Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Sapropterin dihydrochloride for phenylketonuria

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Contraer todo Desplegar todo

Referencias

References to studies included in this review

Levy 2007 {published and unpublished data}

Lee P, Treacy EP, Crombez E, Wasserstein M, Waber L, Wolff J, et al. Safety and efficacy of 22 weeks of treatment with sapropterin dihydrochloride in patients with phenylketonuria. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A2008; Vol. 146A, issue 22:2851‐9.
Levy H, Milanowski A, Chakrapani A, Cleary M, Trefz F, Whitley C, et al. A phase 3 study of the efficacy of sapropterin in reducing phe levels in subjects with phenylketonuria [abstract]. Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease 2006;29(Suppl 1):13.
Levy HL, Milanowski A, Chakrapani A, Cleary M, Lee P, Trefz FK, et al. Efficacy of sapropterin dihydrochloride (tetrahydrobiopterin, 6R‐BH4) for reduction of phenylalanine concentration in patients with phenylketonuria: a phase III randomised placebo‐controlled study. Lancet 2007;370(9586):504‐10.

Trefz 2009 {published and unpublished data}

Trefz FK, Burton BK, Longo N, Casanova MM‐P, Gruskin DJ, Dorenbaum A, et al. Efficacy of sapropterin dihydrochloride in increasing phenylalanine tolerance in children with phenylketonuria: a phase III, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study. Journal of Pediatrics 2009;154(5):700‐7.

References to studies excluded from this review

Nwose 2008 {unpublished data only}

Nwose D. A Phase 1 Study to Evaluate Effects of Sapropterin Dihydrochloride on QTc Intervals in Healthy Adult Subjects. www.ClinicalTrials.gov [accessed 19 October 2012].

Gropmann 2011 {unpublished data only}

Gropmann AL. Neuroimaging and Neurocognitive Assessment and Response to Sapropterin Dihydrochloride Treatment in Phenylketonuria. www.ClinicalTrials.gov [accessed 19 October 2012]. [NCT01412437]

Prasad 2010 {unpublished data only}

Prasad S. Safety and Therapeutic Effects of Sapropterin Dihydrochloride on Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Phenylketonuria (PKU) Patients. www.ClinicalTrials.gov [accessed 19 October 2012].

Vincent 2011 {unpublished data only}

Vincent C. Kuvan in Phenylketonuria (PKU) Patients Less Than 4 Years Old. www.ClinicalTrials.gov [accessed 19 October 2012].

Baulny 2007

Baulny HO, Abadie V, Feille F, Parscau L. Management of phenylketonuria and hyperphenylalaninemia. Journal of Nutrition 2007;137(6 Suppl 1):1561S‐3S.

Belanger‐Quintana 2005

Belanger‐Quintana A, Garcia MJ, Castro M, Desviat LR, Perez B, Mejia B, et al. Spanish BH4‐responsive phenylalanine hydroxylase‐deficient patients: evolution of seven patients on long‐term treatment with tetrahydrobiopterin. Molecular Genetics and Metabolism 2005;86(Suppl 1):S61‐6.

Bernegger 2002

Bernegger C, Blau N. High frequency of tetrahydrobiopterin‐responsiveness among hyperphenylalaninemias: a study of 1919 patients observed from 1988 to 2002. Molecular Genetics and Metabolism 2002;77(4):304‐13.

Blau 2004

Blau N, Erlandsen H. The metabolic and molecular bases of tetrahydrobiopterin‐responsive phenylalanine hydroxylase deficiency. Molecular Genetics and Metabolism 2004;82(2):101‐11.

Boveda 2007

Boveda MD, Couce ML, Castineiras DE, Cocho JA, Perez B, Ugarte M, et al. The tetrahydrobiopterin loading test in 36 patients with hyperphenylalaninemia: evaluation of response and subsequent treatment. Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease 2007;30(5):812.

Burlina 2009

Burlina A, Blau N. Effect of BH(4) supplementation on phenylalanine tolerance. Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease 2009;32(1):40‐5.

Burton 2007

Burton BK, Grange DK, Milanowski G, Feillet F, Crombwz EA, Abadie V, et al. The response of patients with phenylketonuria and elevated serum phenylalanine to treatment with oral sapropterin dihydrochloride (6R‐tetrahydrobiopterin): a phase II, multicentre, open‐label, screening study. Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease 2007;30:700‐7.

Cerone 2004

Cerone R, Schiaffino MC, Fantasia AR, Perfumo M, Birk Moller L, Blau N. Long‐term follow‐up of a patient with mild tetrahydrobiopterin‐responsive phenylketonuria. Molecular Genetics and Metabolism 2004;81(2):137‐9.

Channon 2007

Channon S, Goodman G, Zlotowitz S, Mockler C, Lee PJ. Effects of dietary management of phenylketonuria on long‐term cognitive outcome. Archives of Disease in Childhood 2007;92(3):213‐8.

Cockburn 1996

Cockburn F, Clark BJ. Recommendations for protein and amino acid intake in phenylketonuric patients. European Journal of Pediatrics 1996;155(Suppl 1):125‐9.

Elbourne 2002

Elbourne DR, Altman DG, Higgins JP, Curtin F, Worthington HV, Vail A. Meta‐analyses involving cross‐over trials: methodological issues. International Journal of Epidemiology 2002;31(1):140‐9.

Erlandsen 2004

Erlandsen H, Pey AL, Gamez A, Perez B, Desviat LR, Aguado C, et al. Correction of kinetic and stability defects by tetrahydrobiopterin in phenylketonuria patients with certain phenylalanine hydroxylase mutations. Proceedings of National Academy of Science USA 2004;101(48):16903‐8.

Fiege 2005

Fiege B, Bonafe L, Ballhausen D, Baumgartner M, Thony B, Meili D, et al. Extended tetrahydrobiopterin loading test in the diagnosis of cofactor‐responsive phenylketonuria: a pilot study. Molecular Genetics and Metabolism 2005;86(Suppl 1):S91‐5.

Fiege 2007

Fiege B, Blau N. Assessment of tetrahydrobiopterin responsiveness in phenylketonuria. Journal of Pediatrics 2007;150(6):627‐30.

Fiori 2005

Fiori L, Fiege B, Riva E, Giovanni M. Incidence of BH4‐responsiveness in phenylalanine‐hydroxylase‐deficient Italian patients. Molecular Genetics and Metabolism 2005;86(Suppl 1):S67‐74.

Giovanni 2007

Giovanni M, Verduci E, Salvatici E, Fiori L. Phenylketonuria: Dietary and therapeutic challenges. Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease 2007;30(2):145‐52.

Hennermann 2005

Hennermann JB, Buhrer C, Blau N, Vetter B, Monch E. Long‐term treatment with tetrahydrobiopterin increases phenylalanine tolerance in children with severe phenotype of phenylketonuria. Molecular Genetics and Metabolism 2005;86(Suppl 1):S86‐90.

Higgins 2003

Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta‐analyses. BMJ 2003;327(7414):557‐60.

Higgins 2011

Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.

Koch 2002

Koch R, Burton B, Hoganson G, Peterson R, Rhead W, Rouse B, et al. Phenylketonuria in adulthood: a collaborative study. Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease 2002;25(5):333‐46.

Kure 1999

Kure S, Hou DC, Ohura T, Iwamoto H, Suzuki S, Sugiyama N, et al. Tetrahydrobiopterin‐responsive phenylalanine hydroxylase deficiency. Journal of Pediatrics 1999;135(3):375‐8.

Leuzzi 2006

Leuzzi V, Carducci C, Carducci C, Chiarotti F, Artiola C, Giovanniello T, et al. The spectrum of phenylalanine variations under tetrahydrobiopterin load in subjects affected by phenylalanine hydroxylase deficiency. Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease 2006;29(1):38‐46.

Lindner 2001

Lindner M, Haas D, Zschocke J, Burgard P. Tetrahydrobiopterin responsiveness in phenylketonuria differs between patients with the same genotype. Molecular Genetics and Metabolism 2001;73(1):104‐6.

Matalon 2002

Matalon R, Koch R, Michals‐Matalon K, Mosley K, Stevens R. Tetrahydrobiopterin‐responsive phenylalanine hydroxylase mutations. Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease 2002;25(Suppl 1):23.

Matalon 2005

Matalon R, Michals‐Matalon K, Koch R, Grady J, Tyring S, Stevens RC. Response of patients with phenylketonuria in the US to tetrahydrobiopterin. Molecular Genetics and Metabolism 2005;86(Suppl 1):S17‐21.

Michals‐Matalon 2007

Michals‐Matalon K, Bhatia G, Guttler F, Tyring SK, Matalon R. Response of phenylketonuria to tetrahydrobiopterin. Journal of Nutrition 2007;137(6 Suppl 1):1564S‐7S.

MRC (UK) 1993

Medical Research Council (UK). Phenylketonuria due to phenylalanine hydroxylase deficiency: an unfolding story. BMJ 1993;306(6870):115‐9.

Muntau 2002

Muntau AC, Roschinger W, Habich M, Demmelmain H, Hoffmann B, Sommerhoff CP, et al. Tetrahydrobiopterin as an alternative treatment for mild phenylketonuria. New England Journal of Medicine 2002;347(26):2122‐32.

NIH Consensus Development Panel 2001

National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Panel. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference statement: phenylketonuria: screening and management. Pediatrics 2000;108(4):972‐82.

Nuoffer 2001

Nuoffer JM, Thony B, Romstad A, Blau N. A patient with phenylketonuria successfully treated with tetrahydrobiopterin. Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease 2001;24(Suppl 1):29.

Scriver 2001

Scriver CR, Seymour K. Hyperphenylalaninemia : Phenylalanine Hydroxylase Deficiency. In: Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Sly WS, Valle D, Childs B, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B editor(s). The Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Disease. 8th Edition. Vol. 2, New York: McGraw‐Hill, 2001:1667‐724.

Scriver 2007

Scriver CR. The PAH gene, phenylketonuria, and a paradigm shift. Human Mutation 2007;28(9):831‐45.

Shintaku 2004

Shintaku H, Kure S, Ohura T, Okano Y, Ohwada M, Sugiyama N, et al. Long‐term treatment and diagnosis of tetrahydrobiopterin‐responsive hyperphenylalaninemia with a mutant phenylalanine hydroxylase gene. Pediatric Research 2004;55(3):425‐30.

Spaapen 2001

Spaapen LJM, Bakker JA, Velter C, Loots W, Rubio ME, Forget PP, et al. Tetrahydrobiopterin‐responsive phenylalanine hydroxylase deficiency in Ditch neonates. Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease 2001;24(3):325‐58.

Steinfeld 2002

Steinfeld R, Kohlschutter A, Zschocke J, Lindner M, Ullrich K, Lukacs Z. Tetrahydrobipterin monotherapy for phenylketonuria patients with common mild mutations. European Journal of Pediatrics 2002;161(7):403‐5.

Steinfeld 2003

Steinfeld R, Kohlschutter A, Ullrich K, Lukacs Z. A hypothesis on the biochemical mechanism of BH(4) ‐responsiveness in phenylalanine hydroxylase deficiency. Amino Acids 2003;25(1):63‐8.

Steinfeld 2004

Steinfeld R, Kohlschutter A, Ullrich K, Lukacs Z. Efficiency of long‐term tetrahydrobiopterin monotherapy in phenylketonuria. Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease 2004;27(4):449‐53.

Trefz 2001

Trefz FK, Aulehla‐Scholz C, Blau N. Successful treatment of phenylketonuria with tetrahydrobiopterin. European Journal of Pediatrics 2001;160(5):315.

Wappner 1999

Wappner R, Cho S, Kronmal RA, Schuett V, Seashore MR. Management of phenylketonuria for optimal outcome: a review of guidelines for phenylketonuria management and a report of surveys of parents, patients, and clinic directors. Pediatrics 1999;104(6):e68.

Williams 2008

Williams RA, Mamotte CDS, Burnett JR. Phenylketonuria: an inborn error of phenylalanine metabolism. Clinical Biochemist Reviews 2008;29(1):31‐41.

References to other published versions of this review

Somaraju 2010

Somaraju UR, Merrin M. Sapropterin dihydrochloride for phenylketonuria. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 6. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008005.pub2]

Characteristics of studies

Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]

Levy 2007

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind placebo‐controlled study.

Multicentre, North America and Europe.

Participants

89 children and adults with PKU, over 8 years of age, with blood phe ≥450μmol/L; individuals who had a reduction of 30% or more in blood phe concentration after 8 days of treatment with sapropterin at a dose of 10 mg/kg in a previous screening test (PKU 001) were eligible for the study.

Participants had been involved in a phase 1 screening study.

Interventions

Sapropterin 10 mg/kg/day versus placebo; treatment was for a period of 6 weeks.

Outcomes

Change in blood phe concentration.

Notes

Data published only as a six week study; further details requested from the author.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Treatment allocations were made centrally from randomisation lists generated by a computer program. Each randomisation list started with a block of two, followed by blocks of four.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Described that a central interactive voice response system was used; investigators, patients and sponsors were kept unaware of treatment allocation until database was locked; block size was not divulged to sponsors or investigators until study was completed.

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Stated as double blind; sapropterin and placebo tablets were identical in taste and appearance.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Two withdrawals (one from each group) described.

One withdrawal from the study in the sapropterin group before closing due to an inability to comply with the study course. The data was not included in the analysis as the patient did not receive even one dose of study drug.

There was another withdrawal from the control group due to non‐compliance with specified dosing, but the data was included in the analysis.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

High risk

Comparison of the trial protocol available at the ClinicalTrials.gov web site and also the 'Methods' section with the results reported in the final paper showed all the detailed outcomes in the protocol were reported in the published reports. However, in the Levy study they measured data at several time points (weeks 0, 1, 2, 4,and 6) but only reported them at 6 weeks.

Other bias

Unclear risk

Sponsored by BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.

Trefz 2009

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind placebo‐controlled study.

Multicentre, North America and Europe.

Participants

90 children with PKU between 4 to 12 years of age, under phe‐restricted diet with a phe tolerance ≤ 1000 mg/d, and blood phe ≤ 480 μmol/L; exclusion criteria: history of organ transplantation, usage of investigational agent within 30 days before screening, serum alanine aminotransferase levels more than twice upper limit of normal, concurrent disease, using drugs that inhibit folate synthesis, primary BH4 deficiency.

46 children eligible for inclusion (see 'Notes' below).

Interventions

Sapropterin 20 mg/kg/d versus placebo; treatment was for a period of 10 weeks.

Outcomes

Change in blood phe concentration.

Change in phe tolerance.

Notes

Study conducted in two parts. Eligible participants (N = 90) entered part 1, received oral sapropterin 20 mg/kg/d for eight days. Those who had a ≥30% reduction in blood phe and had a blood phe ≤ 300 μmol/L were included in part 2 (N = 46) which was for 10 weeks. The phe supplement was added at the beginning of week 3. Only the part 2 of the study is eligible to be included in analysis.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Described that randomisation was performed by a computer program and interactive voice response system using block sizes of four.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Described that a central interactive voice response system was used; stated that block sizes were not divulged to investigators or study sponsor until the study was completed.

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Stated as double‐blind. Sapropterin and placebo tablets had similar taste and appearance.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

One participant randomised to the sapropterin group did not return to for week 0 visit. The data was not included in the analysis.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

High risk

Comparison of the trial protocol available at the ClinicalTrials.gov web site and also the 'Methods' section with the results reported in the final paper showed all the detailed outcomes in the protocol were reported in the published reports. But the data could not be included in meta‐analysis as the details in control group were not given.

Other bias

Unclear risk

Sponsored by BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.

BH4: tetrahydrobiopterin
Phe: phenylalanine
PKU: phenylketonuria

Characteristics of excluded studies [ordered by study ID]

Study

Reason for exclusion

Nwose 2008

Participants and Outcome measures are not relevant to the review.

Characteristics of ongoing studies [ordered by study ID]

Gropmann 2011

Trial name or title

Neuroimaging and Neurocognitive Assessment and Response to Sapropterin Dihydrochloride Treatment in Phenylketonuria

Methods

Participants

Patients with PKU

Interventions

Sapropterin dihydrochloride, PKU diet

Outcomes

Neuroimaging biomarkers at 4 months, an estimate of change in white matter damage and biochemistry, Brain biochemistry at 4 months, assessment of cognitive system abnormalities

Starting date

April 2011

Contact information

Andrea Gropman, M.D. 202‐476‐3511, [email protected]

Notes

Participants will be randomised into Diet alone group and Kuvan group.

Prasad 2010

Trial name or title

A Double‐blind, Placebo‐controlled, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Safety and Therapeutic Effects of Sapropterin Dihydrochloride on Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Subjects With Phenylketonuria

Methods

Allocation: randomized

Endpoint classification: safety/efficacy study

Intervention model: parallel assignment

Masking: double‐blind (subject, caregiver, investigator, outcome assessor)

Primary purpose: treatment

Participants

People with PKU. 8 years to 65 years

Interventions

Oral sapropterin dihydrochloride (20 mg/kg/day) versus placebo

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures:

Evaluate the therapeutic effects of sapropterin dihydrochloride on the symptoms of ADHD and on global function compared to placebo, in subjects with a blood Phe level reduction after treatment

ADHD change will be measured as a change in ADHD from baseline to week 13 using the Attention‐Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale and Adult ADHD Self‐Report Scale (ADHD RS/ASRS) measurement

Global function will be measured as a change in global function using the Clinical Global Impression‐Improvement (CGI‐I) scale rating compared from baseline to week 13.

Secondary Outcome Measures:

Evaluate the therapeutic effects of sapropterin dihydrochloride on the symptoms of anxiety and depression compared to placebo, in subjects with a blood Phe level reduction after treatment
Evaluate the durability of any therapeutic effects of sapropterin dihydrochloride on neuropsychiatric symptoms and global function of subjects who have a blood Phe level reduction after treatment.
Determine if sapropterin dihydrochloride has a therapeutic effect on neuropsychiatric symptoms in PKU patients who do not have a blood Phe reduction after treatment
Assess the safety of sapropterin dihydrochloride when administered as therapy to these patients

Starting date

June 2010

Contact information

Contact: Malathi Jakkula ([email protected])

Notes

Estimated completion date: January 2013. Estimated enrolment: 200 participants

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01114737

Vincent 2011

Trial name or title

Kuvan in Phenylketonuria (PKU) Patients Less Than 4 Years Old

Methods

Participants

Children less than 4 years old with PKU

Interventions

Kuvan, Phe‐restricted diet

Outcomes

Dietary Phe tolerance after 26 weeks, Levels of blood Phe, Change from baseline in dietary Phe tolerance after 26 weeks, number of subjects with adverse events after 26 weeks and 3 years

Starting date

June 2011

Contact information

[email protected]

Notes

Participants randomised into Phe‐restricted diet only and Kuvan + Phe‐restricted diet groups. Study period is 26 weeks, with an extension period of three years.

Data and analyses

Open in table viewer
Comparison 1. Sapropterin versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in blood phenylalanine concentration from baseline Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Sapropterin versus placebo, Outcome 1 Change in blood phenylalanine concentration from baseline.

Comparison 1 Sapropterin versus placebo, Outcome 1 Change in blood phenylalanine concentration from baseline.

1.1 Over 2 weeks and up to 4 weeks

1

45

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐51.90 [‐197.27, 93.47]

1.2 Over 4 weeks and up to 6 weeks

1

88

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐238.8 [‐343.09, ‐134.51]

2 Mean difference in blood phenylalanine concentration between treatment groups Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Sapropterin versus placebo, Outcome 2 Mean difference in blood phenylalanine concentration between treatment groups.

Comparison 1 Sapropterin versus placebo, Outcome 2 Mean difference in blood phenylalanine concentration between treatment groups.

2.1 Over 2 weeks and up to 4 weeks

1

45

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐135.2 [‐187.92, ‐82.48]

2.2 Over 4 weeks and up to 6 weeks

1

88

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐245.0 [‐349.47, ‐140.53]

3 Adverse events due to sapropterin Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Sapropterin versus placebo, Outcome 3 Adverse events due to sapropterin.

Comparison 1 Sapropterin versus placebo, Outcome 3 Adverse events due to sapropterin.

3.1 Upper respiratory tract infection

2

133

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.63 [0.29, 1.36]

3.2 Headache

2

133

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.84 [0.36, 1.96]

3.3 Vomiting

2

133

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.04 [0.28, 3.91]

3.4 Abdominal pain

2

133

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.12, 2.21]

3.5 Diarrhoea

2

133

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.31 [0.32, 5.43]

3.6 Pyrexia

2

133

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.23, 2.69]

3.7 Back pain

1

88

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.38 [0.04, 3.53]

3.8 Rhinorrhea

1

45

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.45 [0.18, 11.75]

3.9 Cough

1

45

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.21 [0.25, 70.82]

3.10 Pharybgolaryngeal pain

1

45

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.45 [0.18, 11.75]

3.11 Contusion

1

45

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.09 [0.13, 9.50]

3.12 Nasal congestion

1

45

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.68 [0.15, 48.32]

3.13 Decreased appetite

1

45

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.91 [0.10, 37.20]

3.14 Erythema

1

45

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.91 [0.10, 37.20]

3.15 Excoriation

1

45

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.91 [0.10, 37.20]

3.16 Lymphadenopathy

1

45

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.91 [0.10, 37.20]

3.17 Streptococcal infection

1

45

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.36 [0.06, 2.30]

3.18 Tooth ache

1

45

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.91 [0.10, 37.20]

4 Mean phenylalanine supplement tolerated Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Sapropterin versus placebo, Outcome 4 Mean phenylalanine supplement tolerated.

Comparison 1 Sapropterin versus placebo, Outcome 4 Mean phenylalanine supplement tolerated.

4.1 Over 2 months and up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Difference in total phenylalanine intake Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Sapropterin versus placebo, Outcome 5 Difference in total phenylalanine intake.

Comparison 1 Sapropterin versus placebo, Outcome 5 Difference in total phenylalanine intake.

5.1 At baseline ( week 0)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 Over 2 months and up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Change in phenylalanine tolerance Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Sapropterin versus placebo, Outcome 6 Change in phenylalanine tolerance.

Comparison 1 Sapropterin versus placebo, Outcome 6 Change in phenylalanine tolerance.

6.1 Over 2 months and up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Comparison 1 Sapropterin versus placebo, Outcome 1 Change in blood phenylalanine concentration from baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Sapropterin versus placebo, Outcome 1 Change in blood phenylalanine concentration from baseline.

Comparison 1 Sapropterin versus placebo, Outcome 2 Mean difference in blood phenylalanine concentration between treatment groups.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Sapropterin versus placebo, Outcome 2 Mean difference in blood phenylalanine concentration between treatment groups.

Comparison 1 Sapropterin versus placebo, Outcome 3 Adverse events due to sapropterin.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Sapropterin versus placebo, Outcome 3 Adverse events due to sapropterin.

Comparison 1 Sapropterin versus placebo, Outcome 4 Mean phenylalanine supplement tolerated.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Sapropterin versus placebo, Outcome 4 Mean phenylalanine supplement tolerated.

Comparison 1 Sapropterin versus placebo, Outcome 5 Difference in total phenylalanine intake.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Sapropterin versus placebo, Outcome 5 Difference in total phenylalanine intake.

Comparison 1 Sapropterin versus placebo, Outcome 6 Change in phenylalanine tolerance.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Sapropterin versus placebo, Outcome 6 Change in phenylalanine tolerance.

Comparison 1. Sapropterin versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in blood phenylalanine concentration from baseline Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Over 2 weeks and up to 4 weeks

1

45

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐51.90 [‐197.27, 93.47]

1.2 Over 4 weeks and up to 6 weeks

1

88

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐238.8 [‐343.09, ‐134.51]

2 Mean difference in blood phenylalanine concentration between treatment groups Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 Over 2 weeks and up to 4 weeks

1

45

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐135.2 [‐187.92, ‐82.48]

2.2 Over 4 weeks and up to 6 weeks

1

88

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐245.0 [‐349.47, ‐140.53]

3 Adverse events due to sapropterin Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 Upper respiratory tract infection

2

133

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.63 [0.29, 1.36]

3.2 Headache

2

133

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.84 [0.36, 1.96]

3.3 Vomiting

2

133

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.04 [0.28, 3.91]

3.4 Abdominal pain

2

133

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.12, 2.21]

3.5 Diarrhoea

2

133

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.31 [0.32, 5.43]

3.6 Pyrexia

2

133

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.23, 2.69]

3.7 Back pain

1

88

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.38 [0.04, 3.53]

3.8 Rhinorrhea

1

45

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.45 [0.18, 11.75]

3.9 Cough

1

45

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.21 [0.25, 70.82]

3.10 Pharybgolaryngeal pain

1

45

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.45 [0.18, 11.75]

3.11 Contusion

1

45

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.09 [0.13, 9.50]

3.12 Nasal congestion

1

45

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.68 [0.15, 48.32]

3.13 Decreased appetite

1

45

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.91 [0.10, 37.20]

3.14 Erythema

1

45

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.91 [0.10, 37.20]

3.15 Excoriation

1

45

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.91 [0.10, 37.20]

3.16 Lymphadenopathy

1

45

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.91 [0.10, 37.20]

3.17 Streptococcal infection

1

45

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.36 [0.06, 2.30]

3.18 Tooth ache

1

45

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.91 [0.10, 37.20]

4 Mean phenylalanine supplement tolerated Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

4.1 Over 2 months and up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Difference in total phenylalanine intake Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

5.1 At baseline ( week 0)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 Over 2 months and up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Change in phenylalanine tolerance Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

6.1 Over 2 months and up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Sapropterin versus placebo