Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Quantitative versus qualitative cultures of respiratory secretions for clinical outcomes in patients with ventilator‐associated pneumonia

Esta versión no es la más reciente

ver la versión actual 30 octubre 2014

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006482.pub3Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 18 enero 2012see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:

  1. Grupo Cochrane de Infecciones respiratorias agudas

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2012 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Danilo Cortozi Berton

    Department of Pulmonary Medicine ‐ Pavilhão Pereira Filho ‐ Santa Casa de Porto Alegre, Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre (UFCSPA) and Feevale University, Porto Alegre, Brazil

  • Andre C Kalil

    Transplant ID Program, Nebraska Medical Centre, Omaha, USA

  • Paulo José Zimermann Teixeira

    Correspondencia a: Department of Pulmonary Medicine ‐ Pavilhão Pereira Filho ‐ Santa Casa de Porto Alegre, Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre (UFCSPA) and Feevale University, Porto Alegre, Brazil

    [email protected]

Contributions of authors

Danilo Cortozi Berton (DCB), Andre Kalil (AK) and Paulo José Zimermann Teixeira (PJZT) wrote the draft protocol.
AK revised the methodology section.
PJZT and DCB were responsible for identifying studies and extracting data.
All review authors contributed to the review.

Declarations of interest

None known.

Acknowledgements

The review authors would like to thank the following people for commenting on the draft protocol and/or review: Elizabeth Lissiman, Antoni Torres, Bernard Allaouchiche, Terry Neeman, Allen Cheng, Carlos Luna and Janet Wale. We further would like to acknowledge Elizabeth Dooley for all her support and Hayley Edmonds for her assistance with the organisation of translations.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2014 Oct 30

Quantitative versus qualitative cultures of respiratory secretions for clinical outcomes in patients with ventilator‐associated pneumonia

Review

Danilo Cortozi Berton, Andre C Kalil, Paulo José Zimermann Teixeira

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006482.pub4

2012 Jan 18

Quantitative versus qualitative cultures of respiratory secretions for clinical outcomes in patients with ventilator‐associated pneumonia

Review

Danilo Cortozi Berton, Andre C Kalil, Paulo José Zimermann Teixeira

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006482.pub3

2008 Oct 08

Quantitative versus qualitative cultures of respiratory secretions for clinical outcomes in patients with ventilator‐associated pneumonia

Review

Danilo Cortozi Berton, Andre C Kalil, Manuela Cavalcanti, Paulo José Zimermann Teixeira

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006482.pub2

2007 Apr 18

Quantitative versus qualitative cultures of respiratory secretions for clinical outcomes in patients with ventilator‐associated pneumonia

Protocol

Danilo Cortozi Berton, Andre C Kalil, Manuela Cavalcanti, Paulo José Zimermann Teixeira

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006482

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.