Surgical versus non‐surgical management of abdominal injury
Información
- DOI:
- https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007383.pub2Copiar DOI
- Base de datos:
-
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Versión publicada:
-
- 14 noviembre 2012see what's new
- Tipo:
-
- Intervention
- Etapa:
-
- Review
- Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
-
Grupo Cochrane de Lesiones
- Copyright:
-
- Copyright © 2012 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Cifras del artículo
Altmetric:
Citado por:
Autores
Contributions of authors
The protocol was drafted by AO, UU, and IAI. IAI and UU screened the titles and abstract for potentially relevant studies. They also applied the inclusion criteria independently and selected the paper to be included in the review. Data extraction and assessment of the risk of bias were done by AO and UU. AO wrote the manuscript and IAI and UU commented on the draft of the review.
Sources of support
Internal sources
-
None, Not specified.
External sources
-
No sources of support supplied
Declarations of interest
None known.
Acknowledgements
We wish to acknowledge the support of the Cochrane Injuries Group staff. Karen Blackhall designed the search for studies and Emma Sydenham provided technical and moral support to the review team.
Version history
| Published | Title | Stage | Authors | Version |
| 2015 Nov 13 | Surgical versus non‐surgical management of abdominal injury | Review | Angela Oyo‐Ita, Paul Chinnock, Ikpeme A Ikpeme | |
| 2012 Nov 14 | Surgical versus non‐surgical management of abdominal injury | Review | Angela Oyo‐Ita, Udey G Ugare, Ikpeme A Ikpeme | |
| 2008 Oct 08 | Surgical versus non surgical management of abdominal injury | Protocol | Angela Oyo‐Ita, Udey G Ugare, Ikpeme A Ikpeme | |
Differences between protocol and review
In the protocol the methodological quality of included studies were stated as: assessment of method of random allocation of patients to care, quality of care rendered to the treatment and control groups, the extent of loss to follow‐up and outcome assessment. In the completed review the current risk of bias criteria were used to assess the methodological quality of the included study. We did not perform handsearching as part of the search for studies.
