Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

درمان زخم با فشار منفی در سوختگی‌هایی با ضخامت نسبی

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006215.pub4Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 15 diciembre 2014see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Heridas

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2014 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Jo C Dumville

    Correspondencia a: School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

    [email protected]

  • Christopher Munson

    Plastic Surgery Department, St John's Hospital at Howden, Livingston, UK

  • Janice Christie

    School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

Contributions of authors

Jo Dumville: literature searching, study selection, risk of bias assessment, writing and updating review.
Christopher Munson: literature searching, study selection, drafting written submission of review update.
Janice Christie: literature searching, writing and updating review.

Contributions of editorial base

Nicky Cullum: edited the review, advised on methodology, interpretation and review content. Approved the final review and review update prior to submission.
Sally Bell‐Syer: co‐ordinated the editorial process. Advised on methodology, interpretation and content. Edited the review and the updated review, checked the search results for the update and actioned feedback from the copy editors.
Amanda Briant: ran the searches for the update.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No sources of support supplied

External sources

  • The National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) is the sole funder of the Cochrane Wounds Group, UK.

Declarations of interest

None known.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Sally Bell‐Syer for her ongoing support and commitment, and acknowledge the Wounds Group Editors (Nicky Cullum, Andrea Nelson and Gill Worthy) and referees (Susanne Hempel, Tom Potokar and Durhane Wong‐Rieger) for their comments on both the protocol and review. The first update of this review was copy edited by Helena Mullineaux and Nancy Owens. This update was copy edited by Elizabeth Royle.

The authors would like to acknowledge the contribution of Jason Wasiak and Heather Cleland who drafted the protocol, undertook study selection and wrote the original version of the review (Wasiak 2007). They did not wish to be involved in the current and future updates of this review.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2014 Dec 15

Negative pressure wound therapy for partial‐thickness burns

Review

Jo C Dumville, Christopher Munson, Janice Christie

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006215.pub4

2012 Dec 12

Negative pressure wound therapy for partial‐thickness burns

Review

Jo C Dumville, Christopher Munson

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006215.pub3

2007 Jul 18

Topical negative pressure (TNP) for partial thickness burns

Review

Jason Wasiak, Heather Cleland

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006215.pub2

2006 Oct 18

Topical negative pressure for partial thickness burns

Protocol

Jason Wasiak, Heather Cleland

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006215

Keywords

MeSH

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.