Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Study flow diagram
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Orthodontic treatment for deep bite and retroclined upper front teeth in children

Orthodontic intervention (without extraction) compared with extraction or no orthodontic intervention for treating deep bite and retroclined upper front teeth in children

Patient or population: children with deep bite and retroclined upper front teeth

Settings: orthodontic clinic

Intervention: orthodontic treatment

Comparison: extraction or no treatment

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

Number of Participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Extraction or no treatment

Orthodontic treatment

Dento‐occlusal results of treatment, measured with the PAR index

No data are available as no RCTs or CCTs have been conducted.

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; RR: risk ratio; RCT: randomised controlled trial; CCT: controlled clinical trial

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Orthodontic treatment for deep bite and retroclined upper front teeth in children