Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Incentivos económicos para la esquizofrenia

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007626.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 07 octubre 2009see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:

  1. Grupo Cochrane de Esquizofrenia

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2010 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Rosanna Michalczuk

    Cochrane Schizophrenia Group, Institute of Mental Health, Nottingham, UK

  • Amy Mitchell

    Correspondencia a: Psychology Divison, School of social sciences, Nottingham, UK

    [email protected]

Contributions of authors

Amy Mitchell ‐ instigated the review, wrote the protocol, extracted data, wrote review.
Rosanna Michalczuk ‐ instigated the review, wrote the protocol, extracted data, wrote review.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • University of Nottingham, UK.

External sources

  • No sources of support supplied

Declarations of interest

None known.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge adaptation of the text of the ‘Methods’ section of this review. The Cochrane Schizophrenia Group has evolved generic text that we have used and changed to make it relevant to this review. We would like to thank the Editorial base of the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2009 Oct 07

Monetary incentives for schizophrenia

Review

Rosanna Michalczuk, Amy Mitchell

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007626.pub2

2009 Jul 08

Monetary incentives for schizophrenia

Protocol

Rosanna Michalczuk , Amy Mitchell

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007626

Differences between protocol and review

Some sections of the protocol are updated to reflect the new format of Cochrane Schizophrenia Group reviews. We do not feel that the update of the protocol threatens validity of the review.