Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Corticosteroids for preventing neonatal respiratory morbidity after elective caesarean section at term

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006614.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 07 octubre 2009see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Embarazo y parto

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Alexandros Sotiriadis

    Correspondencia a: Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Clinical Trials and Evidence‐based Medicine Unit, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece

    [email protected]

  • George Makrydimas

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece

  • Stefania Papatheodorou

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece

  • John PA Ioannidis

    Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Clinical Trials and Evidence‐based Medicine Unit, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece

Contributions of authors

For the protocol Alexandros Sotiriadis (AS) prepared the first draft and revised it in response to editorial comments. George Makrydimas (GM) and John PA Ionannidis (JI) commented on the drafts.

For this review, AS and GM assessed potential studies. Stefania Papatheodorou (SP) and AS extracted the data, entered it into RevMan, assessed studies for risk of bias, and tabulated the results. All authors contributed in preparation of the review.

Declarations of interest

None known.

Acknowledgements

The authors cordially thank Dr Peter Stutchfield of the ASTECS group for providing non‐published data on subgroup analysis by gestational age and clarifications on published data.

As part of the pre‐publication editorial process, this review has been commented on by two peers (an editor and referee who is external to the editorial team), a member of the Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's international panel of consumers and the Group's Statistical Adviser.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2021 Dec 22

Antenatal corticosteroids prior to planned caesarean at term for improving neonatal outcomes

Review

Alexandros Sotiriadis, Emma McGoldrick, George Makrydimas, Stefania Papatheodorou, John PA Ioannidis, Fiona Stewart, Roses Parker

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006614.pub4

2018 Aug 03

Corticosteroids for preventing neonatal respiratory morbidity after elective caesarean section at term

Review

Alexandros Sotiriadis, George Makrydimas, Stefania Papatheodorou, John PA Ioannidis, Emma McGoldrick

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006614.pub3

2009 Oct 07

Corticosteroids for preventing neonatal respiratory morbidity after elective caesarean section at term

Review

Alexandros Sotiriadis, George Makrydimas, Stefania Papatheodorou, John PA Ioannidis

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006614.pub2

2009 Jul 08

Corticosteroids for preventing neonatal respiratory morbidity after elective caesarean section at term

Protocol

Alexandros Sotiriadis, George Makrydimas, John PA Ioannidis

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006614

Differences between protocol and review

The original outcome "Admission to the neonatal special care unit or above" was split into a primary outcome (Admission to neonatal special care for respiratory morbidity (all levels of care or intensive care unit (NICU))) and a secondary outcome (Admission to neonatal special care for any indication (all levels of care or intensive care unit (NICU))). This was done because, in the case of non‐blinded trials, there is a possibility of bias, as infants in the treatment group may have been less likely to have had their reason for admission classified as “respiratory” because they were known to have received corticosteroids. Furthermore, special care was split into two categories "special care ‐ all levels" and "special care ‐ NICU", as different levels of care may reflect different severity of respiratory distress.

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.