of nausea and vomiting

Use of rescue medication

PGE: 4‐point scale

Adverse effects

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R1, DB2, W1. Total = 4

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Not described

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Not described

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Double‐dummy design

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Missing data < 3%

Study size

Unclear risk

50 to 200 participants per treatment group

Thomson 1992

Methods

Multicentre, randomised, double‐blind, parallel‐group, double‐dummy. Single oral dose per attack Participants treated up to three migraine attacks

Assessments at 0 and 2 hours

If pain not controlled, participants asked to wait 2 hours before taking rescue medication

Participants instructed to leave minimum interval of 48 hours between consecutive study treatments to ensure adequate washout

Participants

Aged 18‐65 years, meeting IHS criteria for migraine. At least 12‐month history of migraine, with one to six attacks per month of moderate or severe intensity

Excluded participants with need for continuing migraine prophylaxis

N = 358 (355 analysed for at least one attack)

M = 72, F = 283

Mean age = 41 years

Interventions

Aspirin 900 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg, n = 183

Sumatriptan 100 mg, n = 172

Outcomes

Headache relief at 2 hours

PI: 4‐point scale

Presence of nausea, vomiting, photophobia, phonophobia

Functional disability

Headache recurrence at 48 hours

Use of rescue medication

PGE: 4‐point scale

Adverse events

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R1, DB2, W1. Total = 4

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Not described

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Not described

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Double‐dummy design

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Discrepancy between numbers in text and in Table 2. Numbers in text used: up to 15% missing data

Study size

Unclear risk

50 to 200 participants per treatment group

Titus 2001

Methods

Multicentre, randomised, double‐blind, parallel‐group

Medication taken up to three times at 2‐hour intervals, if adequate relief not obtained, to treat a single migraine attack

Rescue medication taken if no relief of symptoms after three doses of trial medication. Usual medication allowed if attack persisted 2 hours after second dose of trial medication

Assessments at 0 and 2 hours

Participants

Aged 18‐65 years, meeting IHS criteria for migraine

Excluded participants with tension headache

N = 227

M = 34, F = 193

Mean age 34 years

Interventions

Lysine acetylsalicylate 1620 mg (equivalent to 900 mg aspirin) plus metoclopramide 10 mg, n = 112

Ergotamine 2 mg plus caffeine 200 mg, n = 115

Outcomes

No nausea or vomiting 2 hours after first intake

Headache intensity (4‐point categorical scale)

Headache relief

Complete resolution of headache

Use of rescue medication

Patients' global evaluation of treatment

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R2, DB2, W1. Total = 5

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

"Central randomisation list generated with SAS (PC version) 6.08"

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Not described

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

"Maintained by providing an equivalent number of placebo sachets or capsules"

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

No useful efficacy data. Safety population accounted for

Study size

Unclear risk

50 to 200 participants per treatment group

Characteristics of excluded studies [ordered by study ID]

Study

Reason for exclusion

Chabriat 1993

Abstract (full data in Chabriat 1994)

Diener 2005

Mixed migraine and tension‐type headaches

Limmroth 1999

Intravenous administration ‐ self‐administration not possible

Nebe 1995

Mixed migraine and tension‐type headaches

Tfelt‐Hansen 1980

Not randomised or double‐blind

Tfelt‐Hansen 1984

Included patients with mild headaches, headaches not IHS classified

Data and analyses

Open in table viewer
Comparison 1. Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Pain free at 2 hours Show forest plot

6

2027

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.08 [1.70, 2.55]

Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 1 Pain free at 2 hours.

Comparison 1 Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 1 Pain free at 2 hours.

2 Headache relief at 2 hours Show forest plot

6

2027

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.64 [1.48, 1.83]

Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 2 Headache relief at 2 hours.

Comparison 1 Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 2 Headache relief at 2 hours.

3 Headache relief at 1 hour Show forest plot

4

1288

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.13 [1.72, 2.63]

Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 3 Headache relief at 1 hour.

Comparison 1 Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 3 Headache relief at 1 hour.

4 24‐hour sustained headache relief Show forest plot

3

1142

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.63 [1.37, 1.95]

Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 4 24‐hour sustained headache relief.

Comparison 1 Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 4 24‐hour sustained headache relief.

5 Pain free at 2 hours ‐ effect of formulation Show forest plot

6

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 5 Pain free at 2 hours ‐ effect of formulation.

Comparison 1 Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 5 Pain free at 2 hours ‐ effect of formulation.

5.1 Soluble

4

1230

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.92 [1.51, 2.44]

5.2 Tablet

2

797

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.47 [1.70, 3.58]

6 Headache relief at 2 hours ‐ effect of formulation Show forest plot

6

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 6 Headache relief at 2 hours ‐ effect of formulation.

Comparison 1 Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 6 Headache relief at 2 hours ‐ effect of formulation.

6.1 Soluble

4

1230

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.65 [1.43, 1.89]

6.2 Tablet

2

797

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.64 [1.38, 1.95]

7 Relief of associated symptoms at 2 hours Show forest plot

6

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 7 Relief of associated symptoms at 2 hours.

Comparison 1 Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 7 Relief of associated symptoms at 2 hours.

7.1 Nausea

4

878

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.26 [1.10, 1.44]

7.2 Vomiting

3

139

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.12 [0.94, 1.34]

7.3 Photophobia

5

1274

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.47 [1.29, 1.69]

7.4 Phonophobia

5

1217

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.44 [1.27, 1.64]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 2. Aspirin 900 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Pain free at 2 hours Show forest plot

2

519

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.68 [1.59, 4.55]

Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Aspirin 900 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg versus placebo, Outcome 1 Pain free at 2 hours.

Comparison 2 Aspirin 900 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg versus placebo, Outcome 1 Pain free at 2 hours.

2 Headache relief at 2 hours Show forest plot

3

765

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.15 [1.78, 2.60]

Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Aspirin 900 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg versus placebo, Outcome 2 Headache relief at 2 hours.

Comparison 2 Aspirin 900 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg versus placebo, Outcome 2 Headache relief at 2 hours.

3 24‐hour sustained headache relief Show forest plot

1

257

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.18 [1.39, 3.41]

Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Aspirin 900 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg versus placebo, Outcome 3 24‐hour sustained headache relief.

Comparison 2 Aspirin 900 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg versus placebo, Outcome 3 24‐hour sustained headache relief.

4 Relief of associated symptoms at 2 hours Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 Aspirin 900 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg versus placebo, Outcome 4 Relief of associated symptoms at 2 hours.

Comparison 2 Aspirin 900 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg versus placebo, Outcome 4 Relief of associated symptoms at 2 hours.

4.1 Nausea

2

417

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.53 [4.20, 13.50]

4.2 Vomiting

2

59

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

16.14 [2.30, 113.05]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 3. Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus active comparator

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Pain free at 2 hours Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus active comparator, Outcome 1 Pain free at 2 hours.

Comparison 3 Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus active comparator, Outcome 1 Pain free at 2 hours.

1.1 Sumatriptan 50 mg

2

726

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.82 [0.65, 1.03]

2 Headache relief at 2 hours Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus active comparator, Outcome 2 Headache relief at 2 hours.

Comparison 3 Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus active comparator, Outcome 2 Headache relief at 2 hours.

2.1 Sumatriptan 50 mg

2

726

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.96 [0.84, 1.11]

3 Headache relief at 1 hour Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3 Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus active comparator, Outcome 3 Headache relief at 1 hour.

Comparison 3 Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus active comparator, Outcome 3 Headache relief at 1 hour.

3.1 Sumatriptan 50 mg

2

726

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.59 [1.26, 1.99]

4 Relief of associated symptoms at 2 hours Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 3.4

Comparison 3 Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus active comparator, Outcome 4 Relief of associated symptoms at 2 hours.

Comparison 3 Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus active comparator, Outcome 4 Relief of associated symptoms at 2 hours.

4.1 Photophobia

2

575

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.81, 1.04]

4.2 Phonophobia

2

540

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.86, 1.11]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 4. Aspirin 900 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg versus active comparator

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Pain free at 2 hours Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Aspirin 900 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg versus active comparator, Outcome 1 Pain free at 2 hours.

Comparison 4 Aspirin 900 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg versus active comparator, Outcome 1 Pain free at 2 hours.

1.1 Sumatriptan 100 mg

2

528

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.63 [0.45, 0.87]

2 Headache relief at 2 hours Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 Aspirin 900 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg versus active comparator, Outcome 2 Headache relief at 2 hours.

Comparison 4 Aspirin 900 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg versus active comparator, Outcome 2 Headache relief at 2 hours.

2.1 Sumartiptan 100 mg

2

523

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.93 [0.79, 1.10]

3 Relief of associated symptoms at 2 hours Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 4.3

Comparison 4 Aspirin 900 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg versus active comparator, Outcome 3 Relief of associated symptoms at 2 hours.

Comparison 4 Aspirin 900 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg versus active comparator, Outcome 3 Relief of associated symptoms at 2 hours.

3.1 Nausea

2

410

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.10 [0.83, 1.46]

3.2 Vomiting

2

67

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

10.59 [1.43, 78.64]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 5. Aspirin ± metoclopramide versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Any adverse event within 24 hours Show forest plot

7

2458

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.26 [1.02, 1.55]

Analysis 5.1

Comparison 5 Aspirin ± metoclopramide versus placebo, Outcome 1 Any adverse event within 24 hours.

Comparison 5 Aspirin ± metoclopramide versus placebo, Outcome 1 Any adverse event within 24 hours.

1.1 Aspirin alone

5

1892

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.30 [1.00, 1.68]

1.2 Aspirin + metoclopramide

2

566

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.17 [0.82, 1.67]

2 Use of rescue medication Show forest plot

8

2922

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.68 [0.63, 0.72]

Analysis 5.2

Comparison 5 Aspirin ± metoclopramide versus placebo, Outcome 2 Use of rescue medication.

Comparison 5 Aspirin ± metoclopramide versus placebo, Outcome 2 Use of rescue medication.

2.1 Aspirin 100 mg alone

5

1881

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.67 [0.61, 0.73]

2.2 Aspirin 900 mg + metoclopramide 10 mg

3

1041

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.69 [0.62, 0.77]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 6. Aspirin ± metoclopramide versus active comparator

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Any adverse event within 24 hours Show forest plot

4

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 6.1

Comparison 6 Aspirin ± metoclopramide versus active comparator, Outcome 1 Any adverse event within 24 hours.

Comparison 6 Aspirin ± metoclopramide versus active comparator, Outcome 1 Any adverse event within 24 hours.

1.1 Aspirin versus sumatriptan 50 mg

2

730

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.85 [0.61, 1.18]

1.2 Aspirin+met versus sumatriptan 100 mg

2

617

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.66 [0.52, 0.84]

2 Use of rescue medication Show forest plot

4

1340

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.14 [1.01, 1.28]

Analysis 6.2

Comparison 6 Aspirin ± metoclopramide versus active comparator, Outcome 2 Use of rescue medication.

Comparison 6 Aspirin ± metoclopramide versus active comparator, Outcome 2 Use of rescue medication.

2.1 Aspirin versus sumatriptan 50 mg

2

726

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.09 [0.92, 1.29]

2.2 Aspirin+met versus sumatriptan 100 mg

2

614

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.18 [1.01, 1.39]

Methodological quality graph: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Methodological quality graph: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus placebo, outcome: 1.1 Pain free at 2 hours.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus placebo, outcome: 1.1 Pain free at 2 hours.

L'Abbé plot showing pain‐free at 2 h response in individual studies. Each circle represents one study, with size on the inset scale.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

L'Abbé plot showing pain‐free at 2 h response in individual studies. Each circle represents one study, with size on the inset scale.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus placebo, outcome: 1.2 Headache relief at 2 hours.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 4

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus placebo, outcome: 1.2 Headache relief at 2 hours.

L'Abbé plot showing headache response at 2 h in individual studies. Each circle represents one study, with size on the inset scale.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 5

L'Abbé plot showing headache response at 2 h in individual studies. Each circle represents one study, with size on the inset scale.

Response rates for aspirin 900 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg in consecutive attacks, reported in five studies (from left:Tfelt‐Hansen 1995; Chabriat 1994; Thomson 1992; Le Jeunne 1998; Geraud 2002)
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 6

Response rates for aspirin 900 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg in consecutive attacks, reported in five studies (from left:Tfelt‐Hansen 1995; Chabriat 1994; Thomson 1992; Le Jeunne 1998; Geraud 2002)

Forest plot of comparison: 5 Aspirin ± metoclopramide versus placebo, outcome: 5.2 Use of rescue medication.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 7

Forest plot of comparison: 5 Aspirin ± metoclopramide versus placebo, outcome: 5.2 Use of rescue medication.

Comparison 1 Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 1 Pain free at 2 hours.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 1 Pain free at 2 hours.

Comparison 1 Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 2 Headache relief at 2 hours.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 2 Headache relief at 2 hours.

Comparison 1 Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 3 Headache relief at 1 hour.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 3 Headache relief at 1 hour.

Comparison 1 Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 4 24‐hour sustained headache relief.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 4 24‐hour sustained headache relief.

Comparison 1 Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 5 Pain free at 2 hours ‐ effect of formulation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 5 Pain free at 2 hours ‐ effect of formulation.

Comparison 1 Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 6 Headache relief at 2 hours ‐ effect of formulation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 6 Headache relief at 2 hours ‐ effect of formulation.

Comparison 1 Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 7 Relief of associated symptoms at 2 hours.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 7 Relief of associated symptoms at 2 hours.

Comparison 2 Aspirin 900 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg versus placebo, Outcome 1 Pain free at 2 hours.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Aspirin 900 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg versus placebo, Outcome 1 Pain free at 2 hours.

Comparison 2 Aspirin 900 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg versus placebo, Outcome 2 Headache relief at 2 hours.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Aspirin 900 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg versus placebo, Outcome 2 Headache relief at 2 hours.

Comparison 2 Aspirin 900 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg versus placebo, Outcome 3 24‐hour sustained headache relief.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Aspirin 900 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg versus placebo, Outcome 3 24‐hour sustained headache relief.

Comparison 2 Aspirin 900 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg versus placebo, Outcome 4 Relief of associated symptoms at 2 hours.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 Aspirin 900 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg versus placebo, Outcome 4 Relief of associated symptoms at 2 hours.

Comparison 3 Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus active comparator, Outcome 1 Pain free at 2 hours.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus active comparator, Outcome 1 Pain free at 2 hours.

Comparison 3 Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus active comparator, Outcome 2 Headache relief at 2 hours.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus active comparator, Outcome 2 Headache relief at 2 hours.

Comparison 3 Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus active comparator, Outcome 3 Headache relief at 1 hour.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3 Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus active comparator, Outcome 3 Headache relief at 1 hour.

Comparison 3 Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus active comparator, Outcome 4 Relief of associated symptoms at 2 hours.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.4

Comparison 3 Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus active comparator, Outcome 4 Relief of associated symptoms at 2 hours.

Comparison 4 Aspirin 900 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg versus active comparator, Outcome 1 Pain free at 2 hours.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Aspirin 900 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg versus active comparator, Outcome 1 Pain free at 2 hours.

Comparison 4 Aspirin 900 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg versus active comparator, Outcome 2 Headache relief at 2 hours.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 Aspirin 900 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg versus active comparator, Outcome 2 Headache relief at 2 hours.

Comparison 4 Aspirin 900 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg versus active comparator, Outcome 3 Relief of associated symptoms at 2 hours.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.3

Comparison 4 Aspirin 900 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg versus active comparator, Outcome 3 Relief of associated symptoms at 2 hours.

Comparison 5 Aspirin ± metoclopramide versus placebo, Outcome 1 Any adverse event within 24 hours.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.1

Comparison 5 Aspirin ± metoclopramide versus placebo, Outcome 1 Any adverse event within 24 hours.

Comparison 5 Aspirin ± metoclopramide versus placebo, Outcome 2 Use of rescue medication.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.2

Comparison 5 Aspirin ± metoclopramide versus placebo, Outcome 2 Use of rescue medication.

Comparison 6 Aspirin ± metoclopramide versus active comparator, Outcome 1 Any adverse event within 24 hours.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.1

Comparison 6 Aspirin ± metoclopramide versus active comparator, Outcome 1 Any adverse event within 24 hours.

Comparison 6 Aspirin ± metoclopramide versus active comparator, Outcome 2 Use of rescue medication.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.2

Comparison 6 Aspirin ± metoclopramide versus active comparator, Outcome 2 Use of rescue medication.

Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg compared with placebo for migraine headache

Patient or population: migraine headache ‐ moderate or severe pain

Settings: community

Intervention: aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg

Comparison: placebo

Outcomes

Probable outcome with
intervention

Probable outcome with
comparator

NNT or NNTH and/or
relative effect
(95% CI)

No of Participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Pain‐free at 2 h

240 in 1000

110 in 1000

NNT 8.1 (6.4 to 11)

6 studies, 2027 participants

357 events

Moderate1

Standard tablet and soluble formulations

Headache relief at 2 h

520 in 1000

320 in 1000

NNT 4.9 (4.1 to 6.2)

6 studies, 2027 participants

848 events

Moderate1

Standard tablet and soluble formulations

Sustained pain‐free at 24 h

No data

 

 

 

 

 

Sustained headache relief at 24 h

390 in 1000

240 in 1000

NNT 6.6 (4.9 to 10)

3 studies, 1142 participants

361 events

Moderate1

Standard tablet and soluble formulations

At least one AE

120 in 1000

90 in 1000

NNH 34 (18 to 340)

5 studies, 1892 participants

206 events

Low

Standard tablet and soluble formulations

Serious AE

Insufficient data

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1 ‐ Quality of evidence downgraded from high because of threat from potential publication bias with modest effect size and numbers of events

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Pain free at 2 hours Show forest plot

6

2027

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.08 [1.70, 2.55]

2 Headache relief at 2 hours Show forest plot

6

2027

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.64 [1.48, 1.83]

3 Headache relief at 1 hour Show forest plot

4

1288

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.13 [1.72, 2.63]

4 24‐hour sustained headache relief Show forest plot

3

1142

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.63 [1.37, 1.95]

5 Pain free at 2 hours ‐ effect of formulation Show forest plot

6

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

5.1 Soluble

4

1230

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.92 [1.51, 2.44]

5.2 Tablet

2

797

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.47 [1.70, 3.58]

6 Headache relief at 2 hours ‐ effect of formulation Show forest plot

6

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

6.1 Soluble

4

1230

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.65 [1.43, 1.89]

6.2 Tablet

2

797

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.64 [1.38, 1.95]

7 Relief of associated symptoms at 2 hours Show forest plot

6

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

7.1 Nausea

4

878

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.26 [1.10, 1.44]

7.2 Vomiting

3

139

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.12 [0.94, 1.34]

7.3 Photophobia

5

1274

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.47 [1.29, 1.69]

7.4 Phonophobia

5

1217

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.44 [1.27, 1.64]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus placebo
Comparison 2. Aspirin 900 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Pain free at 2 hours Show forest plot

2

519

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.68 [1.59, 4.55]

2 Headache relief at 2 hours Show forest plot

3

765

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.15 [1.78, 2.60]

3 24‐hour sustained headache relief Show forest plot

1

257

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.18 [1.39, 3.41]

4 Relief of associated symptoms at 2 hours Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1 Nausea

2

417

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.53 [4.20, 13.50]

4.2 Vomiting

2

59

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

16.14 [2.30, 113.05]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Aspirin 900 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg versus placebo
Comparison 3. Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus active comparator

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Pain free at 2 hours Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Sumatriptan 50 mg

2

726

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.82 [0.65, 1.03]

2 Headache relief at 2 hours Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 Sumatriptan 50 mg

2

726

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.96 [0.84, 1.11]

3 Headache relief at 1 hour Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 Sumatriptan 50 mg

2

726

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.59 [1.26, 1.99]

4 Relief of associated symptoms at 2 hours Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1 Photophobia

2

575

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.81, 1.04]

4.2 Phonophobia

2

540

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.86, 1.11]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. Aspirin 900 mg or 1000 mg versus active comparator
Comparison 4. Aspirin 900 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg versus active comparator

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Pain free at 2 hours Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Sumatriptan 100 mg

2

528

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.63 [0.45, 0.87]

2 Headache relief at 2 hours Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 Sumartiptan 100 mg

2

523

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.93 [0.79, 1.10]

3 Relief of associated symptoms at 2 hours Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 Nausea

2

410

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.10 [0.83, 1.46]

3.2 Vomiting

2

67

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

10.59 [1.43, 78.64]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 4. Aspirin 900 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg versus active comparator
Comparison 5. Aspirin ± metoclopramide versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Any adverse event within 24 hours Show forest plot

7

2458

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.26 [1.02, 1.55]

1.1 Aspirin alone

5

1892

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.30 [1.00, 1.68]

1.2 Aspirin + metoclopramide

2

566

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.17 [0.82, 1.67]

2 Use of rescue medication Show forest plot

8

2922

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.68 [0.63, 0.72]

2.1 Aspirin 100 mg alone

5

1881

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.67 [0.61, 0.73]

2.2 Aspirin 900 mg + metoclopramide 10 mg

3

1041

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.69 [0.62, 0.77]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 5. Aspirin ± metoclopramide versus placebo
Comparison 6. Aspirin ± metoclopramide versus active comparator

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Any adverse event within 24 hours Show forest plot

4

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Aspirin versus sumatriptan 50 mg

2

730

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.85 [0.61, 1.18]

1.2 Aspirin+met versus sumatriptan 100 mg

2

617

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.66 [0.52, 0.84]

2 Use of rescue medication Show forest plot

4

1340

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.14 [1.01, 1.28]

2.1 Aspirin versus sumatriptan 50 mg

2

726

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.09 [0.92, 1.29]

2.2 Aspirin+met versus sumatriptan 100 mg

2

614

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.18 [1.01, 1.39]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 6. Aspirin ± metoclopramide versus active comparator