Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Tratamientos médicos para la púrpura trombocitopénica idiopática durante el embarazo

Contraer todo Desplegar todo

Referencias

Referencias de los estudios incluidos en esta revisión

Christiaens 1990 {published data only}

Christiaens GCML, Nieuwenhuis HK, Von Dem Borne AEGK, Ouwehand WH, Helmerhorst FM, Van Dalen CM, et al. Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura in pregnancy: a randomized trial on the effect of antenatal low dose corticosteroids on neonatal platelet count. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology1990; Vol. 97:893‐8. [MEDLINE: 2223679]

Referencias de los estudios excluidos de esta revisión

Gill 2002 {published data only}

Gill KK, Kelton JG. Management of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura in pregnancy. Seminars in Hematology 2000;37:275‐89. [MEDLINE: 10942222]

Lee 2002 {published data only}

Lee LH. Idiopathic thrombocytopenia in pregnancy. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2002;31:335‐9. [MEDLINE: 12061294]

Referencias adicionales

Ali 2003

Ali R, Ozkalemkas F, Ozçelik T, Ozkocaman V, Ozan U, Kimya Y, et al. Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura in pregnancy: a single institutional experience with maternal and neonatal outcomes. Annals of Hematology 2003;82(6):348‐52. [MEDLINE: 12734677]

Appel 2006

Appel LJ. A primer on the design, conduct, and interpretation of clinical trials. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2006;1(6):1360‐7. [MEDLINE: 17699370]

Avilés‐Miranda 1983

Avilés‐Miranda A, Ambríz Fernández R, Niz‐Ramos J, García‐Alonso A, De La Luna‐Olsen E, Sinco‐Angeles A, et al. Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura and pregnancy. Use of corticosteroids for the prevention of neonatal purpura. Revista de Investigación Clínica 1983;35:111‐4. [MEDLINE: 6684785]

BCSHGH 2003

British Committee for Standards in Haematology General Haematology Task Force. Guidelines for the investigation and management of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura in adults, children and in pregnancy. British Journal of Haematology 2003;120:574‐96. [MEDLINE: 12588344]

Bhatla 1994

Bhatla N, Buckshee K, Bhargava VL, Takkar D, Malhotra OP. Pregnancy with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Journal of the Association of Physicians of India 1994;42:105‐6. [MEDLINE: 7860466]

Borna 2002

Borna S, Borna H, Khazardoost S. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnant women with immune thrombocytopenic purpura. Archives of Iranian Medicine 2006;9:115‐8. [MEDLINE: 16649352]

Burrows 1990

Burrows RF, Kelton JG. Thrombocytopenia at delivery: a prospective survey of 6715 deliveries. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1990;162:731‐4. [MEDLINE: 2316579]

Bussel 2007

Bussel JB, Cheng G, Saleh MN, Psaila B, Kovaleva L, Meddeb B, et al. Eltrombopag for the treatment of chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. New England Journal of Medicine 2007;357:2237‐47. [MEDLINE: 18046028]

Byrne 1997

Byrne JD, Incerpi MH, Goodwin TM. Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura in pregnancy treated with pulsed high‐dose oral dexamethasone. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1997;177:468‐9. [MEDLINE: 9290474]

Capogna 2007

Capogna G. Maternal and perinatal outcome in idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) with pregnancy. Obstetric Anesthesia Digest 2007;27:158‐9. [1536‐5395 ]

Chedraui 2003

Chedraui PA, Hidalgo LA, San Miguel G. Fatal intracranial hemorrhage in a pregnant patient with autoimmune thrombocytopenic purpura. Journal of Perinatal Medicine 2003;31:526‐9. [MEDLINE: 14711111]

Cines 1982

Cines DB, Dusak B, Tomaski A, Mennuti M, Schreiber AD. Immune thrombocytopenic purpura and pregnancy. New England Journal of Medicine 1982;306:826‐31. [MEDLINE: 7199619]

Cines 2005

Cines DB, McMillan R. Management of adult idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Annual Review of Medicine 2005;56:425‐42. [MEDLINE: 15660520]

Cook 1991

Cook RL, Miller RC, Katz VL, Cefalo RC. Immune thrombocytopenic purpura in pregnancy: a reappraisal of management. Obstetrics & Gynecology 1991;78:578‐83. [MEDLINE: 1923158]

Deeks 2001

Deeks JJ, Altman DG, Bradburn MJ. Statistical methods for examining heterogeneity and combining results from several studies in meta‐analysis. In: Egger M, Davey Smith G, Altman DG editor(s). Systematic reviews in health care: meta‐analysis in context. London: BMJ Books, 2001.

Devendra 2002

Devendra K, Koh LP. Pregnancy in women with idiopathic thrombocytopaenic purpura. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2002;31:276‐80. [MEDLINE: 12061285]

Dufault 1957

Dufault FX, Kaye BM. Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura and pregnancy: report of a case treated with cortisone. Obstetrics & Gynecology 1957;9:228‐30. [MEDLINE: 13400439]

el Hajoui 2003

el Hajoui S, Nabil S, Khachani M, Kaddioui S, Alami MH, Bezad R, et al. Idiopathic thrombopenic purpura and pregnancy. La Tunisie Mèdicale 2003;81:213‐6. [MEDLINE: 12793075]

George 1996

George JN, Woolf SH, Raskob GE, Wasser JS, Aledort LM, Ballem PJ, et al. Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura: a practice guideline developed by explicit methods for the American Society of Hematology. Blood 1996;88:3‐40. [MEDLINE: 7935660]

George 1998

George JN, Raskob GE. Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura: a concise summary of the pathophysiology and diagnosis in children and adults. Seminars in Hematology 1998;35(1 Suppl 1):5‐8. [MEDLINE: 9523743]

Gernsheimer 2007

Gernsheimer T, McCraeb KR. Immune thrombocytopenic purpura in pregnancy. Current Opinion in Hematology 2007;14:574‐80. [MEDLINE: 17934366]

Gibson 1989

Gibson J, Laird PP, Joshua DE, Child A, Harris J, Kronenberg H. Very high dose intravenous gammaglobulin in thrombocytopenia of pregnancy. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine 1989;19:151‐3. [MEDLINE: 2764818]

Gross 1995

Gross Z, Rodriguez JJ, Stalnaker BL. Vincristine for refractory autoimmune thrombocytopenic purpura in pregnancy. A case report. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 1995;40(10):739‐42. [MEDLINE: 8551481]

Harrington 1951

Harrington WJ, Minnich V, Hollingsworth JW, Moore CV. Demonstration of a thrombocytopenic factor in the blood of patients with thrombocytopenic purpura. Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine 1951;38:1‐10. [MEDLINE: 14850832]

Harrington 1953

Harrington WJ, Sprague CC, Minnich V, Moore CV, Aulvin RC, Dubach R. Immunologic mechanisms in idiopathic and neonatal thrombocytopenic purpura. Annals of Internal Medicine 1953;38:433‐69. [MEDLINE: 13031392]

Heys 1966

Heys RF. Steroid therapy for idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura during pregnancy. Obstetrics & Gynecology 1966;28:532‐42. [MEDLINE: 5951132]

Higgins 2008

Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.0 [updated February 2008]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.

Kalish 2001

Kalish, RB, Christiaens GCML, Skupski DW, Bussel JB. Patterns of progression of immune thrombocytopenia purpura during pregnancy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2001;185(Suppl 6):S181.

Kimura 2001

Kimura S, Kuroda J, Akaogi T, Hayashi H, Ogino Y, Kobayashi Y, et al. Treatment of steroid‐resistant idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura in pregnancy with repeated high‐dose intravenous immunoglobulin. Haematologia 2001;31:263‐5. [MEDLINE: 11855790]

Kryc 1983

Kryc JJ, Corrigan JJ. Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura during pregnancy. A pediatric viewpoint. American Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology 1983;5(1):21‐5. [MEDLINE: 6683086]

Kutter 2008

Kuter DJ, Bussel JB, Lyons RM, Pullarkat V, Gernsheimer TB, Senecal FM, et al. Efficacy of romiplostim in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura: a double‐blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2008;371:395‐403. [MEDLINE: 18242413]

Lush 2000

Lush R, Iland H, Peat B, Young G. Successful use of dapsone in refractory pregnancy‐associated idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine 2000;30:105‐7. [MEDLINE: 10800898]

Martí‐Carvajal 2003

Martí‐Carvajal A. El Paciente con...Semiología y Clínica Hematológica. Valencia, Venezuela: Universidad de Carabobo, 2003.

McGee 2002

McGee DC. Steroid use during pregnancy. Journal of Perinatal and Neonatal Nursing 2002;16:26‐39. [MEDLINE: 12233943]

Nisaratanaporn 2006

Nisaratanaporn S, Sukcharoen N. Outcome of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura in pregnancy in King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand 2006;89(Suppl 4):S70‐S75. [MEDLINE: 17725142]

Perruca 2003

Perruca PE, Munoz MP, Liendo PF, Ricci AP, Pérez CC, Domínguez CC, et al. Experience and management of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura during pregnancy [Experiencia y manejo del purpura trombocitopenico idiopatico durante el embarazo]. Revista Chilena de Obstetricia y Ginecología 2003;68(4):293‐9. [ISSN 0717‐7526]

Porta 2008

Porta M, editor. A dictionary of epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008. [ISBN 978‐0‐19‐531449‐6]

RevMan 2008 [Computer program]

The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.0. Copenhagen, The Nordic Cochrane Centre: The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008.

Stasi 2008

Stasi R, Evangelista ML, Amadori S. Novel thrombopoietic agents: a review of their use in idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Drugs 2008;68:901‐12. [MEDLINE: 18457458]

Sukenik‐Halevy 2008

Sukenik‐Halevy R, Ellis MH, Fejgin MD. Management of immune thrombocytopenic purpura in pregnancy. Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey 2008;63:182‐8. [MEDLINE: 18279544]

Suri 2006

Suri V, Aggarwal N, Saxena S, Malhotra P, Varma S. Maternal and perinatal outcome in idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) with pregnancy. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2006;85:1430‐5. [MEDLINE: 17260217]

Tampakoudis 1995

Tampakoudis P, Billi H, Tantanassis T, Kalachanis I, Garipidou B, Sinakos Z, et al. Pregnancy and labor in idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde 1995;55:583‐6. [MEDLINE: 8543133]

Wang 2004

Wang Q, Nie LL. Clinical analysis of 92 cases of pregnancy with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2004;39:729‐32. [MEDLINE: 15634495]

Webert 2003

Webert KE, Mittal R, Sigouin C, Heddle NM, Kelton JG. A retrospective 11‐year analysis of obstetric patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Blood 2003;102:4306‐11. [MEDLINE: 12947011]

Widmer 1999

Widmer A, Brühwiler H, Krause M, Lüscher KP. Severe autoimmune thrombocytopenia in pregnancy. Zeitschrift für Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie 1999;203:258‐60. [MEDLINE: 10612200]

Won 2005

Won YW, Moon W, Yun YS, Oh HS, Choi JH, Lee YY, et al. Clinical aspects of pregnancy and delivery in patients with chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). Korean Journal of Internal Medicine 2005;20:129‐34. [MEDLINE: 16134767]

Woods 1984a

Woods VL, Kurata Y, Montgomery RR, Tani P, Mason D, Oh EH, et al. Autoantibodies against platelet glycoprotein Ib in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura. Blood 1984;164:156‐60. [MEDLINE: 6234034]

Woods 1984b

Woods VL, Oh EH, Mason D, McMillan R. Autoantibodies against the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa complex in patients with chronic ITP. Blood 1984;63:368‐75. [MEDLINE: 6229297]

Yamada 1999

Yamada H, Kato EH, Kobashi G, Kishida T, Ebina Y, Kaneuchi M, et al. Passive immune thrombocytopenia in neonates of mothers with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura: incidence and risk factors. Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis 1999;25:491‐6. [MEDLINE: 10625208]

Yildirim 2006

Yildirim Y, Tinar S, Oner RS, Kaya B, Toz E. Gestational diabetes mellitus in patients receiving long‐term corticosteroid therapy during pregnancy. Journal of Perinatal  Medicine 2006;34:280‐4. [MEDLINE: 16856815]

Zavala 2006

Zavala D, Martí‐Carvajal A, Peña‐Martí G, Comunián G. Data extraction sheet to help manage the characteristics of included studies in Cochraen reviews. (www.cochrane.fcs.edu.ve/hrs). Valencia‐Venezuela: Universidad de Carabobo, 2006.

Characteristics of studies

Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]

Christiaens 1990

Methods

Randomised controlled trial. Open label.
Study type: multicenter study (34 hospitals). National: The Netherlands.
Study phase: III.
Study design: parallel.
Phase of perinatal period at entry: pregnancy (< 36 weeks' gestation).
Randomisation: by computer‐generated table of random numbers allocation. It was conducted before 36 weeks' gestation.
Allocation concealment: not described.
Blinding: pediatricians who assessed the babies were not masked to the treatment.

Analysis results: per‐protocol analysis.
Follow‐up period: from "day 259 of pregnancy till delivery".

Lost post‐randomisation: 13 (32%) (not included the final analysis).

  • Betamethosone group: 6.

  • Control (no treatment): 7.

  • Reasons: secondary thrombocytopenia (7), lost to follow up (3), attending physician altered treatment (2), preterm delivery before treatment started (1).

Participants

Recruited participants: 59 women (64 pregnancies).

Number randomised: 38 women (41 pregnancies).

Number analysed: 26 women (28 pregnancies).
Mean (SD) age of experimental group (n = 14): 29 (5) years.

Mean (SD) age of experimental group (n = 14): 29 (6) years.

Inclusion criteria: pregnant women with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (thrombocytopenia (maternal platelet count < 150 x 109/l) on more than 1 occasion, the presence of a normal or increased number of megakaryocytes in bone marrow, and the absence of other diseases, of splenomegaly, of antinuclear antibodies and of the use of drugs known to induce thrombocytopenia).

Exclusion criteria: pregnant women already using corticosteroids.

Interventions

Bethametasone: 0.5 mg thrice/day (1.5 mg/day) by the first 2 weeks and 0.5 mg twice/day/ during the third week.

Control: no treatment.

Outcomes

Primary:

  1. neonatal thrombocytopenia;

  2. neonatal bleeding complications.

Notes

Funding/support: no special funding required.

8 pregnant women were included with normal platelet counts with diagnosis of ITP made before the current pregnancy and who had had a splenectomy.

Trial period: March 1984 to March 1987.

Reasons for non‐admitted participants during recruitment period: use of corticosteroids (10 participants), concomitant disease (7 participants) and refused to participate (6 participants).

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

Adequate: quote: "...according to a computer‐generated table of random numbers".

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

Insufficient information to permit judgement of ‘yes’ or ‘no’.

Blinding?
Blinding of patients

Unclear risk

Insufficient information to permit judgement of ‘yes’ or ‘no’.

Blinding?
Blinding of outcome assessors

High risk

Inadequate.

Comment: treatment received by mother were known by paediatricians who assessed newborns.

Blinding?
Blinding of caregivers

Unclear risk

Insufficient information to permit judgement of ‘yes’ or ‘no’.

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

High risk

Inadequate.

Comment: study excluded 13 pregnancies (32%).

Free of selective reporting?

Unclear risk

Unclear.
Comments: study reported data on the planned outcomes. However, this RCT did not include relevant clinical outcome: maternal death, perinatal mortality, postpartum haemorrhage and intracranial haemorrhage neonatal.

Free of other bias?

High risk

Inadequate.

There is a chance of bias due to inadequate sample size for estimating a real effect. This trial may be affected by early stopping bias:

Free of baseline imbalance?

Unclear risk

Inadequate.

Comments: it only shows the baseline characteristics of the analysed participants.

Free of academic bias?

Low risk

Adequate.
No previous published RCTs of the same intervention.

No previous published RCTs of the same medical condition.

This RCT reports a retrospective study which used prednisone and suggested a beneficial effect on the neonatal platelet count.

Free of attrition bias?

High risk

Inadequate.

Comment: there were 32% (13/41) post‐randomisation drop‐outs.

ITP: idiopathic thrombocytopenia purpura
RCT: randomised controlled trial
SD: standard deviation

Characteristics of excluded studies [ordered by study ID]

Study

Reason for exclusion

Gill 2002

Narrative review.

Lee 2002

Narrative review.

Data and analyses

Open in table viewer
Comparison 1. Betamethasone versus no treatment

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Neonatal thrombocytopenia Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Betamethasone versus no treatment, Outcome 1 Neonatal thrombocytopenia.

Comparison 1 Betamethasone versus no treatment, Outcome 1 Neonatal thrombocytopenia.

1.1 Overall

1

28

Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.13 [0.62, 2.05]

1.2 Severe

1

28

Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.0 [0.16, 6.14]

1.3 Mild

1

28

Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.17 [0.52, 2.60]

2 Neonatal bleeding Show forest plot

1

28

Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.0 [0.24, 4.13]

Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Betamethasone versus no treatment, Outcome 2 Neonatal bleeding.

Comparison 1 Betamethasone versus no treatment, Outcome 2 Neonatal bleeding.

Open in table viewer
Comparison 2. Betamethasone versus no treatment (worse‐case scenario).

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Overall neonatal thrombocytopenia Show forest plot

1

41

Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.97 [1.08, 3.59]

Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Betamethasone versus no treatment (worse‐case scenario)., Outcome 1 Overall neonatal thrombocytopenia.

Comparison 2 Betamethasone versus no treatment (worse‐case scenario)., Outcome 1 Overall neonatal thrombocytopenia.

2 Neonatal Bleeding Show forest plot

1

41

Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.15 [0.99, 9.99]

Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Betamethasone versus no treatment (worse‐case scenario)., Outcome 2 Neonatal Bleeding.

Comparison 2 Betamethasone versus no treatment (worse‐case scenario)., Outcome 2 Neonatal Bleeding.

Open in table viewer
Comparison 3. Betamethasone versus no medication (Best‐case scenario)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Neonatal bleeding Show forest plot

1

41

Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.32 [0.10, 0.98]

Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Betamethasone versus no medication (Best‐case scenario), Outcome 1 Neonatal bleeding.

Comparison 3 Betamethasone versus no medication (Best‐case scenario), Outcome 1 Neonatal bleeding.

Open in table viewer
Comparison 4. Betamethasone versus no treatment (Intention‐to treat analysis).

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Neonatal thrombocytopenia Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Betamethasone versus no treatment (Intention‐to treat analysis)., Outcome 1 Neonatal thrombocytopenia.

Comparison 4 Betamethasone versus no treatment (Intention‐to treat analysis)., Outcome 1 Neonatal thrombocytopenia.

1.1 Overall

1

41

Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.18 [0.57, 2.45]

1.2 Severe

1

41

Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.05 [0.16, 6.76]

1.3 Mild

1

41

Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.23 [0.50, 3.02]

2 Neonatal bleeding Show forest plot

1

41

Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.05 [0.24, 4.61]

Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 Betamethasone versus no treatment (Intention‐to treat analysis)., Outcome 2 Neonatal bleeding.

Comparison 4 Betamethasone versus no treatment (Intention‐to treat analysis)., Outcome 2 Neonatal bleeding.

Open in table viewer
Comparison 5. Bethamethasone versus no treatment (best‐case scenario)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Overall neonatal thrombocytopenia Show forest plot

1

41

Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.63 [0.36, 1.10]

Analysis 5.1

Comparison 5 Bethamethasone versus no treatment (best‐case scenario), Outcome 1 Overall neonatal thrombocytopenia.

Comparison 5 Bethamethasone versus no treatment (best‐case scenario), Outcome 1 Overall neonatal thrombocytopenia.

Methodological quality graph for Christiaens 1990.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Methodological quality graph for Christiaens 1990.

Methodological quality summary: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item for Christiaens 1990.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Methodological quality summary: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item for Christiaens 1990.

Comparison 1 Betamethasone versus no treatment, Outcome 1 Neonatal thrombocytopenia.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Betamethasone versus no treatment, Outcome 1 Neonatal thrombocytopenia.

Comparison 1 Betamethasone versus no treatment, Outcome 2 Neonatal bleeding.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Betamethasone versus no treatment, Outcome 2 Neonatal bleeding.

Comparison 2 Betamethasone versus no treatment (worse‐case scenario)., Outcome 1 Overall neonatal thrombocytopenia.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Betamethasone versus no treatment (worse‐case scenario)., Outcome 1 Overall neonatal thrombocytopenia.

Comparison 2 Betamethasone versus no treatment (worse‐case scenario)., Outcome 2 Neonatal Bleeding.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Betamethasone versus no treatment (worse‐case scenario)., Outcome 2 Neonatal Bleeding.

Comparison 3 Betamethasone versus no medication (Best‐case scenario), Outcome 1 Neonatal bleeding.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Betamethasone versus no medication (Best‐case scenario), Outcome 1 Neonatal bleeding.

Comparison 4 Betamethasone versus no treatment (Intention‐to treat analysis)., Outcome 1 Neonatal thrombocytopenia.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Betamethasone versus no treatment (Intention‐to treat analysis)., Outcome 1 Neonatal thrombocytopenia.

Comparison 4 Betamethasone versus no treatment (Intention‐to treat analysis)., Outcome 2 Neonatal bleeding.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 Betamethasone versus no treatment (Intention‐to treat analysis)., Outcome 2 Neonatal bleeding.

Comparison 5 Bethamethasone versus no treatment (best‐case scenario), Outcome 1 Overall neonatal thrombocytopenia.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.1

Comparison 5 Bethamethasone versus no treatment (best‐case scenario), Outcome 1 Overall neonatal thrombocytopenia.

Comparison 1. Betamethasone versus no treatment

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Neonatal thrombocytopenia Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Overall

1

28

Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.13 [0.62, 2.05]

1.2 Severe

1

28

Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.0 [0.16, 6.14]

1.3 Mild

1

28

Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.17 [0.52, 2.60]

2 Neonatal bleeding Show forest plot

1

28

Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.0 [0.24, 4.13]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Betamethasone versus no treatment
Comparison 2. Betamethasone versus no treatment (worse‐case scenario).

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Overall neonatal thrombocytopenia Show forest plot

1

41

Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.97 [1.08, 3.59]

2 Neonatal Bleeding Show forest plot

1

41

Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.15 [0.99, 9.99]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Betamethasone versus no treatment (worse‐case scenario).
Comparison 3. Betamethasone versus no medication (Best‐case scenario)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Neonatal bleeding Show forest plot

1

41

Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.32 [0.10, 0.98]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. Betamethasone versus no medication (Best‐case scenario)
Comparison 4. Betamethasone versus no treatment (Intention‐to treat analysis).

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Neonatal thrombocytopenia Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Overall

1

41

Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.18 [0.57, 2.45]

1.2 Severe

1

41

Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.05 [0.16, 6.76]

1.3 Mild

1

41

Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.23 [0.50, 3.02]

2 Neonatal bleeding Show forest plot

1

41

Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.05 [0.24, 4.61]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 4. Betamethasone versus no treatment (Intention‐to treat analysis).
Comparison 5. Bethamethasone versus no treatment (best‐case scenario)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Overall neonatal thrombocytopenia Show forest plot

1

41

Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.63 [0.36, 1.10]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 5. Bethamethasone versus no treatment (best‐case scenario)