Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Adhesively bonded versus non‐bonded amalgam restorations for dental caries

Esta versión no es la más reciente

ver la versión actual 08 marzo 2016

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007517.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 07 octubre 2009see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:

  1. Grupo Cochrane de Salud oral

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2010 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Zbys Fedorowicz

    Correspondencia a: UKCC (Bahrain Branch), Ministry of Health, Bahrain, Awali, Bahrain

    [email protected]

  • Mona Nasser

    Department of Health Information, Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health care, Cologne, Germany

  • Nairn Wilson

    King's College London Dental Institute at Guy's, King's College and St Thomas' Hospitals, London, UK

Contributions of authors

Zbys Fedorowicz (ZF), Nairn Wilson (NW), and Mona Nasser (MN) were responsible for: organising the retrieval of papers; writing to authors of papers for additional information; screening search results; screening retrieved papers against inclusion criteria; appraising the quality of papers; data collection for the review; extracting data from papers; obtaining and screening data on unpublished studies.
ZF and MN entered the data into RevMan and were responsible for analysis and interpretation of the data.
All review authors contributed to writing the review.
All review authors were responsible for designing and co‐ordinating the review and for data management for the review.
NW and ZF conceived the idea for the review and are the guarantors for the review.

Declarations of interest

There are no financial conflicts of interest and the review authors declare that, other than Nairn Wilson who is an investigator in potentially eligible studies, they do not have any associations with any parties who may have vested interests in the results of this review.

Acknowledgements

The review authors would like to thank the Cochrane Oral Health Group and the peer reviewers and referees for their help in conducting this systematic review. We would also like to thank Professor Jin Xuejuan of the Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases who very kindly obtained a full text copy of one of the trials, to Dr Edwin Chan Shih‐Yen the Director of the Singapore Branch of the Australasian Cochrane Centre for carrying out the translation of this paper and Dr Bruce Manzer of The College of Health Sciences at the Ministry of Health Bahrain for help with editing earlier drafts of this review.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2016 Mar 08

Adhesively bonded versus non‐bonded amalgam restorations for dental caries

Review

Anirudha Agnihotry, Zbys Fedorowicz, Mona Nasser

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007517.pub3

2009 Oct 07

Adhesively bonded versus non‐bonded amalgam restorations for dental caries

Review

Zbys Fedorowicz, Mona Nasser, Nairn Wilson

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007517.pub2

2009 Jul 08

Adhesively bonded versus non‐bonded amalgam restorations for dental caries

Protocol

Zbys Fedorowicz, Mona Nasser, Nairn Wilson

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007517

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.