Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Post‐hoc subgroup analysis: Heterogenous data for average change scores (PANSS total scores, high = poor)
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Post‐hoc subgroup analysis: Heterogenous data for average change scores (PANSS total scores, high = poor)

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 1 Global state: 1.Global improvement (CGI‐I).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 1 Global state: 1.Global improvement (CGI‐I).

Study

Intervention

Least Mean Square

SD

N

Notes

Goff 2006a

Adjuvant lamotrigine

‐0.2

0.82

101

Goff 2006a

Adjuvant placebo

‐0.5

0.82

104

Goff 2006b

Adjuvant lamotrigine

‐0.5

0.72

104

Goff 2006b

Adjuvant placebo

‐0.4

0.72

104

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 2 Global state: 2. Average total change score ‐ short term (CGI‐S, high change=good, data skewed).

Study

Intervention

Least Square Mean

SD

N

Notes

Goff 2006b

Adjuvant lamotrigine

0.07

7.18

87

Goff 2006b

Adjuvant placebo

‐0.31

7.22

88

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 3 Global state: 3. Average physical health change score ‐ short term (SF‐36, high change=good, data skewed).

Study

Intervention

Least Square Mean

SD

N

Notes

Goff 2006b

Adjuvant lamotrigine

0.21

8.21

87

Goff 2006b

Adjuvant placebo

1.32

8.16

88

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 4 Global state: 4. Average mental health change score ‐ short term (SF‐36, high change=good, data skewed).

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 5 Mental state: 1.Treatment responders (> 20% reduction in PANSS total).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 5 Mental state: 1.Treatment responders (> 20% reduction in PANSS total).

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 6 Mental state: 2a. Average total endpoint score ‐ short term (PANSS, high=poor).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 6 Mental state: 2a. Average total endpoint score ‐ short term (PANSS, high=poor).

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 7 Mental state: 2b. Average total endpoint score ‐ short term (BPRS, high=poor).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 7 Mental state: 2b. Average total endpoint score ‐ short term (BPRS, high=poor).

Study

Intervention

Least Square Mean

SD

N

Notes

Goff 2006a

Adjuvant lamotrigine

‐6.0

13.77

101

Goff 2006a

Adjuvant placebo

‐8.2

13.84

104

Goff 2006b

Adjuvant lamotrigine

‐12.9

12.34

103

Goff 2006b

Adjuvant placebo

‐12.0

12.40

104

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 8 Mental state: 2c. Average total change score ‐ short term (PANSS, high=poor, data skewed).

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 9 Mental state: 3a. Average positive endpoint score ‐ short term (PANSS subscale, high=poor).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 9 Mental state: 3a. Average positive endpoint score ‐ short term (PANSS subscale, high=poor).

Study

Intervention

Least Square Mean

SD

N

Notes

Goff 2006a

Adjuvant lamotrigine

‐2.2

4.39

101

Goff 2006a

Adjuvant placebo

‐3.2

4.51

104

Goff 2006b

Adjuvant lamotrigine

‐4.4

4.18

103

Goff 2006b

Adjuvant placebo

‐3.9

4.20

104

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 10 Mental state: 3b. Average positive change score ‐ short term (PANSS subscale, high change=good, data skewed).

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 11 Mental state: 4a. Average negative endpoint score ‐ short term (PANSS subscale, high=poor).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.11

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 11 Mental state: 4a. Average negative endpoint score ‐ short term (PANSS subscale, high=poor).

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 12 Mental state: 4b. Average negative endpoint score ‐ short term (SANS, high=poor).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.12

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 12 Mental state: 4b. Average negative endpoint score ‐ short term (SANS, high=poor).

Study

Intervention

Least Mean Square

SD

N

Notes

Goff 2006a

Adjuvant lamotrigine

‐2.6

12.65

97

Goff 2006a

Adjuvant placebo

‐6.2

13.16

100

Goff 2006b

Adjuvant lamotrigine

‐4.8

11.69

101

Goff 2006b

Adjuvant placebo

‐5.7

11.69

102

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.13

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 13 Mental state: 4c. Average negative change score ‐ short term (SANS, high change=good, data skewed).

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 14 Mental state: 5a. Average general psychopathology endpoint score ‐ short term (PANSS, high=poor).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.14

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 14 Mental state: 5a. Average general psychopathology endpoint score ‐ short term (PANSS, high=poor).

Study

Intervention

Least Mean Squares

SD

N

Notes

Goff 2006a

Adjuvant lamotrigine

‐2.4

7.45

101

High change=good

Goff 2006a

Adjuvant placebo

‐3.7

7.48

104

Goff 2006b

Adjuvant lamotrigine

‐5.5

6.63

103

Goff 2006b

Adjuvant placebo

‐5.3

6.56

104

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.15

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 15 Mental state: 5c. Average general psychopathology change score ‐ short term (PANSS subscale, data skewed).

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 16 Mental state: 6a. Average depression endpoint score (HAM‐D 21, high=poor).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.16

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 16 Mental state: 6a. Average depression endpoint score (HAM‐D 21, high=poor).

Study

Intervention

Least Square Mean

SD

N

Notes

Goff 2006a

Adjuvant lamotrigine

‐0.2

3.57

97

Goff 2006a

Adjuvant placebo

‐0.8

3.59

101

Goff 2006b

Adjuvant lamotrigine

‐0.8

2.96

100

Goff 2006b

Adjuvant placebo

‐1.2

2.97

102

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.17

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 17 Mental state: 6b. Average depression change score (CDSS, high change=good, data skewed).

Study

Intervention

Least Square Mean

SD

N

Notes

Goff 2006b

Adjuvant lamotrigine

2.7

22.8

86

Goff 2006b

Adjuvant placebo

1.8

22.71

86

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.18

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 18 Mental state: 6c. Average depression change score ‐ short term (WHO‐5, high change=good, data skewed).

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 19 Cognitive state: 1. Treatment response (BACS).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.19

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 19 Cognitive state: 1. Treatment response (BACS).

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 20 Cognitive state: 2. Average change score ‐ short term (Stroop test, high difference from baseline=good).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.20

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 20 Cognitive state: 2. Average change score ‐ short term (Stroop test, high difference from baseline=good).

Study

Intervention

Least Square mean

SD

N

Notes

Goff 2006a

Adjuvant lamotrigine

0.22

0.61

74

Goff 2006a

Adjuvant placebo

0.23

0.51

84

Goff 2006b

Adjuvant lamotrigine

0.44

0.68

103

Goff 2006b

Adjuvant placebo

0.19

0.70

103

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.21

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 21 Cognitive state: 3. Average change score ‐ short term (BACS, high change=good, data skewed).

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 22 Leaving the study early ‐ short term.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.22

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 22 Leaving the study early ‐ short term.

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 23 Adverse effects: 1. Death, self harm, ideation about harm to self or others ‐ short term.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.23

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 23 Adverse effects: 1. Death, self harm, ideation about harm to self or others ‐ short term.

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 24 Adverse effects: 2a. Specific ‐ any adverse effect ‐ short term.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.24

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 24 Adverse effects: 2a. Specific ‐ any adverse effect ‐ short term.

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 25 Adverse effects: 2b. Specific ‐ cardiovascular ‐ short term.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.25

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 25 Adverse effects: 2b. Specific ‐ cardiovascular ‐ short term.

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 26 Adverse effects: 2c. Specific ‐ dermatological ‐ short term.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.26

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 26 Adverse effects: 2c. Specific ‐ dermatological ‐ short term.

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 27 Adverse effects: 2d. Specific ‐ gastrointestinal ‐ short term.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.27

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 27 Adverse effects: 2d. Specific ‐ gastrointestinal ‐ short term.

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 28 Adverse effects: 2e. Specific ‐ metabolic parameters ‐ short term.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.28

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 28 Adverse effects: 2e. Specific ‐ metabolic parameters ‐ short term.

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 29 Adverse effects: 2f. Specific ‐ neurological ‐ short term.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.29

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 29 Adverse effects: 2f. Specific ‐ neurological ‐ short term.

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 30 Adverse effects: 2g. Specific ‐ psychiatric ‐ short term.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.30

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 30 Adverse effects: 2g. Specific ‐ psychiatric ‐ short term.

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 31 Adverse effects: 2h. Specific ‐ respiratory ‐ short term.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.31

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 31 Adverse effects: 2h. Specific ‐ respiratory ‐ short term.

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 32 Adverse effects: 2i. Specific ‐ others ‐ short term.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.32

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 32 Adverse effects: 2i. Specific ‐ others ‐ short term.

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 33 Adverse effects: 3. Events ‐ co‐incident with trial ‐ short term.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.33

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 33 Adverse effects: 3. Events ‐ co‐incident with trial ‐ short term.

Study

Intervention

Mean

SD

N

Notes

Akhondzadeh 2005

Lamotrigine

2.93

2.99

18

p=0.78

Akhondzadeh 2005

Placebo

3.25

3.27

18

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.34

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 34 Adverse effects: 4a. Movement disorders ‐ average endpoint score (ESRS, high = poor, data skewed).

Study

Intervention

Mean

SD

N

Notes

Akhondzadeh 2005

Lamotrigine

100.33

81.38

17

p=0.19

Akhondzadeh 2005

Placebo

137.66

87.00

17

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.35

Comparison 1 ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO, Outcome 35 Adverse effects: 4b. Movement disorders ‐ average dose (biperiden, mg, high = poor, data skewed).

Table 1. Suggestions for a trial of lamotrigine for schizophrenia

Methods

Participants

Interventions

Outcomes

Notes

Allocation: centralised sequence generation with table of random numbers or computer generated code, stratified by severity of illness, sequence concealed till interventions assigned.
Blinding: those recruiting and assigning participants, those administering intervention, those assessing outcomes, all blind to allocated group, masking by means of identical looking tablets in same schedules.
Duration: minimum of 24 weeks.

Diagnosis: schizophrenia (DSM IV), subtypes and schizoaffective disorder included and numbers in each category clearly reported.
N=300.*
Age: adults.
Sex: men and women.
Setting: anywhere.
History: baseline score on scale such as BPRS or PANSS, stratified by cutoff points into moderate and severe illness, taking routine drugs except lamotrigine or other anticonvulsants.
Exclusion: allergy to lamotrigine, pregnant or lactating women, participation in other drug trials.

1. Lamotrigine: dose 400 mg/ day + routine antipsychotic therapy. N=150.
2. Placebo + routine antipsychotic therapy. N=150.

Qualtiy of life: healthy days,** SF‐36.
Service outcomes: days in hospital, time attending psychiatric outpatient clinic.
Satisfaction with care: patients/carers.
Global state: CGI.***
Mental state: CGI.
Functioning.
Adverse effects: including mortality.
Cognitive function.

* size of study to detect a 10% difference in improvement with 80% certainity.

** Primary outcome.

*** If scales are used to measure outcome then there should be binary cut off points, defined before study starts, of clinically important improvement.

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Suggestions for a trial of lamotrigine for schizophrenia
Comparison 1. ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Global state: 1.Global improvement (CGI‐I) Show forest plot

1

208

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.06 [0.73, 1.54]

2 Global state: 2. Average total change score ‐ short term (CGI‐S, high change=good, data skewed) Show forest plot

Other data

No numeric data

3 Global state: 3. Average physical health change score ‐ short term (SF‐36, high change=good, data skewed) Show forest plot

Other data

No numeric data

4 Global state: 4. Average mental health change score ‐ short term (SF‐36, high change=good, data skewed) Show forest plot

Other data

No numeric data

5 Mental state: 1.Treatment responders (> 20% reduction in PANSS total) Show forest plot

3

297

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.26 [0.81, 1.97]

6 Mental state: 2a. Average total endpoint score ‐ short term (PANSS, high=poor) Show forest plot

2

67

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐16.88 [‐25.18, ‐8.57]

7 Mental state: 2b. Average total endpoint score ‐ short term (BPRS, high=poor) Show forest plot

1

31

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐2.80 [‐12.44, 6.84]

8 Mental state: 2c. Average total change score ‐ short term (PANSS, high=poor, data skewed) Show forest plot

Other data

No numeric data

9 Mental state: 3a. Average positive endpoint score ‐ short term (PANSS subscale, high=poor) Show forest plot

2

65

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐5.10 [‐8.86, ‐1.34]

10 Mental state: 3b. Average positive change score ‐ short term (PANSS subscale, high change=good, data skewed) Show forest plot

Other data

No numeric data

11 Mental state: 4a. Average negative endpoint score ‐ short term (PANSS subscale, high=poor) Show forest plot

2

67

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐5.25 [‐7.07, ‐3.43]

12 Mental state: 4b. Average negative endpoint score ‐ short term (SANS, high=poor) Show forest plot

1

31

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐8.80 [‐19.73, 2.13]

13 Mental state: 4c. Average negative change score ‐ short term (SANS, high change=good, data skewed) Show forest plot

Other data

No numeric data

14 Mental state: 5a. Average general psychopathology endpoint score ‐ short term (PANSS, high=poor) Show forest plot

2

67

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐10.74 [‐16.53, ‐4.96]

15 Mental state: 5c. Average general psychopathology change score ‐ short term (PANSS subscale, data skewed) Show forest plot

Other data

No numeric data

16 Mental state: 6a. Average depression endpoint score (HAM‐D 21, high=poor) Show forest plot

1

31

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.10 [‐3.69, 3.89]

17 Mental state: 6b. Average depression change score (CDSS, high change=good, data skewed) Show forest plot

Other data

No numeric data

18 Mental state: 6c. Average depression change score ‐ short term (WHO‐5, high change=good, data skewed) Show forest plot

Other data

No numeric data

19 Cognitive state: 1. Treatment response (BACS) Show forest plot

2

329

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.10 [0.59, 2.04]

20 Cognitive state: 2. Average change score ‐ short term (Stroop test, high difference from baseline=good) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

20.1 Stroop ‐ color naming time

1

36

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐29.45 [‐53.69, ‐5.21]

20.2 Stroop ‐ color naming error

1

36

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐8.28 [‐12.85, ‐3.71]

20.3 Stroop ‐ word reading time

1

36

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.61 [‐10.81, 12.03]

20.4 Stroop ‐ word reading error

1

36

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.33 [‐2.46, 1.80]

21 Cognitive state: 3. Average change score ‐ short term (BACS, high change=good, data skewed) Show forest plot

Other data

No numeric data

22 Leaving the study early ‐ short term Show forest plot

5

537

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.96 [0.71, 1.29]

23 Adverse effects: 1. Death, self harm, ideation about harm to self or others ‐ short term Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

23.1 death

2

429

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

23.2 any one or more fatalistic acts/impulses

2

429

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.38 [0.90, 6.30]

23.3 suicide attempt

1

217

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.97 [0.12, 72.18]

23.4 ideation ‐ homicidal

1

217

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

4.95 [0.24, 102.01]

23.5 ideation ‐ suicidal

2

429

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.05 [0.15, 7.06]

24 Adverse effects: 2a. Specific ‐ any adverse effect ‐ short term Show forest plot

2

429

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.19 [1.02, 1.38]

25 Adverse effects: 2b. Specific ‐ cardiovascular ‐ short term Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

25.1 chest pain

2

429

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.68 [0.18, 15.99]

25.2 electrocardiogram abnormal

1

212

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.00 [0.12, 72.82]

25.3 hypertension

1

212

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.50 [0.50, 12.60]

25.4 tachycardia

1

212

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.01, 8.09]

26 Adverse effects: 2c. Specific ‐ dermatological ‐ short term Show forest plot

3

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

26.27 hair loss

1

36

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.00 [0.13, 69.09]

26.34 itching

1

36

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

4.0 [0.49, 32.39]

26.45 rash

3

465

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.74 [0.24, 2.28]

27 Adverse effects: 2d. Specific ‐ gastrointestinal ‐ short term Show forest plot

3

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

27.1 constipation

1

212

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.04, 3.15]

27.2 decreased appetite

1

217

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.11 [0.01, 2.02]

27.3 diarrhea

3

465

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.56 [0.39, 6.16]

27.4 dyspepsia

1

212

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

4.0 [0.45, 35.20]

27.5 nausea

3

465

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.26 [1.05, 4.88]

27.6 vomiting

2

253

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.17 [0.77, 13.02]

28 Adverse effects: 2e. Specific ‐ metabolic parameters ‐ short term Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

28.1 alanine aminotransferase increase

1

217

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.97 [0.12, 72.18]

28.2 aspartate aminotransferase

1

217

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.97 [0.12, 72.18]

28.3 blood creatine phosphokinase

1

212

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.01, 8.09]

28.4 blood glucose increase

1

212

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.5 [0.26, 8.80]

29 Adverse effects: 2f. Specific ‐ neurological ‐ short term Show forest plot

3

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

29.1 ataxia

1

36

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

5.00 [0.26, 97.37]

29.2 blurred vision

1

36

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.0 [0.20, 20.15]

29.3 dizziness

3

465

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.17 [0.51, 2.70]

29.4 headache

3

465

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.36 [0.88, 2.08]

29.5 loss of consciousness

1

212

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

5.0 [0.24, 102.92]

29.6 paraesthesia

1

212

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.00 [0.12, 72.82]

29.7 hypoaesthesia

1

212

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

7.00 [0.37, 133.88]

29.8 tremor

1

217

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

4.95 [0.59, 41.71]

30 Adverse effects: 2g. Specific ‐ psychiatric ‐ short term Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

30.1 aggression

1

217

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.97 [0.12, 72.18]

30.2 agitation

1

212

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.5 [0.09, 2.67]

30.3 anxiety

2

429

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.73 [0.09, 5.76]

30.4 crying

1

212

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.01, 8.09]

30.5 hallucination, auditory

1

217

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

10.90 [0.61, 194.74]

30.6 insomnia

2

429

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.02 [0.04, 96.25]

30.7 paranoia

2

429

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.99 [0.37, 10.75]

30.8 somnolence

2

429

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.21 [0.51, 2.87]

31 Adverse effects: 2h. Specific ‐ respiratory ‐ short term Show forest plot

1

424

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.0 [0.48, 18.89]

31.1 cough

1

212

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.0 [0.37, 133.88]

31.2 influenza

1

212

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.0 [0.06, 15.78]

32 Adverse effects: 2i. Specific ‐ others ‐ short term Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

32.1 abnormal dreams

1

217

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.01, 8.02]

32.2 asthenia

1

217

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.01, 8.02]

32.3 back pain

1

217

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.30, 3.33]

32.4 dry mouth

1

212

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.0 [0.21, 4.84]

32.5 fatigue

1

217

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.39 [0.45, 4.24]

32.6 lymphadenopathy

2

429

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.99 [0.31, 28.48]

32.7 urine abnormality

1

212

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.00 [0.12, 72.82]

32.8 weight increase

1

212

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.00 [0.12, 72.82]

33 Adverse effects: 3. Events ‐ co‐incident with trial ‐ short term Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

33.1 abscess

1

212

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.00 [0.12, 72.82]

33.2 arthropod bite

1

212

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.01, 8.09]

33.3 endometrial cancer

1

212

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.00 [0.12, 72.82]

33.5 joint injury

1

217

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.97 [0.12, 72.18]

33.6 local swelling

1

217

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.97 [0.12, 72.18]

33.7 nasopharyngitis

2

429

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.42 [0.28, 7.15]

33.8 pharyngolaryngeal pain

1

212

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.00 [0.12, 72.82]

33.9 post‐procedural pain

1

217

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.97 [0.12, 72.18]

33.10 tooth abscess

1

217

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.97 [0.12, 72.18]

33.11 toothache

1

217

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.40 [0.08, 2.00]

33.12 upper respiratory tract infection

2

429

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.05 [0.22, 4.94]

34 Adverse effects: 4a. Movement disorders ‐ average endpoint score (ESRS, high = poor, data skewed) Show forest plot

Other data

No numeric data

35 Adverse effects: 4b. Movement disorders ‐ average dose (biperiden, mg, high = poor, data skewed) Show forest plot

Other data

No numeric data

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. ADJUNCTIVE LAMOTRIGINE vs ADJUNCTIVE PLACEBO