Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Tratamiento habitual con formoterol para el asma crónica: eventos adversos graves

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006923.pub3Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 18 abril 2012see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Vías respiratorias

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2013 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Christopher J Cates

    Correspondencia a: Population Health Sciences and Education, St George's University of London, London, UK

    [email protected]

  • Matthew J Cates

    Torbay Hospital, Torquay, UK

Contributions of authors

CJC: conception of the idea, study selection and data collection, statistical analysis and co‐writing of the review.
MJC: background information (including Appendices), study selection and co‐writing of the review.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • St George's University of London, UK.

External sources

  • NIHR, UK.

    Programme grant

Declarations of interest

None known.

Acknowledgements

We thank Susan Hansen and Elizabeth Stovold of the Cochrane Airways Group for their assistance in searching for trials and obtaining the abstracts and full reports, and extraction of data on trial characteristics, Toby Lasserson for assistance in checking outcome data and Anne Tattersfield for helpful comments. We are grateful to Martin Shaw (Novartis) for providing data in relation to FitzGerald 1999, Onno van Schayck for providing data for van Schayck 2002, Vincent Le Gros (Novartis) for providing data in relation to Molimard 2001, Andrea von Berg for providing data in relation to Von Berg 2003 and Robyn Von Maltzahn (AstraZeneca) for providing data in relation to Ekstrom 1998; Ekstrom 1998a; van der Molen 1997; Zimmerman 2004.

CRG Funding Acknowledgement: The National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) is the largest single funder of the Cochrane Airways Group.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2012 Apr 18

Regular treatment with formoterol for chronic asthma: serious adverse events

Review

Christopher J Cates, Matthew J Cates

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006923.pub3

2008 Oct 08

Regular treatment with formoterol for chronic asthma: serious adverse events

Review

Christopher J Cates, Matthew J Cates, Toby J Lasserson

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006923.pub2

2008 Jan 23

Regular treatment with formoterol for chronic asthma: serious adverse events

Protocol

Christopher J Cates, Matthew J Cates, Toby J Lasserson

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006923

Differences between protocol and review

We did not use risk difference as the primary metric for analysis of rare events, due to new advice in the latest revision of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Higgins 2008). One of the peer reviewers also pointed out that Bradburn 2007 cautions against the use of inverse‐variance and DerSimonian and Laird methods for sparse data, so for the 2009 update we used the Peto OR for the primary analysis, as no continuity correction is required for zero cells. This brings the analysis for this review in line with the other reviews in this series.

Also we investigated reporting bias by comparing published and unpublished serious adverse events, and investigating the impact of using drug‐related adverse events and the combined results from serious and non‐serious adverse events.

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.