Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Ciclofosfamida versus ifosfamida para niños y adultos jóvenes con sarcoma de tejidos blandos y óseo

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006300.pub4Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 30 septiembre 2015see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Cáncer infantil

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2015 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Renée L Mulder

    Correspondencia a: Department of Paediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands

    [email protected]

  • Marios Paulidesa

    Drug Commission of the German Medical Association, Berlin, Germany

    Joint first authorship with Renée L Mulder

  • Thorsten Langer

    Pediatric Oncology Hematology, University Hospital for Children and Adolescents, Lübeck, Germany

  • Leontien CM Kremer

    Department of Paediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands

  • Elvira C van Dalen

    Department of Paediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Contributions of authors

Renée L Mulder assessed studies against the inclusion criteria. She searched for unpublished and ongoing studies. She contributed to the interpretation of the results. She wrote and revised the review.

Marios Paulides designed the review and wrote the protocol. He assessed studies against the inclusion criteria. He contributed to the interpretation of the results. He critically reviewed the review.

Thorsten Langer critically reviewed the protocol. He contributed to the interpretation of the results. He critically reviewed the review.

Leontien CM Kremer designed the review and critically reviewed the protocol. She contributed to the interpretation of the results. She critically reviewed the review.

Elvira C van Dalen designed the review and wrote the protocol. She developed the search strategy. She assessed studies against the inclusion criteria. She searched for unpublished and ongoing studies. She interpreted the results. She wrote and revised the review.

All authors approved the final version.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No sources of support supplied

External sources

  • Foundation of Pediatric Cancer Research (SKK) Amsterdam, Netherlands.

  • Stichting Kinderen Kankervrij (KIKA), Netherlands.

Declarations of interest

None known.

Acknowledgements

Leontien Kremer and Elvira van Dalen, the Co‐ordinating Editors of the Childhood Cancer Group, are co‐authors of this review and therefore they could not act as the Co‐ordinating Editors for this review. Wim J Tissing (Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands) was willing to take on this task, for which we thank him. Also, we thank Edith Leclercq, the Trials Search Co‐ordinator of the Childhood Cancer Group, for running the search strategy in the different databases and providing us with the titles and abstracts of the searches, and Wolfgang Stöhr for his help in preparing the protocol for this review. The editorial base of the Cochrane Childhood Cancer Group is funded by Kinderen Kankervrij (KIKA).

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2015 Sep 30

Cyclophosphamide versus ifosfamide for paediatric and young adult bone and soft tissue sarcoma patients

Review

Renée L Mulder, Marios Paulides, Thorsten Langer, Leontien CM Kremer, Elvira C van Dalen

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006300.pub4

2012 Dec 12

Cyclophosphamide versus ifosfamide for paediatric and young adult bone and soft tissue sarcoma patients

Review

Renée L Mulder, Marios Paulides, Thorsten Langer, Leontien CM Kremer, Elvira C van Dalen

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006300.pub3

2010 Feb 17

Cyclophosphamide versus ifosfamide for paediatric and young adult bone and soft tissue sarcoma patients

Review

Renée L Mulder, Marios Paulides, Thorsten Langer, Leontien CM Kremer, Elvira C van Dalen

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006300.pub2

2006 Oct 18

Cyclophosphamide versus ifosfamide for paediatric and young adult bone and soft tissue sarcoma patients

Protocol

Renée L Mulder, Marios Paulides, Thorsten Langer, Leontien CM Kremer, Elvira C van Dalen

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006300

Keywords

MeSH

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.