Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Eficacia hipotensora de la monoterapia con betabloqueantes agonistas parciales para la hipertensión primaria

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007450.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 27 noviembre 2014see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Hipertensión

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2014 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Gavin WK Wong

    Correspondencia a: Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

    [email protected]

  • Heidi N Boyda

    Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

  • James M Wright

    Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

Contributions of authors

James Wright formulated the idea for the review and developed the basis for the protocol.

Gavin Wong took the lead role in searching, identifying and assessing studies, in data extraction and analyses, and in writing up the review.

Heidi Boyda aided in the data extraction process and approved the final draft of the manuscript.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • University of British Columbia, Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Canada.

External sources

  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Canada.

Declarations of interest

James Wright: nothing to declare.

Gavin Wong: nothing to declare.

Heidi Boyda: nothing to declare.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the help provided by the Cochrane Hypertension Group. Research assistant of Therapeutics Initiative, Stephen Adams, retrieved the full text from library for the authors.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2014 Nov 27

Blood pressure lowering efficacy of partial agonist beta blocker monotherapy for primary hypertension

Review

Gavin WK Wong, Heidi N Boyda, James M Wright

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007450.pub2

2008 Oct 08

Blood pressure lowering efficacy of partial agonist beta blockers for primary hypertension

Protocol

Gavin WK Wong, Alexandra Laugerotte, James M Wright

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007450

Keywords

MeSH

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Study flow diagram
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram

'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study

Comparison 1 Acebutolol vs Placebo, Outcome 1 SBP.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Acebutolol vs Placebo, Outcome 1 SBP.

Comparison 1 Acebutolol vs Placebo, Outcome 2 DBP.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Acebutolol vs Placebo, Outcome 2 DBP.

Comparison 1 Acebutolol vs Placebo, Outcome 3 Heart rate.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Acebutolol vs Placebo, Outcome 3 Heart rate.

Comparison 1 Acebutolol vs Placebo, Outcome 4 Pulse pressure.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Acebutolol vs Placebo, Outcome 4 Pulse pressure.

Comparison 2 Pindolol vs Placebo, Outcome 1 SBP.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Pindolol vs Placebo, Outcome 1 SBP.

Comparison 2 Pindolol vs Placebo, Outcome 2 DBP.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Pindolol vs Placebo, Outcome 2 DBP.

Comparison 2 Pindolol vs Placebo, Outcome 3 Heart rate.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Pindolol vs Placebo, Outcome 3 Heart rate.

Comparison 2 Pindolol vs Placebo, Outcome 4 Pulse pressure.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 Pindolol vs Placebo, Outcome 4 Pulse pressure.

Comparison 3 Celiprolol vs Placebo, Outcome 1 SBP.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Celiprolol vs Placebo, Outcome 1 SBP.

Comparison 3 Celiprolol vs Placebo, Outcome 2 DBP.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 Celiprolol vs Placebo, Outcome 2 DBP.

Comparison 3 Celiprolol vs Placebo, Outcome 3 Heart rate.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3 Celiprolol vs Placebo, Outcome 3 Heart rate.

Comparison 3 Celiprolol vs Placebo, Outcome 4 Pulse pressure.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.4

Comparison 3 Celiprolol vs Placebo, Outcome 4 Pulse pressure.

Comparison 3 Celiprolol vs Placebo, Outcome 5 SBP dose comparison.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.5

Comparison 3 Celiprolol vs Placebo, Outcome 5 SBP dose comparison.

Comparison 3 Celiprolol vs Placebo, Outcome 6 DBP dose comparison.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.6

Comparison 3 Celiprolol vs Placebo, Outcome 6 DBP dose comparison.

Comparison 4 Alprenolol vs Placebo, Outcome 1 SBP.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Alprenolol vs Placebo, Outcome 1 SBP.

Comparison 4 Alprenolol vs Placebo, Outcome 2 DBP.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 Alprenolol vs Placebo, Outcome 2 DBP.

Comparison 4 Alprenolol vs Placebo, Outcome 3 Heart rate.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.3

Comparison 4 Alprenolol vs Placebo, Outcome 3 Heart rate.

Comparison 4 Alprenolol vs Placebo, Outcome 4 Pulse pressure.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.4

Comparison 4 Alprenolol vs Placebo, Outcome 4 Pulse pressure.

Comparison 5 Bopindolol vs Placebo, Outcome 1 SBP.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.1

Comparison 5 Bopindolol vs Placebo, Outcome 1 SBP.

Comparison 5 Bopindolol vs Placebo, Outcome 2 DBP.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.2

Comparison 5 Bopindolol vs Placebo, Outcome 2 DBP.

Comparison 5 Bopindolol vs Placebo, Outcome 3 Heart rate.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.3

Comparison 5 Bopindolol vs Placebo, Outcome 3 Heart rate.

Comparison 5 Bopindolol vs Placebo, Outcome 4 Pulse pressure.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.4

Comparison 5 Bopindolol vs Placebo, Outcome 4 Pulse pressure.

Comparison 5 Bopindolol vs Placebo, Outcome 5 WDAE.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.5

Comparison 5 Bopindolol vs Placebo, Outcome 5 WDAE.

Comparison 6 Oxprenolol vs Placebo, Outcome 1 SBP.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.1

Comparison 6 Oxprenolol vs Placebo, Outcome 1 SBP.

Comparison 6 Oxprenolol vs Placebo, Outcome 2 DBP.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.2

Comparison 6 Oxprenolol vs Placebo, Outcome 2 DBP.

Comparison 6 Oxprenolol vs Placebo, Outcome 3 Pulse pressure.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.3

Comparison 6 Oxprenolol vs Placebo, Outcome 3 Pulse pressure.

Comparison 7 Pooled partial agonist effects, Outcome 1 SBP.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.1

Comparison 7 Pooled partial agonist effects, Outcome 1 SBP.

Comparison 7 Pooled partial agonist effects, Outcome 2 DBP.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.2

Comparison 7 Pooled partial agonist effects, Outcome 2 DBP.

Comparison 7 Pooled partial agonist effects, Outcome 3 Heart rate.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.3

Comparison 7 Pooled partial agonist effects, Outcome 3 Heart rate.

Comparison 7 Pooled partial agonist effects, Outcome 4 Pulse Pressure.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.4

Comparison 7 Pooled partial agonist effects, Outcome 4 Pulse Pressure.

Comparison 7 Pooled partial agonist effects, Outcome 5 WDAE.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.5

Comparison 7 Pooled partial agonist effects, Outcome 5 WDAE.

Comparison 7 Pooled partial agonist effects, Outcome 6 Combined starting and twice the starting dose.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.6

Comparison 7 Pooled partial agonist effects, Outcome 6 Combined starting and twice the starting dose.

Blood pressure lowering effects of partial agonists compared with placebo for primary hypertension

Patient or population: Adults with primary hypertension

Intervention: Partial agonists

Comparison: Placebo

Outcomes

Mean estimates of 1x and 2x starting dose
(95% CI)

No of Participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Decrease in systolic blood pressure

‐8.1 [‐10.1 to ‐6.1]1,2,3,4

490 (10)

Very low5,6,7

Decrease in diastolic blood pressure

‐4.0 [‐5.1 to ‐2.9]1,2,3,4

490 (10)

Very low5,6,7

Decrease in heart rate

‐4.9 [‐6.2 to ‐3.7]2,3

256 (7)

Very low5,6,7

Decrease in pulse pressure

‐3.6 [‐5.3 to ‐1.9]1,2

490 (10)

Very low5,6,7,8

Withdrawal due to adverse effect

RR [95%CI]: 0.72 [0.07 to 7.67]9

117 (1)

Very low5,6,10

95% CI: 95% confidence interval; RR: relative risk

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

Footnotes

  1. Test for subgroup differences showed that 1x and 2x starting dose subgroups were not significantly different from each other.

  2. The recommended starting and 2x starting contained most of the data for this class. Combining them provided the best estimate of the overall subclass effect.

  3. BP was measured at peak hours.

  4. Weighted mean baseline BP of included studies was 175/107 mmHg.

  5. Quality of evidence was downgraded by one level due to small sample size and wide confidence intervals.

  6. Quality of evidence was downgraded by one level due to high or unknown risk of detection bias caused by loss of blinding.

  7. Quality of evidence was downgraded by one level due to high risk of publication bias.

  8. None of the studies included reported pulse pressure. Pulse pressure was calculated by subtracting DBP from SBP.

  9. Withdrawal due to adverse effect was estimated based on one trial from bopindolol.

  10. Quality of evidence was downgraded by one level due to high risk of reporting bias.

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Acebutolol vs Placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 SBP Show forest plot

3

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 (starting dose) 400mg/day

3

85

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐5.12 [‐8.85, ‐1.40]

2 DBP Show forest plot

3

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 (starting dose) 400mg/day

3

85

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.77 [‐3.88, 0.34]

3 Heart rate Show forest plot

3

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 (starting dose) 400mg/day

3

85

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐8.68 [‐10.85, ‐6.51]

4 Pulse pressure Show forest plot

3

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1 (starting dose) 400 mg/day

3

85

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.40 [‐5.39, 0.59]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Acebutolol vs Placebo
Comparison 2. Pindolol vs Placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 SBP Show forest plot

3

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 (starting dose) 10 mg/day

2

29

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐14.46 [‐19.84, ‐9.08]

1.2 (4x starting) 30 mg/day

1

16

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐12.5 [‐20.16, ‐4.84]

2 DBP Show forest plot

3

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 (starting dose) 10 mg/day

2

29

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐6.88 [‐10.15, ‐3.61]

2.2 (4x starting) 30 mg/day

1

16

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐8.8 [‐14.80, ‐2.80]

3 Heart rate Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 (starting dose) 10 mg/day

2

29

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐5.91 [‐9.50, ‐2.32]

4 Pulse pressure Show forest plot

3

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1 (starting dose)10 mg/day

2

29

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐8.01 [‐12.74, ‐3.29]

4.2 (4x starting) 30 mg/day

1

16

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐3.70 [‐10.34, 2.94]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Pindolol vs Placebo
Comparison 3. Celiprolol vs Placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 SBP Show forest plot

3

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 (starting dose) 200 mg/day

3

171

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐7.86 [‐11.88, ‐3.84]

1.2 (2x starting) 400 mg/day

2

120

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐8.59 [‐13.41, ‐3.77]

1.3 (4x starting) 600 mg/day

1

90

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐10.0 [‐16.47, ‐3.53]

2 DBP Show forest plot

3

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 (starting dose) 200 mg/day

3

171

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐4.57 [‐6.62, ‐2.53]

2.2 (2x starting) 400 mg/day

2

120

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐4.88 [‐7.25, ‐2.52]

2.3 (4x starting) 600 mg/day

1

90

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐6.0 [‐9.49, ‐2.51]

3 Heart rate Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 (starting dose) 200 mg/day

1

26

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.4 [‐4.93, 0.13]

3.2 (2x starting) 400 mg/day

1

26

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.6 [‐3.36, 2.16]

4 Pulse pressure Show forest plot

3

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1 (starting dose) 200 mg/day

3

171

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐3.76 [‐7.26, ‐0.25]

4.2 (2x starting) 400 mg/day

2

120

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐3.89 [‐8.09, 0.32]

4.3 (4x starting) 600 mg/day

1

90

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐4.0 [‐9.59, 1.59]

5 SBP dose comparison Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

5.1 200 mg/day

2

80

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐7.42 [‐12.15, ‐2.69]

5.2 400 mg/day

2

85

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐8.59 [‐13.41, ‐3.77]

6 DBP dose comparison Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

6.1 200 mg/day

2

80

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐5.09 [‐7.34, ‐2.85]

6.2 400 mg/day

2

85

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐4.88 [‐7.25, ‐2.52]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. Celiprolol vs Placebo
Comparison 4. Alprenolol vs Placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 SBP Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 400 mg/day

2

27

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐16.94 [‐23.86, ‐10.01]

2 DBP Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 400 mg/day

2

27

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐6.73 [‐10.06, ‐3.39]

3 Heart rate Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 400 mg/day

1

16

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐8.0 [‐15.45, ‐0.55]

4 Pulse pressure Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1 400 mg/day

2

27

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐8.71 [‐14.77, ‐2.65]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 4. Alprenolol vs Placebo
Comparison 5. Bopindolol vs Placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 SBP Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 0.5 mg/day

1

55

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐5.90 [‐15.77, 3.97]

1.2 1 mg/day

1

60

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐6.10 [‐15.58, 3.38]

1.3 2 mg/day

1

60

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐5.80 [‐14.64, 3.04]

2 DBP Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 0.5 mg/day

1

55

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.5 [‐6.84, 3.84]

2.2 1 mg/day

1

60

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐4.0 [‐9.05, 1.05]

2.3 2 mg/day

1

60

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.40 [‐7.24, 2.44]

3 Heart rate Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 0.5 mg/day

1

55

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.23 [‐7.33, 2.87]

3.2 1 mg/day

1

60

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐5.57 [‐10.13, ‐1.01]

3.3 2 mg/day

1

60

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐6.06 [‐10.21, ‐1.91]

4 Pulse pressure Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1 0.5 mg/day

1

55

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐4.8 [‐13.35, 3.75]

4.2 1 mg/day

1

60

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.1 [‐10.39, 6.19]

4.3 2 mg/day

1

60

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐3.4 [‐11.06, 4.26]

5 WDAE Show forest plot

1

117

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.72 [0.07, 7.67]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 5. Bopindolol vs Placebo
Comparison 6. Oxprenolol vs Placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 SBP Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 (0.25x starting) 20 mg/day

1

26

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.40 [‐8.57, 15.37]

1.2 (0.5x starting) 40 mg/day

1

27

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐6.20 [‐17.93, 5.53]

1.3 (starting dose) 60 & 80 mg/day

1

39

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐11.50 [‐21.60, ‐1.40]

2 DBP Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 (0.25x starting) 20 mg/day

1

26

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.2 [‐2.33, 10.73]

2.2 (0.5x starting) 40 mg/day

1

27

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.40 [‐6.02, 6.82]

2.3 (starting dose) 60 & 80 mg/day

1

39

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐3.30 [‐8.94, 2.34]

3 Pulse pressure Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 (0.25x starting) 20 mg/day

1

26

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

5.3 [‐5.11, 15.71]

3.2 (0.5x starting) 40 mg/day

1

27

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.7 [‐9.51, 10.91]

3.3 (starting dose) 60 & 80 mg/day

1

39

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

2.7 [‐7.71, 13.11]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 6. Oxprenolol vs Placebo
Comparison 7. Pooled partial agonist effects

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 SBP Show forest plot

11

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 0.25x starting dose

1

26

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

3.4 [‐8.58, 15.38]

1.2 0.5x starting dose

2

82

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐6.12 [‐11.36, ‐0.87]

1.3 starting dose

10

384

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐8.11 [‐10.41, ‐5.81]

1.4 2x starting dose

3

180

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐7.95 [‐12.18, ‐3.72]

1.5 4x starting dose

2

106

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐11.04 [‐15.98, ‐6.10]

2 DBP Show forest plot

11

778

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐3.89 [‐4.87, ‐2.91]

2.1 0.25x starting dose

1

26

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

4.2 [‐2.33, 10.73]

2.2 0.5x starting dose

2

82

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.73 [‐4.83, 3.38]

2.3 starting dose

10

384

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐3.81 [‐5.08, ‐2.55]

2.4 2x starting dose

3

180

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐4.41 [‐6.53, ‐2.28]

2.5 4x starting dose

2

106

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐6.71 [‐9.72, ‐3.69]

3 Heart rate Show forest plot

7

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 0.5x starting dose

1

55

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.23 [‐7.33, 2.87]

3.2 1x starting dose

7

200

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐5.96 [‐7.38, ‐4.53]

3.3 2x starting dose

2

86

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.27 [‐4.58, 0.03]

4 Pulse Pressure Show forest plot

11

765

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐3.40 [‐4.94, ‐1.87]

4.1 0.25x starting dose

1

26

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

5.3 [‐5.11, 15.71]

4.2 0.5x starting dose

2

82

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.53 [‐9.09, 4.02]

4.3 1x starting dose

10

371

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐3.58 [‐5.54, ‐1.63]

4.4 2x starting dose

3

180

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐3.76 [‐7.39, ‐0.14]

4.5 4x starting dose

2

106

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐3.88 [‐8.15, 0.40]

5 WDAE Show forest plot

1

117

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.72 [0.07, 7.67]

6 Combined starting and twice the starting dose Show forest plot

10

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

6.1 SBP

10

564

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐8.07 [‐10.09, ‐6.05]

6.2 DBP

10

564

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐3.97 [‐5.05, ‐2.88]

6.3 Heart rate

7

286

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐4.94 [‐6.15, ‐3.73]

6.4 Pulse pressure

10

551

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐3.62 [‐5.34, ‐1.90]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 7. Pooled partial agonist effects