Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Prenatal education for congenital toxoplasmosis

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Contraer todo Desplegar todo

Abstract

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows:

The primary objectives of this review are to assess the efficacy of prenatal education to reduce the rate of:
(1) new cases of congenital toxoplasmosis;
(2) toxoplasmosis seroconversion during pregnancy.

Secondary objectives are to assess the efficacy of prenatal education to increase the rate of:
(1) pregnant women's knowledge on risk factors for acquiring toxoplasmosis infection;
(2) pregnant women's awareness of the importance to avoid toxoplasmosis infection during pregnancy;
(3) pregnant women's behavior with respect to avoidance of risk factors for toxoplasmosis infection during pregnancy.

Background

Congenital toxoplasmosis is a rare (NSC 2001) but potentially severe parasitic infection that can lead to intrauterine death or stillbirth, malformation, mental retardation, deafness and blindness of the infected infant (Montoya 2004). It is caused by Toxoplasma gondii (T. gondii). T. gondii is one of the most common infectious pathogenic animal parasites of man, belonging to the phylum apicomplexa group (Montoya 2004). Other members of this phylum include known human pathogens such as Plasmodium (malaria) and Cryptosporidium. It is acquired by ingesting oocysts excreted by cats, contaminated soil or water, or by eating the undercooked meat of infected animals, which contain tissue cysts (Gilbert 2002; Montoya 2004). Most cases of toxoplasmosis infection are asymptomatic and self‐limited except for congenital infection and immunocompromised patients (Montoya 2004); hence many cases remain undiagnosed. The incubation period of acquired infection is estimated to be within the range of four and 21 days (seven days on average) (Rorman 2006). Serological surveys demonstrate that world‐wide exposure to T. gondii is high (30% in US and 50% to 80% in Europe) (Rorman 2006). The susceptibility of pregnant women (that is the rate of seronegative pregnant women) to toxoplasmosis varies between countries. It is up to 90% in northern Europe, where T. gondii is not so common (Cook 2000; Gilbert 2002). When infection does occur during pregnancy, T. gondii can be transmitted from the mother to the fetus (vertical transmission) and can lead to congenital toxoplasmosis. Multiple factors are associated with the occurrence of congenital toxoplasmosis infection, including route of transmission, climate, cultural behaviour, eating habits and hygenic standards (Rorman 2006). The probability of transmission of the parasite to the fetus varies according to the gestational age and the risk is greater during the third trimester (from 5% at 12 weeks to 80% just before delivery) (Gilbert 2002). Conversely, the severity of the condition, that is the risk of the fetus to develop major clinical signs, decreases with increasing gestational age (from 60% at 12 weeks to 5% just before delivery) (Gilbert 2002). Clinical features include hydrocephalus (excessive accumulation of cerebrospinal fluid within the cranium), microcephaly (abnormal smallness of the head, usually associated with mental retardation), deafness, cerebral calcifications, seizures and psychomotor retardation. Signs of a systemic infection may also be present at birth, including fever, rash, and enlargement of liver and spleen. Fetal infection can cause inflammatory lesions of the retina and choroids that can lead to visual impairment. Moreover, it can cause lesions of the brain leading to mental damage; more rarely the infection can cause the death of the fetus or of the newborn (Gilbert 2002; Montoya 2004; NSC 2001). Severe damage in infancy occurs in 5% of congenital toxoplasmosis cases while intracranial or ocular lesions are observed in 20% to 30% of cases by three years of age (Gilbert 2002). Although there is no consensus on the most appropriate screening or treatment for congenital toxoplasmosis, three possible approaches have been proposed: prenatal screening, neonatal screening and primary prevention (Gilbert 2002).

Prenatal screening
Prenatal screening (secondary prevention), offered in some European countries, for example France, Switzerland, Germany, Austria and Italy where the incidence of T. gondii maternal infection is more frequent, is based on the timely detection of the mother's infection by a serum test for toxoplasma IgG and IgM (NSC 2001). If the first prenatal test shows signs of recent infection or a seroconversion is detected during pregnancy, a confirmatory test is required before starting treatment with spiramycin or pyrimethamine‐sulfadoxine or both (Foulon 1999a; Gilbert 2002; Montoya 2004). Diagnosis of fetal infection is performed by amniocentesis, which is known to be associated with 1% risk of miscarriage (Alfirevic 2003) and testing of the amniotic fluid for the detection of the parasite or, most recently, of toxoplasma DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique. Congenital toxoplasmosis can also be diagnosed by cordocentesis, that consists in drawing fetal blood from the umbilical cord, and the detection of the parasite or specific immunoglobulin (IgM and IgA) in the fetal blood, but the risk of complications due to the procedure is higher (Bader 1997; Foulon 1999b; Gilbert 2002). If fetal infection is confirmed, the parents can decide either to terminate the pregnancy or to opt for drug treatment. Prenatal screening, although advocated by some as essential for reducing congenital toxoplasmosis (Boyer 2005), has several limitations: false‐positive toxoplasma IgM results are common, false‐positive toxoplasma IgG are less common but also possible (Gilbert 2002; Montoya 2004); moreover, the rate of false‐positive test results can increase notably in settings where local prevalence of the infection is lower; there can be organizational problems or problems of acceptability due to the need to repeat the serum test every four to six weeks in seronegative women (Bader 1997); there is no evidence on the efficacy of antenatal treatment in reducing transmission to the fetus nor of improving neonatal outcomes or reducing functional impairment in later childhood (Montoya 2004; Peyron 1999); there are problems concerning the accuracy of the diagnostic test for fetal infection, particularly the lack of a standardized technique for PCR (Chabbert 2004; Foulon 1999b; Thalib 2005). Finally, this strategy causes additional fetal losses, that are healthy fetuses lost due to amniocentesis and to elective terminations of pregnancy: it has been estimated that the number of additional losses necessary to prevent one additional case of toxoplasmosis can be as high as 18.5 in case of universal screening in a setting with a low incidence of T. gondii maternal infection like the USA (Bader 1997).

Neonatal screening
Neonatal screening (tertiary prevention), adopted in Poland, Denmark and some areas of the USA (NSC 2001), consists of the diagnosis of newborn infection through detection of toxoplasma specific IgM on Guthrie card blood spots. In fact, up to 90% of infected infants are asymptomatic at birth and will show clinical symptoms only in later life (Stegmann 2002). Current guidelines suggest that infected infants should receive treatment with pyrimethamine and sulfadiazine for up to one year regardless of symptoms (Gilbert 2002). Even if this strategy is technically feasible and less costly than prenatal screening, there is no evidence that treating the infected children has any effect (Gilbert 2002; Lebech 1999). Moreover, this approach is ineffective on irreversible damages already present at birth. Considering such limitations, neonatal screening should be adopted only in places where other options are not available; the implications of such a policy should be fully discussed with the parents of the newborn tested.

Primary prevention
Primary prevention can involve the whole population, by educating the general public and filtering water, and veterinary public health intervention (such as labeling to indicate toxoplasma‐free meat and improved farm hygiene to reduce animal infection): this will reduce the protozoan circulation and could be an option but up to now there is not enough research to determine the feasibility and efficacy of this approach (Gilbert 2002; NSC 2001). Another possibility is primary prevention based on prenatal education of pregnant women or women of reproductive age to avoid toxoplasmosis in pregnancy (Gilbert 2002). In fact, sources and risk factors for contracting toxoplasmosis are well known (Cook 2000) and can be avoided by adopting simple behavioral measures like not eating raw or insufficiently cooked meat, washing hands thoroughly after handling raw meat and after gardening, avoiding contact with cats' faeces (directly or indirectly through the soil, or possibly contaminated raw vegetables or fruits) (Cook 2000; Gilbert 2002). Primary prevention based on prenatal education, if proven to be effective, could be a good strategy to reduce congenital toxoplasmosis, since it will not imply any of the problems linked to secondary and tertiary prevention strategies discussed above.

Readers may wish to refer to the following Cochrane systematic reviews for further information about toxoplasmosis in pregnancy: 'Timing and type of prenatal treatment for congenital toxoplasmosis' (Thiébaut 2003) and 'Treatments for toxoplasmosis in pregnancy' (Peyron 1999).

Objectives

The primary objectives of this review are to assess the efficacy of prenatal education to reduce the rate of:
(1) new cases of congenital toxoplasmosis;
(2) toxoplasmosis seroconversion during pregnancy.

Secondary objectives are to assess the efficacy of prenatal education to increase the rate of:
(1) pregnant women's knowledge on risk factors for acquiring toxoplasmosis infection;
(2) pregnant women's awareness of the importance to avoid toxoplasmosis infection during pregnancy;
(3) pregnant women's behavior with respect to avoidance of risk factors for toxoplasmosis infection during pregnancy.

Methods

Criteria for considering studies for this review

Types of studies

Randomized and quasi‐randomized clinical trials evaluating any kind of prenatal educational intervention dealing with toxoplasmosis infection in pregnancy, and how to avoid it, will be included. We will include studies where the control group includes an alternative intervention or no intervention. Studies where the unit of randomization is a group of women (cluster randomization) will be included and analyzed as a separate group. Intervention, exclusively focused on toxoplasmosis or intervention not exclusively focused on toxoplasmosis infection but that includes it among a series of different topics, will also be included.

Types of participants

Women of reproductive age irrespective of their pregnant status will be included. Since a screening policy for toxoplasmosis infection is not universally adopted, studies including women irrespective of their toxoplasmosis seropositive status will be included.

Types of interventions

Any kind of prenatal education on toxoplasmosis infection during pregnancy. Prenatal educational interventions could include: antenatal classes provided to pregnant women, distribution of leaflets to pregnant women or to women of reproductive age irrespective of their pregnant status, one‐to‐one or group counseling from different professionals (nurses, midwives, obstetrician and gynecologists, social workers, counselors, teachers, trained lay people, etc), educational intervention in schools, mass‐media campaign and others.

Types of outcome measures

Primary outcomes
(1) Rate of congenital toxoplasmosis, defined by persistence of specific IgG antibodies beyond 11 months of age (Lebech 1996).
(2) Rate of toxoplasmosis seroconversion in pregnant women, defined by:
(a) an increase in specific IgG from paired sera in pregnant woman previously seronegative;
(b) a rising IgG titre, low IgG avidity, IgA antibodies or a combination of these in pregnant women who are IgG and IgM positive at their first prenatal test (Gilbert 2002).

Secondary outcomes
(1) Pregnant women's knowledge on risk factors for acquiring toxoplasmosis infection as objectively measured (quantitative score) through specific questionnaire.
(2) Pregnant women's awareness of the importance to avoid toxoplasmosis infection during pregnancy as objectively measured (quantitative score) through specific questionnaire.
(3) Pregnant women's behavior with respect to avoidance of risk factors for toxoplasmosis infection during pregnancy as objectively measured (quantitative score) through specific questionnaire.

Search methods for identification of studies

We will contact the Trials Search Co‐ordinator to search the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register.

The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register is maintained by the Trials Search Co‐ordinator and contains trials identified from:
(1) quarterly searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL);
(2) monthly searches of MEDLINE;
(3) handsearches of 30 journals and the proceedings of major conferences;
(4) weekly current awareness search of a further 37 journals.

Details of the search strategies for CENTRAL and MEDLINE, the list of hand‐searched journals and conference proceedings, and the list of journals reviewed via the current awareness service can be found in the 'Search strategies for identification of studies' section within the editorial information about the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group.

Trials identified through the searching activities described above are given a code (or codes) depending on the topic. The codes are linked to review topics. The Trials Search Co‐ordinator searches the register for each review using these codes rather than keywords.

In addition, we will search CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE (1966 to present), EMBASE (1980 to present), CINAHL (1982 to present), LILACS ‐ Latin American and Caribbean Health Science Literature (1982 to present), and IMEMR ‐ Eastern Mediterranean Region Index Medicus (1984 to present) using the following search strategy adapted for each database:

#1. toxoplasm*
#2. 'toxoplasma'/exp
#3. 'toxoplasmosis'/exp
#4. #1 OR #2 OR #3
#5. neonat*
#6. antenat*
#7. infant*
#8. ('baby'/exp OR 'baby')
#9. babies
#10. foet*
#11. fetus
#12. fetal*
#13. p?ediatr*
#14. prenat*
#15. 'infant'/exp
#16. 'fetus'/exp
#17. 'pediatrics'/exp
#18. OR/ #5‐#17
#19. #4 AND #18
#20.'mass media'/exp OR 'mass media'
#21. communication*
#22. multimedia*
#23. 'multi media'
#24. 'multimedia'/exp
#25. 'mass communication'
#26. ('audiovisual equipment'/exp OR 'audiovisual equipment')
#27. ('patient information'/exp OR 'patient information)
#28. ('visual information'/exp OR 'visual information')
#29. ('radio'/exp OR 'radio')
#30. ('television'/exp OR 'television')
#31. leaflet*
#32. poster*
#33. pamphlet*
#34. 'print media'
#35. 'printed media'
#36. 'broadcast'
#37. film*
#38. ('telecommunication'/exp OR telecommunication*)
#39. counsel*
#40. educat*
#41. empower*
#42. knowledge*
#43. skill*
#44. 'public health'/exp
#45. 'preventive medicine'/exp
#46. 'preventive health service'/exp
#47. 'primary health care'/exp
#48. 'health care delivery'/exp
#49. 'patient attitude'/exp
#50. 'primary prevention'/exp
#51. 'health promotion'/exp
#52. 'health education'/exp
#53. 'patient education'/exp
#54. 'education'/exp
#55. 'attitude'/exp
#56. 'cognition'/exp
#57. 'health behavior'/exp
#58. 'decision making'/exp
#59 OR/#20‐#58
#60 #19 AND #59

We will search the references of published reviews and contact researchers working in the field for information on any relevant studies and for any additional published or unpublished studies.

We will not apply any language restrictions.

Data collection and analysis

Studies selection and quality assessment
Titles and abstract of the identified trials will be selected in an independent and blinded way for inclusion in the review by three review authors. The methodological quality of included trials will be assessed according to the criteria in the Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook (Clarke 2003), with a grade allocated to each trial on the basis of allocation concealment: A (adequate), B (unclear), C (clearly inadequate). Details regarding randomization method, completeness of follow up, blinding of outcome measures will be documented for all trials using a standard checklist. Cluster‐randomized and quasi‐randomized designs, such as alternate allocation and use of record numbers will be included. Differences of opinion regarding trials for inclusion will be resolved by discussion with all the authors. Data extraction will be performed independently by three authors using prepared data extraction forms. Discrepancies will be resolved by discussion, involving all authors.

Methods of analysis
We will perform statistical analyses using the Review Manager software (RevMan 2003). Categorical data will be analyzed using relative risks and continuous data using weighted mean difference; 95% confidence intervals will also be reported. We will also calculate numbers needed to treat, if possible. Statistical heterogeneity between trials will be assessed using the heterogeneity test and I‐square measure described by Higgins (Higgins 2000). We will include all eligible trials in the initial analysis and will carry out sensitivity analyses to evaluate the effect of trial quality. This will be done by excluding trials given a B rating for quality for allocation concealment, then C through to E for completeness of follow up, then C and D for blinding (where appropriate).

Subgroup analyses will be prespecified where possible, and reported as post hoc where this is not the case. Trials that had no interventions in the control group, and trials which had a different method of intervention in the control group, will be analyzed first as a whole group and then separately. Trials recruiting exclusively pregnant women and trials recruiting women of reproductive age irrespective of their pregnant status will be analyzed first as a whole group and then separately.