Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Study flow diagram.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Screening for oesophageal cancer

Screening for oesophageal cancer

Patient or population: patients with oesophageal cancer
Settings:
Intervention: screening

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of Participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Control

Screening

Oesophageal cancer‐specific mortality ‐ not measured

See comment

See comment

Not estimable

See comment

There were no studies eligible for inclusion.

Secondary outcomes ‐ not measured

See comment

See comment

Not estimable

See comment

There were no studies eligible for inclusion.

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% CI) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: Confidence interval;

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Screening for oesophageal cancer