Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Heparina no fraccionada subcutánea para el tratamiento inicial de la tromboembolia venosa

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006771.pub3Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 14 febrero 2017see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Vascular

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2018 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Lindsay Robertson

    Correspondencia a: Cochrane Common Mental Disorders Group, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

  • James Strachan

    Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

Contributions of authors

JS: selected and assessed the quality of trials for inclusion in this update, extracted and entered data for analyses, and wrote the text of the review.
LR: selected and assessed the quality of trials for inclusion in this update, extracted and entered data for analyses, and wrote the text of the review.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No sources of support supplied

External sources

  • Chief Scientist Office, Scottish Government Health Directorates, The Scottish Government, UK.

    The Cochrane Vascular editorial base is supported by the Chief Scientist Office.

  • National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), UK.

    This project was supported by the NIHR, via Cochrane Programme Grant funding Cochrane Vascular (13/89/23). The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Systematic Reviews Programme, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health.

Declarations of interest

JS: none known.
LR: none known.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr M Vardi, Dr E Zittan, and Dr H Bitterman for their contributions to previous versions of this review.

We would like to thank Dr K Welch for searching the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library (www.thecochranelibrary.com). We would also like to thank Dr M Stewart, Managing Editor of Cochrane Vascular for her assistance and advice in completing this review.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2017 Feb 14

Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism

Review

Lindsay Robertson, James Strachan

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006771.pub3

2009 Oct 07

Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism

Review

Moshe Vardi, Eran Zittan, Haim Bitterman

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006771.pub2

2009 Jul 08

Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin for the treatment of venous thromboembolism

Protocol

Moshe Vardi, Haim Bitterman

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006771

Differences between protocol and review

For this update, we amended the outcomes of the review to reflect current terminology and practice. We redefined the outcome 'treatment‐related serious adverse effects, i.e. major bleeding; overall mortality' as two events, namely 'all‐cause mortality' and 'major bleeding'. In addition, we used a more comprehensive definition of bleeding.

Notes

This Cochrane review has been marked stable and will only be updated if new studies are identified as people are moving towards LMWH and newer drugs in favour of UFH.

Keywords

MeSH

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Study flow diagram.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

Methodological quality graph: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Methodological quality graph: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Methodological quality summary: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Methodological quality summary: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item for each included study.

Comparison 1 Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus intravenous unfractionated heparin, Outcome 1 Symptomatic recurrent VTE at 3 months.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus intravenous unfractionated heparin, Outcome 1 Symptomatic recurrent VTE at 3 months.

Comparison 1 Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus intravenous unfractionated heparin, Outcome 2 Symptomatic recurrent DVT at 3 months.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus intravenous unfractionated heparin, Outcome 2 Symptomatic recurrent DVT at 3 months.

Comparison 1 Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus intravenous unfractionated heparin, Outcome 3 PE at 3 months.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus intravenous unfractionated heparin, Outcome 3 PE at 3 months.

Comparison 1 Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus intravenous unfractionated heparin, Outcome 4 VTE‐related mortality at 3 months.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus intravenous unfractionated heparin, Outcome 4 VTE‐related mortality at 3 months.

Comparison 1 Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus intravenous unfractionated heparin, Outcome 5 Major bleeding.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus intravenous unfractionated heparin, Outcome 5 Major bleeding.

Comparison 1 Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus intravenous unfractionated heparin, Outcome 6 All‐cause mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus intravenous unfractionated heparin, Outcome 6 All‐cause mortality.

Comparison 1 Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus intravenous unfractionated heparin, Outcome 7 Treatment related morbidity ‐ minor bleeding.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus intravenous unfractionated heparin, Outcome 7 Treatment related morbidity ‐ minor bleeding.

Comparison 2 Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparin, Outcome 1 Symptomatic recurrent VTE at 3 months.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparin, Outcome 1 Symptomatic recurrent VTE at 3 months.

Comparison 2 Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparin, Outcome 2 Symptomatic recurrent DVT at 3 months.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparin, Outcome 2 Symptomatic recurrent DVT at 3 months.

Comparison 2 Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparin, Outcome 3 PE at 3 months.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparin, Outcome 3 PE at 3 months.

Comparison 2 Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparin, Outcome 4 VTE‐related mortality at 3 months.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparin, Outcome 4 VTE‐related mortality at 3 months.

Comparison 2 Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparin, Outcome 5 Major bleeding.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.5

Comparison 2 Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparin, Outcome 5 Major bleeding.

Comparison 2 Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparin, Outcome 6 All‐cause mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.6

Comparison 2 Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparin, Outcome 6 All‐cause mortality.

Comparison 2 Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparin, Outcome 7 Treatment related morbidity ‐ minor bleeding.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.7

Comparison 2 Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparin, Outcome 7 Treatment related morbidity ‐ minor bleeding.

Comparison 2 Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparin, Outcome 8 Treatment related morbidity ‐ HIT.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.8

Comparison 2 Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparin, Outcome 8 Treatment related morbidity ‐ HIT.

Comparison 3 Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparin (excluding large studies), Outcome 1 Symptomatic recurrent VTE at 3 months.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparin (excluding large studies), Outcome 1 Symptomatic recurrent VTE at 3 months.

Comparison 3 Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparin (excluding large studies), Outcome 2 Symptomatic recurrent DVT at 3 months.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparin (excluding large studies), Outcome 2 Symptomatic recurrent DVT at 3 months.

Comparison 3 Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparin (excluding large studies), Outcome 3 PE at 3 months.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3 Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparin (excluding large studies), Outcome 3 PE at 3 months.

Comparison 3 Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparin (excluding large studies), Outcome 4 VTE‐related mortality at 3 months.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.4

Comparison 3 Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparin (excluding large studies), Outcome 4 VTE‐related mortality at 3 months.

Comparison 3 Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparin (excluding large studies), Outcome 5 Major bleeding.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.5

Comparison 3 Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparin (excluding large studies), Outcome 5 Major bleeding.

Comparison 3 Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparin (excluding large studies), Outcome 6 All‐cause mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.6

Comparison 3 Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparin (excluding large studies), Outcome 6 All‐cause mortality.

Comparison 3 Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparin (excluding large studies), Outcome 7 Treatment‐related morbidity.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.7

Comparison 3 Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparin (excluding large studies), Outcome 7 Treatment‐related morbidity.

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin compared to intravenous unfractionated heparin for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism

Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin compared to intravenous unfractionated heparin for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism

Patient or population: people aged ≥ 18 years with a diagnosis of new or recurrent VTE
Setting: inpatient and outpatient
Intervention: subcutaneous unfractionated heparin
Comparison: intravenous unfractionated heparin

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

Number of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Risk with intravenous unfractionated heparin

Risk with subcutaneous unfractionated heparin

Symptomatic recurrent VTE at 3 months

Study population

OR 1.66
(0.89 to 3.10)

965
(8 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowa

35 per 1000

57 per 1000
(32 to 102)

Symptomatic recurrent DVT at 3 months

Study population

OR 3.29
(0.64 to 17.06)

115
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowb

34 per 1000

105 per 1000
(22 to 379)

PE at 3 months

Study population

OR 1.44
(0.73 to 2.84)

1161
(9 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowc

26 per 1000

37 per 1000
(19 to 70)

VTE‐related mortality at 3 months

Study population

OR 0.98
(0.20 to 4.88)

1168
(9 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowc

3 per 1000

3 per 1000
(1 to 17)

Major bleedingd

(7 days ‐ 12 months)

Study population

OR 0.91
(0.42 to 1.97)

583
(4 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowe

48 per 1000

44 per 1000
(21 to 91)

All‐cause mortality

(5 days to 12 months)

Study population

OR 1.74
(0.67 to 4.51)

972
(8 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowa

12 per 1000

21 per 1000
(8 to 54)

Asymptomatic VTE at 3 months

No study measured this outcome

*The basis for the assumed risk was the average risk in the intravenous unfractionated heparin group (i.e. the number of participants with events divided by total number of participants of the intravenous heparin group included in the meta‐analysis). The risk in the subcutaneous unfractionated heparin group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the intravenous unfractionated heparin group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; DVT: deep vein thrombosis; PE: pulmonary embolism; RCT: randomised controlled trial; OR: odds ratio; VTE: venous thromboembolism

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate quality: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low quality: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Very low quality: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

aWe downgraded the quality of the evidence to low due to a high risk of performance bias in eight studies (Andersson 1982; Belcaro 1999; Bentley 1980; Doyle 1987; Krähenbühl 1979; Lopaciuk 1990; Pini 1990; Walker 1987), plus a high risk of attrition bias in five studies (Andersson 1982; Belcaro 1999; Bentley 1980; Krähenbühl 1979; Pini 1990). We also downgraded for imprecision, as reflected by the wide confidence intervals.
bWe downgraded the quality of the evidence to low for imprecision as only one study with a small number of participants was included, leading to a wide confidence interval around the effect estimate (Hull 1986).
cWe downgraded the quality of the evidence to low due to a high risk of performance bias in seven studies (Andersson 1982; Bentley 1980; Doyle 1987; Krähenbühl 1979; Lopaciuk 1990; Pini 1990; Walker 1987), plus a high risk of attrition bias in four studies (Andersson 1982; Bentley 1980; Krähenbühl 1979; Pini 1990). We also downgraded for imprecision reflected by the wide confidence intervals.
d Major bleeding as defined by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) (Schulman 2005); fatal bleeding; symptomatic bleeding in a critical area or organ, such as intracranial, intraspinal, intraocular, retroperitoneal, intra‐articular or pericardial, or intramuscular with compartment syndrome; bleeding causing a fall in haemoglobin level of 20 g/L (1.24 mmol/L) or more, or leading to transfusion of two or more units of whole blood or red cells; any combination of the above.
eWe downgraded the quality of the evidence to low due to a high risk of performance bias in three studies (Doyle 1987; Lopaciuk 1990; Pini 1990), plus a high risk of attrition bias in one study (Pini 1990). We also downgraded for imprecision, as reflected by the wide confidence intervals.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin compared to intravenous unfractionated heparin for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism
Summary of findings 2. Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin compared to low molecular weight heparin for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism

Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin compared to low molecular weight heparin for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism

Patient or population: people aged ≥ 18 years with a diagnosis of new or recurrent VTE
Setting: inpatient and outpatient
Intervention: subcutaneous unfractionated heparin
Comparison: low molecular weight heparin

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

Number of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Risk with low molecular weight heparin

Risk with subcutaneous unfractionated heparin

Symptomatic recurrent VTE at 3 months

Study population

OR 1.01
(0.63 to 1.63)

2156
(5 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowa

31 per 1000

32 per 1000
(20 to 50)

Symptomatic recurrent DVT at 3 months

Study population

OR 1.38
(0.73 to 2.63)

1566
(3 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowb

20 per 1000

28 per 1000
(15 to 52)

PE at 3 months

Study population

OR 0.84
(0.36 to 1.96)

1819
(5 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowa

12 per 1000

10 per 1000
(4 to 23)

VTE‐related mortality at 3 months

Study population

OR 0.53
(0.17 to 1.67)

2469
(8 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowc

6 per 1000

3 per 1000
(1 to 11)

Major bleedingd (3 months)

Study population

OR 0.72
(0.43 to 1.20)

2300
(5 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowa

31 per 1000

23 per 1000
(14 to 37)

All‐cause mortality (7 days ‐ 3 months)

Study population

OR 0.73
(0.50 to 1.07)

2272
(7 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowe

58 per 1000

43 per 1000
(30 to 62)

Asymptomatic VTE at 3 months

No study measured this outcome

*The basis for the assumed risk was the average risk in the low molecular weight heparin group (i.e. the number of participants with events divided by total number of participants of the low molecular weight heparin group included in the meta‐analysis). The risk in the subcutaneous unfractionated heparin group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the low molecular weight heparin group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; DVT: deep vein thrombosis; PE: pulmonary embolism; RCT: randomised controlled trial; OR: odds ratio; VTE: venous thromboembolism

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate quality: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low quality: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Very low quality: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

aWe downgraded the quality of the evidence to low due to high risk of selection and reporting bias in one study (Holm 1986), plus a high risk of performance bias in four studies (Kearon 2006; Leizorovicz 2011; Lopaciuk 1992; Prandoni 2004). We also downgraded for imprecision, as reflected by the wide confidence intervals.
bWe downgraded the quality of the evidence to low due to a high risk of performance bias in three studies (Kearon 2006; Lopaciuk 1992; Prandoni 2004). We also downgraded for imprecision, as reflected by the wide confidence intervals.
cWe downgraded the quality of the evidence to low due to a high risk of performance bias in seven studies (Belcaro 1999; Faivre 1987; Kearon 2006; Leizorovicz 2011; Lopaciuk 1992; Peternel 2002; Prandoni 2004), a high risk of attrition bias in three studies (Belcaro 1999; Faivre 1987; Peternel 2002), and a high risk of selection and reporting bias in one study (Holm 1986). We also downgraded for imprecision, as reflected by the wide confidence intervals.
d Major bleeding as defined by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) (Schulman 2005); fatal bleeding; symptomatic bleeding in a critical area or organ, such as intracranial, intraspinal, intraocular, retroperitoneal, intra‐articular or pericardial, or intramuscular with compartment syndrome; bleeding causing a fall in haemoglobin level of 20 g/L (1.24 mmol/L) or more, or leading to transfusion of two or more units of whole blood or red cells; any combination of the above.
eWe downgraded the quality of the evidence to low due to a high risk of performance bias in six studies (Faivre 1987; Kearon 2006; Leizorovicz 2011; Lopaciuk 1992; Peternel 2002; Prandoni 2004), a high risk of attrition bias in two studies (Faivre 1987; Peternel 2002), and a high risk of selection and reporting bias in one study (Holm 1986). We also downgraded for imprecision reflected by the wide confidence intervals.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 2. Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin compared to low molecular weight heparin for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism
Comparison 1. Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus intravenous unfractionated heparin

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Symptomatic recurrent VTE at 3 months Show forest plot

8

965

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.66 [0.89, 3.10]

1.1 DVT with/without PE

8

965

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.66 [0.89, 3.10]

2 Symptomatic recurrent DVT at 3 months Show forest plot

1

115

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.29 [0.64, 17.06]

2.1 DVT with/without PE

1

115

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.29 [0.64, 17.06]

3 PE at 3 months Show forest plot

9

1161

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.44 [0.73, 2.84]

3.1 DVT with/without PE

9

1161

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.44 [0.73, 2.84]

4 VTE‐related mortality at 3 months Show forest plot

9

1168

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.20, 4.88]

4.1 DVT with/without PE

9

1168

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.20, 4.88]

5 Major bleeding Show forest plot

4

583

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.42, 1.97]

5.1 DVT with/without PE

4

583

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.42, 1.97]

6 All‐cause mortality Show forest plot

8

972

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.74 [0.67, 4.51]

6.1 DVT with/without PE

8

972

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.74 [0.67, 4.51]

7 Treatment related morbidity ‐ minor bleeding Show forest plot

5

779

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.63 [0.33, 1.20]

7.1 DVT with/without PE

5

779

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.63 [0.33, 1.20]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus intravenous unfractionated heparin
Comparison 2. Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparin

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Symptomatic recurrent VTE at 3 months Show forest plot

5

2156

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.63, 1.63]

1.1 DVT with/without PE

3

1954

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.57, 1.56]

1.2 DVT without PE

2

202

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.12 [0.38, 11.84]

2 Symptomatic recurrent DVT at 3 months Show forest plot

3

1566

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.38 [0.73, 2.63]

2.1 DVT with/without PE

2

1420

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.27 [0.65, 2.46]

2.2 DVT without PE

1

146

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.28 [0.25, 111.99]

3 PE at 3 months Show forest plot

5

1819

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.84 [0.36, 1.96]

3.1 DVT with/without PE

2

1420

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.80 [0.31, 2.04]

3.2 DVT without PE

3

399

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.05 [0.14, 7.63]

4 VTE‐related mortality at 3 months Show forest plot

8

2469

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.53 [0.17, 1.67]

4.1 DVT with/without PE

4

2016

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.53 [0.17, 1.67]

4.2 DVT without PE

4

453

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Major bleeding Show forest plot

5

2300

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.72 [0.43, 1.20]

5.1 DVT with/without PE

3

1957

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.69 [0.41, 1.16]

5.2 DVT without PE

2

343

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.13 [0.13, 78.00]

6 All‐cause mortality Show forest plot

7

2272

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.73 [0.50, 1.07]

6.1 DVT with/without PE

4

2016

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.71 [0.48, 1.05]

6.2 DVT without PE

3

256

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.71 [0.22, 13.26]

7 Treatment related morbidity ‐ minor bleeding Show forest plot

5

2300

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.71, 1.37]

7.1 DVT with/without PE

3

1957

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.69, 1.43]

7.2 DVT without PE

2

343

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.44, 2.05]

8 Treatment related morbidity ‐ HIT Show forest plot

3

1954

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.52 [0.25, 9.14]

8.1 DVT with/without PE

3

1954

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.52 [0.25, 9.14]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparin
Comparison 3. Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparin (excluding large studies)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Symptomatic recurrent VTE at 3 months Show forest plot

3

736

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.80 [0.29, 2.16]

2 Symptomatic recurrent DVT at 3 months Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3 PE at 3 months Show forest plot

3

399

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.05 [0.14, 7.63]

4 VTE‐related mortality at 3 months Show forest plot

6

1049

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.06, 16.13]

5 Major bleeding Show forest plot

3

880

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.92 [0.41, 2.09]

6 All‐cause mortality Show forest plot

5

852

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.58 [0.32, 1.03]

7 Treatment‐related morbidity Show forest plot

3

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

7.1 Minor bleeding

3

880

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.60, 1.30]

7.2 Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia

1

534

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.05 [0.19, 22.78]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparin (excluding large studies)