Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

original image
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Comparison 1 Function ‐ multidisciplinary intervention versus usual care, Outcome 1 Maintained or improved ADL scores between hospital admission and discharge ‐ MDI versus usual care.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Function ‐ multidisciplinary intervention versus usual care, Outcome 1 Maintained or improved ADL scores between hospital admission and discharge ‐ MDI versus usual care.

Comparison 1 Function ‐ multidisciplinary intervention versus usual care, Outcome 2 Maintained or improved mobility scores between hospital admission and discharge ‐ MDI versus usual care.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Function ‐ multidisciplinary intervention versus usual care, Outcome 2 Maintained or improved mobility scores between hospital admission and discharge ‐ MDI versus usual care.

Comparison 1 Function ‐ multidisciplinary intervention versus usual care, Outcome 3 Maintained or improved ADL scores between 2 weeks prior to hospital admission and discharge‐ MDI v usual care.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Function ‐ multidisciplinary intervention versus usual care, Outcome 3 Maintained or improved ADL scores between 2 weeks prior to hospital admission and discharge‐ MDI v usual care.

Comparison 2 Function ‐ additional exercise only versus usual care, Outcome 1 Change in Barthel Index between hospital admission and discharge ‐ additional exercise versus usual care.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Function ‐ additional exercise only versus usual care, Outcome 1 Change in Barthel Index between hospital admission and discharge ‐ additional exercise versus usual care.

Comparison 2 Function ‐ additional exercise only versus usual care, Outcome 2 Change in TUG scores between hospital admission and discharge ‐ additional exercise versus usual care.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Function ‐ additional exercise only versus usual care, Outcome 2 Change in TUG scores between hospital admission and discharge ‐ additional exercise versus usual care.

Comparison 3 Adverse events ‐ multidisciplinary intervention versus usual care, Outcome 1 Patient mortality during hospitalisation ‐ MDI versus usual care.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Adverse events ‐ multidisciplinary intervention versus usual care, Outcome 1 Patient mortality during hospitalisation ‐ MDI versus usual care.

Comparison 3 Adverse events ‐ multidisciplinary intervention versus usual care, Outcome 2 Patient mortality 3 months after hospital discharge ‐ MDI versus usual care.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 Adverse events ‐ multidisciplinary intervention versus usual care, Outcome 2 Patient mortality 3 months after hospital discharge ‐ MDI versus usual care.

Comparison 3 Adverse events ‐ multidisciplinary intervention versus usual care, Outcome 3 Patient complications during hospitalisation ‐ MDI versus usual care.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3 Adverse events ‐ multidisciplinary intervention versus usual care, Outcome 3 Patient complications during hospitalisation ‐ MDI versus usual care.

Comparison 4 Adverse events ‐ additional exercise versus usual care, Outcome 1 Patient mortality during hospitalisation ‐ additional exercise versus usual care.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Adverse events ‐ additional exercise versus usual care, Outcome 1 Patient mortality during hospitalisation ‐ additional exercise versus usual care.

Comparison 4 Adverse events ‐ additional exercise versus usual care, Outcome 2 Admission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) ‐ additional exercise versus usual care.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 Adverse events ‐ additional exercise versus usual care, Outcome 2 Admission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) ‐ additional exercise versus usual care.

Comparison 4 Adverse events ‐ additional exercise versus usual care, Outcome 3 Falls during hospitalisation ‐ additional exercise versus usual care.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.3

Comparison 4 Adverse events ‐ additional exercise versus usual care, Outcome 3 Falls during hospitalisation ‐ additional exercise versus usual care.

Comparison 5 Hospital outcomes ‐ multidisciplinary intervention versus usual care, Outcome 1 Discharge to preadmission residence/home from hospital ‐ MDI versus usual care.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.1

Comparison 5 Hospital outcomes ‐ multidisciplinary intervention versus usual care, Outcome 1 Discharge to preadmission residence/home from hospital ‐ MDI versus usual care.

Comparison 5 Hospital outcomes ‐ multidisciplinary intervention versus usual care, Outcome 2 Acute hospital length of stay ‐ MDI versus usual care.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.2

Comparison 5 Hospital outcomes ‐ multidisciplinary intervention versus usual care, Outcome 2 Acute hospital length of stay ‐ MDI versus usual care.

Comparison 5 Hospital outcomes ‐ multidisciplinary intervention versus usual care, Outcome 3 Cost of acute hospital stay ‐ MDI versus usual care.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.3

Comparison 5 Hospital outcomes ‐ multidisciplinary intervention versus usual care, Outcome 3 Cost of acute hospital stay ‐ MDI versus usual care.

Comparison 6 Hospital outcomes ‐ additional exercise versus usual care, Outcome 1 Discharge to preadmission residence/home from hospital ‐ additional exercise versus usual care.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.1

Comparison 6 Hospital outcomes ‐ additional exercise versus usual care, Outcome 1 Discharge to preadmission residence/home from hospital ‐ additional exercise versus usual care.

Comparison 6 Hospital outcomes ‐ additional exercise versus usual care, Outcome 2 Acute hospital length of stay ‐ additional exercise versus usual care.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.2

Comparison 6 Hospital outcomes ‐ additional exercise versus usual care, Outcome 2 Acute hospital length of stay ‐ additional exercise versus usual care.

Comparison 6 Hospital outcomes ‐ additional exercise versus usual care, Outcome 3 Total (acute plus subacute) hospital length of stay‐ additional exercise versus usual care.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.3

Comparison 6 Hospital outcomes ‐ additional exercise versus usual care, Outcome 3 Total (acute plus subacute) hospital length of stay‐ additional exercise versus usual care.

Table 1. Clinical relevance table for dichtomous outcomes

Outcome

Comparison

#patients (#trials)

Control event rate

ARD (95%CI), %

Wt Rel % change

NNT (95% CI)

Statistically sig

Quality of evidence

Maintain or improve ADL scores between admission and discharge

MDI v UC ‐ function

2271 (3)

901/1111 (82.0%)

0.05 (‐0.03, 0.12) , 5%

5% (I)

NA

Not statistically significant

Silver

Maintain or improve mobility scores between admission and discharge

MDI v UC ‐ function

2119 (3)

894/1032 (86.6%)

0.03 (0.00, 0.06), 3%

3% (I)

NA

Not statistically significant

Silver

Maintain or improve ADL scores between 2 weeks prior to hospital admission and discharge

MDI v UC ‐ function

2001 (2)

648/990 (65.5%)

0.04 (0.00, 0.04), 4%

7% (I)

NA

Not statistically significant

Silver

Mortality during hospitalisation

MDI v UC ‐ adverse events

3552 (6)

102/1910 (5.3%)

0.00 (‐0.03, 0.03), 0%

1% (I)

NA

Not statistically significant

Silver

Mortality 3 months after hospital discharge

MDI v UC ‐ adverse events

2595 (3)

214/1311 (16.3%)

0.00 (‐0.03, 0.03), 0%

1% (I)

NA

Not statistically significant

Silver

Complications during hospitalisation

MDI v UC ‐ adverse events

550 (2)

88/372 (23.7%)

‐0.01 (‐0.09, 0.06), ‐1%

6% (I)

NA

Not statistically significant

Silver

Mortality during hospitalisation

Exercise only versus UC ‐ adverse events

696 (3)

4/357 (1.1%)

0.01 (‐0.01, 0.03), 1%

98% (W)

NA

Not statistically significant

Silver

Admission to ICU during hospitalisation

Exercise only versus UC ‐ adverse events

396 (2)

4/206 (1.9%)

0.01 (‐0.07, 0.09), 1%

6% (W)

NA

Not statistically significant

Silver

Falls during hospitalisation

Exercise only versus UC ‐ adverse events

384 (2)

7/203 (3.5%)

0.00 (‐0.04, 0.04), 0%

12% (W)

NA

Not statistically significant

Silver

Discharge to preadmission residence/home

MDI v UC ‐ hospital outcomes

1675 (4)

739/980 (75.4%)

0.06 (0.02, 0.10), 6%, 6 more patients out of 100

8% (I)

16 (11, 43)

Statistically significant

Silver

Discharge to preadmisison residence/home

Exercise only versus UC ‐ hospital outcomes

380 (2)

131/201 (65.2%)

0.08 (‐0.10, 0.26), 8%

15% (I)

NA

Not statistically significant

Silver

Legend: ADL=activities of daily living; ICU=intensive care unit

MDI=multidisciplinary intervention; UC=usual care

ARD=absolute risk difference

Wt Rel=weighted relative change

NNT=number needed to treat

sig=significant

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Clinical relevance table for dichtomous outcomes
Table 2. Clinical Relevance Table for continuous outcomes (using the same scale)

Outcome (scale)

#patients (#trials)

Control baseline m

Wt absolute change

Relative % change

NNT

Statistical sig

Quality of evidence

Change in TUG score (seconds)‐ additional exercise versus usual care

188 (2)

20.59 (de Morton et al.)

‐2.52 seconds

2.52/20.59 = 0.12 = 12%

NA

Not statistically significant

Silver

Acute hospital LOS ‐ MDI versus usual care

3478 (6)

6.3 days (Counsell et al.)

‐1.08 days

1.08/6.3 = 0.17 = 17%

16

Significant

Silver

Cost of acute hospital stay ‐ MDI versus usual care

3241 (5)

0

‐$278.65

NA

26

Significant

Silver

Acute hospital LOS ‐ additional exercise versus usual care

680 (3)

6.0 (de Morton et al.)

0.01

0.01/6.0 = 0.002 =0.2%

NA

Not statistically significant

Silver

Total LOS (acute plus subacute)‐ additional exercise versus usual care

380 (2)

6.0 (de Morton et al.)

‐0.70 days

0.70/6.0 = 0.12 = 12%

NA

Not statistically significant

Silver

Legend: TUG=timed up and go test; LOS=length of stay; MDI=multidisciplinary intervention

m=mean

Wt=weighted

NNT=number needed to treat

sig=signficant

Figuras y tablas -
Table 2. Clinical Relevance Table for continuous outcomes (using the same scale)
Table 3. Clinical Relevance Table for continuous outcomes (using different scale)

Outcome (scale)

# patients (#trials)

Control baseline m

Wt absolute change

Relative % change

NNT

Statistical sig

Quality of evidence

Barthel Index (original and modified versions, scale range 0‐100) ‐ additional exercise versus usual care

293 (2)

68.09 (de Morton et al.)

0.17 x 26.08 = 4.43. This represents 4.45 more points on a 100 point Barthel Index scale.

4.43/68.09 = 0.06 = 6%

NA

Not statistically significant

Silver

Legend:

m=mean

wt=weighted

NNT=number needed to treat

sig=significant

Figuras y tablas -
Table 3. Clinical Relevance Table for continuous outcomes (using different scale)
Comparison 1. Function ‐ multidisciplinary intervention versus usual care

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Maintained or improved ADL scores between hospital admission and discharge ‐ MDI versus usual care Show forest plot

3

2271

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.05 [0.97, 1.15]

2 Maintained or improved mobility scores between hospital admission and discharge ‐ MDI versus usual care Show forest plot

3

2119

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.02 [0.99, 1.06]

3 Maintained or improved ADL scores between 2 weeks prior to hospital admission and discharge‐ MDI v usual care Show forest plot

2

2001

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.07 [1.00, 1.13]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Function ‐ multidisciplinary intervention versus usual care
Comparison 2. Function ‐ additional exercise only versus usual care

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in Barthel Index between hospital admission and discharge ‐ additional exercise versus usual care Show forest plot

2

293

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.17 [‐0.06, 0.40]

2 Change in TUG scores between hospital admission and discharge ‐ additional exercise versus usual care Show forest plot

2

188

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐2.52 [‐5.75, 0.71]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Function ‐ additional exercise only versus usual care
Comparison 3. Adverse events ‐ multidisciplinary intervention versus usual care

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Patient mortality during hospitalisation ‐ MDI versus usual care Show forest plot

6

3552

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.59, 1.64]

2 Patient mortality 3 months after hospital discharge ‐ MDI versus usual care Show forest plot

3

2595

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.83, 1.17]

3 Patient complications during hospitalisation ‐ MDI versus usual care Show forest plot

2

550

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.94 [0.68, 1.29]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. Adverse events ‐ multidisciplinary intervention versus usual care
Comparison 4. Adverse events ‐ additional exercise versus usual care

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Patient mortality during hospitalisation ‐ additional exercise versus usual care Show forest plot

3

696

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.98 [0.64, 6.18]

2 Admission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) ‐ additional exercise versus usual care Show forest plot

2

396

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.06 [0.04, 30.44]

3 Falls during hospitalisation ‐ additional exercise versus usual care Show forest plot

2

384

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.12 [0.40, 3.15]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 4. Adverse events ‐ additional exercise versus usual care
Comparison 5. Hospital outcomes ‐ multidisciplinary intervention versus usual care

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Discharge to preadmission residence/home from hospital ‐ MDI versus usual care Show forest plot

4

1675

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.08 [1.03, 1.14]

2 Acute hospital length of stay ‐ MDI versus usual care Show forest plot

6

3478

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.08 [‐1.93, ‐0.22]

3 Cost of acute hospital stay ‐ MDI versus usual care Show forest plot

5

3241

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐278.65 [‐491.85, ‐65.44]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 5. Hospital outcomes ‐ multidisciplinary intervention versus usual care
Comparison 6. Hospital outcomes ‐ additional exercise versus usual care

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Discharge to preadmission residence/home from hospital ‐ additional exercise versus usual care Show forest plot

2

380

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.15 [0.80, 1.66]

2 Acute hospital length of stay ‐ additional exercise versus usual care Show forest plot

3

680

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.01 [‐1.23, 1.26]

3 Total (acute plus subacute) hospital length of stay‐ additional exercise versus usual care Show forest plot

2

380

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.70 [‐2.58, 1.17]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 6. Hospital outcomes ‐ additional exercise versus usual care