Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Dilatación mecánica del cuello uterino en la cesárea sin trabajo de parto para la reducción de la morbilidad posoperatoria

Esta versión no es la más reciente

ver la versión actual 10 agosto 2018

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008019.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 09 noviembre 2011see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:

  1. Grupo Cochrane de Embarazo y parto

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

Contributions of authors

Tippawan Liabsuetrakul (TL), is guarantor of the review and prepared the first draft of review. Krantarat Peeyananjarassri reviewed and commented on the review. TL revised the final version which was approved by both authors.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Thailand.

External sources

  • Senior Research Scholarship, Thailand Research Fund, Thailand.

Declarations of interest

None known.

Acknowledgements

As part of the pre‐publication editorial process, this review has been commented on by three peers (an editor and two referees who are external to the editorial team) and the Group's Statistical Adviser.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2018 Aug 10

Mechanical dilatation of the cervix during elective caesarean section before the onset of labour for reducing postoperative morbidity

Review

Tippawan Liabsuetrakul, Krantarat Peeyananjarassri

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008019.pub3

2011 Nov 09

Mechanical dilatation of the cervix at non‐labour caesarean section for reducing postoperative morbidity

Review

Tippawan Liabsuetrakul, Krantarat Peeyananjarassri

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008019.pub2

2009 Oct 07

Mechanical dilatation of the cervix at non‐labour caesarean section for reducing postoperative morbidity

Protocol

Tippawan Liabsuetrakul, Krantarat Peeyananjarassri

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008019

Differences between protocol and review

Only postpartum haemorrhage was kept in as a primary outcome. The remaining primary outcomes in protocol were moved to secondary outcomes. Some additional outcomes reported by included studies which were not prespecified in the protocol for our review were considered to be clinically relevant and have therefore been added as secondary outcomes. These additional outcomes are as follows.

  • Blood loss: estimated blood loss recorded during and immediately after caesarean section.

  • Wound infection: presence of purulent or serous wound discharge with induration, warmth and tenderness (not prespecified).

  • Urinary tract infection: clinical signs plus identification of micro‐organisms of 105 on culture.

  • Operative time: duration of operative time.

The methods have been updated to reflect the latest Handbook (Higgins 2011).

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.